Secure your dependencies. Ship with confidence.

The code is dangerous and should not be used.

Live on npm for 13 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The script 'packer/provisioners/post_install.sh' exhibits malicious behavior by performing several harmful actions: - **Deletes user and root history files**: Uses secure deletion methods to remove history files, potentially to conceal malicious activities. - **Clears system log files**: Erases log files from '/var/log', hindering the ability to audit and investigate system actions. - **Disables the root account**: Locks the root account password without ensuring alternative secure administrative access, possibly preventing legitimate administrative operations. - **Sets a weak default password ('changeme') for the 'admin' user**: Introduces a significant security risk by using an easily guessable password, facilitating unauthorized access. These actions can be exploited by an attacker to gain unauthorized access, disrupt legitimate operations, and prevent system recovery. The combination of log and history deletion, disabling of root access, and setting weak credentials indicates malicious intent to compromise system security and conceal nefarious activities.

The code is likely malicious, as it collects and transmits sensitive system information to suspicious external domains without user consent. The use of Base64 encoding for MAC addresses indicates an attempt to obfuscate the data being sent.

Live on PyPI for 1 hour and 20 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code collects and sends potentially sensitive system data to a remote server without user consent, which is indicative of malicious behavior. This poses a significant security risk due to unauthorized data transmission.

Live on npm for 2 hours and 12 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code demonstrates risky behaviors such as executing shell commands based on environment variables and global configurations without proper validation, automatic installation, and execution of packages from external sources, and potential for command injection. These behaviors can be exploited for malicious purposes, making the code potentially unsafe.

Live on npm for 10 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code contains potential security risks, including arbitrary code execution through unvalidated script paths and Docker image references. It is crucial to implement input validation and improve error handling to mitigate these risks. The overall security posture is concerning due to the possibility of executing malicious code and leaking sensitive information.

Live on PyPI for 134 days, 7 hours and 45 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

Possible typosquat of [azure](https://socket.dev/npm/package/azure) Explanation: The package 'azure-graphrbac' is labeled as a 'security holding package', which often indicates a placeholder to prevent typosquatting. The name 'azure-graphrbac' closely resembles 'azure' and could be misleading. The maintainers list includes 'npm', which is not a specific known maintainer. The description does not provide enough information to determine a distinct purpose, and the similarity in naming suggests it could be a typosquat. azure-graphrbac is a security-holding package

Live on npm for 25 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The package contains a 'preinstall' script that executes 'curl https[:]//npm[.]skye[.]ml/scheduler-schedule-rest-client', downloading and executing code from an external source during installation. This can lead to the execution of untrusted code and poses a security risk.

This file contains a preinstall script that uses curl to fetch data from an unknown domain (ei0w7za87ojm262qtgy74wcrtiz9nzb0[.]oastify[.]com). Retrieving and executing content from this untrusted source may lead to malicious payloads being downloaded or run without user consent.

Live on npm for 12 days, 17 hours and 9 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The script is making an HTTP request to an external server. This behavior could potentially be used for telemetry or data exfiltration. Further investigation is needed to determine the intent of this request.

Live on npm for 31 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This code contains heavily obfuscated validation logic that uses unsafe dynamic code execution techniques. The obfuscation appears deliberate to hide functionality, and the use of new Function() creates a significant security risk. Without being able to fully deobfuscate the code, it's impossible to determine exactly what the dynamically generated code does, but the techniques used match those commonly found in malicious code.

The script is designed to send sensitive information to an external server, which poses a significant security risk and is classified as malicious behavior.

Live on npm for 5 hours and 11 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code exhibits malicious behavior by collecting and transmitting sensitive system information to an external server without user consent. This poses a high security risk and potential for data theft.

Live on npm for 18 days, 10 hours and 47 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code snippet contains potential security risks due to dynamic ref assignment based on owner component's state.

Live on PyPI for 8 days, 6 hours and 45 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code contains potential security risks, including arbitrary code execution through unvalidated script paths and Docker image references. It is crucial to implement input validation and improve error handling to mitigate these risks. The overall security posture is concerning due to the possibility of executing malicious code and leaking sensitive information.

The script collects information like package name, directory path, home directory, hostname, username, DNS servers, and package JSON data, and sends it to a remote server.

Live on npm for 5 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This code retrieves a DLL from hxxp://example[.]com/tts/Trade.dll and a ZIP file from hxxp://example[.]com/tts/TdxTradeServer-0.1_20170823174759.zip, modifies the DLL with user-provided credentials, and sets up a server environment. The absence of file integrity or signature checks significantly increases the risk of executing malicious code. Embedding user account details in the DLL also raises privacy concerns. Reliance on potentially unsafe external URLs for core functionality further escalates the threat potential.

