Security News
GitHub Removes Malicious Pull Requests Targeting Open Source Repositories
GitHub removed 27 malicious pull requests attempting to inject harmful code across multiple open source repositories, in another round of low-effort attacks.
github.com/clarify/rested
This repository contain a maintenance fork of rs/rest-layer. We are not planning or accepting any major features at this time, but will accept and conduct minor improvements and bugfixes as needed. Features that are not used by us may be deprecated or dropped in upcoming releases. Breaking changes might be introduced when suitable
Requires Go 1.17 or newer and use of go modules.
The goals of this fork is:
Package | Description |
---|---|
rest | A net/http handler to expose a REST-ful API. |
schema | A validation framework for the API resources. |
resource | Defines resources, manages the resource graph and manages the interface with resource storage handler. |
storers/mongo | Implementation of resource.Storers interface. |
As REST Layer is a simple net/http
handler. You can use standard middleware to extend its functionalities. E.g.:
package main
import (
"log"
"net/http"
"github.com/clarify/rested/resource/testing/mem"
"github.com/clarify/rested/resource"
"github.com/clarify/rested/rest"
"github.com/clarify/rested/schema/query"
"github.com/clarify/rested/schema"
)
var (
// Define a user resource schema
user = schema.Schema{
Description: `The user object`,
Fields: schema.Fields{
"id": {
Required: true,
// When a field is read-only, only default values or hooks can
// set their value. The client can't change it.
ReadOnly: true,
// This is a field hook called when a new user is created.
// The schema.NewID hook is a provided hook to generate a
// unique id when no value is provided.
OnInit: schema.NewID,
// The Filterable and Sortable allows usage of filter and sort
// on this field in requests.
Filterable: true,
Sortable: true,
Validator: &schema.String{
Regexp: "^[0-9a-v]{20}$",
},
},
"created": {
Required: true,
ReadOnly: true,
Filterable: true,
Sortable: true,
OnInit: schema.Now,
Validator: &schema.Time{},
},
"updated": {
Required: true,
ReadOnly: true,
Filterable: true,
Sortable: true,
OnInit: schema.Now,
// The OnUpdate hook is called when the item is edited. Here we use
// provided Now hook which returns the current time.
OnUpdate: schema.Now,
Validator: &schema.Time{},
},
// Define a name field as required with a string validator
"name": {
Required: true,
Filterable: true,
Validator: &schema.String{
MaxLen: 150,
},
},
},
}
// Define a post resource schema
post = schema.Schema{
Description: `Represents a blog post`,
Fields: schema.Fields{
// schema.*Field are shortcuts for common fields
// (identical to users' same fields)
"id": schema.IDField,
"created": schema.CreatedField,
"updated": schema.UpdatedField,
// Define a user field which references the user owning the post.
// See bellow, the content of this field is enforced by the fact
// that posts is a sub-resource of users.
"user": {
Required: true,
Filterable: true,
Validator: &schema.Reference{
Path: "users",
},
},
"published": {
Required: true,
Filterable: true,
Default: false,
Validator: &schema.Bool{},
},
"title": {
Required: true,
Validator: &schema.String{
MaxLen: 150,
},
},
"body": {
// Dependency defines that body field can't be changed if
// the published field is not "false".
Dependency: query.MustParsePredicate(`{"published": false}`),
Validator: &schema.String{
MaxLen: 100000,
},
},
},
}
)
func main() {
// Create a REST API resource index
index := resource.NewIndex()
// Add a resource on /users[/:user_id]
users := index.Bind("users", user, mem.NewHandler(), resource.Conf{
// We allow all REST methods
// (rest.ReadWrite is a shortcut for []resource.Mode{resource.Create,
// resource.Read, resource.Update, resource.Delete, resource,List})
AllowedModes: resource.ReadWrite,
})
// Bind a sub resource on /users/:user_id/posts[/:post_id]
// and reference the user on each post using the "user" field of the posts resource.
users.Bind("posts", "user", post, mem.NewHandler(), resource.Conf{
// Posts can only be read, created and deleted, not updated
AllowedModes: []resource.Mode{resource.Read, resource.List,
resource.Create, resource.Delete},
})
// Create API HTTP handler for the resource graph
api, err := rest.NewHandler(index)
if err != nil {
log.Fatalf("Invalid API configuration: %s", err)
}
// Bind the API under /api/ path
http.Handle("/api/", http.StripPrefix("/api/", api))
// Serve it
log.Print("Serving API on http://localhost:8080")
if err := http.ListenAndServe(":8080", nil); err != nil {
log.Fatal(err)
}
}
Just run this code (or use the provided examples/demo):
$ go run examples/demo/main.go
2015/07/27 20:54:55 Serving API on http://localhost:8080
Using HTTPie, you can now play with your API.
First create a user:
$ http POST :8080/api/users name="John Doe"
HTTP/1.1 201 Created
Content-Length: 155
Content-Location: /api/users/ar6ejgmkj5lfl98r67p0
Content-Type: application/json
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 19:10:20 GMT
Etag: "1e18e148e1ff3ecdaae5ec03ac74e0e4"
Last-Modified: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 19:10:20 GMT
Vary: Origin
{
"id": "ar6ejgmkj5lfl98r67p0",
"created": "2015-07-27T21:10:20.671003126+02:00",
"updated": "2015-07-27T21:10:20.671003989+02:00",
"name": "John Doe",
}
As you can see, the id
, created
and updated
fields have been automatically generated by our OnInit
field hooks.
Also notice the Etag
and Last-Modified
headers. Those guys allow data integrity and concurrency control down to the storage layer through the use of the If-Match
and If-Unmodified-Since
headers. They can also serve for conditional requests using If-None-Match
and If-Modified-Since
headers.
Here is an example of conditional request:
$ http :8080/api/users/ar6ejgmkj5lfl98r67p0 \
If-Modified-Since:"Mon, 27 Jul 2015 19:10:20 GMT"
HTTP/1.1 304 Not Modified
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 19:17:11 GMT
Vary: Origin
And here is a data integrity request following the RFC-5789 recommendations:
$ http PATCH :8080/api/users/ar6ejgmkj5lfl98r67p0 \
name="Someone Else" If-Match:invalid-etag
HTTP/1.1 412 Precondition Failed
Content-Length: 58
Content-Type: application/json
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 19:33:27 GMT
Vary: Origin
{
"code": 412,
"fields": null,
"message": "Precondition Failed"
}
Retry with the valid etag:
$ http PATCH :8080/api/users/ar6ejgmkj5lfl98r67p0 \
name="Someone Else" If-Match:'"1e18e148e1ff3ecdaae5ec03ac74e0e4"'
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Length: 159
Content-Type: application/json
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 19:36:19 GMT
Etag: "7bb7a71b0f66197aa07c4c8fc9564616"
Last-Modified: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 19:36:19 GMT
Vary: Origin
{
"created": "2015-07-27T21:33:09.168492448+02:00",
"id": "ar6ejmukj5lflde9q8bg",
"name": "Someone Else",
"updated": "2015-07-27T21:36:19.904545093+02:00"
}
Note that even if you don't use conditional request, the Etag
is always used by the storage handler to manage concurrency control between requests.
