Socket
Socket
Sign inDemoInstall

memoizerific

Package Overview
Dependencies
1
Maintainers
1
Versions
32
Alerts
File Explorer

Advanced tools

Install Socket

Detect and block malicious and high-risk dependencies

Install

memoizerific

Fast, small, efficient JavaScript memoization lib to memoize JS functions


Version published
Maintainers
1
Weekly downloads
4,883,824
decreased by-5.91%

Weekly downloads

Readme

Source

Memoizerific.js

Build Status

Fast (see benchmarks), small (1k min/gzip), efficient, JavaScript memoization lib to memoize JS functions.

Uses JavaScript's Map() object for instant lookups, or a performant polyfill if Map is not available - does not do expensive serialization or string manipulation.

Supports multiple complex arguments. Includes least-recently-used (LRU) caching to maintain only the most recent specified number of results.

Compatible with the browser and nodejs.

Memoization is the process of caching function results so that they may be returned cheaply without re-execution if the function is called again using the same arguments. This is especially useful with the rise of [redux] (https://github.com/rackt/redux), and the push to calculate all derived data on the fly instead of maintaining it in state.

Install

NPM:

npm install memoizerific --save

Or use one of the compiled distributions compatible in any environment (UMD):

Quick Start

const memoizerific = require('memoizerific');

// memoize the 50 most recent argument combinations of our function
const memoized = memoizerific(50)(function(arg1, arg2, arg3) {
    // many long expensive calls here
});

memoized(1, 2, 3); // that took long to process
memoized(1, 2, 3); // this one was instant!

memoized(2, 3, 4); // expensive again :(
memoized(2, 3, 4); // this one was cheap!

Or with complex arguments:

const 
    complexArg1 = { a: { b: { c: 99 }}}, // hairy nested object
    complexArg2 = [{ z: 1}, { q: [{ x: 3 }]}], // objects within arrays within arrays
    complexArg3 = new Set(); // new Set object

memoized(complexArg1, complexArg2, complexArg3); // slow
memoized(complexArg1, complexArg2, complexArg3); // instant!

Arguments

There are two required arguments:

limit (required): the max number of items to cache before the least recently used items are removed.

fn (required): the function to memoize.

The arguments are specified like this:

memoizerific(limit)(fn);

Examples:

// memoize 1 argument combination
memoizerific(1)(function(arg1, arg2){});

// memoize the last 10,000 unique argument combinations
memoizerific(10000)(function(arg1, arg2){}); 

// memoize infinity results (not recommended)
memoizerific(0)(function(arg1){}); 

The cache works using LRU logic, purging the least recently used results when the limit is reached. For example:

// memoize 1 result
const myMemoized = memoizerific(1)(function(arg1) {});

myMemoized('a'); // function runs, result is cached
myMemoized('a'); // cached result is returned
myMemoized('b'); // function runs again, new result is cached, old cached result is purged
myMemoized('b'); // cached result is returned
myMemoized('a'); // function runs again

Equality

Arguments are compared using strict equality, while taking into account small edge cases like NaN !== NaN (NaN is a valid argument type). A complex object will only trigger a cache hit if it refers to the exact same object in memory, not just another object that has similar properties. For example, the following code will not produce a cache hit even though the objects look the same:

const myMemoized = memoizerific(1)(function(arg1) {});

myMemoized({ a: true });
myMemoized({ a: true }); // not cached, the two objects are different instances even though they look the same

This is because a new object is being created on each invocation, rather than the same object being passed in.

A common scenario where this may appear is when providing options to functions, such as: do(opts), where opts is an object.

Typically this would be called with an inline object like this: do({prop1: 10000, prop2: 'abc'}).

If that function were memoized, it would not hit the cache because the opts object would be newly created each time.

There are several ways around this:

Store Arguments

Store constant arguments separately for use later on:

const do = memoizerific(1)(function(opts) {
    // function body
});

// store the argument object
const opts = { prop1: 10000, prop2: 'abc' };

do(opts);
do(opts); // cache hit

Destructure

Destructure the object and memoize its simple properties (strings, numbers, etc) using a wrapper function:

// it doesn't matter that a new object is being created internally because the simple values in the wrapping function are memoized
const callDo = memoizerific(1)(function(prop1, prop2) {
  return do({prop1, prop2 });
});

callDo(1000, 'abc');
callDo(1000, 'abc'); // cache hit

Internals

Meta properties are available for introspection for debugging and informational purposes. They should not be manipulated directly, only read. The following properties are available:

memoizedFn.limit       : The cache limit that was passed in. This will never change.
memoizedFn.wasMemoized : Returns true if the last invocation was a cache hit, otherwise false.
memoizedFn.cache       : The cache object that stores all the memoized results.
memoizedFn.lru         : The lru object that stores the most recent arguments called.

