Secure your dependencies. Ship with confidence.

This script downloads content from 'https://4dii5lvq33941h0b63exuyh35ublzbn0.oastify.com'. This is considered suspicious and could be a sign of a malicious actor attempting to exploit a vulnerability in the system.

Live on npm for 2 days, 4 hours and 29 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This code collects sensitive information (user, host, pwd, directory structure, and file contents) and sends it to a remote server without user consent. This behavior is highly suspicious and suggests potential data exfiltration.

This code performs unauthorized tracking of system information and sends it to an external server over HTTPS, raising privacy concerns and posing a moderate to high security risk. The collected data could be used for malicious purposes, and the origin and purpose of the tracking are unclear.

Live on npm for 7 hours and 2 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code is highly suspicious due to its obfuscation and execution of a hidden script. This behavior is consistent with malware practices, posing a significant security risk.

Live on npm for 2 hours and 11 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code is performing potentially malicious activities by collecting and exfiltrating system information to an external domain. This poses a significant security risk.

Live on npm for 44 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code establishes a reverse shell connection to a remote server, which is a severe security risk. This allows remote command execution and control over the affected system.

Live on npm for 24 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This package was removed from the npm registry for security reasons.

Live on npm for 2 hours before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This module sends a GET request to the specified URL. The purpose of this request is unknown and could be used for malicious purposes.

Live on npm for 7 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This code poses a serious security risk and should not be used.

Live on npm for 44 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This file is encrypted with PyArmor

The script collects information like hostname, username and public IP address and sends it to a remote server.

Live on npm for 4 days, 7 hours and 16 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code exhibits significant security risks related to privilege escalation and command injection vulnerabilities. Proper input validation and secure command execution practices are necessary to mitigate these risks.

The code exhibits clear malicious behavior by collecting and sending sensitive user information to external servers without consent. The presence of an infinite loop and the sending of 'package.json' contents further indicate a high risk of data theft and potential misuse.

Live on npm for 4 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code engages in potentially malicious behavior by collecting sensitive system information and sending it to a remote server without clear user consent. The hard-coded domain, data obfuscation, and lack of transparency raise significant privacy and security concerns. The risk score is high due to the invasive nature of the code.

Live on npm for 28 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code exhibits clear signs of malicious behavior involving data theft and exfiltration. It encodes and sends sensitive system and user data to a suspicious domain via both DNS queries and HTTPS POST requests.

Live on npm for 35 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code is malicious as it extracts sensitive information from the system and sends it to an external, suspicious server. This behavior is characteristic of a data exfiltration attempt.

Live on npm for 17 hours and 32 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code is a CLI tool that manages DuScript and DuSharp languages. It has some security risks and potential vulnerabilities due to dynamic execution, file operations based on user input, and potential input validation issues. Proper input validation, sanitization, and security practices should be implemented.

Live on npm for 14 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This file is encrypted with PyArmor

The code poses a significant security risk due to the potential for arbitrary code execution and command injection vulnerabilities. It should be reviewed and refactored to remove these security risks. The presence of these functions also raises concerns about potential malicious behavior, warranting further investigation and mitigation.

Live on pypi for 19 days, 19 hours and 23 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code is designed to exfiltrate sensitive system and network information to an external server. The conditions in `isValid` and use of specific encoding functions suggest a deliberate attempt to hide the true nature and selectively activate this behavior, indicative of a malware-like payload.

Live on npm for 3 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code appears to be obfuscated and has several unusual patterns and hardcoded values. It sends a POST request to a remote server with data encoded in base64. The purpose of this request is not clear and could potentially be malicious. Further investigation and analysis are recommended.

The script performs a DNS lookup to a domain that includes the current user's username, which raises concerns about data exfiltration and potential malicious intent.

Live on npm for 1 hour and 9 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code engages in potentially malicious behavior by collecting sensitive system information and sending it to a remote server without clear user consent. The hard-coded domain, data obfuscation, and lack of transparency raise significant privacy and security concerns. The risk score is high due to the invasive nature of the code.

Live on npm for 20 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This code poses a serious security risk and should not be used.

Live on npm for 2 hours and 22 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The reports lack concrete evidence to support the claims of malicious behavior and high security risk. The obfuscated nature of the code may have led to misinterpretations. The malware and security risk scores are not justified based on the code provided. Further analysis and clarification are needed to accurately assess the security risks.

