Secure your dependencies. Ship with confidence.

This code provides a remote-execution agent: it deserializes cloudpickled objects from the network and executes a received callable via multiprocessing.Pool.map, and it exfiltrates host metadata. Without authentication, integrity protection, or transport encryption, this pattern is a high-severity security risk and effectively provides remote code execution/backdoor capabilities. Treat the code as dangerous unless used only in fully trusted, isolated environments with additional external protections.

The code appears to be a legitimate part of the SpiderMesh library, but it has potential security risks and unusual patterns that should be further reviewed and analyzed.

This settings module contains multiple insecure configurations and several hardcoded secrets and keys that create a substantial supply‑chain and operational security risk if this repository is public or shared. There is no direct evidence of active malware in the code fragment itself, but the committed secrets and permissive production flags (DEBUG, ALLOWED_HOSTS, CORS allow all) materially increase risk of compromise and misuse. Treat this as high security risk: remove secrets from source control, rotate exposed credentials, tighten hosts/CORS/DEBUG, and audit dependent apps and configured endpoints.

This module functions as an active webshell probe/exploitation helper: it reads target entries from 'webshell.log', crafts a known-output payload ('print(md5(1));'), optionally applies configurable encoders, and sends the payload to remote URLs to detect execution. The behavior is consistent with offensive tooling that can verify and interact with webshell backdoors. Treat as high-risk if present in general-purpose packages; acceptable only in controlled, authorized security testing contexts.

The analyzed code is highly suspicious and likely malicious. It exfiltrates configuration or system data to an external server, uses cryptographic operations to conceal data, writes files locally with encrypted content, and terminates the process abruptly. The heavy obfuscation is intended to evade detection and analysis. This code poses a high security risk and should be treated as malware or a backdoor. Usage of this package or code should be avoided.

This assembly contains a highly obfuscated module that performs embedded-payload decryption, native memory allocation, direct process memory writes (including /proc/self/mem), CLR/JIT runtime pointer patching, and execution of unpacked code. Those behaviors are consistent with a loader/backdoor and are not appropriate for a logging library. I assess this as malicious and a high supply-chain risk — the package should not be used and existing installations should be considered compromised until fully audited.

This script is using the 'curl' command to send data to a remote server. The data being sent includes the hostname, username, and password. This behavior is considered suspicious and potentially malicious as it could be used to exfiltrate sensitive information from the system.

Live on npm for 3 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This module implements system-wide keyboard capture (on Windows via a low-level hook) and persists keystrokes to local files, then forwards them to callbacks — behavior that constitutes a local keylogger. It also provides APIs to synthesize key events across platforms. There is no network exfiltration in the provided code, but the local logging of keystrokes and the global capture capability are high-risk and can be abused to steal sensitive input (passwords, tokens) if used maliciously or without explicit user consent. Reviewers should treat this package as potentially dangerous; ensure the 'keyboard' feature is only enabled intentionally, audit who receives callbacks, and remove/disable file logging if not strictly required.

This code is an administrative automation component that deliberately executes arbitrary ServiceNow server-side scripts and manipulates system tables. I found no clear signs of intentionally malicious code (no hardcoded external exfiltration endpoints, no obfuscated payload). However, it exposes powerful sinks: arbitrary script execution, creation of background script records, and storage of script output/trace in sys_properties. The primary security risk is abuse/misconfiguration (e.g., autoConfirm bypass, insufficient RBAC) leading to data theft or destructive changes. Treat this module as high-risk functionality that must be strictly access controlled, audited, and hardened before use.

This code is not obviously malicious in itself; it is intended to call an external solver (msolve) and parse its output. However, it contains a high-risk design choice: it executes an external binary and directly evaluates that binary's stdout via sage_eval, which yields arbitrary code execution if the external binary or its output is tampered with. If the msolve executable can be compromised (supply-chain attack, replaced binary, or attacker-controlled output), this code can execute arbitrary Python. Recommended mitigations: avoid eval-style parsing of external output, use a strict parser or sandbox evaluation, validate output structure and types before evaluation, and ensure the msolve binary is obtained and verified from a trusted source. Overall: low probability the code is intentionally malicious, but a significant security risk exists due to unsafe evaluation of external output.

This file implements a focused brute-force credential-guessing tool targeting destiny.district833.org for a supplied username. It uses keyboard emulation + Selenium to automate login attempts, persists tried passwords locally, and is configured to auto-run with a specific username and driver path. The code is weaponized for unauthorized access and poses a high security risk. It should be treated as malicious and removed from any supply chain; systems containing it should be investigated for compromise and sensitive persisted files (trynots.dat) considered exposed.