Another cool thing is sub-resources. We've set our posts
resource as a child of the users
resource. This way we can handle ownership very easily as routes are constructed as /users/:user_id/posts
.
Lets create a post:
$ http POST :8080/api/users/ar6ejgmkj5lfl98r67p0/posts \
title="My first post"
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Length: 212
Content-Type: application/json
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 19:46:55 GMT
Etag: "307ae92df6c3dd54847bfc7d72422e07"
Last-Modified: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 19:46:55 GMT
Vary: Origin
{
"id": "ar6ejs6kj5lflgc28es0",
"created": "2015-07-27T21:46:55.355857401+02:00",
"updated": "2015-07-27T21:46:55.355857989+02:00",
"title": "My first post",
"user": "ar6ejgmkj5lfl98r67p0"
}
Notice how the user
field has been set with the user id provided in the route, that's pretty cool, huh?
We defined that we can create posts but we can't modify them, lets verify that:
$ http PATCH :8080/api/users/821d…/posts/ar6ejs6kj5lflgc28es0 \
private=true
HTTP/1.1 405 Method Not Allowed
Content-Length: 53
Content-Type: application/json
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 19:50:33 GMT
Vary: Origin
{
"code": 405,
"fields": null,
"message": "Invalid method"
}
Let's list posts for that user now:
$ http :8080/api/users/ar6ejgmkj5lfl98r67p0/posts
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Length: 257
Content-Type: application/json
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 19:51:46 GMT
Vary: Origin
X-Total: 1
[
{
"id": "ar6ejs6kj5lflgc28es0",
"_etag": "307ae92df6c3dd54847bfc7d72422e07",
"created": "2015-07-27T21:46:55.355857401+02:00",
"updated": "2015-07-27T21:46:55.355857989+02:00",
"title": "My first post",
"user": "ar6ejgmkj5lfl98r67p0"
}
]
Notice the added _etag
field. This is to let you get etags of multiple items without having to GET
each one of them through individual requests.
Now, let's get user's information for each posts in a single request:
$ http :8080/api/users/ar6ejgmkj5lfl98r67p0/posts fields=='id,title,user{id,name}'
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Length: 257
Content-Type: application/json
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 19:51:46 GMT
Vary: Origin
X-Total: 1
[
{
"id": "ar6ejs6kj5lflgc28es0",
"_etag": "307ae92df6c3dd54847bfc7d72422e07",
"created": "2015-07-27T21:46:55.355857401+02:00",
"updated": "2015-07-27T21:46:55.355857989+02:00",
"title": "My first post",
"user": {
"id": "ar6ejgmkj5lfl98r67p0",
"name": "John Doe"
}
}
]
Notice how we selected which fields we wanted in the result using the field selection query format. Thanks to sub-request support, the user name is included with each post with no additional HTTP request.
We can go even further and embed a sub-request list responses. Let's say we want a list of users with the last two posts:
$ http GET :8080/api/users fields='id,name,posts(limit:2){id,title}'
HTTP/1.1 201 Created
Content-Length: 155
Content-Location: /api/users/ar6ejgmkj5lfl98r67p0
Content-Type: application/json
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 19:10:20 GMT
Etag: "1e18e148e1ff3ecdaae5ec03ac74e0e4"
Last-Modified: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 19:10:20 GMT
Vary: Origin
[
{
"id": "ar6ejgmkj5lfl98r67p0",
"name": "John Doe",
"posts": [
{
"id": "ar6ejs6kj5lflgc28es0",
"title": "My first post"
},
{
"id": "ar6ek26kj5lfljgh84qg",
"title": "My second post"
}
]
}
]
Sub-requests are executed concurrently whenever possible to ensure the fastest response time.
For REST Layer to be able to expose resources, you have to first define what fields the resource contains and where to bind it in the REST API URL namespace.
Resource field configuration is performed through the schema package. A schema is a struct describing a resource. A schema is composed of metadata about the resource and a description of the allowed fields through a map of field name pointing to field definition.
Sample resource schema:
foo = schema.Schema{
Description: "A foo object",
Fields: schema.Fields{
"field_name": {
Required: true,
Filterable: true,
Validator: &schema.String{
MaxLen: 150,
},
},
},
}
Schema fields:
Field | Description |
---|---|
Description | The description of the resource. This is used for API documentation. |
Fields | A map of field name to field definition. |
The field definitions contains the following properties:
Field | Description |
---|---|
Required | If true , the field must be provided when the resource is created and can't be set to null . The client may be able to omit a required field if a Default or a hook sets its content. |
ReadOnly | If true , the field can not be set by the client, only a Default or a hook can alter its value. You may specify a value for a read-only field in your mutation request if the value is equal to the old value, REST Layer won't complain about it. This lets your client PUT the same document it got with GET without having to take care of removing the read-only fields. |
Hidden | Hidden allows writes but hides the field's content from the client. When this field is enabled, PUTing the document without the field would not remove the field but use the previous document's value if any. |
Default | The value to be set when resource is created and the client didn't provide a value for the field. The content of this variable must still pass validation. |
OnInit | A function to be executed when the resource is created. The function gets the current value of the field (after Default has been set if any) and returns the new value to be set. |
OnUpdate | A function to be executed when the resource is updated. The function gets the current (updated) value of the field and returns the new value to be set. |
Params | Params defines the list of parameters allowed for this field. See Field Parameters section for some examples. |
Handler | Handler defines a function able to change the field's value depending on the passed parameters. See Field Parameters section for some examples. |
Validator | A schema.FieldValidator to validate the content of the field. |
Dependency | A query using filter format created with query.MustParsePredicate(`{"field": "value"}`) . If the query doesn't match the document, the field generates a dependency error. |
Filterable | If true , the field can be used with the filter parameter. You may want to ensure the backend database has this field indexed when enabled. Some storage handlers may not support all the operators of the filter parameter, see their documentation for more information. |
Sortable | If true , the field can be used with the sort parameter. You may want to ensure the backend database has this field indexed when enabled. |
Schema | An optional sub schema to validate hierarchical documents. |
REST Layer comes with a set of validators. You can add your own by implementing the schema.FieldValidator
interface. Here is the list of provided validators:
Validator | Description |
---|---|
schema.String | Ensures the field is a string |
schema.Integer | Ensures the field is an integer |
schema.Float | Ensures the field is a float |
schema.Bool | Ensures the field is a Boolean |
schema.Array | Ensures the field is an array |
schema.Dict | Ensures the field is a dict |
schema.Object | Ensures the field is an object validating against a sub-schema |
