Secure your dependencies. Ship with confidence.

The code contains several unusual aspects, such as importing numerous third-party libraries without apparent usage in the main function and using potentially misleading variable names. The console.log statements invoking undefined methods on these imports suggest a potential for malicious behavior. However, due to the lack of clear malicious actions and the provided fragment's incomplete context, it's challenging to definitively determine malicious intent.

Live on npm for 56 days, 18 hours and 17 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code imports several suspiciously named libraries and calls a function from each without any apparent logic or purpose. The libraries and function names do not follow conventional naming practices, which is a red flag. However, there is no clear evidence of malicious activity within this fragment alone, but it warrants further investigation due to the unusual naming and lack of clear functionality.

Live on npm for 56 days, 17 hours and 42 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code poses a significant security risk by downloading and executing a file from an external source without verification. This could lead to arbitrary code execution if the URL is compromised. The use of silent exception handling further obscures potential errors.

Live on pypi for 16 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code presents several security risks, primarily due to the lack of validation for external inputs and the potential for arbitrary code execution through untrusted package installations. The use of environment variables without checks increases the risk of malicious manipulation. Overall, the code should be reviewed and modified to include validation mechanisms to mitigate these risks.

Live on pypi for 56 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code contains suspicious behavior and appears to send system data to a suspicious domain. The use of concatenated strings for the 'host' value in 'http.request' adds to the suspicion.

Live on npm for 40 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This code is highly suspicious and should not be used without further investigation. The code is heavily obfuscated and could potentially contain malicious code. The purpose of the code is unclear and further investigation is necessary to determine its exact behavior.

Live on npm for 1 hour and 7 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This script is exfiltrating sensitive system information to a remote server without the user's consent. This behavior is highly suspicious and poses a significant security risk.

Live on npm for 1 hour before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This code poses a serious security risk and should not be used.

Live on npm for 6 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This code poses a serious security risk and should not be used.

Live on npm for 2 hours and 8 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code performs several potentially risky operations such as downloading and executing binaries from external sources, running network services, and using Telnet for remote command execution. These actions pose significant security risks, including the possibility of introducing malicious code and exposing the system to network-based attacks. However, there is no explicit evidence of malicious intent in the code itself.

Due to the lack of detailed information in the reports, it is not possible to accurately assess the security risks, malware presence, or obfuscation in the code. Further clarification and complete reports are necessary to make a proper evaluation.

Live on npm for 4 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code engages in potentially malicious behavior by collecting sensitive system information and sending it to a remote server without clear user consent. The hard-coded domain, data obfuscation, and lack of transparency raise significant privacy and security concerns. The risk score is high due to the invasive nature of the code.

Live on npm for 23 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

Malicious code in es6shsm (npm) Source: ghsa-malware (532e251435e5aa43412f0a3d67927aad3b0df8a7a31d174bc651cda37d917934) Any computer that has this package installed or running should be considered fully compromised. All secrets and keys stored on that computer should be rotated immediately from a different computer. The package should be removed, but as full control of the computer may have been given to an outside entity, there is no guarantee that removing the package will remove all malicious software resulting from installing it.

The code uses `child_process.execSync` to execute shell commands, which poses a significant security risk if the `command` input is not properly sanitized. This can lead to command injection vulnerabilities, especially if untrusted input is passed to the method. There are no hard-coded credentials or other clearly malicious elements, but the potential for exploitation is high.

Live on npm for 46 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code contains potential security risks related to improper handling of function execution results, modifications of properties, and usage of key and index properties. Further validation and careful handling of the input and properties are needed to ensure security.

Live on npm for 3 days, 12 hours and 59 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The script is designed to send critical system information and environment variables to an external server, which is highly suspicious and indicative of malicious behavior.

