Racine
“A single word often betrays a great design.”
— Jean Racine
Racine is a component library consisting of documented, reusable components built for consumption in Sprout Social’s web products. The design principals of this library are based off Sprout Social’s Design System SEEDS and the components are expressed as React components which encapsulate logic, styling, example usage and documentation.
Racine Setup
To get started running Racine locally, make sure you have Node.js, NPM and Yarn installed and then clone or download this GitHub repo, navigate in terminal to the project's folder and run the following commands:
$ yarn install
$ yarn start
Contributing to Racine
Contributions to Racine are welcome from any part of the team, whether updating component presets, documentation or adding a new component to the library. If you are interested in getting involved, feel free to submit a Pull Request, create a ticket on the Design Systems Jira Board, or join us at the Component Library Guild meeting.
Contents
New Components
A good Racine component should…
...have an easily statable, specific purpose.
✓ | ⚠ |
---|
A component should be able to be described in a maximum of 1-3 sentences | Don’t make components so specific or vague that they can’t be reused or are easy to confuse with other components |
...attempt to solve a single concern.
⚠ |
---|
If a component requires constant tweaks or one off changes, it is probably doing too much or needs further refinement or to be split into multiple components |
...have well documented props and a verbose description.
⚠ |
---|
Avoid scenarios like declaring, “this is a theme prop”, explain what exactly is being themed and how that theme was derived |
...incorporate its own error and default states.
⚠ |
---|
The end-to-end experience should be considered as a part of the component’s creation, not as an afterthought |
...contain tests and QA attributes when appropriate.
✓ | ⚠ |
---|
Contributors should leverage available testing tools like Jest as needed and work with QA to determine if specific attributes are needed for testing | If modifying the component has the potential to ruin your team members’ or our customers day, it probably needs to be tested |
…be context agnostic.
✓ | ⚠ |
---|
Should be able to work in any of Sprout’s products | Avoiding defining any layout, sizes, color or spacing assumptions that may hinder reusability |
…be tested in all relevant supported browsers and platforms.
✓ |
---|
If there are technology limitations then the component should gracefully degrade or contain a polyfill |
Users should be able to use the component for its stated purpose in all supported browsers and platforms unless otherwise noted |
…have at least one functional preset defined.
✓ |
---|
The more context available, the easier it is to convey the component’s purpose |
Components should use as many presets as is needed to demonstrate its intended uses |
…define its own styles.
⚠ |
---|
Don’t override or style other components or DOM elements outside of the scope of the component |
…be able to be easily categorized.
✓ | ⚠ |
---|
“Atomically” as well as in other taxonomies available in the Component library | If a component cannot easily be categorized, it might be too complex or have a purpose that is not well defined |
Questions to ask when creating a component
Let's go from idea to delivery. In this example, we will create a new component called KurtRussell
.
Does this need to be in Racine?
In order to ensure the longevity of Racine, the components that are added need to be reusable and of high quality. Ask yourself, does KurtRussell
need to be in Racine? Will other teams benefit from this pattern? Does it deliver a need no other component delivers? Is there more value in creating a new component, or should an existing component be extended? For example, if Racine already has PatrickSwayze
, would we be better served with a HollywoodActor
component that covers both?
If you are having trouble answering these questions, then talk about it:
- Component Library Guild meeting is the best place to discuss the benefits of a particular component
- For quicker questions, use the #design-systems or #eng_web channels in Slack
What category does this belong to?
After discussion, it's agreed that, yes, KurtRussell
belongs in Racine. Of course, naming things is hard. If KurtRussell
doesn't fit in any of our existing categories, discuss with the Design developer and or Front-End engineers on your team, add it to the agenda of the Component Library Guild meeting at or reach out in the #design-systems #eng_web Slack channels to get advice.
What should I name the component?
Are you making a Patrick Swayze Card? Then here's how you should name the component.
- Does this component utilize an existing
Card
pattern? Your component should be CardPatrickSwayze
. - Is this component a new kind of card altogether? Your component should be
PatrickSwayzeCard
.
Scaffolding Your Component
To build a new Racine component, simply use the command:
$ yarn new
This command will walk you through naming, categorizing and tagging your new component.
One complete, the scaffolding tool will generate three files for your new component:
index.js
: The component JavaScript and JSX goes hereindex.test.js
: Jest tests for the componentpresets.js
: Presets and example use cases for the componentdata.js
: Component Metadata like categories, tags and accessibility status_styles.scss
: Component styles. Note: global variables and Sass mixins are automatically imported, so there's no need to @import
them in these files.
Documenting Your Component
Documentation should be written inline in KurtRussell.js
, following the existing boilerplate comments the file after running yarn new
. The documentation is extracted with react-docgen
.
Prop names should, along with their Flow types, be self-documenting. Props should be documented if they would not be clear to other developers who are not familiar with the component. Certain basic universal props like onClick
and isHidden
probably don't need a thorough documentation but you should strive to add as much context as needed.
presets.js
should contain, at a minimum, the common use cases for this component. They are included in this file as Javascript objects in an exported array.