schema.Time | Ensures the field is a datetime |
schema.URL | Ensures the field is a valid URL |
schema.IP | Ensures the field is a valid IPv4 or IPv6 |
schema.Password | Ensures the field is a valid password and bcrypt it |
schema.Reference | Ensures the field contains a reference to another existing API item |
schema.AnyOf | Ensures that at least one sub-validator is valid |
schema.AllOf | Ensures that at least all sub-validators are valid |
Some common hook handler to be used with OnInit
and OnUpdate
are also provided:
Hook | Description |
---|---|
schema.Now | Returns the current time ignoring the input (current) value. |
schema.NewID | Returns a unique identifier using xid if input value is nil . |
Some common field configuration are also provided as variables:
Field Config | Description |
---|---|
schema.IDField | A required, read-only field with schema.NewID set as OnInit hook and a schema.String validator matching xid format. |
schema.CreatedField | A required, read-only field with schema.Now set on OnInit hook with a schema.Time validator. |
schema.UpdatedField | A required, read-only field with schema.Now set on OnInit and OnUpdate hooks with a schema.Time validator. |
schema.PasswordField | A hidden, required field with a schema.Password validator. |
Here is an example of schema declaration:
// Define a post resource schema
post = schema.Schema{
Fields: schema.Fields{
// schema.*Field are shortcuts for common fields (identical to users' same fields)
"id": schema.IDField,
"created": schema.CreatedField,
"updated": schema.UpdatedField,
// Define a user field which references the user owning the post.
// See bellow, the content of this field is enforced by the fact
// that posts is a sub-resource of users.
"user": {
Required: true,
Filterable: true,
Validator: &schema.Reference{
Path: "users",
},
},
// Sub-documents are handled via a sub-schema
"meta": {
Schema: &schema.Schema{
Fields: schema.Fields{
"title": {
Required: true,
Validator: &schema.String{
MaxLen: 150,
},
},
"body": {
Validator: &schema.String{
MaxLen: 100000,
},
},
},
},
},
},
}
Now you just need to bind this schema at a specific endpoint on the resource.Index object:
index := resource.NewIndex()
posts := index.Bind("posts", post, mem.NewHandler(), resource.DefaultConf)
This tells the resource.Index
to bind the post
schema at the posts
endpoint. The resource collection URL is then /posts
and item URLs are /posts/<post_id>
.
The resource.DefaultConf variable is a pre-defined resource.Conf type with sensible defaults. You can customize the resource behavior using a custom configuration.
The resource.Conf
type has the following customizable properties:
Property | Description |
---|---|
AllowedModes | A list of resource.Mode allowed for the resource. |
PaginationDefaultLimit | If set, pagination is enabled for list requests by default with the number of item per page as defined here. Note that the default ony applies to list (GET) requests, i.e. it does not apply for clear (DELETE) requests. |
ForceTotal | Control the behavior of the computation of X-Total header and the total query-string parameter. See resource.ForceTotalMode for available options. |
REST Layer handles mapping of HTTP methods to your resource URLs automatically. With REST, there is two kind of resource URL paths: collection and item URLs. Collection URLs (/<resource>
) are pointing to the collection of items, while item URL (/<resource>/<item_id>
) points to a specific item in that collection. HTTP methods are used to perform CRUDL operations on those resources.
You can easily dis/allow an operation on a per resource basis using resource.Conf
's AllowedModes
property. The use of modes instead of HTTP methods in the configuration adds a layer of abstraction necessary to handle specific cases like PUT
HTTP method performing a create
if the specified item does not exist or a replace
if it does. This gives you precise control of what you want to allow or not.
Modes are passed as configuration to resources as follow:
users := index.Bind("users", user, mem.NewHandler(), resource.Conf{
AllowedModes: []resource.Mode{resource.Read, resource.List, resource.Create, resource.Delete},
})
The following table shows how REST layer maps CRUDL operations to HTTP methods and modes
:
Mode | HTTP Method | Context | Description |
---|---|---|---|
Read | GET | Item | Get an individual item by its ID. |
List | GET | Collection | List/find items using filters and sorts. |
Create | POST | Collection | Create an item letting the system generate its ID. |
Create | PUT | Item | Create an item by choosing its ID. |
Update | PATCH | Item | Partially modify the item following RFC-5789, RFC-6902. |
Replace | PUT | Item | Replace the item by a new on. |
Delete | DELETE | Item | Delete the item by its ID. |
Clear | DELETE | Collection | Delete all items from the collection matching the context and/or filters. |
Hooks are piece of code you can attach before or after an operation is performed on a resource. A hook is a Go type implementing one of the event handler interface below, and attached to a resource via the Resource.Use method.
Hook Interface | Description |
---|---|
FindEventHandler | Defines a function called when the resource is listed with or without a query. Note that hook is called for both resource and item fetch as well a prior to updates and deletes. |
FoundEventHandler | Defines a function called with the result of a find on resource. |
GetEventHandler | Defines a function called when a get is performed on an item of the resource. Note: when multi-get is performed this hook is called for each items id individually. |
GotEventHandler | Defines a function called with the result of a get on a resource. |
InsertEventHandler | Defines a function called before an item is inserted. |
InsertedEventHandler | Defines a function called after an item has been inserted. |
UpdateEventHandler | Defines a function called before an item is updated. |
UpdatedEventHandler | Defines a function called after an item has been updated. |
DeleteEventHandler | Defines a function called before an item is deleted. |
DeletedEventHandler | Defines a function called after an item has been deleted. |
ClearEventHandler | Defines a function called before a resource is cleared. |
ClearedEventHandler | Defines a function called after a resource has been cleared. |
Note that these are resource level hooks, and do not correspond one-to-one to rest
operations. Note that a HTTP request to GET
an item by ID, will result in a Find
and not a Get
call which will triggering the OnFind
and OnFound
hooks to be called, not OnGet
and OnGot
. Similarly, a PATCH
or PUT
request will call Find
before it calls Update
, which will trigger the same hooks. If your hooks logic require knowing which rest-level operation is performed see rest.RouteFromContext
All hooks functions get a context.Context
as first argument. If a network call must be performed from the hook, the context's deadline must be respected. If a hook returns an error, the whole request is aborted with that error. You can also use the context to pass data to your hooks from a middleware executed before REST Layer. This can be used to manage authentication for instance. See examples/auth to see an example.