For example:

const callDo = memoizerific(1)(function(prop1, prop2) {
  return do({prop1, prop2 });
});

callDo(1000, 'abc');
console.log(callDo.wasMemoized); // false
callDo(1000, 'abc');
console.log(callDo.wasMemoized); // true

Principles

There are many memoization libs available for JavaScript. Some of them have specialized use-cases, such as memoizing file-system access, or server async requests. While others, such as this one, tackle the more general case of memoizing standard synchronous functions. Some criteria to look for:

  • Support for multiple arguments
  • Support for complex arguments: Including large arrays, complex objects, arrays-within-objects, objects-within-arrays, and any object structure, not just primitives like strings or numbers.
  • Controlled cache: A cache that grows unimpeded will quickly become a memory leak and source of bugs.
  • Consistent performance profile: Performance should degrade linearly and predictably as parameters becomes less favorable.

Two libs with traction that meet the criteria are:

:heavy_check_mark: Memoizee (@medikoo)

:heavy_check_mark: LRU-Memoize (@erikras)

Benchmarks

Benchmarks were performed with complex data. Example arguments look like:

myMemoized(
    { a: 1, b: [{ c: 2, d: { e: 3 }}] }, // 1st argument
    [{ x: 'x', q: 'q', }, { b: 8, c: 9 }, { b: 2, c: [{x: 5, y: 3}, {x: 2, y: 7}] }, { b: 8, c: 9 }, { b: 8, c: 9 }], // 2nd argument
    { z: 'z' }, // 3rd argument
    ... // 4th, 5th... argument
);

Testing involves calling the memoized functions thousands times using varying numbers of arguments (between 2-8) and with varying amounts of data repetition (more repetion means more cache hits and vice versa).

Measurements

Following are measurements from 5000 iterations of each combination of number of arguments and variance on firefox 44:

Cache SizeNum ArgsApprox. Cache Hits (variance)LRU-MemoizeMemoizeeMemoizerific% Faster
10299%19ms31ms10ms90%
10262%212ms319ms172ms23%
1027%579ms617ms518ms12%
100299%137ms37ms20ms85%
100269%696ms245ms161ms52%
100210%1,057ms649ms527ms23%
500495%476ms67ms62ms8%
500436%2,642ms703ms594ms18%
500411%3,619ms880ms725ms21%
1000895%1,009ms52ms65ms25%
1000814%10,477ms659ms635ms4%
100081%6,943ms1,501ms1,466ms2%
Cache Size                    : The maximum number of results to cache.
Num Args                      : The number of arguments the memoized function accepts, ex. fn(arg1, arg2, arg3) is 3.
Approx. Cache Hits (variance) : How varied the passed in arguments are. If the exact same arguments are always used, the cache would be hit 100% of the time. If the same arguments are never used, the cache would be hit 0% of the time.
% Faster                      : How much faster the 1st best performer was from the 2nd best performer (not against the worst performer).
Results

LRU-Memoize performed well with few arguments and lots of cache hits, but degraded quickly as the parameters became less favorable. At 4+ arguments it was up to 20x slower, enough to cause material concern.

Memoizee performed reliably with good speed.

Memoizerific was fastest by about 30% with predictable decreases in performance as tests became more challenging. It is built for real-world production use.

License

Released under an MIT license.

  • Map or Similar: A JavaScript (JS) Map or Similar object polyfill if Map is not available.
  • Multi Key Cache: A JavaScript (JS) cache that can have multiple complex values as keys.

Other

Like it, star it.

Keywords

FAQs

Last updated on 23 Mar 2018

Did you know?

Socket for GitHub automatically highlights issues in each pull request and monitors the health of all your open source dependencies. Discover the contents of your packages and block harmful activity before you install or update your dependencies.

Install

Related posts

SocketSocket SOC 2 Logo

Product

  • Package Alerts
  • Integrations
  • Docs
  • Pricing
  • FAQ
  • Roadmap

Stay in touch

Get open source security insights delivered straight into your inbox.


  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • Security

Made with ⚡️ by Socket Inc