@forter/button-group
Advanced tools
A group of buttons
<script>
import '@forter/button-group';
</script>
<fc-button-group .options="${[{'icon': 'edit', 'key': 'edit', 'tooltip':'Edit'},{'icon':'admin','key':'admin','selected':true},{'icon':'copy', 'key':'copy','tooltip':'Copy'}]}">
</fc-button-group>
| Property | Attribute | Type | Default | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
disabled | disabled | boolean | false | If the element is disabled |
inputId | string | |||
label | label | string | The label for the group | |
name | name | string | The formdata name for the group | |
options | options | any[][] | The model for the buttons. example: [{"icon": "edit", "key": "edit", "tooltip":"Edit"},{"icon":"admin","key":"admin","selected":true}] |
| Event |
|---|
select |
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
input | internal slot for rendering light children. Do not use. |
| Property |
|---|
--fc-button-group-padding-horizontal |
--fc-button-group-padding-vertical |
FAQs
Button Group from Forter Components
The npm package @forter/button-group receives a total of 3 weekly downloads. As such, @forter/button-group popularity was classified as not popular.
We found that @forter/button-group demonstrated a not healthy version release cadence and project activity because the last version was released a year ago. It has 3 open source maintainers collaborating on the project.
Did you know?
Socket for GitHub automatically highlights issues in each pull request and monitors the health of all your open source dependencies. Discover the contents of your packages and block harmful activity before you install or update your dependencies.
Security News
Research
Socket researchers have discovered malicious npm packages targeting crypto developers, stealing credentials and wallet data using spyware delivered through typosquats of popular cryptographic libraries.
Security News
Socket's package search now displays weekly downloads for npm packages, helping developers quickly assess popularity and make more informed decisions.
Security News
A Stanford study reveals 9.5% of engineers contribute almost nothing, costing tech $90B annually, with remote work fueling the rise of "ghost engineers."