Hooks that get passed both an an error and/or an item, such as GotEventHandler, UpdatedEventHandler, DeletedEventHandler should insert guards to handle the error being set and/or the item not being set; both can be true in some cases. It's also allowed to set items or errors to nil, which is why double pointers are often used.
func (hook Hook) OnGot(ctx context.Context, item **resource.Item, err *error) {
// Guard.
if *err != nil || *item == nil {
return
}
// ...
}
func (hook Hook) OnGot(ctx context.Context, item **resource.Item, err *error) {
// Overriding an error response.
if *err != nil || *item == nil {
(*err) = nil
(*item) = fallbackItem()
}
// ...
}
Sub resources can be used to express a one-to-may parent-child relationship between two resources. A sub-resource is automatically filtered by its parent on the field specified as second argument of the Bind
method.
To create a sub-resource, you bind you resource on the object returned by the binding of the parent resource. For instance, here we bind a comments
resource to a posts
resource:
posts := index.Bind("posts", post, mem.NewHandler(), resource.DefaultConf)
// Bind comment as sub-resource of the posts resource
posts.Bind("comments", "post", comment, mem.NewHandler(), resource.DefaultConf)
The second argument post
defines the field in the comments
resource that refers to the parent. This field must be present in the resource and the backend storage must support filtering on it. As a result, we get a new hierarchical route as follow:
/posts/:post_id/comments[/:comment_id]
When performing a GET
on /posts/:post_id/comments
, it is like adding the filter {"post":"<post_id>"}
to the request to comments resource.
Additionally, thanks to REST Layer's embedding, this relationship can be embedded in the parent object as a sub-query:
/posts?fields=id,title,comments(limit=5,sort=-updated){id,user{id,name},message}
Here we would get all post with their respective 5 last comments embedded in the comments
field of each post object with the user commenting to post embedded in each comment's sub-document:
[
{
"id": "abc",
"comments": [
{
"id": "def",
"user": {
"id": "ghi",
"name": "John Doe"
},
"message": "Last comment"
}
]
}
]
See embedding for more information.
Fields can depend on other fields in order to be changed. To configure a dependency, set a filter on the Dependency
property of the field using the query.MustParsePredicate() method.
In this example, the body
field can't be changed if the published
field is not set to true
:
post = schema.Schema{
Fields: schema.Fields{
"published": schema.Field{
Validator: &schema.Bool{},
},
"body": {
Dependency: query.MustParsePredicate(`{"published": true}`),
Validator: &schema.String{},
},
},
}
Currently supported values are:
200
or 201
), response body is not returned. For Response Status of 200 OK
, status becomes 204 No Content
. Can be used for e.g PUT
, POST
and PATCH
methods, where returned body will be known by the client.return=minimal
.$ echo '[{"op": "add", "path":"/foo", "value": "bar"}]' | http PATCH :8080/users/ar6ej4mkj5lfl688d8lg If-Match:'"1234567890123456789012345678901234567890"' \
Content-Type: application/json-patch+json \
Prefer: return=minimal
HTTP/1.1 204 No Content
The Content-Type of the request body. Most HTTP methods only support "aplication/json"
by default, but PUT
requests also allow "application/json-patch+json"
.
Following HTTP Methods are currently supported by rest-layer.
Used to tell the client which HTTP Methods are supported for any given path.
The same as GET
, except it includes only headers in the response.
Used to retrieve a (projected[#field-selection]) resource document by specifying it's ID
in the path, or to retrieve a paginated view of documents matching a query.
Used to create new resource document when the ID
can be generated by the server. Field default values are set for omitted fields, and OnCreate
field hooks are issued.
Used to create or update a single resource document by specifying it's ID
in the path. Field default values are set for omitted fields. If the document did not previously exist OnCreate
field hooks are issued, otherwise OnUpdate
field hooks are issued.
If-Match
concurrency protection could be used if relevant.
Used to create or patch a single resource document by specifying it's ID
in the path. OnUpdate
field hooks are issued.
REST Layer supports two PATCH protocols, that can be specified via the Content-Type
header.
Simple filed replacement RFC-5789 - this protocol will update only supplied top level fields, and will leave other fields in the document intact. This means that this protocol can't delete fields. Using this protocol is specified with Content-Type: application/json
HTTP Request header.
JSON-Patch/RFC-6902 - When patching deeply nested documents, it is more convenient to use protocol designed especially for this. Using this protocol is specified with Content-Type: application/json-patch+json
HTTP Request header.
If-Match
concurrency protection could be used if relevant.
Example JSON Patch Request where we utilize concurrency control ask for the response body to be omitted:
$ echo '[{"op": "add", "path":"/foo", "value": "bar"}]' | http PATCH :8080/users/ar6ej4mkj5lfl688d8lg If-Match:'"1234567890123456789012345678901234567890"' \
Content-Type: application/json-patch+json \
Prefer: return=minimal
HTTP/1.1 204 No Content
Used to delete single resource document given its ID
, or multiple documents matching a query.
When supplying query parameters be sure to honor URL encoding scheme. If you need to include +
sign, use %2B
, etc.
To filter resources, you use the filter
query-string parameter. The format of the parameter is inspired by the MongoDB query format. The filter
parameter can be used with GET
and DELETE
methods on resource URLs.
To use a resource field with the filter
parameter, the field must be defined on the resource and the Filterable
field property must be set to true
. You may want to ensure the backend database has this field indexed when enabled.
To specify equality condition, use the query {<field>: <value>}
to select all items with <field>
equal <value>
. REST Layer will complain with a 422
HTTP error if any field queried is not defined in the resource schema or is using an operator incompatible with field type (i.e.: $lt
on a string field).
A query can specify conditions for more than one field. Implicitly, a logical AND
conjunction connects the clauses so that the query selects the items that match all the conditions.
It is also possible to use an explicit $and
operator to join each clause with a logical AND
. There are sometimes good use-cases for this, such as when joining two independent $or
queries that must both match, or when programmatically merging multiple queries with potentially overlapping fields.
{$and: [
{$or: [{quantity: {$gt: 100}}, {price: {$lt: 9.95}}]},
{$or: [{length: {$lt: 1000}}, {width: {$lt: 1000}}
]}
Using the the $or
operator, you can specify a compound query that joins each clause with a logical OR
conjunction so that the query selects the items that match at least one condition.