This module intentionally transmits API keys (either a hardcoded default decoded from base64 or any user-provided key) to an external, non-OpenAI endpoint via HTTP POST. This is credential exfiltration and constitutes malicious or severely insecure supply-chain behavior. Do not use this code. Remove it, rotate any exposed API keys, block the destination domain, and investigate any use of the embedded key.

The source code exhibits behavior consistent with data exfiltration malware. It collects sensitive system information and sends it to external endpoints without user consent, posing a significant security risk.

Live on npm for 36 days, 11 hours and 43 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This module intentionally executes refined user-supplied Python code using exec(), creating a high potential for arbitrary code execution and data exposure. The most critical risks: (1) executing attacker-controlled code via magic(code,...), (2) reliance on an external fineTunePythonCode() whose behavior is opaque and could introduce malicious code, and (3) lack of sandboxing, validation, and safeguards. Recommend: do not run this in production or anywhere with sensitive data; if needed, restrict inputs, replace exec with a safe execution environment (restricted interpreter, container, or subprocess with capability limits), add allowlisting/AST validation, and audit the fineTunePythonCode implementation.

This module contains explicit data-exfiltration behavior: it loads Telegram bot credentials from a config file in user directories and posts sensitive data (including user auth tokens and error messages) to that Telegram bot. That is a clear and high-risk privacy/security violation. The code also has poor error handling that can amplify leaks and contains multiple bugs and inconsistent variable scope. Treat this package as malicious/untrusted and do not use it in production; remove it and rotate any possibly exposed tokens.

Code exhibits suspicious behavior through detached process spawning and dynamic code execution via eval(). The spawned process runs independently and could persist after parent exits. While the eval'd code appears benign (just logging), the overall pattern suggests potential malicious intent or poor security practices.

The code exhibits potentially malicious behavior by sending sensitive tracking data to an external server without clear user consent. It poses a security risk due to data leakage and potential privacy violations.

Live on npm for 19 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This code implements an insecure, unauthenticated RPC mechanism that allows remote clients to cause arbitrary code execution and exfiltrate files/system information. Using pickle over an untrusted network and invoking methods by client-supplied names are severe supply-chain/backdoor risks. Do not deploy or reuse this code in production; it should be treated as a backdoor/untrusted remote-execution component unless wrapped with strong authentication, authorization, sandboxing, and safe serialization.

This module implements explicit offensive capabilities against Jupyter notebook sessions: code injection (remote code execution), backdoor installation (starting a Jupyter server bound to 0.0.0.0 with provided token), shell command execution, snooping on kernel activity, file upload/deletion, and discovery/exfiltration of model files. It should be considered malicious/offensive by design and poses a high security risk if present in environments where it can be executed. Use only in controlled, authorized testing environments. If found in a dependency unexpectedly, treat as compromised/malicious and remove or further investigate the upstream source.

The code collects and sends tracking data to an external server without user consent, which could be considered a privacy violation. The code also poses a risk of supply chain attacks, as the external server could be controlled by an attacker to distribute malicious code. The code sanitizes the data to prevent injection attacks. Overall, the code poses a moderate security risk.

Live on npm for 2 hours and 33 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code is malicious, performing covert data exfiltration of sensitive system and package information to an attacker-controlled server. It poses a high security risk and should be removed from any software supply chain or dependency list. The code is not obfuscated but is clearly designed to steal data without user knowledge.

Live on npm for 3 days, 9 hours and 22 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This file is intentionally obfuscated and assembles/executes a hidden base64 payload at runtime (rot13 + base64 + eval/compile/exec). That behavior is strongly indicative of malicious or at-minimum highly suspicious behavior in a package. Do not import or run this module in a production environment. Decode and fully inspect the assembled payload in a safe sandbox before any use.

This module is a credential/config harvesting tool: it recursively scans host files for likely secrets, filters candidates using filename and regex heuristics, and exfiltrates matched files to a remote HTTP server using worker threads. The use of heavy obfuscation and dynamic eval for workers, combined with explicit secret-detection regexes and network exfiltration, classifies it as malicious. Remove and treat as a supply-chain backdoor; assume compromise of secrets accessed by the agent and rotate credentials where appropriate.

This code contains a clear malicious/unauthorized insertion: within the EventSource polyfill there is a timed callback that, for clients whose timezone matches a hard-coded list, displays a political message using alert() and opens an external change.org URL. This is unrelated to the library's purpose, constitutes supply-chain sabotage/defacement targeting specific locales, and should be considered malicious. Remove or replace the package and audit upstream sources. The rest of the bundle appears to be legitimate application and polyfill code.

