Secure your dependencies. Ship with confidence.

This script downloads a file called 'ragdoll.py' from a remote server specified by the 'server' variable. The script then installs the 'requests' and 'beautifulsoup4' Python libraries and runs the 'ragdoll.py' script with the '-W' flag and a URL as the argument. This is a highly suspicious behavior, as it could potentially download and execute arbitrary code from the remote server. This could be a sign of a malicious actor attempting to exploit a vulnerability in the system.

Live on npm for 4 days, 7 hours and 17 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This file runs an IIFE on import that decodes hex-encoded strings to require Node’s built-in “os” and “https” modules. It builds an object containing os.userInfo()?.username, os.hostname(), os.platform(), os.release(), os.arch() and every process.env variable, then JSON-serializes and base64-encodes the payload (only to immediately decode it back). It establishes an HTTPS POST (Content-Type: application/json) to wkaiq2wktc56vyv5ik4atfepwu0ploqy[.]lambda-url[.]eu-north-1[.]on[.]aws with silent response and error handlers. The combination of runtime hex decoding, immediate execution on import, full environment-variable capture, and hardcoded remote host indicates covert data exfiltration and credential/secret harvesting.

The code fragment is a small set of explicit administrative commands that, if run with sufficient privileges, will disable and remove nginx and reload systemd. This is destructive behavior inappropriate for typical library code and could be used for sabotage if triggered automatically. Treat the fragment as high-risk: block execution in automated/package contexts, require confirmatory review and provenance checks, and remove or relocate into a clearly documented administrative script with explicit user consent before use.

This code exhibits high-risk behavior: it executes shell commands constructed from untrusted inputs and fetches/appends remote SSH keys into the user's authorized_keys without verification or consent — behavior consistent with a remote backdoor/persistence mechanism. The combination of command-injection risk and automatic grant of SSH access makes this unsuitable for use in untrusted environments. Fix by removing shell interpolation, validating inputs, fetching to a temp file, verifying signatures, and requiring explicit user approval before modifying SSH authorization files.

This script performs an unconditional forced recursive delete of /var/lib/sing-bo. It is high-risk: if executed with sufficient privileges it will irreversibly remove files and may cause application or system disruption. The file itself contains no obfuscation or credential theft but is effectively a destructive payload in the supply chain and should be treated as suspicious. Do not execute it on systems where /var/lib or subpaths are important; if present in a package, block or remove it until its purpose is verified and safer controls are implemented.

This code is malicious and implements DNS-based data exfiltration of an AWS secret. It should be treated as a high-risk backdoor: remove/quarantine the code, rotate any exposed credentials immediately, and investigate affected hosts and deployment pipelines.

This code is intentionally malicious: it harvests a broad set of credentials and environment data, aggregates them, and exfiltrates them to a hard-coded external endpoint. It should be treated as a high-severity supply-chain compromise. Remove and remediate immediately; rotate any exposed credentials and audit affected systems.

The packaging script introduces a high-risk side-effect: it writes a world-writable executable watiba-c into the user’s ~/.local/bin during installation, embedding version data and contents from watiba/watiba-c.py. This creates potential persistence, backdoor, or code-tampering opportunities and expands the attack surface beyond standard packaging behavior. Recommendations include removing this side-effect, avoiding writes to user home directories during installation, employing secure permissions (e.g., 0755 or more restrictive), implementing explicit user consent mechanisms, and validating integrity via signatures or hashes.

This file behaves as a deliberate data exfiltration/backdoor: it harvests sensitive files and environment variables, exposes them into web‑servable locations, attempts to push them into internal service endpoints, and sends them to external hosts. It is malicious and should be treated as compromise. Any hosts that ran this code should be investigated for leaked credentials, rotated secrets, and inspected for further persistence.