In the following example, the query document selects all items in the collection where the field quantity
has a value greater than ($gt
) 100
or the value of the price
field is less than ($lt
) 9.95
:
{
$or: [{ quantity: { $gt: 100 } }, { price: { $lt: 9.95 } }];
}
Match on sub-fields is performed through field path separated by dots. This example shows an exact match on the sub-fields country
and city
of the address
sub-document:
{address.country: "France", address.city: "Paris"}
Some operators can change the type of match. For instance $in
can be used to match a field against several values. For instance, to select all items with the type
field equal either food
or snacks
, use the following query:
{
type: {
$in: ["food", "snacks"];
}
}
The opposite $nin
is also available.
The following numeric comparisons operators are supported: $lt
, $lte
, $gt
, $gte
.
The $exists
operator matches documents containing the field, even if this field is null
.
{
type: {
$exists: true;
}
}
You can invert the operator by passing false
.
There is also a $regex
operator that matches documents containing the field given as a regular expression. In general, the syntax of the regular expressions accepted is the same general syntax used by Perl, Python, and other languages.
More precisely, it is the syntax accepted by RE2 and described at https://golang.org/s/re2syntax, except for \C
.
Flags are supported for more control over regular expressions. Flag syntax is xyz (set) or -xyz (clear) or xy-z (set xy, clear z). The flags are:
Flag | Mode | Default |
---|---|---|
i | case-insensitive | false |
m | multi-line mode: ^ and $ match begin/end line in addition to begin/end text | false |
s | let . match \n | false |
U | non-greedy: swap meaning of x* and x*?, x+ and x+?, etc | false |
For example the following regular expression would match any document with a field type
and its value rest-layer
.
{
type: {
$regex: "re[s]{1}t-la.+r";
}
}
The same example with flags:
{
type: {
$regex: "(?i)re[s]{1}t-LAYER";
}
}
However, keep in mind that Storers have to support regular expression and depending on the implementation of the storage handler the accepted syntax may vary.
An error of ErrNotImplemented
will be returned for those storage back-ends which do not support the $regex
operator.
The $elemMatch
operator matches documents that contain an array field with at least one element that matches all the specified query criteria.
"telephones": schema.Field{
Filterable: true,
Validator: &schema.Array{
Values: schema.Field{
Validator: &schema.Object{Schema: &Telephone},
},
},
},
Matching documents that contain specific values within array objects can be done with $elemMatch
:
{telephones: {$elemMatch: {name: "John Snow", active: true}}}
The snippet above will return all documents, which telephones
array field contains objects that have name
AND active
fields matching queried values.
Note that documents returned may contain other objects in
telephones
that don't match the query above, but at least one object will do. Further filtering could be needed on the API client side.
$elemMatch
will work only for arrays of objects for now. Later it could be extended to work on plain arrays e.g:
{
numbers: {
$elemMatch: {
$gt: 20;
}
}
}
Operator | Usage | Description |
---|---|---|
$or | {$or: [{a: "b"}, {a: "c"}]} | Join two clauses with a logical OR conjunction. |
$and | {$and: [{a: "b"}, {b: "c"}]} | Join two clauses with a logical AND conjunction. |
$in | {a: {$in: ["b", "c"]}} | Match a field against several values. |
$nin | {a: {$nin: ["b", "c"]}} | Opposite of $in . |
$lt | {a: {$lt: 10}} | Fields value is lower than specified number. |
$lte | {a: {$lte: 10}} | Fields value is lower than or equal to the specified number. |
$gt | {a: {$gt: 10}} | Fields value is greater than specified number. |
$gte | {a: {$gte: 10}} | Fields value is greater than or equal to the specified number. |
$exists | {a: {$exists: true}} | Match if the field is present (or not if set to false ) in the item, event if nil . |
$regex | {a: {$regex: "fo[o]{1}"}} | Match regular expression on a field's value. |
$elemMatch | {a: {$elemMatch: {b: "foo"}}} | Match array items against multiple query criteria. |
Some storage handlers may not support all operators. Refer to the storage handler's documentation for more info.
Sorting of resource items is defined through the sort
query-string parameter. The sort
value is a list of resource's fields separated by comas (,
). To invert a field's sort, you can prefix its name with a minus (-
) character. The sort
parameter can be used with GET
and DELETE
methods on resource URLs.
To use a resource field with the sort
parameter, the field must be defined on the resource and the Sortable
field property must be set to true
. You may want to ensure the backend database has this field indexed when enabled.
Here we sort the result by ascending quantity and descending create time:
/posts?sort=quantity,-created
REST APIs tend to grow over time. Resources get more and more fields to fulfill the needs for new features. But each time fields are added, all existing API clients automatically get the additional cost. This tend to lead to huge waste of bandwidth and added latency due to the transfer of unnecessary data. As a workaround, the field
parameter can be used to minimize and customize the response body from requests with a GET
, POST
, PUT
or PATCH
method on resource URLs.
REST Layer provides a powerful fields selection (also named projection) system. If you provide the fields
parameter with a list of fields for the resource you are interested in separated by commas, only those fields will be returned in the document:
$ http -b :8080/api/users/ar6eimekj5lfktka9mt0 fields=='id,name'
{
"id": "ar6eimekj5lfktka9mt0",
"name": "John Doe"
}
If your document has sub-fields, you can use brackets to select sub-fields:
$ http -b :8080/api/users/ar6eimekj5lfktka9mt0/posts fields=='meta{title,body}'
[
{
"_etag": "ar6eimukj5lfl07r0uv0",
"meta": {
"title": "test",
"body": "example"
}
}
]
Also all fields
expansion is supported:
$ http -b :8080/api/users/ar6eimekj5lfktka9mt0/posts fields=='*,user{*}'
[
{
"_etag": "ar6eimukj5lfl07r0uv0",
"id": "ar6eimukj5lfl07r0ugz",
"created": "2015-07-27T21:46:55.355857401+02:00",
"updated": "2015-07-27T21:46:55.355857989+02:00",
"user": {
"id": "ar6eimukj5lfl07gzb0b",
"created": "2015-07-24T21:46:55.355857401+02:00",
"updated": "2015-07-24T21:46:55.355857989+02:00",
"name": "John Snow",
},
"meta": {
"title": "test",
"body": "example"
}
}
]
It's also possible to rename fields in the response using aliasing. To create an alias, prefix the field name by the wanted alias separated by a colon (:
):
$ http -b :8080/api/users/ar6eimekj5lfktka9mt0 fields=='id,name,n:name'
{
"id": "ar6eimekj5lfktka9mt0",
"n": "John Doe",
"name": "John Doe"
}
As you see, you can specify the same field several times. It doesn't seem useful in this example, but with fields parameters, it becomes very powerful (see below).
