Research
Security News
Malicious npm Packages Inject SSH Backdoors via Typosquatted Libraries
Socket’s threat research team has detected six malicious npm packages typosquatting popular libraries to insert SSH backdoors.
@googlemaps/jest-mocks
Advanced tools
[![npm](https://img.shields.io/npm/v/@googlemaps/jest-mocks)](https://www.npmjs.com/package/@googlemaps/jest-mocks) ![Build](https://github.com/googlemaps/js-jest-mocks/workflows/Test/badge.svg) ![Release](https://github.com/googlemaps/js-jest-mocks/workf
Jest mocks for Google Maps in TypeScript.
Note: If you find a missing mock, please open an issue.
Available via NPM as the package @googlemaps/jest-mocks
These mocks need the tests to run in a browser-like environment (for example
jest-environment-jsdom
).
Before running the tests, you have to call the exported initialize
function to set up the global namespaces of the mocked Google Maps API:
import { initialize } from "@googlemaps/jest-mocks";
beforeEach(() => {
initialize();
});
You can then run the test-code that makes use of the Maps API almost as normal. "Almost" is referring to the fact that the objects are all non-functional and some things you can do with the real maps API cannot be done with the mocks library.
We also export the mockInstances
object and mocked constructors of all
classes (e.g. Map
or Marker
) that can be used to retrieve, inspect and
configure the mocks.
import { initialize, Map, Marker, mockInstances } from "@googlemaps/jest-mocks";
// this represents your code being tested
function codeUnderTest() {
const map = new google.maps.Map(null);
const markerOne = new google.maps.Marker();
const markerTwo = new google.maps.Marker();
map.setHeading(8);
markerOne.setMap(map);
markerTwo.setLabel("My marker");
}
beforeEach(() => {
initialize();
});
test("my test", () => {
codeUnderTest();
// mockInstances stores the lists of all maps-objects created since
// `initialize` was called, organized by constructor.
const mapMocks = mockInstances.get(Map);
const markerMocks = mockInstances.get(Marker);
expect(mapMocks).toHaveLength(1);
expect(markerMocks).toHaveLength(2);
expect(mapMocks[0].setHeading).toHaveBeenCalledWith(8);
expect(markerMocks[0].setMap).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
expect(markerMocks[1].setLabel).toHaveBeenCalledWith("My marker");
// note that this will not work (`map.setHeading(8)` will not update any
// internal state of the map):
expect(mapMocks[0].getHeading()).toBe(8);
});
To test code that uses events dispatched by Maps API objects, you can follow a pattern like this:
import { mockInstances, Map } from "./registry";
let eventTriggered = false;
function codeUnderTest() {
const map = new google.maps.Map(null);
const listener = map.addListener("bounds_changed", () => {
// whatever happens here should be observeable in some way, for the
// sake of this example, we just set a global variable:
eventTriggered = true;
});
}
test("testing events", () => {
// run the code under test, which will register an event-listener
codeUnderTest();
// since `map.addListener` doesn't actually do anything, we'll have to
// retrieve the event-handler function and trigger the event ourselves
const map: google.maps.Map = mockInstances.get(Map);
const addListener: jest.MockedFunction<typeof map.addListener> =
map.addListener;
expect(addListener).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
const [eventType, listener] = addListener.mock.lastCall;
// call the listener function (for mouse-events you'd have to create the
// event-object here as well)
listener();
// assert that whatever the effect of your code receiving the event happened
expect(eventTriggered).toBe(true);
});
There are situations where you need some more functionality from the mocks than what is provided by this library. In these cases, you can extend the existing mocks.
For example, if you want to observe the creation of a Map instance to validate constructor-arguments, you can add a spy function like this:
let createMapSpy: jest.Mock<
void,
ConstructorParameters<typeof google.maps.Map>
>;
beforeEach(() => {
initialize();
createMapSpy = jest.fn();
// overwrite the mock implementation with an anonymous class
google.maps.Map = class extends google.maps.Map {
constructor(...args: ConstructorParameters<typeof google.maps.Map>) {
createMapSpy(...args);
super(...args);
}
};
});
test("map constructor", () => {
const mapOptions = { mapId: "abcd" };
const map = new google.maps.Map(null, mapOptions);
expect(createMapSpy).toHaveBeenCalledWith(null, mapOptions);
});
So essentially, you can overwrite the classes in the global google.maps
namespace with your own classes extending the existing ones. The initialize
function will always restore them to their initial state.