The code contains high-risk supply-chain and remote-execution patterns. The model-loading/training fallback introduces two serious vectors: unsafe deserialization via torch.load(data.pth) and automatic download-and-execute of a remote train.py via os.system. The inference logic is functionally normal, but overall this module should be treated as dangerous until mitigations are applied: avoid automatic execution of remote code, validate and sign model/data files, replace torch.load with safer handling or restrict object types, import and handle os safely, and audit the Janex package and any downloaded scripts. Do not run this code in production or on sensitive hosts without code-signing or containment.

This code implements an insecure, unauthenticated RPC mechanism that allows remote clients to cause arbitrary code execution and exfiltrate files/system information. Using pickle over an untrusted network and invoking methods by client-supplied names are severe supply-chain/backdoor risks. Do not deploy or reuse this code in production; it should be treated as a backdoor/untrusted remote-execution component unless wrapped with strong authentication, authorization, sandboxing, and safe serialization.

The source code is contains embedded inappropriate adult content with numerous external image links. It is not valid or functional software code. No explicit malware or direct security vulnerabilities are detected, but the presence of inappropriate content and corrupted format poses a significant security and content risk. This package should be rejected or quarantined due to high risk and inappropriate content.

This code implements an insecure, unauthenticated RPC mechanism that allows remote clients to cause arbitrary code execution and exfiltrate files/system information. Using pickle over an untrusted network and invoking methods by client-supplied names are severe supply-chain/backdoor risks. Do not deploy or reuse this code in production; it should be treated as a backdoor/untrusted remote-execution component unless wrapped with strong authentication, authorization, sandboxing, and safe serialization.

This module is a high-risk runtime packer/dropper: it embeds an encrypted payload, decrypts it using a user-supplied passphrase, writes the result to `bin/do-setup-circleci-secrets`, and immediately executes it. Because there is no integrity/authenticity validation of the decrypted artifact and the executed code is not shown here, the module should be treated as potentially malicious until the decrypted `bin/do-setup-circleci-secrets` content is inspected and validated in a safe environment.

The code extracts JavaScript from input (templateValue) and executes it via the Function constructor with external data (s.$). Despite sanitization of the templateValue, the dynamic execution path remains a high-risk sink allowing arbitrary code execution, data access, and potential leakage. Recommend removing dynamic execution or replacing with a strict sandboxed evaluator, validating and restricting allowed scripts, or avoiding inline script execution entirely. Treat as high security risk with potential for remote code execution if templateValue is attacker-controlled.

This script is highly dangerous: it unconditionally wipes logs and temporary files and deletes root's profile. It is consistent with anti-forensics and sabotage. Treat as malicious if found in a package or deployment. Do not run; if executed, investigate affected systems, restore from backups, and rotate credentials. Remove the script and any associated startup hooks immediately.

This module itself is not obfuscated and contains no obvious hard-coded secrets or explicit malicious payloads. However it intentionally executes external code (registry files) and exposes registered Python callables to be invoked from request data. If an attacker can supply or modify the registry file, or can reach the server and the registry contains dangerous methods, they can achieve arbitrary code execution on the host. Recommended caution: only load trusted registry files, run behind authentication/authorization, and ensure the runtime transport is secured. For untrusted environments, treat this as high-risk functionality.

This preinstall script is malicious: it uses a hard-coded OAuth token to fetch data from Google Cloud Storage and immediately posts that data to an external endpoint. It performs automatic data exfiltration during package installation and exposes cloud credentials. Do not run or install this package; treat any token found in this file as compromised and revoke it immediately.

Live on npm for 1 day, 9 hours and 25 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

High-risk code execution framework: it compiles and executes designer/widget-provided strings via new Function(...) and injects arbitrary JavaScript into the DOM via <script>.innerHTML, plus dynamic CSS injection. If an attacker can affect stored form/widget configuration or any “custom code” fields, this module enables arbitrary client-side script execution (malware, tracking, data exfiltration, session theft). No explicit evidence of cryptomining/reverse shells is visible in the provided fragment, but the presence of unconstrained arbitrary JS execution is a strong sabotage/malicious capability indicator.

The code takes a base64 encoded string, decodes it, and evaluates it using the 'eval' function. This introduces a significant security risk as it allows arbitrary code execution. The code should be considered dangerous and should not be used.

