@6river/reason-guard - npm Package Compare versions

Comparing version 5.0.0 to 5.0.1-node.1

dist/src/Checker.js

@@ -15,3 +15,3 @@ "use strict";
             if (typeof result === 'string') {
-                confirmations?.push(result);
+                confirmations === null || confirmations === void 0 ? void 0 : confirmations.push(result);
                 return true;
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ }
         if (result instanceof ContextError_1.CompositeError) {
-            errors?.push(...result.errors);
+            errors === null || errors === void 0 ? void 0 : errors.push(...result.errors);
         }
         else {
             // can't get here if we got a positive confirmation
-            errors?.push(result);
+            errors === null || errors === void 0 ? void 0 : errors.push(result);
         }
@@ -40,3 +40,3 @@ return false;
             if (typeof result === 'string') {
-                errors?.push((0, ReasonGuard_1.errorLike)(`negation of: ${result}`));
+                errors === null || errors === void 0 ? void 0 : errors.push((0, ReasonGuard_1.errorLike)(`negation of: ${result}`));
                 return false;
@@ -49,3 +49,3 @@ }
         // can't get here if we got a positive inner confirmation
-        confirmations?.push(result.message);
+        confirmations === null || confirmations === void 0 ? void 0 : confirmations.push(result.message);
         return true;
@@ -52,0 +52,0 @@ };

dist/src/Combinators/notGuard.js

@@ -23,3 +23,3 @@ "use strict";
                 if (innerConfirmations) {
-                    errors?.push((0, ReasonGuard_1.errorLike)(innerConfirmations[innerConfirmations.length - 1]));
+                    errors === null || errors === void 0 ? void 0 : errors.push((0, ReasonGuard_1.errorLike)(innerConfirmations[innerConfirmations.length - 1]));
                 }
@@ -30,3 +30,3 @@ return false;
                 if (innerErrors) {
-                    confirmations?.push(innerErrors[0].message);
+                    confirmations === null || confirmations === void 0 ? void 0 : confirmations.push(innerErrors[0].message);
                 }
@@ -37,3 +37,3 @@ return true;
         catch (err) {
-            errors?.push(err);
+            errors === null || errors === void 0 ? void 0 : errors.push(err);
             return false;
@@ -40,0 +40,0 @@ }

dist/src/Combinators/orGuard.js

@@ -16,3 +16,3 @@ "use strict";
             if (left(input, innerErrors, innerConfirmations)) {
-                confirmations?.push(...innerConfirmations);
+                confirmations === null || confirmations === void 0 ? void 0 : confirmations.push(...innerConfirmations);
                 return true;
@@ -23,10 +23,10 @@ }
             if (right(input, innerErrors, innerConfirmations)) {
-                confirmations?.push(...innerConfirmations);
+                confirmations === null || confirmations === void 0 ? void 0 : confirmations.push(...innerConfirmations);
                 return true;
             }
-            errors?.push((0, ReasonGuard_1.errorLike)(`${innerErrors[0].message}, and ${innerErrors[1].message}`));
+            errors === null || errors === void 0 ? void 0 : errors.push((0, ReasonGuard_1.errorLike)(`${innerErrors[0].message}, and ${innerErrors[1].message}`));
             return false;
         }
         catch (err) {
-            errors?.push(err);
+            errors === null || errors === void 0 ? void 0 : errors.push(err);
             return false;
@@ -33,0 +33,0 @@ }

dist/src/constantGuards.js

@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ "use strict";
 const unnegatableTrueGuard = (input, errors, confirmations) => {
-    confirmations?.push('true');
+    confirmations === null || confirmations === void 0 ? void 0 : confirmations.push('true');
     return true;
 };
 const unnegatableFalseGuard = (input, errors) => {
-    errors?.push((0, ReasonGuard_1.errorLike)('false'));
+    errors === null || errors === void 0 ? void 0 : errors.push((0, ReasonGuard_1.errorLike)('false'));
     return false;
@@ -20,0 +20,0 @@ };

dist/src/objectGuards.js

@@ -31,3 +31,3 @@ "use strict";
     if (!anyPassed && !anyFailed) {
-        output?.push((0, ReasonGuard_1.errorLike)('definition had no guards'));
+        output === null || output === void 0 ? void 0 : output.push((0, ReasonGuard_1.errorLike)('definition had no guards'));
         return false;
@@ -34,0 +34,0 @@ }

dist/src/restrictingGuards.js

@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ "use strict";
             if (values.has(input)) {
-                confirmations?.push(`is ${String(input)}`);
+                confirmations === null || confirmations === void 0 ? void 0 : confirmations.push(`is ${String(input)}`);
                 return true;
             }
             else {
-                errors?.push((0, ReasonGuard_1.errorLike)(`not in ${keys}`));
+                errors === null || errors === void 0 ? void 0 : errors.push((0, ReasonGuard_1.errorLike)(`not in ${keys}`));
                 return false;
@@ -136,3 +136,3 @@ }
         catch (err) {
-            errors?.push(err);
+            errors === null || errors === void 0 ? void 0 : errors.push(err);
             return false;
@@ -139,0 +139,0 @@ }

dist/test/benchGuards.js

@@ -34,6 +34,11 @@ "use strict";
     console.log(negativeResults, 'negative results');
+    let offset = 50;
+    if (process.env.CI) {
+        // CI runners are slow
+        offset += 50;
+    }
     for (const mode of Object.keys(negativeResults)) {
         chai_1.assert.isAtMost(negativeResults[mode].nsPerCall, 
         // negative results should be no more than 50ns+50% slower than positives
-        positiveResults[mode].nsPerCall * 1.5 + 50, `negative result for ${mode} should be within 50%+50ns of positive result ${positiveResults[mode].nsPerCall}`);
+        positiveResults[mode].nsPerCall * 1.5 + offset, `negative result for ${mode} should be within 50%+${offset}ns of positive result ${positiveResults[mode].nsPerCall}`);
     }
@@ -80,4 +85,4 @@ }
         // new ones
-        errors?.splice(0);
-        confirmations?.splice(0);
+        errors === null || errors === void 0 ? void 0 : errors.splice(0);
+        confirmations === null || confirmations === void 0 ? void 0 : confirmations.splice(0);
         guard(values[i], errors, confirmations);
@@ -84,0 +89,0 @@ }

package.json

@@ -35,3 +35,3 @@ {
   "engines": {
-    "node": "\u003e= 14.17.6"
+    "node": "\u003e= 12.0.0"
   },
@@ -69,3 +69,3 @@ "husky": {
   },
-  "version": "5.0.0"
+  "version": "5.0.1-node.1"
 }

New alerts

Environment variable access

Supply chain risk

Package accesses environment variables, which may be a sign of credential stuffing or data theft.

Found 1 instance in 1 package

No v1

Quality

Package is not semver >=1. This means it is not stable and does not support ^ ranges.

Found 1 instance in 1 package

Improved metrics

Total package byte prevSize

244021

increased by0.27%

Lines of code

3042

increased by0.16%

Worsened metrics

Number of low quality alerts

2

increased by100%

Number of low supply chain risk alerts

2

increased by100%

No dependency changes