Security News
Oracle Drags Its Feet in the JavaScript Trademark Dispute
Oracle seeks to dismiss fraud claims in the JavaScript trademark dispute, delaying the case and avoiding questions about its right to the name.
Beginning in v21.3, Sanic makes use of this new AST-style router in two use cases:
Therefore, this package comes with a BaseRouter
that needs to be subclassed in order to be used for its specific needs.
Most Sanic users should never need to concern themselves with the details here.
A simple implementation:
import logging
from sanic_routing import BaseRouter
logging.basicConfig(level=logging.DEBUG)
class Router(BaseRouter):
def get(self, path, *args, **kwargs):
return self.resolve(path, *args, **kwargs)
router = Router()
router.add("/<foo>", lambda: ...)
router.finalize()
router.tree.display()
logging.info(router.find_route_src)
route, handler, params = router.get("/matchme", method="BASE", extra=None)
The above snippet uses router.tree.display()
to show how the router has decided to arrange the routes into a tree. In this simple example:
<Node: level=0>
<Node: part=__dynamic__:str, level=1, groups=[<RouteGroup: path=<foo:str> len=1>], dynamic=True>
We can can see the code that the router has generated for us. It is available as a string at router.find_route_src
.
def find_route(path, method, router, basket, extra):
parts = tuple(path[1:].split(router.delimiter))
num = len(parts)
# node=1 // part=__dynamic__:str
if num == 1: # CHECK 1
try:
basket['__matches__'][0] = str(parts[0])
except ValueError:
pass
else:
# Return 1
return router.dynamic_routes[('<__dynamic__:str>',)][0], basket
raise NotFound
FYI: If you are on Python 3.9, you can see a representation of the source after compilation at router.find_route_src_compiled
Therefore, in general implementation requires you to:
get
method;router.finalize()
); andget
method.NOTE: You can call router.finalize(False)
if you do not want to compile the source code into executable form. This is useful if you only intend to review the generated output.
Every time you call router.add
you create one (1) new Route
instance. Even if that one route is created with multiple methods, it generates a single instance. If you add()
another Route
that has a similar path structure (but, perhaps has differen methods) they will be grouped together into a RouteGroup
. It is worth also noting that a RouteGroup
is created the first time you call add()
, but subsequent similar routes will reuse the existing grouping instance.
When you call finalize()
, it is taking the defined route groups and arranging them into "nodes" in a hierarchical tree. A single node is a path segment. A Node
instance can have one or more RouteGroup
on it where the Node
is the termination point for that path.
Perhaps an example is easier:
router.add("/path/to/<foo>", lambda: ...)
router.add("/path/to/<foo:int>", lambda: ...)
router.add("/path/to/different/<foo>", lambda: ...)
router.add("/path/to/different/<foo>", lambda: ..., methods=["one", "two"])
The generated RouteGroup
instances (3):
<RouteGroup: path=path/to/<foo:str> len=1>
<RouteGroup: path=path/to/<foo:int> len=1>
<RouteGroup: path=path/to/different/<foo:str> len=2>
The generated Route
instances (4):
<Route: path=path/to/<foo:str>>
<Route: path=path/to/<foo:int>>
<Route: path=path/to/different/<foo:str>>
<Route: path=path/to/different/<foo:str>>
The Node Tree:
<Node: level=0>
<Node: part=path, level=1>
<Node: part=to, level=2>
<Node: part=different, level=3>
<Node: part=__dynamic__:str, level=4, groups=[<RouteGroup: path=path/to/different/<foo:str> len=2>], dynamic=True>
<Node: part=__dynamic__:int, level=3, groups=[<RouteGroup: path=path/to/<foo:int> len=1>], dynamic=True>
<Node: part=__dynamic__:str, level=3, groups=[<RouteGroup: path=path/to/<foo:str> len=1>], dynamic=True>
And, the generated source code:
def find_route(path, method, router, basket, extra):
parts = tuple(path[1:].split(router.delimiter))
num = len(parts)
# node=1 // part=path
if num > 1: # CHECK 1
if parts[0] == "path": # CHECK 4
# node=1.1 // part=to
if num > 2: # CHECK 1
if parts[1] == "to": # CHECK 4
# node=1.1.1 // part=different
if num > 3: # CHECK 1
if parts[2] == "different": # CHECK 4
# node=1.1.1.1 // part=__dynamic__:str
if num == 4: # CHECK 1
try:
basket['__matches__'][3] = str(parts[3])
except ValueError:
pass
else:
if method in frozenset({'one', 'two'}):
route_idx = 0
elif method in frozenset({'BASE'}):
route_idx = 1
else:
raise NoMethod
# Return 1.1.1.1
return router.dynamic_routes[('path', 'to', 'different', '<__dynamic__:str>')][route_idx], basket
# node=1.1.2 // part=__dynamic__:int
if num >= 3: # CHECK 1
try:
basket['__matches__'][2] = int(parts[2])
except ValueError:
pass
else:
if num == 3: # CHECK 5
# Return 1.1.2
return router.dynamic_routes[('path', 'to', '<__dynamic__:int>')][0], basket
# node=1.1.3 // part=__dynamic__:str
if num >= 3: # CHECK 1
try:
basket['__matches__'][2] = str(parts[2])
except ValueError:
pass
else:
if num == 3: # CHECK 5
# Return 1.1.3
return router.dynamic_routes[('path', 'to', '<__dynamic__:str>')][0], basket
raise NotFound
The above example only shows routes that have a dynamic path segment in them (example: <foo>
). But, there are other use cases that are covered differently:
/user/login
). These are basically matched against a key/value store.path
type (example: <foo:path>
) that can match on an expanded delimiter. This is also true for any regex that uses the path delimiter in it. These cannot be matched in the normal course since they are of unknown length.FAQs
Core routing component for Sanic
We found that sanic-routing demonstrated a healthy version release cadence and project activity because the last version was released less than a year ago. It has 1 open source maintainer collaborating on the project.
Did you know?
Socket for GitHub automatically highlights issues in each pull request and monitors the health of all your open source dependencies. Discover the contents of your packages and block harmful activity before you install or update your dependencies.
Security News
Oracle seeks to dismiss fraud claims in the JavaScript trademark dispute, delaying the case and avoiding questions about its right to the name.
Security News
The Linux Foundation is warning open source developers that compliance with global sanctions is mandatory, highlighting legal risks and restrictions on contributions.
Security News
Maven Central now validates Sigstore signatures, making it easier for developers to verify the provenance of Java packages.