This code provides a remote-execution agent: it deserializes cloudpickled objects from the network and executes a received callable via multiprocessing.Pool.map, and it exfiltrates host metadata. Without authentication, integrity protection, or transport encryption, this pattern is a high-severity security risk and effectively provides remote code execution/backdoor capabilities. Treat the code as dangerous unless used only in fully trusted, isolated environments with additional external protections.

The code appears to be a legitimate part of the SpiderMesh library, but it has potential security risks and unusual patterns that should be further reviewed and analyzed.

This settings module contains multiple insecure configurations and several hardcoded secrets and keys that create a substantial supply‑chain and operational security risk if this repository is public or shared. There is no direct evidence of active malware in the code fragment itself, but the committed secrets and permissive production flags (DEBUG, ALLOWED_HOSTS, CORS allow all) materially increase risk of compromise and misuse. Treat this as high security risk: remove secrets from source control, rotate exposed credentials, tighten hosts/CORS/DEBUG, and audit dependent apps and configured endpoints.

This module functions as an active webshell probe/exploitation helper: it reads target entries from 'webshell.log', crafts a known-output payload ('print(md5(1));'), optionally applies configurable encoders, and sends the payload to remote URLs to detect execution. The behavior is consistent with offensive tooling that can verify and interact with webshell backdoors. Treat as high-risk if present in general-purpose packages; acceptable only in controlled, authorized security testing contexts.

The analyzed code is highly suspicious and likely malicious. It exfiltrates configuration or system data to an external server, uses cryptographic operations to conceal data, writes files locally with encrypted content, and terminates the process abruptly. The heavy obfuscation is intended to evade detection and analysis. This code poses a high security risk and should be treated as malware or a backdoor. Usage of this package or code should be avoided.

This assembly contains a highly obfuscated module that performs embedded-payload decryption, native memory allocation, direct process memory writes (including /proc/self/mem), CLR/JIT runtime pointer patching, and execution of unpacked code. Those behaviors are consistent with a loader/backdoor and are not appropriate for a logging library. I assess this as malicious and a high supply-chain risk — the package should not be used and existing installations should be considered compromised until fully audited.

This script is using the 'curl' command to send data to a remote server. The data being sent includes the hostname, username, and password. This behavior is considered suspicious and potentially malicious as it could be used to exfiltrate sensitive information from the system.

Live on npm for 3 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This module implements system-wide keyboard capture (on Windows via a low-level hook) and persists keystrokes to local files, then forwards them to callbacks — behavior that constitutes a local keylogger. It also provides APIs to synthesize key events across platforms. There is no network exfiltration in the provided code, but the local logging of keystrokes and the global capture capability are high-risk and can be abused to steal sensitive input (passwords, tokens) if used maliciously or without explicit user consent. Reviewers should treat this package as potentially dangerous; ensure the 'keyboard' feature is only enabled intentionally, audit who receives callbacks, and remove/disable file logging if not strictly required.

This code is an administrative automation component that deliberately executes arbitrary ServiceNow server-side scripts and manipulates system tables. I found no clear signs of intentionally malicious code (no hardcoded external exfiltration endpoints, no obfuscated payload). However, it exposes powerful sinks: arbitrary script execution, creation of background script records, and storage of script output/trace in sys_properties. The primary security risk is abuse/misconfiguration (e.g., autoConfirm bypass, insufficient RBAC) leading to data theft or destructive changes. Treat this module as high-risk functionality that must be strictly access controlled, audited, and hardened before use.

This code is not obviously malicious in itself; it is intended to call an external solver (msolve) and parse its output. However, it contains a high-risk design choice: it executes an external binary and directly evaluates that binary's stdout via sage_eval, which yields arbitrary code execution if the external binary or its output is tampered with. If the msolve executable can be compromised (supply-chain attack, replaced binary, or attacker-controlled output), this code can execute arbitrary Python. Recommended mitigations: avoid eval-style parsing of external output, use a strict parser or sandbox evaluation, validate output structure and types before evaluation, and ensure the msolve binary is obtained and verified from a trusted source. Overall: low probability the code is intentionally malicious, but a significant security risk exists due to unsafe evaluation of external output.

This file implements a focused brute-force credential-guessing tool targeting destiny.district833.org for a supplied username. It uses keyboard emulation + Selenium to automate login attempts, persists tried passwords locally, and is configured to auto-run with a specific username and driver path. The code is weaponized for unauthorized access and poses a high security risk. It should be treated as malicious and removed from any supply chain; systems containing it should be investigated for compromise and sensitive persisted files (trynots.dat) considered exposed.