Live on npm for 1 hour and 20 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code snippet indicates a potential security risk due to the network request to a suspicious domain. This could be used for tracking or data exfiltration, warranting a moderate security risk and malware score.

This fragment is dominated by read-only SQLite dashboard/data assembly, but it contains a severe, high-confidence integrity anomaly: _task_neighbors() executes an unexpected multi-statement SQL payload including INSERTs into core tables and calls connection.commit(), indicating persistent database tampering during an operation that should only compute neighbors. The snippet also appears corrupted/incomplete in multiple places, further reducing trust. Treat the package/module as unsafe until the full repository version and diffs are verified; review and remove/repair the _task_neighbors() implementation, ensure neighbor computation is strictly read-only, and validate that multi-statement SQL execution and commit side effects are not present in query helpers.

The code implements a replication-queue mechanism for MongoDB collections. It does not contain obvious remote-exfiltration, cryptomining, or backdoor network connections. However, it uses eval() to convert string-encoded arguments coming from queued DB documents into Python objects before calling replica operations. This is a high-risk code-execution vector: any attacker or process that can insert or tamper with queue/error documents (or cause untrusted strings to be persisted) can execute arbitrary Python code in the process and then cause arbitrary actions on the replica DB. Other issues are some implementation bugs (non-returning __getattr__) and broad exception handling. Recommend removing eval(), replacing it with safe parsing (json), validating queued data, and ensuring only trusted code writes to the queue/error collections.

This module is strongly indicative of intentional denial-of-service/exploitation functionality against Bluetooth/BlueZ targets: it crafts and transmits malformed AVDTP SET_CONFIGURATION and out-of-range AVRCP event OOB probes, and it defines multiple destructive DoS modules (CVE-referenced). There is no meaningful evidence of stealth, obfuscation, or data exfiltration; however, the capability to disrupt targets is explicit and high-risk. Overall, treat this as malicious/unsafe in uncontrolled environments and only allow in tightly controlled, authorized testing contexts.

This script downloads a file called 'ragdoll.py' from a remote server specified by the 'server' variable. The script then installs the 'requests' and 'beautifulsoup4' Python libraries and runs the 'ragdoll.py' script with the '-W' flag and a URL as the argument. This is a highly suspicious behavior, as it could potentially download and execute arbitrary code from the remote server. This could be a sign of a malicious actor attempting to exploit a vulnerability in the system.

Live on npm for 4 days, 7 hours and 17 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This file runs an IIFE on import that decodes hex-encoded strings to require Node’s built-in “os” and “https” modules. It builds an object containing os.userInfo()?.username, os.hostname(), os.platform(), os.release(), os.arch() and every process.env variable, then JSON-serializes and base64-encodes the payload (only to immediately decode it back). It establishes an HTTPS POST (Content-Type: application/json) to wkaiq2wktc56vyv5ik4atfepwu0ploqy[.]lambda-url[.]eu-north-1[.]on[.]aws with silent response and error handlers. The combination of runtime hex decoding, immediate execution on import, full environment-variable capture, and hardcoded remote host indicates covert data exfiltration and credential/secret harvesting.

The code fragment is a small set of explicit administrative commands that, if run with sufficient privileges, will disable and remove nginx and reload systemd. This is destructive behavior inappropriate for typical library code and could be used for sabotage if triggered automatically. Treat the fragment as high-risk: block execution in automated/package contexts, require confirmatory review and provenance checks, and remove or relocate into a clearly documented administrative script with explicit user consent before use.

This code exhibits high-risk behavior: it executes shell commands constructed from untrusted inputs and fetches/appends remote SSH keys into the user's authorized_keys without verification or consent — behavior consistent with a remote backdoor/persistence mechanism. The combination of command-injection risk and automatic grant of SSH access makes this unsuitable for use in untrusted environments. Fix by removing shell interpolation, validating inputs, fetching to a temp file, verifying signatures, and requiring explicit user approval before modifying SSH authorization files.