Aliasing works with sub-fields as well:
$ http -b :8080/api/users/ar6eimekj5lfktka9mt0/posts fields=='meta{title,b:body}'
[
{
"_etag": "ar6eimukj5lfl07r0uv0",
"meta": {
"title": "test",
"b": "example"
}
}
]
Field parameters are used to apply a transformation on the value of a field using custom logic.
For instance, if you are using an on demand dynamic image resizer, you may want to expose the capability of this service, without requiring from the client to learn another URL based API. Wouldn't it be better if we could just ask the API to return the thumbnail_url
dynamically transformed with the desired dimensions?
By combining field aliasing and field parameters, we can expose this resizer API as follow:
$ http -b :8080/api/videos fields=='id,
thumb_small_url:thumbnail_url(width:80,height:60),
thumb_large_url:thumbnail_url(width:800,height:600)'
[
{
"_etag": "ar6eimukj5lfl07r0uv0",
"thumb_small_url": "http://cdn.com/path/to/image-80w60h.jpg",
"thumb_large_url": "http://cdn.com/path/to/image-800w600h.jpg"
}
]
The example above show the same field represented twice but with some useful value transformations.
To add parameters on a field, use the Params
property of the schema.Field
type as follow:
schema.Schema{
Fields: schema.Fields{
"field": {
Params: schema.Params{
"width": {
Description: "Change the width of the thumbnail to the value in pixels",
Validator: schema.Integer{}
},
"height": {
Description: "Change the width of the thumbnail to the value in pixels",
Validator: schema.Integer{},
},
},
Handler: func(ctx context.Context, value interface{}, params map[string]interface{}) (interface{}, error) {
// your transformation logic here
return value, nil
},
},
},
}
Only parameters listed in the Params
field will be accepted. You Handler
function is called with the current value of the field and parameters sent by the user if any. Your function can apply wanted transformations on the value and return it. If an error is returned, a 422
error will be triggered with your error message associated to the field.
With sub-fields notation you can also request referenced resources or connections (sub-resources). REST Layer will recognize them automatically and fetch the associated resources in order embed their data in the response. This can save a lot of unnecessary sequential round-trips:
$ http -b :8080/api/users/ar6eimekj5lfktka9mt0/posts \
fields=='meta{title},user{id,name},comments(sort:"-created",limit:10){user{id,name},body}'
[
{
"_etag": "ar6eimukj5lfl07r0uv0",
"meta": {
"title": "test"
},
"user": {
"id": "ar6eimul07lfae7r4b5l",
"name": "John Doe"
},
"comments": [
{
"user": {
"id": "ar6emul0kj5lfae7reimu",
"name": "Paul Wolf"
},
"body": "That's awesome!"
},
...
]
},
...
]
In the above example, the user
field is a reference on the users
resource. REST Layer did fetch the user referenced by the post and embedded the requested sub-fields (id
and name
). Same for comments
: comments
is set as a sub-resource of the posts
resource. With this syntax, it's easy to get the last 10 comments on the post in the same REST request. For each of those comment, we asked to embed the user
field referenced resource with id
and name
fields again.
Notice the sort
and limit
parameters passed to the comments
field. Those are field parameter automatically exposed by connections to let you control the embedded list order, filter and pagination. You can use sort
, filter
, skip
, page
and limit
parameters with those field with the same syntax as their top level query-string parameter counterpart.
Such request can quickly generate a lot of queries on the storage handler. To ensure a fast response time, REST layer tries to coalesce those storage requests and to execute them concurrently whenever possible.
Pagination is supported on collection URLs using the page
and limit
query-string parameters and can be used for resource list view URLs with request method GET
and DELETE
. If you don't define a default pagination limit using PaginationDefaultLimit
resource configuration parameter, the resource won't be paginated for list GET
requests until you provide the limit
query-string parameter. The PaginationDefaultLimit
does not apply to list DELETE
requests, but the limit
and page
parameters may still be used to delete a subset of items.
If your collections are large enough, failing to define a reasonable PaginationDefaultLimit
parameter may quickly render your API unusable.
Skipping of resource items is defined through the skip
query-string parameter. The skip
value is a positive integer defining the number of items to skip when querying for items, and can be applied for requests with method GET
or DELETE
.
Skip the first 10 items of the result:
/posts?skip=10
Return the first 2 items after skipping the first 10 of the result:
/posts?skip=10&limit=2
The skip
parameter can be used in conjunction with the page
parameter. You may want them both when for instance, you show the first N elements of a list and then allow to paginate the remaining items:
Show the first 2 elements:
/posts?limit=2
Paginate the rest of the list:
/posts?skip=2&page=1&limit=10
REST Layer doesn't provide any kind of support for authentication. Identifying the user is out of the scope of a REST API, it should be performed by an OAuth server. The OAuth endpoints could be either hosted on the same code base as your API or live in a different app. The recommended way to integrate OAuth or any other kind of authentication with REST Layer is through a signed token like JWT.
In this schema, the authentication service identifies the user and stores data relevant to the user's identification in a JWT token. This token is sent to the API client as a bearer token, through the access-token
query-string parameter or the Authorization
HTTP header. A http middleware then decodes and verifies this token, extracts user's info from it and stores it into the context. In REST layer, user info is now accessible from your resource hooks so you can change the query lookup or ensure mutated objects are owned by the user in order to handle the authorization part.
See the JWT auth example for more info.
Each stored resource provides information on the last time it was updated (Last-Modified
), along with a hash value computed on the representation itself (ETag
). These headers allow clients to perform conditional requests by using the If-Modified-Since
header:
$ http :8080/users/ar6ej4mkj5lfl688d8lg If-Modified-Since:'Wed, 05 Dec 2012 09:53:07 GMT'
HTTP/1.1 304 Not Modified
or the If-None-Match
header:
$ http :8080/users/ar6ej4mkj5lfl688d8lg If-None-Match:'"1234567890123456789012345678901234567890"'
HTTP/1.1 304 Not Modified
API responses include a ETag
header which also allows for proper concurrency control. An ETag
is a hash value representing the current state of the resource on the server. Clients may choose to ensure they update (PATCH
or PUT
) or delete (DELETE
) a resource in the state they know it by providing the last known ETag
for that resource. This prevents overwriting items with obsolete data.
Consider the following workflow:
$ http PATCH :8080/users/ar6ej4mkj5lfl688d8lg If-Match:'"1234567890123456789012345678901234567890"' \
name='John Doe'
HTTP/1.1 412 Precondition Failed
What went wrong? We provided a If-Match
header with the last known ETag
, but its value did not match the current ETag
of the item currently stored on the server, so we got a 412 Precondition Failed.