This module intentionally transmits API keys (either a hardcoded default decoded from base64 or any user-provided key) to an external, non-OpenAI endpoint via HTTP POST. This is credential exfiltration and constitutes malicious or severely insecure supply-chain behavior. Do not use this code. Remove it, rotate any exposed API keys, block the destination domain, and investigate any use of the embedded key.

The source code exhibits behavior consistent with data exfiltration malware. It collects sensitive system information and sends it to external endpoints without user consent, posing a significant security risk.

Live on npm for 36 days, 11 hours and 43 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This module intentionally executes refined user-supplied Python code using exec(), creating a high potential for arbitrary code execution and data exposure. The most critical risks: (1) executing attacker-controlled code via magic(code,...), (2) reliance on an external fineTunePythonCode() whose behavior is opaque and could introduce malicious code, and (3) lack of sandboxing, validation, and safeguards. Recommend: do not run this in production or anywhere with sensitive data; if needed, restrict inputs, replace exec with a safe execution environment (restricted interpreter, container, or subprocess with capability limits), add allowlisting/AST validation, and audit the fineTunePythonCode implementation.

This module contains explicit data-exfiltration behavior: it loads Telegram bot credentials from a config file in user directories and posts sensitive data (including user auth tokens and error messages) to that Telegram bot. That is a clear and high-risk privacy/security violation. The code also has poor error handling that can amplify leaks and contains multiple bugs and inconsistent variable scope. Treat this package as malicious/untrusted and do not use it in production; remove it and rotate any possibly exposed tokens.

Code exhibits suspicious behavior through detached process spawning and dynamic code execution via eval(). The spawned process runs independently and could persist after parent exits. While the eval'd code appears benign (just logging), the overall pattern suggests potential malicious intent or poor security practices.

The code exhibits potentially malicious behavior by sending sensitive tracking data to an external server without clear user consent. It poses a security risk due to data leakage and potential privacy violations.

Live on npm for 19 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This code implements an insecure, unauthenticated RPC mechanism that allows remote clients to cause arbitrary code execution and exfiltrate files/system information. Using pickle over an untrusted network and invoking methods by client-supplied names are severe supply-chain/backdoor risks. Do not deploy or reuse this code in production; it should be treated as a backdoor/untrusted remote-execution component unless wrapped with strong authentication, authorization, sandboxing, and safe serialization.

This module implements explicit offensive capabilities against Jupyter notebook sessions: code injection (remote code execution), backdoor installation (starting a Jupyter server bound to 0.0.0.0 with provided token), shell command execution, snooping on kernel activity, file upload/deletion, and discovery/exfiltration of model files. It should be considered malicious/offensive by design and poses a high security risk if present in environments where it can be executed. Use only in controlled, authorized testing environments. If found in a dependency unexpectedly, treat as compromised/malicious and remove or further investigate the upstream source.

The code collects and sends tracking data to an external server without user consent, which could be considered a privacy violation. The code also poses a risk of supply chain attacks, as the external server could be controlled by an attacker to distribute malicious code. The code sanitizes the data to prevent injection attacks. Overall, the code poses a moderate security risk.

Live on npm for 2 hours and 33 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code is malicious, performing covert data exfiltration of sensitive system and package information to an attacker-controlled server. It poses a high security risk and should be removed from any software supply chain or dependency list. The code is not obfuscated but is clearly designed to steal data without user knowledge.

Live on npm for 3 days, 9 hours and 22 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This file is intentionally obfuscated and assembles/executes a hidden base64 payload at runtime (rot13 + base64 + eval/compile/exec). That behavior is strongly indicative of malicious or at-minimum highly suspicious behavior in a package. Do not import or run this module in a production environment. Decode and fully inspect the assembled payload in a safe sandbox before any use.

This module is a credential/config harvesting tool: it recursively scans host files for likely secrets, filters candidates using filename and regex heuristics, and exfiltrates matched files to a remote HTTP server using worker threads. The use of heavy obfuscation and dynamic eval for workers, combined with explicit secret-detection regexes and network exfiltration, classifies it as malicious. Remove and treat as a supply-chain backdoor; assume compromise of secrets accessed by the agent and rotate credentials where appropriate.

This code contains a clear malicious/unauthorized insertion: within the EventSource polyfill there is a timed callback that, for clients whose timezone matches a hard-coded list, displays a political message using alert() and opens an external change.org URL. This is unrelated to the library's purpose, constitutes supply-chain sabotage/defacement targeting specific locales, and should be considered malicious. Remove or replace the package and audit upstream sources. The rest of the bundle appears to be legitimate application and polyfill code.