ast-types - npm Package Compare versions

Comparing version 0.2.19 to 0.2.20

def/es6.js

@@ -7,2 +7,3 @@ require("./core");
 var isBoolean = builtin.boolean;
+var isString = builtin.string;
 var defaults = require("../lib/shared").defaults;
@@ -48,2 +49,12 @@
 
+// This would be the ideal definition for ModuleSpecifier, but alas we
+// can't expect ASTs parsed by Esprima to use this custom subtype:
+def("ModuleSpecifier")
+    .bases("Specifier", "Literal")
+//  .build("value") // Make it abstract/non-buildable for now.
+    .field("value", isString);
+
+// Instead we must settle for a cheap type alias:
+var ModuleSpecifier = def("Literal");
+
 def("ModuleDeclaration")
@@ -53,11 +64,5 @@ .bases("Declaration")
     .field("id", or(def("Literal"), def("Identifier")))
-    .field("from", or(def("Path"), null))
+    .field("source", or(ModuleSpecifier, null))
     .field("body", or(def("BlockStatement"), null));
 
-def("Path")
-    .bases("Node")
-    .build("body")
-    // TODO This really ought be a recursive type.
-    .field("body", [def("Identifier")]);
-
 def("MethodDefinition")
@@ -130,3 +135,6 @@ .bases("Declaration")
     .field("default", isBoolean)
-    .field("declaration", def("Statement"))
+    .field("declaration", or(
+        def("Declaration"),
+        def("AssignmentExpression") // Implies default.
+    ))
     .field("specifiers", [or(
@@ -136,3 +144,3 @@ def("ExportSpecifier"),
     )])
-    .field("source", def("Expression"));
+    .field("source", or(ModuleSpecifier, null));
 
@@ -144,4 +152,4 @@ def("ImportDeclaration")
     .field("kind", or("named", "default"))
-    .field("source", def("Expression"));
+    .field("source", ModuleSpecifier);
 
 types.finalize();

package.json

@@ -21,3 +21,3 @@ {
   ],
-  "version": "0.2.19",
+  "version": "0.2.20",
   "homepage": "http://github.com/benjamn/ast-types",
@@ -24,0 +24,0 @@ "repository": {

No alert changes

Improved metrics

Total package byte prevSize

385768

increased by0.09%

Lines of code

10857

increased by0.06%

No dependency changes