When this happens, it's up to the client to decide whether to inform the user of the error and/or re-fetch the latest version of the document to get the latest ETag
before retrying the operation.
$ http PATCH :8080/users/ar6ej4mkj5lfl688d8lg If-Match:'"80b81f314712932a4d4ea75ab0b76a4eea613012"' \
name='John Doe'
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Etag: "7bb7a71b0f66197aa07c4c8fc9564616"
Last-Modified: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 19:36:19 GMT
This time the update operation was accepted and we got a new ETag
for the updated resource.
Concurrency control header If-Match
can be used with all mutation methods on item URLs: PATCH
(update), PUT
(replace) and DELETE
(delete).
Data validation is provided out-of-the-box. Your configuration includes a schema definition for every resource managed by the API. Data sent to the API to be inserted/updated will be validated against the schema, and a resource will only be updated if validation passes. See Field Definition section to know more about how to configure your validators.
$ http :8080/api/users name:=1 foo=bar
HTTP/1.1 422 status code 422
Content-Length: 110
Content-Type: application/json
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 21:56:39 GMT
Vary: Origin
{
"code": 422,
"message": "Document contains error(s)",
"issues": {
"foo": [
"invalid field"
],
"name": [
"not a string"
]
}
}
In the example above, the document did not validate so the request was rejected with description of the errors for each fields.
To allow null
value in addition the field type, you can use schema.AnyOf validator:
"nullable_field": {
Validator: schema.AnyOf{
schema.String{},
schema.Null{},
},
}
It is very easy to add new validators. You just need to implement the schema.FieldValidator:
type FieldValidator interface {
Validate(value interface{}) (interface{}, error)
}
The Validate
method takes the value as argument and must either return the value back with some eventual transformation or an error
if the validation failed.
Your validator may also implement the optional schema.Compiler interface:
type Compiler interface {
Compile() error
}
When a field validator implements this interface, the Compile
method is called at the server initialization. It's a good place to pre-compute some data (i.e.: compile regexp) and verify validator configuration. If validator configuration contains issues, the Compile
method must return an error, so the initialization of the resource will generate a fatal error.
A validator may implement some advanced serialization or transformation of the data to optimize its storage. In order to read this data back and put it in a format suitable for JSON representation, a validator can implement the schema.FieldSerializer interface:
type FieldSerializer interface {
Serialize(value interface{}) (interface{}, error)
}
When a validator implements this interface, the method is called with the field's value just before JSON marshaling. You should return an error if the format stored in the db is invalid and can't be converted back into a suitable representation.
See schema.IP validator for an implementation example.
REST Layer respects context deadline from end to end. Timeout and request cancellation are thus handled through context
. Since Go 1.8, context is cancelled automatically if the user closes the connection.
When a request is stopped because the client closed the connection (context cancelled), the response HTTP status is set to 499 Client Closed Request
(for logging purpose). When a timeout is set and the request has reached this timeout, the response HTTP status is set to 509 Gateway Timeout
.
You can customize REST Layer logger by changing the resource.Logger
function to call any logging framework you want.
We recommend using zerolog. To configure REST Layer with zerolog
, proceed as follow:
// Init an alice handler chain (use your preferred one)
c := alice.New()
// Install a logger
c = c.Append(hlog.NewHandler(log.With().Logger()))
// Log API accesses
c = c.Append(hlog.AccessHandler(func(r *http.Request, status, size int, duration time.Duration) {
hlog.FromRequest(r).Info().
Str("method", r.Method).
Str("url", r.URL.String()).
Int("status", status).
Int("size", size).
Dur("duration", duration).
Msg("")
}))
// Add some fields to per-request logger context
c = c.Append(hlog.RequestHandler("req"))
c = c.Append(hlog.RemoteAddrHandler("ip"))
c = c.Append(hlog.UserAgentHandler("ua"))
c = c.Append(hlog.RefererHandler("ref"))
c = c.Append(hlog.RequestIDHandler("req_id", "Request-Id"))
// Install zerolog/rest-layer adapter
resource.LoggerLevel = resource.LogLevelDebug
resource.Logger = func(ctx context.Context, level resource.LogLevel, msg string, fields map[string]interface{}) {
zerolog.Ctx(ctx).WithLevel(zerolog.Level(level)).Fields(fields).Msg(msg)
}
See zerolog documentation for more info.
REST Layer doesn't support CORS internally but relies on an external middleware to do so. You may use the CORS middleware to add CORS support to REST Layer if needed. Here is a basic example:
package main
import (
"log"
"net/http"
"github.com/rs/cors"
"github.com/clarify/rested/resource"
"github.com/clarify/rested/rest"
)
func main() {
index := resource.NewIndex()
// configure your resources
api, err := rest.NewHandler(index)
if err != nil {
log.Fatalf("Invalid API configuration: %s", err)
}
handler := cors.Default().Handler(api)
log.Fatal(http.ListenAndServe(":8080", handler))
}
In general you don’t really want to add JSONP when you can use CORS instead:
There have been some criticisms raised about JSONP. Cross-origin resource sharing (CORS) is a more recent method of getting data from a server in a different domain, which addresses some of those criticisms. All modern browsers now support CORS making it a viable cross-browser alternative (source.) There are circumstances however when you do need JSONP, like when you have to support legacy software (IE6 anyone?)
As for CORS, REST Layer doesn't support JSONP directly but rely on an external middleware. Such a middleware is very easy to write. Here is an example:
package main
import (
"log"
"net/http"
"github.com/clarify/rested/resource"
"github.com/clarify/rested/rest"
)
func main() {
index := resource.NewIndex()
// configure your resources
api, err := rest.NewHandler(index)
if err != nil {
log.Fatalf("Invalid API configuration: %s", err)
}
handler := http.HandlerFunc(func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
fn := r.URL.Query().Get("callback")
if fn != "" {
w.Header().Set("Content-Type", "application/javascript")
_, _ = w.Write([]byte(";fn("))
}
api.ServeHTTP(w, r)
if fn != "" {
_, _ = w.Write([]byte(");"))
}
})
log.Fatal(http.ListenAndServe(":8080", handler))
}
REST Layer doesn't handle storage of resources directly. A mem.MemoryHandler is provided as an example but should be used for testing only.
