Research
Security News
Malicious npm Package Targets Solana Developers and Hijacks Funds
A malicious npm package targets Solana developers, rerouting funds in 2% of transactions to a hardcoded address.
dbmlite3
is a simple key-value store built on top of SQLite3 that
provides a Hash-like interface. It is a drop-in replacement for DBM
or YAML::DBM
that uses SQLite3 to do the underlying storage.
Because DBM is really simple and SQLite3 is solid, reliable, ubiquitous, and file-format-compatible across all platforms. This gem gives you the best of both worlds.
require 'dbmlite3'
# Open a table in a database
settings = Lite3::DBM.new("config.sqlite3", "settings")
# You use it like a hash
settings["speed"] = 88
settings["date"] = Date.new(1955, 11, 5) # Most Ruby types are allowed
settings["power_threshold"] = 2.2
puts settings['power_threshold']
settings.each{|k,v| puts "setting: #{k} = #{v}" }
# But you also have transactions
settings.transaction{
settings["speed"] = settings["speed"] * 2
}
# You can open other tables in the same database if you want, as above
# or with a block
Lite3::DBM.open("config.sqlite3", "stats") { |stats|
stats["max"] = 42
# You can even open multiple handles to the same table if you need to
Lite3::DBM.open("config.sqlite3", "stats") { |stats2|
stats2["max"] += 1
}
puts "stats=#{stats["max"]}"
}
settings.close
Complete documentation is available in the accompanying rdoc.
dbmlite3
is available as a gem:
$ [sudo] gem install dbmlite3
Alternately, you can fetch the source code from GitLab and build it yourself:
$ git clone https://gitlab.com/suetanvil/dbmlite3
$ cd dbmlite3
$ rake
It depends on the gem sequel
; previously, it used sqlite3
.
DBM
is a (potentially) shared fileIt is important to keep in mind that while Lite3::DBM
objects
look like Hashes, they are accessing files on disk that other
processes could modify at any time.
For example, an innocuous-looking expression like
db['foo'] = db['foo'] + 1
or its shorter equivalent
db['foo'] += 1
contains a race condition. If (e.g.) two copies of this script are running at the same time, it is possible for both to perform the read before one of them writes, losing the others' result.
There are two ways to deal with this. You can wrap the read-modify-write cycle in a transaction:
db.transaction { db['foo'] += 1 }
Or, of course, you could just design your script or program so that only one program accesses the table at a time.
While values may be any serializable type, keys must be strings. As a special exception, Symbols are also allowed but are transparently converted to Strings first. This means that while something like this will work:
db[:foo] = 42
a subseqent
db.keys.include?(:foo) or raise AbjectFailure.new
will raise an exception because the key :foo
was turned into a
string before being used. You will need to do this instead:
db.keys.include?('foo') or raise AbjectFailure.new
However, this
db.has_key?(:foo)
will work because has_key?
does the conversion for us.
If you need to do a large number of accesses in a short amount of time (e.g. loading data from a file), it is significantly faster to do these in batches in one or more transactions.
Lite3::DBM
stores Ruby data by first serializing values using the
Marshal
or Psych
modules. This can pose a security risk if an
untrusted third party has direct access to the underlying SQLite3
database. This tends to be pretty rare most of the time but if it is
a concern, you can always configure Lite3::DBM
to store its values
as plain strings.
It is a documented limitation of SQLite3 that database objects cannot be carried across a process fork. Either the parent or the child process will keep the open handle and the other one must forget it completely.
For this reason, if you need both the parent and child process to
be able to use Lite3::DBM
after a fork
, you must first call
Lite3::SQL.close_all
. Not only will this make it safe but it
also lets the child and parent use the same Lite3::DBM
objects.
Lite3::DBM
objects act like file handles but are notWhile it is generally safe to treat Lite3::DBM
as a wrapper around a
file handle (i.e. open
and close
work as expected), you should be
aware that this is not precisely the way things actually work.
Instead, the gem maintains a pool of database handles, one per file,
and associates them with Lite3::DBM
instances as needed. This is
necessary for transactions to work correctly.
Mostly, you don't need to care about this. However, it affects you in the following ways:
Transactions are done at the file level and not the table level. This means that you can access separate tables in the same transaction, which is a Very Good Thing.
You can safely fork the current process and keep using existing
DBM
objects in both processes, provided you've invoked
Lite3::SQL.close_all
before the fork. This will have closed the
actual database handles (which can't tolerate being carried across
a fork) and opens new ones the next time they're needed.
DBM
objects that go out of scope without first being closed will
eventually have their underlying resources cleaned up. However, given
that when when that happens depends on the vagaries of the garbage
collector and various library internals, it's almost always a bad idea
to not explicitly call close
first.
Currently, Lite3::DBM
uses Sequel
to access the sqlite3
library. On JRuby, it goes through the jdbc
interface. The previous version (1.0.0) used
sqlite3 and only
worked on MRI. However, you should make no assumptions about the
underlying database libraries this gem uses. It may change in a
future release.
All tables created by Lite3::DBM
will have names beginning with
dbmlite3_
and you should not modify them directly. It might be
safe to put other tables in the same database file (e.g. via Sequel
)
provided that you don't make global changes or mix transactions across
interfaces. However, I make no guarantees.
FAQs
Unknown package
We found that dbmlite3 demonstrated a healthy version release cadence and project activity because the last version was released less than a year ago. It has 1 open source maintainer collaborating on the project.
Did you know?
Socket for GitHub automatically highlights issues in each pull request and monitors the health of all your open source dependencies. Discover the contents of your packages and block harmful activity before you install or update your dependencies.
Research
Security News
A malicious npm package targets Solana developers, rerouting funds in 2% of transactions to a hardcoded address.
Security News
Research
Socket researchers have discovered malicious npm packages targeting crypto developers, stealing credentials and wallet data using spyware delivered through typosquats of popular cryptographic libraries.
Security News
Socket's package search now displays weekly downloads for npm packages, helping developers quickly assess popularity and make more informed decisions.