synchronous-promise - npm Package Compare versions

Comparing version 2.0.15 to 2.0.16

package.json

 {
   "name": "synchronous-promise",
-  "version": "2.0.15",
+  "version": "2.0.16",
   "description": "Synchronous Promise-like prototype to use in testing where you would have used an ES6 Promise",
   "main": "index.js",
+  "files": [
+    "browser.js",
+    "index.d.ts",
+    "index.js",
+    "LICENSE",
+    "README.md"
+  ],
   "repository": {
@@ -23,3 +30,4 @@ "type": "git",
     "dist": "browserify browser.js -o dist/synchronous-promise.js",
-    "prepublish": "run-s -s test dist",
+    "prerelease": "run-s -s test dist",
+    "release": "npm publish",
     "debug": "mocha -w *.spec.js --reporter mocha-yar --debug-brk --inspect",
@@ -26,0 +34,0 @@ "debug-ts": "mocha -r ts-node/register *.spec.ts --debug-brk --inspect",

README.md

@@ -12,2 +12,5 @@ # synchronous-promise
 
+If `synchronous-promise` has made something easier for you and you'd like to say thanks,
+[check out my sponsors page](https://github.com/sponsors/fluffynuts).
+
 ### Why?
@@ -174,5 +177,5 @@ The standard ES6 Promise (and any others which *are* A+ compliant) push the promise logic to the background
   promise = SynchronousPromise.unresolved().then(function(data) {
-    resolved = data;
+    resolvedValue = data;
   }).catch(function(data) {
-    rejected = data;
+    rejectedValue = data;
   });
@@ -282,3 +285,3 @@ // at this point, resolved and rejected are both undefined
 [https://github.com/Microsoft/TypeScript/issues/19909](https://github.com/Microsoft/TypeScript/issues/19909)
-but discussion so far has not beein particularly convincing that
+but discussion so far has not been particularly convincing that
 TypeScript emission will be altered to (imo) a more robust
@@ -296,3 +299,3 @@ implementation which wraps the emitted `__awaiter` in a closure.
 ES6 Promise, where possible (or the shim, where you're in ES5). Or Q.
-Or jQUery.Deferred(), Bluebird or any of the implementations at [https://promisesaplus.com/implementations](https://promisesaplus.com/implementations).
+Or jQuery.Deferred(), Bluebird or any of the implementations at [https://promisesaplus.com/implementations](https://promisesaplus.com/implementations).
 
@@ -299,0 +302,0 @@ Basically, this seems to work quite well for testing and

New alerts

Major refactor

Supply chain risk

Package has recently undergone a major refactor. It may be unstable or indicate significant internal changes. Use caution when updating to versions that include significant changes.

Found 1 instance in 1 package

Fixed alerts

Dynamic require

Supply chain risk

Dynamic require can indicate the package is performing dangerous or unsafe dynamic code execution.

Found 1 instance in 1 package

Improved metrics

Number of lines in readme file

301

increased by1.01%

Number of low supply chain risk alerts

0

decreased by-100%

Worsened metrics

Total package byte prevSize

32107

decreased by-70.38%

Number of package files

6

decreased by-53.85%

Lines of code

584

decreased by-78.38%

Number of medium supply chain risk alerts

1

increased byInfinity%

No dependency changes