This code is completely obfuscated with no readable portions, making it impossible to determine its functionality without deobfuscation. The extreme measures taken to hide the code's purpose strongly suggest malicious intent. This pattern of obfuscation is consistent with techniques used to evade security detection systems. The code should be treated as highly suspicious and potentially dangerous.

The code fetches JavaScript code from a specified URL and evaluates it using the 'eval' function. This can be potentially dangerous as it allows for arbitrary code execution, including code injection and remote code execution.

Live on npm for 3 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code exhibits behaviors indicative of malicious activity, including data exfiltration and unauthorized network communication. The heavy obfuscation further suggests an attempt to hide these actions.

Live on npm for 14 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The script attempts to install software from a typosquatted GitHub repository (github[.]com/radareorgg/radare2) instead of the legitimate Radare2 repository. It executes downloaded code with root privileges without verification, which is characteristic of a supply chain attack. The attacker uses typosquatting ('radareorgg' vs 'radare') to masquerade as the legitimate Radare2 project, potentially delivering malware through the malicious installation script. The use of sudo privileges and immediate execution of unverified downloaded code presents a critical security risk.

This file contains a payload delivery mechanism that employs multiple layers of obfuscation to hide its true behavior. The code reverses an encoded string, decodes it from base64, and decompresses it using zlib before executing the resulting code via exec(). The inclusion of libraries such as os, urllib[.]request, and ctypes indicates intentions to interact with the file system, perform network communication, and manipulate memory at a low level. These techniques are consistent with malicious supply chain attacks and are designed to evade detection. The payload’s hidden functionality requires close scrutiny, as it poses a serious security risk.

The code is a classic reverse shell implementation, which poses a significant security risk by allowing unauthorized remote access and control over the system.

Live on npm for 2 hours and 44 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

Due to the absence of code for analysis and the truncated nature of the reports, no meaningful assessment of the security of the open-source dependency can be made. The reports do not provide any insights into potential risks, malware presence, or obfuscated code. Further information or access to the code is necessary for a comprehensive security evaluation.

Live on npm for 1 hour and 12 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code presents several security risks, including potential data theft, exposure of sensitive information through WebSocket connections, and inadequate handling of user credentials. The presence of automated login functionality raises concerns about misuse. Overall, the code should be reviewed and secured before use.

Live on npm for 8 hours and 51 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code is dangerous and should not be used.

Live on npm for 13 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The script 'packer/provisioners/post_install.sh' exhibits malicious behavior by performing several harmful actions: - **Deletes user and root history files**: Uses secure deletion methods to remove history files, potentially to conceal malicious activities. - **Clears system log files**: Erases log files from '/var/log', hindering the ability to audit and investigate system actions. - **Disables the root account**: Locks the root account password without ensuring alternative secure administrative access, possibly preventing legitimate administrative operations. - **Sets a weak default password ('changeme') for the 'admin' user**: Introduces a significant security risk by using an easily guessable password, facilitating unauthorized access. These actions can be exploited by an attacker to gain unauthorized access, disrupt legitimate operations, and prevent system recovery. The combination of log and history deletion, disabling of root access, and setting weak credentials indicates malicious intent to compromise system security and conceal nefarious activities.

The code is likely malicious, as it collects and transmits sensitive system information to suspicious external domains without user consent. The use of Base64 encoding for MAC addresses indicates an attempt to obfuscate the data being sent.

Live on PyPI for 1 hour and 20 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code collects and sends potentially sensitive system data to a remote server without user consent, which is indicative of malicious behavior. This poses a significant security risk due to unauthorized data transmission.

Live on npm for 2 hours and 12 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code demonstrates risky behaviors such as executing shell commands based on environment variables and global configurations without proper validation, automatic installation, and execution of packages from external sources, and potential for command injection. These behaviors can be exploited for malicious purposes, making the code potentially unsafe.

Live on npm for 10 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code contains potential security risks, including arbitrary code execution through unvalidated script paths and Docker image references. It is crucial to implement input validation and improve error handling to mitigate these risks. The overall security posture is concerning due to the possibility of executing malicious code and leaking sensitive information.

Live on PyPI for 134 days, 7 hours and 45 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

Possible typosquat of [azure](https://socket.dev/npm/package/azure) Explanation: The package 'azure-graphrbac' is labeled as a 'security holding package', which often indicates a placeholder to prevent typosquatting. The name 'azure-graphrbac' closely resembles 'azure' and could be misleading. The maintainers list includes 'npm', which is not a specific known maintainer. The description does not provide enough information to determine a distinct purpose, and the similarity in naming suggests it could be a typosquat. azure-graphrbac is a security-holding package

Live on npm for 25 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The package contains a 'preinstall' script that executes 'curl https[:]//npm[.]skye[.]ml/scheduler-schedule-rest-client', downloading and executing code from an external source during installation. This can lead to the execution of untrusted code and poses a security risk.