Soliciting Feedback
As the author of a global component, you are accountable for soliciting feedback from fellow designers and developers on your team as well other teams who might be affected. If you would like to start a discussion about the component, the #design-systems and #eng-web channels on Slack are a great place to start.
Working with Code
Committing Changes
We use standard-version to automatically update the changelog and decide new version numbers. As such, we need commit messages to follow a consistent format (drawn from conventional commits).
Example commit messages (simply match this pattern and your commit message will be accepted):
git commit -m "feat: add Alert component"
git commit -m "fix(Alert): display the correct icon when type is \"danger\"" -m "fixes RD-999"
git commit -m "feat(Alert): remove \"danger\" Alert type" -m "BREAKING CHANGE: removes one option for \"type\" prop"
git commit -m "feat(icons): add reporting range icon"
git commit -m "docs: update accessibility statuses"
git commit -m "feat(dependencies): upgrade classnames to 2.2.5"
git commit -m "chore(dependencies): upgrade babel dependencies to latest version"
(chore because they are devDependencies)git commit -m "feat(build): add dist/iconList.js to package output"
Commit message format:
type(scope?): subject
body?
footer?
type
is one of the following:
- fix: Solves a bug
- feat: Adds a new feature
- build: Affects the build system or external dependencies
- docs: Adds or alters documentation or the Racine app
- perf: Improves performance
- test: Adds or modifies tests
- chore: Other changes that don't modify src or test files
scope
is optional but, with few exceptions, should be used for all feat
and fix
commits. Common scopes include:
- [ComponentName]: Changes to a Racine component
- icons: Changes to the SVG icon files
- dependencies: Changes to
dependencies
should be feat
, and devDependencies
should be chore
- build: Changes to the build that make significant changes to the published package, should be a
feat
or fix
Feel free to suggest additional scope options
subject
requirements:
- starts with lower case
- uses the imperative, present tense: "change" not "changed" nor "changes"
- includes motivation for the change and contrasts with previous behavior
body
is optional and allows for more details to be added
footer
contains meta-information about pull requests, e.g. "fixes RD-999", referring to a Jira ticket
Submitting PRs to Racine
Before submitting a PR to Racine, please review the Racine Git Worflow Chart for an overview of the process.
- Create a new branch
$ git checkout -b my-branch-name
-
Make your changes
-
Test your changes
$ yarn test
- Commit your changes, following the commit message guidelines above
$ git add -A
$ git commit -m "MESSAGE"
- Push your change
$ git push origin my-branch-name
-
Open a PR (you should see the option to open a PR at the top of the Racine Github page)
-
Once your PR is tested, approved and passes the automated validation tasks, you can "Squash and Merge" it (this will be the only merge option available). Please double check that the squashed commit message still follows our commit guidelines.
Congrats, thanks for contributing!
Releasing
Only those with admin privileges to the Racine repo can publish new versions of the package. Contact one of the following about releasing a new version:
- Ben Lister
- Ben Rothman
- Chase McCoy
- Doug Garofalo
- Kevin Bertram
- Shane Brunson
- Westin Wrzesinski
Admins: The release script will automatically pick a new package version based on the commits since the last release. For information about explicitly setting the new version, pre-releases, and other concepts see the standard-version docs.
$ git checkout master
$ git pull origin master
$ yarn release
Consuming a Racine Component
Consuming a Racine component can be done in a number of ways, depending on it's stage of development.
Testing local Racine changes in another project
Test any local package in another project by utilizing yarn link. Below is an example workflow to link Racine to web-app-core
.
-
Navigate to your local copy of Racine in a terminal window
$ cd ~/YourCodeFolder/racine
$ yarn link
$ yarn start
Note: This build task packages all Racine components into the bundle, not just the specific components you are adding or modifying. After yarn link
succeeds and Racine is globally linked, you shouldn't have to run link again.
-
Navigate to the folder you wish to use Racine components in your terminal (such as web-app-core
) and complete the link
$ cd ~/YourCodeFolder/web-app-core
$ yarn link "@sproutsocial/racine"
$ yarn start
-
You can now use any components from your local instance of Racine in your project. See below for an example usage
import {Icon} from '@sproutsocial/racine';
<Icon name='compose' />
-
When you are done, be sure to unlink Racine so you are using the app's version of the package
$ yarn unlink "@sproutsocial/racine"
A Video walkthrough of this process can be found here.
Consuming a published Racine component in your project
To consume a Racine component that has been merged and published, do the following:
-
Check your project's package.json
to make sure you are importing the latest version of Racine. If you need to update the Racine version. If an update is needed, you can either run yarn upgrade @sproutsocial/racine
or manually update the version number in your project’s package.json
.
-
Import and use the component as desired
import {Icon} from '@sproutsocial/racine';
<Icon name='compose' />