A resource storage handler is easy to write though. Some handlers for popular databases are available, but you may want to write your own to put an API in front of anything you want. It is very easy to write a data storage handler, you just need to implement the resource.Storer interface:
type Storer interface {
Find(ctx context.Context, q *query.Query) (*ItemList, error)
Insert(ctx context.Context, items []*Item) error
Update(ctx context.Context, item *Item, original *Item) error
Delete(ctx context.Context, item *Item) error
Clear(ctx context.Context, q *query.Query) (int, error)
}
Mutation methods like Update
and Delete
must ensure they are atomically mutating the same item as specified in argument by checking their ETag
(the stored ETag
must match the ETag
of the provided item). In case the handler can't guarantee that, the storage must be left untouched and a resource.ErrConflict must be returned.
If the operation is not immediate, the method must listen for cancellation on the passed ctx
. If the operation is stopped due to context cancellation, the function must return the result of the ctx.Err() method. See this blog post for more information about how context
works.
If the backend storage is able to efficiently fetch multiple document by their id, it can implement the optional resource.MultiGetter interface. REST Layer will automatically use it whenever possible.
See resource.Storer documentation for more information on resource storage handler implementation details.
REST Layer lets you extend or replace the default response formatter and sender. To write a new response format, you need to implement the rest.ResponseFormatter interface:
// ResponseFormatter defines an interface responsible for formatting a the different types of response objects
type ResponseFormatter interface {
// FormatItem formats a single item in a format ready to be serialized by the ResponseSender
FormatItem(ctx context.Context, headers http.Header, i *resource.Item, skipBody bool) (context.Context, interface{})
// FormatList formats a list of items in a format ready to be serialized by the ResponseSender
FormatList(ctx context.Context, headers http.Header, l *resource.ItemList, skipBody bool) (context.Context, interface{})
// FormatError formats a REST formated error or a simple error in a format ready to be serialized by the ResponseSender
FormatError(ctx context.Context, headers http.Header, err error, skipBody bool) (context.Context, interface{})
}
You can also customize the response sender responsible for the serialization of the formatted payload:
// ResponseSender defines an interface responsible for serializing and sending the response
// to the http.ResponseWriter.
type ResponseSender interface {
// Send serialize the body, sets the given headers and write everything to the provided response writer
Send(ctx context.Context, w http.ResponseWriter, status int, headers http.Header, body interface{})
}
Then set your response formatter and sender on the REST Layer HTTP handler like this:
api, _ := rest.NewHandler(index)
api.ResponseFormatter = &myResponseFormatter{}
api.ResponseSender = &myResponseSender{}
You may also extend the DefaultResponseFormatter and/or DefaultResponseSender if you just want to wrap or slightly modify the default behavior:
type myResponseFormatter struct {
rest.DefaultResponseFormatter
}
// Add a wrapper around the list with pagination info
func (r myResponseFormatter) FormatList(ctx context.Context, headers http.Header, l *resource.ItemList, skipBody bool) (context.Context, interface{}) {
ctx, data := r.DefaultResponseFormatter.FormatList(ctx, headers, l, skipBody)
return ctx, map[string]interface{}{
"meta": map[string]int{
"offset": l.Offset,
"total": l.Total,
},
"list": data,
}
}
It is possible to convert a schema to JSON Schema with some limitations for certain schema fields. Currently, we implement JSON Schema Draft 4 core and validation specifications. In addition, we have implemented "readOnly" from the less commonly used hyper-schema specification.
Example usage:
import "github.com/clarify/rested/schema/encoding/jsonschema"
b := new(bytes.Buffer)
enc := jsonschema.NewEncoder(b)
if err := enc.Encode(aSchema); err != nil {
return err
}
fmt.Println(b.String()) // Valid JSON Document describing the schema.
For a custom FieldValidator
to support encoding to JSON Schema, it must implement the jsonschema.Builder
interface:
// The Builder interface should be implemented by custom schema.FieldValidator implementations to allow JSON Schema
// serialization.
type Builder interface {
// BuildJSONSchema should return a map containing JSON Schema Draft 4 properties that can be set based on
// FieldValidator data. Application specific properties can be added as well, but should not conflict with any
// legal JSON Schema keys.
BuildJSONSchema() (map[string]interface{}, error)
}
To easier extend a FieldValidator
from the schema
package, you can call ValidatorBuilder
inside BuildJSONSchema()
:
type Email struct {
schema.String
}
func (e Email) BuildJSONSchema() (map[string]interface{}, error) {
parentBuilder, _ = jsonschema.ValidatorBuilder(e.String)
m, err := parentBuilder.BuildJSONSchema()
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
m["format"] = "email"
return m, nil
}
Sub-schemas only get converted to JSON Schema, if you specify a sub-schema via setting a Field's Validator
attribute to a schema.Object
instance. Use of the Field's Schema
field is not supported.
schema.Dict
only supports nil
and schema.String
as KeysValidator
values. Note that some less common combinations of schema.String
attributes will lead to usage of an allOf
construct with duplicated schemas for values. This is to avoid usage of regular expression expansions that only a subset of implementations actually support.
The limitation in KeysValidator
values arise because JSON Schema draft 4 (and draft 5) support for key validation is limited to properties, patternProperties and additionalProperties. This essentially means that there can be no JSON Schema object supplied for key validation, but that we need to rely on exact match (properties), regular expressions (patternProperties) or no key validation (additionalProperties).
The support for schema.Reference
is purely provisional and simply returns an empty object {}
, meaning it does not give any hint as to which validation the server might use.
With a potential later implantation of the OpenAPI Specification (a.k.a. the Swagger 2.0 Specification), the goal is to refer to the ID field of the linked resource via an object {"$ref": "#/definitions/<unique schema title>/id"}
. This is tracked via issue #36.
The current serialization of schema.URL
always returns a schema {"type": "string", "format": "uri"}
, ignoring any struct attributes that affect the actual validation within rest-layer. The JSON Schema is thus not completely accurate for this validator.
Note that JSON Schema draft 5 adds uriref, which could allow us to at least document whether AllowRelative
is true
or false
. JSON Schema also allow application specific additional formats to be defined, but it's not practical to create a custom format for any possible struct attribute combination.
All source code is licensed under the MIT License.
FAQs
Unknown package
Did you know?
Socket for GitHub automatically highlights issues in each pull request and monitors the health of all your open source dependencies. Discover the contents of your packages and block harmful activity before you install or update your dependencies.
Security News
GitHub removed 27 malicious pull requests attempting to inject harmful code across multiple open source repositories, in another round of low-effort attacks.
Security News
RubyGems.org has added a new "maintainer" role that allows for publishing new versions of gems. This new permission type is aimed at improving security for gem owners and the service overall.
Security News
Node.js will be enforcing stricter semver-major PR policies a month before major releases to enhance stability and ensure reliable release candidates.