Live on npm for 1 hour and 39 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

Malicious code in fluent_plugin-logsene (RubyGems)

Malicious code in cryztalnitro (PyPI)

The code downloads and executes two files from a remote server without proper validation or verification. This introduces potential security risks, such as the risk of downloading and executing malicious files or being vulnerable to command injection attacks. The hard-coded URLs also pose a security risk if they are controlled by an attacker. Additionally, the code does not handle any errors or exceptions that may occur during the execution of the commands, which can lead to unexpected behavior or failure of the script. It is recommended to review and modify the code to include proper validation and verification of the downloaded files, handle errors and exceptions, and consider the security implications of hard-coded URLs.

Live on npm for 30 days, 7 hours and 23 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This package was removed from the npm registry for security reasons.

The behavior of this script is suspicious as it runs the 'preinstall.js' file twice, once in the background and once normally. This could potentially indicate an attempt to execute malicious code or perform unauthorized actions.

Live on npm for 26 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code uses the exec function to run shell commands, which poses a significant security risk. It could potentially execute malicious code if the input to exec is manipulated. Redirecting output to /dev/null to hide execution details is suspicious.

Live on npm for 14 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code is clearly designed to exfiltrate sensitive system information to a remote server without user consent. This behavior is malicious and poses a significant security risk.

Live on npm for 1 hour and 23 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code implements a WebSocket server that handles client connections, performs session management, and executes various operations based on client messages. However, it introduces several security risks, including the use of the 'Eval' module for executing arbitrary code, lack of input validation and sanitization, and the presence of hardcoded credentials and secrets. These issues can lead to code injection vulnerabilities, data leakage, and other security vulnerabilities. The code should be thoroughly reviewed and improved to ensure secure communication, proper input handling, and protection against potential attacks.

Live on npm for 23 days, 12 hours and 21 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code is suspicious as it retrieves update information from an unverified external source and uses 'execSync' to run shell commands, which could lead to remote code execution if the external content is compromised. Furthermore, the code attempts to forcibly update and reinstall packages which is not typical for secure update practices.

Live on npm for 4 days, 12 hours and 26 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code contains several unusual aspects, such as importing numerous third-party libraries without apparent usage in the main function and using potentially misleading variable names. The console.log statements invoking undefined methods on these imports suggest a potential for malicious behavior. However, due to the lack of clear malicious actions and the provided fragment's incomplete context, it's challenging to definitively determine malicious intent.

Live on npm for 56 days, 18 hours and 17 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code imports several suspiciously named libraries and calls a function from each without any apparent logic or purpose. The libraries and function names do not follow conventional naming practices, which is a red flag. However, there is no clear evidence of malicious activity within this fragment alone, but it warrants further investigation due to the unusual naming and lack of clear functionality.

Live on npm for 56 days, 17 hours and 42 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code poses a significant security risk by downloading and executing a file from an external source without verification. This could lead to arbitrary code execution if the URL is compromised. The use of silent exception handling further obscures potential errors.

Live on pypi for 16 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code presents several security risks, primarily due to the lack of validation for external inputs and the potential for arbitrary code execution through untrusted package installations. The use of environment variables without checks increases the risk of malicious manipulation. Overall, the code should be reviewed and modified to include validation mechanisms to mitigate these risks.

Live on pypi for 56 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code contains suspicious behavior and appears to send system data to a suspicious domain. The use of concatenated strings for the 'host' value in 'http.request' adds to the suspicion.

Live on npm for 40 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This code is highly suspicious and should not be used without further investigation. The code is heavily obfuscated and could potentially contain malicious code. The purpose of the code is unclear and further investigation is necessary to determine its exact behavior.

Live on npm for 1 hour and 7 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This script is exfiltrating sensitive system information to a remote server without the user's consent. This behavior is highly suspicious and poses a significant security risk.

Live on npm for 1 hour before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This code poses a serious security risk and should not be used.

Live on npm for 6 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This code poses a serious security risk and should not be used.