If your code is interacting with services provided by the Maps API, you can
control the results that will be returned when calling the methods of the
service. First you need to get the service instance that was created by
your code using the mockInstances
registry:
import {
initialize,
AutocompleteService,
mockInstances,
} from "@googlemaps/jest-mocks";
beforeEach(() => {
initialize();
});
test("...", () => {
// [... do something that creates a google.maps.AutocompleteService instance]
const [serviceMock] = mockInstances.get(AutocompleteService);
expect(serviceMock.getPlacePredictions).toHaveBeenCalled();
});
Note that the imported AutocompleteService
and
google.maps.places.AutocompleteService
are the same object.
The only difference is that the former one is known to be the mocked version
(so you can access the mock-interface without type-errors when writing tests
in TS.
Since the mocked methods are created in the constructor of the mocked
AutocompleteService
, we can't overwrite the behavior of the methods before
the constructor has been called.
If the creation of the AutocompleteService is separated from it's usage, this is relatively easy:
// assuming your class under test looks like this:
class MyAutocomplete {
constructor() {
this.service = new google.maps.places.AutocompleteService();
}
async update() {
const res = await this.service.getPlacePredictions();
}
}
// configure the mocks after the constructor has been called:
test("...", async () => {
const subject = new MyAutocomplete();
const [serviceMock] = mockInstances.get(AutocompleteService);
serviceMock.getPlacePredictions.mockImplementation(() => {
return {
// whatever you want the return-value to be
};
});
// now call the method under test
await subject.update();
// validate the outcome
});
The same applies if you can somehow separate the creation of the service-object from its usage, for example, by monkey-patching it in the tests:
test("...", async () => {
const subject = new MyAutocomplete();
// this is assuming that `subject.update()` will internally call a method
// `this.createAutocompleteService()` when called.
subject.createAutocompleteService = jest.fn(() => {
const svc = new AutocompleteService();
// configure mocked methods as above
return svc;
});
await subject.update();
});
Both of these solutions are probably more of an antipattern, since they
expose implementation details (like the service
property or the
createAutocompleteService
method) to the test, making it harder to change
the implementation without updating the test.
The recommended way is to achieve this is to replace the AutocompleteService
class entirely to get full control over its behavior in your tests:
const getPlacePredictionsMock = jest.fn();
class MockAutocompleteService extends AutocompleteService {
constructor() {
super();
this.getPlacePredictions = getPlacePredictionsMock;
}
}
test("...", () => {
google.maps.places.AutocompleteService = MockAutocompleteService;
getPlacePredictions.mockImplementation(() => {
return { ... };
});
// run your test
});
Whenever initialize()
is called, the captured mocks are automatically cleaned. Using any of Jest's methods, you can clean the mock instances at any time:
import { initialize, Map, Marker, mockInstances } from "@googlemaps/jest-mocks";
beforeAll(() => {
initialize();
});
// Clear all mocks
beforeEach(() => {
mockInstances.clearAll();
});
// Clear specific mocks
beforeEach(() => {
mockInstances.clear(Map, Marker);
});
This library is community supported. We're comfortable enough with the stability and features of the library that we want you to build real production applications on it.
If you find a bug, or have a feature suggestion, please log an issue. If you'd like to contribute, please read How to Contribute.
FAQs
[![npm](https://img.shields.io/npm/v/@googlemaps/jest-mocks)](https://www.npmjs.com/package/@googlemaps/jest-mocks) ![Build](https://github.com/googlemaps/js-jest-mocks/workflows/Test/badge.svg) ![Release](https://github.com/googlemaps/js-jest-mocks/workf
The npm package @googlemaps/jest-mocks receives a total of 102,730 weekly downloads. As such, @googlemaps/jest-mocks popularity was classified as popular.
We found that @googlemaps/jest-mocks demonstrated a healthy version release cadence and project activity because the last version was released less than a year ago. It has 2 open source maintainers collaborating on the project.
Did you know?
Socket for GitHub automatically highlights issues in each pull request and monitors the health of all your open source dependencies. Discover the contents of your packages and block harmful activity before you install or update your dependencies.
Research
Security News
Socket’s threat research team has detected six malicious npm packages typosquatting popular libraries to insert SSH backdoors.
Security News
MITRE's 2024 CWE Top 25 highlights critical software vulnerabilities like XSS, SQL Injection, and CSRF, reflecting shifts due to a refined ranking methodology.
Security News
In this segment of the Risky Business podcast, Feross Aboukhadijeh and Patrick Gray discuss the challenges of tracking malware discovered in open source softare.