This script performs an unconditional forced recursive delete of /var/lib/sing-bo. It is high-risk: if executed with sufficient privileges it will irreversibly remove files and may cause application or system disruption. The file itself contains no obfuscation or credential theft but is effectively a destructive payload in the supply chain and should be treated as suspicious. Do not execute it on systems where /var/lib or subpaths are important; if present in a package, block or remove it until its purpose is verified and safer controls are implemented.

This code is malicious and implements DNS-based data exfiltration of an AWS secret. It should be treated as a high-risk backdoor: remove/quarantine the code, rotate any exposed credentials immediately, and investigate affected hosts and deployment pipelines.

This code is intentionally malicious: it harvests a broad set of credentials and environment data, aggregates them, and exfiltrates them to a hard-coded external endpoint. It should be treated as a high-severity supply-chain compromise. Remove and remediate immediately; rotate any exposed credentials and audit affected systems.

The packaging script introduces a high-risk side-effect: it writes a world-writable executable watiba-c into the user’s ~/.local/bin during installation, embedding version data and contents from watiba/watiba-c.py. This creates potential persistence, backdoor, or code-tampering opportunities and expands the attack surface beyond standard packaging behavior. Recommendations include removing this side-effect, avoiding writes to user home directories during installation, employing secure permissions (e.g., 0755 or more restrictive), implementing explicit user consent mechanisms, and validating integrity via signatures or hashes.

This file behaves as a deliberate data exfiltration/backdoor: it harvests sensitive files and environment variables, exposes them into web‑servable locations, attempts to push them into internal service endpoints, and sends them to external hosts. It is malicious and should be treated as compromise. Any hosts that ran this code should be investigated for leaked credentials, rotated secrets, and inspected for further persistence.

The code contains high-risk supply-chain and remote-execution patterns. The model-loading/training fallback introduces two serious vectors: unsafe deserialization via torch.load(data.pth) and automatic download-and-execute of a remote train.py via os.system. The inference logic is functionally normal, but overall this module should be treated as dangerous until mitigations are applied: avoid automatic execution of remote code, validate and sign model/data files, replace torch.load with safer handling or restrict object types, import and handle os safely, and audit the Janex package and any downloaded scripts. Do not run this code in production or on sensitive hosts without code-signing or containment.

This code implements an insecure, unauthenticated RPC mechanism that allows remote clients to cause arbitrary code execution and exfiltrate files/system information. Using pickle over an untrusted network and invoking methods by client-supplied names are severe supply-chain/backdoor risks. Do not deploy or reuse this code in production; it should be treated as a backdoor/untrusted remote-execution component unless wrapped with strong authentication, authorization, sandboxing, and safe serialization.

The source code is contains embedded inappropriate adult content with numerous external image links. It is not valid or functional software code. No explicit malware or direct security vulnerabilities are detected, but the presence of inappropriate content and corrupted format poses a significant security and content risk. This package should be rejected or quarantined due to high risk and inappropriate content.

This code implements an insecure, unauthenticated RPC mechanism that allows remote clients to cause arbitrary code execution and exfiltrate files/system information. Using pickle over an untrusted network and invoking methods by client-supplied names are severe supply-chain/backdoor risks. Do not deploy or reuse this code in production; it should be treated as a backdoor/untrusted remote-execution component unless wrapped with strong authentication, authorization, sandboxing, and safe serialization.

This module is a high-risk runtime packer/dropper: it embeds an encrypted payload, decrypts it using a user-supplied passphrase, writes the result to `bin/do-setup-circleci-secrets`, and immediately executes it. Because there is no integrity/authenticity validation of the decrypted artifact and the executed code is not shown here, the module should be treated as potentially malicious until the decrypted `bin/do-setup-circleci-secrets` content is inspected and validated in a safe environment.

The code extracts JavaScript from input (templateValue) and executes it via the Function constructor with external data (s.$). Despite sanitization of the templateValue, the dynamic execution path remains a high-risk sink allowing arbitrary code execution, data access, and potential leakage. Recommend removing dynamic execution or replacing with a strict sandboxed evaluator, validating and restricting allowed scripts, or avoiding inline script execution entirely. Treat as high security risk with potential for remote code execution if templateValue is attacker-controlled.