Live on npm for 2 hours and 8 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code performs several potentially risky operations such as downloading and executing binaries from external sources, running network services, and using Telnet for remote command execution. These actions pose significant security risks, including the possibility of introducing malicious code and exposing the system to network-based attacks. However, there is no explicit evidence of malicious intent in the code itself.

Due to the lack of detailed information in the reports, it is not possible to accurately assess the security risks, malware presence, or obfuscation in the code. Further clarification and complete reports are necessary to make a proper evaluation.

Live on npm for 4 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code engages in potentially malicious behavior by collecting sensitive system information and sending it to a remote server without clear user consent. The hard-coded domain, data obfuscation, and lack of transparency raise significant privacy and security concerns. The risk score is high due to the invasive nature of the code.

Live on npm for 23 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

Malicious code in es6shsm (npm) Source: ghsa-malware (532e251435e5aa43412f0a3d67927aad3b0df8a7a31d174bc651cda37d917934) Any computer that has this package installed or running should be considered fully compromised. All secrets and keys stored on that computer should be rotated immediately from a different computer. The package should be removed, but as full control of the computer may have been given to an outside entity, there is no guarantee that removing the package will remove all malicious software resulting from installing it.

The code uses `child_process.execSync` to execute shell commands, which poses a significant security risk if the `command` input is not properly sanitized. This can lead to command injection vulnerabilities, especially if untrusted input is passed to the method. There are no hard-coded credentials or other clearly malicious elements, but the potential for exploitation is high.

Live on npm for 46 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code contains potential security risks related to improper handling of function execution results, modifications of properties, and usage of key and index properties. Further validation and careful handling of the input and properties are needed to ensure security.

Live on npm for 3 days, 12 hours and 59 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The script is designed to send critical system information and environment variables to an external server, which is highly suspicious and indicative of malicious behavior.

Live on npm for 1 hour and 39 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

Malicious code in fluent_plugin-logsene (RubyGems)

Malicious code in cryztalnitro (PyPI)

The code downloads and executes two files from a remote server without proper validation or verification. This introduces potential security risks, such as the risk of downloading and executing malicious files or being vulnerable to command injection attacks. The hard-coded URLs also pose a security risk if they are controlled by an attacker. Additionally, the code does not handle any errors or exceptions that may occur during the execution of the commands, which can lead to unexpected behavior or failure of the script. It is recommended to review and modify the code to include proper validation and verification of the downloaded files, handle errors and exceptions, and consider the security implications of hard-coded URLs.

Live on npm for 30 days, 7 hours and 23 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This package was removed from the npm registry for security reasons.

The behavior of this script is suspicious as it runs the 'preinstall.js' file twice, once in the background and once normally. This could potentially indicate an attempt to execute malicious code or perform unauthorized actions.

Live on npm for 26 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code uses the exec function to run shell commands, which poses a significant security risk. It could potentially execute malicious code if the input to exec is manipulated. Redirecting output to /dev/null to hide execution details is suspicious.

Live on npm for 14 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code is clearly designed to exfiltrate sensitive system information to a remote server without user consent. This behavior is malicious and poses a significant security risk.

Live on npm for 1 hour and 23 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code implements a WebSocket server that handles client connections, performs session management, and executes various operations based on client messages. However, it introduces several security risks, including the use of the 'Eval' module for executing arbitrary code, lack of input validation and sanitization, and the presence of hardcoded credentials and secrets. These issues can lead to code injection vulnerabilities, data leakage, and other security vulnerabilities. The code should be thoroughly reviewed and improved to ensure secure communication, proper input handling, and protection against potential attacks.

Live on npm for 23 days, 12 hours and 21 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code is suspicious as it retrieves update information from an unverified external source and uses 'execSync' to run shell commands, which could lead to remote code execution if the external content is compromised. Furthermore, the code attempts to forcibly update and reinstall packages which is not typical for secure update practices.

Live on npm for 4 days, 12 hours and 26 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.