Security News
Research
Data Theft Repackaged: A Case Study in Malicious Wrapper Packages on npm
The Socket Research Team breaks down a malicious wrapper package that uses obfuscation to harvest credentials and exfiltrate sensitive data.
STAM is a library for dealing with standoff annotations on text, this is the python binding.
STAM is a data model for stand-off text annotation and described in detail here. This is a python library (to be more specific; a python binding written in Rust) to work with the model.
What can you do with this library?
This STAM library is intended as a foundation upon which further applications can be built that deal with stand-off annotations on text. We implement all the low-level logic in dealing this so you no longer have to and can focus on your actual application.
$ pip install stam
Or if you feel adventurous and have the necessary build-time dependencies installed (Rust), you can try the latest development release from Github:
$ pip install git+https://github.com/annotation/stam-python
Import the library
import stam
Loading a STAM JSON (or CSV) file containing an annotation store:
store = stam.AnnotationStore(file="example.stam.json")
The annotation store is your workspace, it holds all resources, annotation sets (i.e. keys and annotation data) and of course the actual annotations. It is a memory-based store and you can put as much as you like into it (as long as it fits in memory).
You can optionally pass configuration parameters upon loading a store, as follows:
store = stam.AnnotationStore(file="example.stam.json", config={"debug": True})
Once loaded, you can retrieve anything by its public ID:
annotation = store.annotation("my-annotation")
resource = store.resource("my-resource")
dataset = store.dataset("my-annotationset")
key = dataset.key("my-key")
data = dataset.annotationdata("my-data")
You can also iterate through all annotations in the store, and output a simple tab separated format:
for annotation in store.annotations():
# get the text to which this annotation refers (if any)
try:
text = str(annotation)
except stam.StamError:
text = "n/a"
for data in annotation:
print("\t".join(( annotation.id(), data.key().id(), str(data.value()), text)))
Adding a resource:
resource = store.add_resource(filename="my-text.txt")
Create a store and annotations from scratch:
from stam import AnnotationStore, Selector, AnnotationDataBuilder
store = AnnotationStore(id="test")
resource = store.add_resource(id="testres", text="Hello world")
store.annotate(id="A1",
target=Selector.textselector(resource, Offset.simple(6,11)),
data={ "id": "D1", "key": "pos", "value": "noun", "set": "testdataset"})
In the above example, the AnnotationDataSet
, DataKey
and AnnotationData
are created on-the-fly. You can also create them explicitly within the set first, as shown in the
next snippet, resulting in the exact same store:
store = AnnotationStore(id="test")
resource = store.add_resource(id="testres", text="Hello world")
dataset = store.add_dataset(id="testdataset")
dataset.add_key("pos")
data = dataset.add_data("pos","noun","D1")
store.annotate(id="A1",
target=Selector.textselector(resource, Offset.simple(6,11)),
data=data)
Providing the full data dictionary as in the earlier example would have
also worked fine, with the same end result, but would be less performant than passing an AnnotationData
instance directly.
The implementation will always ensure any already existing AnnotationData
will be reused if
possible, as not duplicating data is one of the core characteristics of the
STAM model.
You can serialize the entire annotation store (including all sets and annotations) to a STAM JSON file:
store.set_filename("example.stam.json")
store.save()
For more documentation, please read: STAM Tutorial: Standoff Text Annotation for Pythonistas.
Although this Python binding builds on the Rust library, the API it exposes differs in certain aspects to make it more pythonic and easier to work with. This results in a higher-level API that hides some of the lower-level details that are present in the Rust library. This approach does come at the cost of causing some additional runtime overhead.
The Rust methods will often return iterators, references or handles whenever they can, moreover it will do so safely. The Python API is often forced to make a local copy. For iterators we often decide to let the entire underlying Rust iterator run its course and then return the result as a whole as a tuple, rather than return a Python generator. Here you gain some speed at the cost of some memory.
Probably needless to say, but using Rust directly will always be more performant than using this Python binding. However, using this Python binding should still be way more performant than if the whole thing were implemented in native Python. The trick is in letting the binding work for you as much as possible, use higher-level methods whenever they are available rather than implementing your logic in Python.
This work is conducted at the KNAW Humanities Cluster's Digital Infrastructure department, and funded by the CLARIAH project (CLARIAH-PLUS, NWO grant 184.034.023) as part of the FAIR Annotations track.
FAQs
STAM is a library for dealing with standoff annotations on text, this is the python binding.
We found that stam demonstrated a healthy version release cadence and project activity because the last version was released less than a year ago. It has 1 open source maintainer collaborating on the project.
Did you know?
Socket for GitHub automatically highlights issues in each pull request and monitors the health of all your open source dependencies. Discover the contents of your packages and block harmful activity before you install or update your dependencies.
Security News
Research
The Socket Research Team breaks down a malicious wrapper package that uses obfuscation to harvest credentials and exfiltrate sensitive data.
Research
Security News
Attackers used a malicious npm package typosquatting a popular ESLint plugin to steal sensitive data, execute commands, and exploit developer systems.
Security News
The Ultralytics' PyPI Package was compromised four times in one weekend through GitHub Actions cache poisoning and failure to rotate previously compromised API tokens.