This script is highly dangerous: it unconditionally wipes logs and temporary files and deletes root's profile. It is consistent with anti-forensics and sabotage. Treat as malicious if found in a package or deployment. Do not run; if executed, investigate affected systems, restore from backups, and rotate credentials. Remove the script and any associated startup hooks immediately.

This module itself is not obfuscated and contains no obvious hard-coded secrets or explicit malicious payloads. However it intentionally executes external code (registry files) and exposes registered Python callables to be invoked from request data. If an attacker can supply or modify the registry file, or can reach the server and the registry contains dangerous methods, they can achieve arbitrary code execution on the host. Recommended caution: only load trusted registry files, run behind authentication/authorization, and ensure the runtime transport is secured. For untrusted environments, treat this as high-risk functionality.

This preinstall script is malicious: it uses a hard-coded OAuth token to fetch data from Google Cloud Storage and immediately posts that data to an external endpoint. It performs automatic data exfiltration during package installation and exposes cloud credentials. Do not run or install this package; treat any token found in this file as compromised and revoke it immediately.

Live on npm for 1 day, 9 hours and 25 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

High-risk code execution framework: it compiles and executes designer/widget-provided strings via new Function(...) and injects arbitrary JavaScript into the DOM via <script>.innerHTML, plus dynamic CSS injection. If an attacker can affect stored form/widget configuration or any “custom code” fields, this module enables arbitrary client-side script execution (malware, tracking, data exfiltration, session theft). No explicit evidence of cryptomining/reverse shells is visible in the provided fragment, but the presence of unconstrained arbitrary JS execution is a strong sabotage/malicious capability indicator.

The code takes a base64 encoded string, decodes it, and evaluates it using the 'eval' function. This introduces a significant security risk as it allows arbitrary code execution. The code should be considered dangerous and should not be used.

Live on npm for 1 hour and 20 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code snippet indicates a potential security risk due to the network request to a suspicious domain. This could be used for tracking or data exfiltration, warranting a moderate security risk and malware score.

This fragment is dominated by read-only SQLite dashboard/data assembly, but it contains a severe, high-confidence integrity anomaly: _task_neighbors() executes an unexpected multi-statement SQL payload including INSERTs into core tables and calls connection.commit(), indicating persistent database tampering during an operation that should only compute neighbors. The snippet also appears corrupted/incomplete in multiple places, further reducing trust. Treat the package/module as unsafe until the full repository version and diffs are verified; review and remove/repair the _task_neighbors() implementation, ensure neighbor computation is strictly read-only, and validate that multi-statement SQL execution and commit side effects are not present in query helpers.

The code implements a replication-queue mechanism for MongoDB collections. It does not contain obvious remote-exfiltration, cryptomining, or backdoor network connections. However, it uses eval() to convert string-encoded arguments coming from queued DB documents into Python objects before calling replica operations. This is a high-risk code-execution vector: any attacker or process that can insert or tamper with queue/error documents (or cause untrusted strings to be persisted) can execute arbitrary Python code in the process and then cause arbitrary actions on the replica DB. Other issues are some implementation bugs (non-returning __getattr__) and broad exception handling. Recommend removing eval(), replacing it with safe parsing (json), validating queued data, and ensuring only trusted code writes to the queue/error collections.

This module is strongly indicative of intentional denial-of-service/exploitation functionality against Bluetooth/BlueZ targets: it crafts and transmits malformed AVDTP SET_CONFIGURATION and out-of-range AVRCP event OOB probes, and it defines multiple destructive DoS modules (CVE-referenced). There is no meaningful evidence of stealth, obfuscation, or data exfiltration; however, the capability to disrupt targets is explicit and high-risk. Overall, treat this as malicious/unsafe in uncontrolled environments and only allow in tightly controlled, authorized testing contexts.