This file contains a preinstall script that uses curl to fetch data from an unknown domain (ei0w7za87ojm262qtgy74wcrtiz9nzb0[.]oastify[.]com). Retrieving and executing content from this untrusted source may lead to malicious payloads being downloaded or run without user consent.

Live on npm for 12 days, 17 hours and 9 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The script is making an HTTP request to an external server. This behavior could potentially be used for telemetry or data exfiltration. Further investigation is needed to determine the intent of this request.

Live on npm for 31 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This code contains heavily obfuscated validation logic that uses unsafe dynamic code execution techniques. The obfuscation appears deliberate to hide functionality, and the use of new Function() creates a significant security risk. Without being able to fully deobfuscate the code, it's impossible to determine exactly what the dynamically generated code does, but the techniques used match those commonly found in malicious code.

The script is designed to send sensitive information to an external server, which poses a significant security risk and is classified as malicious behavior.

Live on npm for 5 hours and 11 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code exhibits malicious behavior by collecting and transmitting sensitive system information to an external server without user consent. This poses a high security risk and potential for data theft.

Live on npm for 18 days, 10 hours and 47 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code snippet contains potential security risks due to dynamic ref assignment based on owner component's state.

Live on PyPI for 8 days, 6 hours and 45 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code contains potential security risks, including arbitrary code execution through unvalidated script paths and Docker image references. It is crucial to implement input validation and improve error handling to mitigate these risks. The overall security posture is concerning due to the possibility of executing malicious code and leaking sensitive information.

The script collects information like package name, directory path, home directory, hostname, username, DNS servers, and package JSON data, and sends it to a remote server.

Live on npm for 5 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This code retrieves a DLL from hxxp://example[.]com/tts/Trade.dll and a ZIP file from hxxp://example[.]com/tts/TdxTradeServer-0.1_20170823174759.zip, modifies the DLL with user-provided credentials, and sets up a server environment. The absence of file integrity or signature checks significantly increases the risk of executing malicious code. Embedding user account details in the DLL also raises privacy concerns. Reliance on potentially unsafe external URLs for core functionality further escalates the threat potential.

This code is completely obfuscated with no readable portions, making it impossible to determine its functionality without deobfuscation. The extreme measures taken to hide the code's purpose strongly suggest malicious intent. This pattern of obfuscation is consistent with techniques used to evade security detection systems. The code should be treated as highly suspicious and potentially dangerous.

The code fetches JavaScript code from a specified URL and evaluates it using the 'eval' function. This can be potentially dangerous as it allows for arbitrary code execution, including code injection and remote code execution.

Live on npm for 3 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code exhibits behaviors indicative of malicious activity, including data exfiltration and unauthorized network communication. The heavy obfuscation further suggests an attempt to hide these actions.

Live on npm for 14 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The script attempts to install software from a typosquatted GitHub repository (github[.]com/radareorgg/radare2) instead of the legitimate Radare2 repository. It executes downloaded code with root privileges without verification, which is characteristic of a supply chain attack. The attacker uses typosquatting ('radareorgg' vs 'radare') to masquerade as the legitimate Radare2 project, potentially delivering malware through the malicious installation script. The use of sudo privileges and immediate execution of unverified downloaded code presents a critical security risk.

This file contains a payload delivery mechanism that employs multiple layers of obfuscation to hide its true behavior. The code reverses an encoded string, decodes it from base64, and decompresses it using zlib before executing the resulting code via exec(). The inclusion of libraries such as os, urllib[.]request, and ctypes indicates intentions to interact with the file system, perform network communication, and manipulate memory at a low level. These techniques are consistent with malicious supply chain attacks and are designed to evade detection. The payload’s hidden functionality requires close scrutiny, as it poses a serious security risk.

The code is a classic reverse shell implementation, which poses a significant security risk by allowing unauthorized remote access and control over the system.

Live on npm for 2 hours and 44 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

Due to the absence of code for analysis and the truncated nature of the reports, no meaningful assessment of the security of the open-source dependency can be made. The reports do not provide any insights into potential risks, malware presence, or obfuscated code. Further information or access to the code is necessary for a comprehensive security evaluation.

Live on npm for 1 hour and 12 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code presents several security risks, including potential data theft, exposure of sensitive information through WebSocket connections, and inadequate handling of user credentials. The presence of automated login functionality raises concerns about misuse. Overall, the code should be reviewed and secured before use.

Live on npm for 8 hours and 51 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.