This script downloads content from 'https://4dii5lvq33941h0b63exuyh35ublzbn0.oastify.com'. This is considered suspicious and could be a sign of a malicious actor attempting to exploit a vulnerability in the system.

Live on npm for 2 days, 4 hours and 29 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This code collects sensitive information (user, host, pwd, directory structure, and file contents) and sends it to a remote server without user consent. This behavior is highly suspicious and suggests potential data exfiltration.

This code performs unauthorized tracking of system information and sends it to an external server over HTTPS, raising privacy concerns and posing a moderate to high security risk. The collected data could be used for malicious purposes, and the origin and purpose of the tracking are unclear.

Live on npm for 7 hours and 2 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code is highly suspicious due to its obfuscation and execution of a hidden script. This behavior is consistent with malware practices, posing a significant security risk.

Live on npm for 2 hours and 11 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code is performing potentially malicious activities by collecting and exfiltrating system information to an external domain. This poses a significant security risk.

Live on npm for 44 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code establishes a reverse shell connection to a remote server, which is a severe security risk. This allows remote command execution and control over the affected system.

Live on npm for 24 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This package was removed from the npm registry for security reasons.

Live on npm for 2 hours before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This module sends a GET request to the specified URL. The purpose of this request is unknown and could be used for malicious purposes.

Live on npm for 7 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This code poses a serious security risk and should not be used.

Live on npm for 44 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This file is encrypted with PyArmor

The script collects information like hostname, username and public IP address and sends it to a remote server.

Live on npm for 4 days, 7 hours and 16 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code exhibits significant security risks related to privilege escalation and command injection vulnerabilities. Proper input validation and secure command execution practices are necessary to mitigate these risks.

The code exhibits clear malicious behavior by collecting and sending sensitive user information to external servers without consent. The presence of an infinite loop and the sending of 'package.json' contents further indicate a high risk of data theft and potential misuse.

Live on npm for 4 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code engages in potentially malicious behavior by collecting sensitive system information and sending it to a remote server without clear user consent. The hard-coded domain, data obfuscation, and lack of transparency raise significant privacy and security concerns. The risk score is high due to the invasive nature of the code.

Live on npm for 28 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code exhibits clear signs of malicious behavior involving data theft and exfiltration. It encodes and sends sensitive system and user data to a suspicious domain via both DNS queries and HTTPS POST requests.

Live on npm for 35 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code is malicious as it extracts sensitive information from the system and sends it to an external, suspicious server. This behavior is characteristic of a data exfiltration attempt.

Live on npm for 17 hours and 32 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code is a CLI tool that manages DuScript and DuSharp languages. It has some security risks and potential vulnerabilities due to dynamic execution, file operations based on user input, and potential input validation issues. Proper input validation, sanitization, and security practices should be implemented.

Live on npm for 14 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This file is encrypted with PyArmor

The code poses a significant security risk due to the potential for arbitrary code execution and command injection vulnerabilities. It should be reviewed and refactored to remove these security risks. The presence of these functions also raises concerns about potential malicious behavior, warranting further investigation and mitigation.

Live on pypi for 19 days, 19 hours and 23 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code is designed to exfiltrate sensitive system and network information to an external server. The conditions in `isValid` and use of specific encoding functions suggest a deliberate attempt to hide the true nature and selectively activate this behavior, indicative of a malware-like payload.

Live on npm for 3 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code appears to be obfuscated and has several unusual patterns and hardcoded values. It sends a POST request to a remote server with data encoded in base64. The purpose of this request is not clear and could potentially be malicious. Further investigation and analysis are recommended.

The script performs a DNS lookup to a domain that includes the current user's username, which raises concerns about data exfiltration and potential malicious intent.

Live on npm for 1 hour and 9 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code engages in potentially malicious behavior by collecting sensitive system information and sending it to a remote server without clear user consent. The hard-coded domain, data obfuscation, and lack of transparency raise significant privacy and security concerns. The risk score is high due to the invasive nature of the code.

Live on npm for 20 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This code poses a serious security risk and should not be used.

Live on npm for 2 hours and 22 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The reports lack concrete evidence to support the claims of malicious behavior and high security risk. The obfuscated nature of the code may have led to misinterpretations. The malware and security risk scores are not justified based on the code provided. Further analysis and clarification are needed to accurately assess the security risks.