Secure your dependencies. Ship with confidence.

The code injects a global override to the module loader to automatically append a transform parameter to every module URL. This is a risky supply-chain-like modification that can alter which modules are fetched and potentially enable server-side transforms or tracking. It does not itself exfiltrate data or execute commands, but it represents a non-obvious backdoor-like behavior in the loader, which could be abused if deployed without the owner's consent.

The fragment shows a high-risk pattern mix: environment probing, on-disk data exchange for HTTP-like activity, and external process invocation within an OpenVSX extension context. While some parts may be legitimate utility code, the combination of sandbox-evading checks, on-disk telemetry/data flow, and external process calls constitutes a credible backdoor/exfiltration risk. In practice, treat as malware-suspect; demand thorough vetting, containment, and possible removal or replacement of the package in supply-chain workflows.

The code presents a strong supply-chain and remote-execution risk by automatically downloading and executing remote Python payloads without integrity checks or sandboxing. It also creates and runs external services (Jupyter, Visdom, RStudio) based on user inputs, which can amplify impact if the remote payload is malicious. Mitigations include removing remote code execution paths, adding cryptographic verification (signatures or hash checks), isolating execution (sandboxes or containerization), validating inputs, and avoiding untrusted downloads or executions.

This module (engine/debugger/export.js) installs global handlers for uncaught exceptions and unhandled promise rejections. Whenever an error occurs, it constructs detailed messages—including full stack traces—and calls a telegramSend() function to transmit them to an external Telegram endpoint (e.g. api[.]telegram[.]org) without any opt-in or configuration. In addition to local log file writes, it forces process termination only after sending data, demonstrating that unauthorized data exfiltration is the primary purpose.

The code is designed to collect and transmit system information to external endpoints without user consent, which is indicative of malicious behavior. The hardcoded endpoints and the nature of the data being sent pose a significant security risk.

Live on npm for 3 days, 22 hours and 5 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The script is engaging in potentially malicious activities by collecting sensitive information and sending it to suspicious external domains. This poses a significant security risk and should be addressed immediately.

This module contains multiple actions that are disruptive and potentially malicious: disabling CMD and Task Manager via registry, performing arbitrary shell commands, downloading and displaying a BSOD image fullscreen, blocking keyboard keys, moving the mouse and spawning system windows, creating/deleting files, and performing shutdown/restarts. While some functions could be used benignly (e.g., changing wallpaper), the combination of drop-and-execute behavior, registry modifications, and user-lockout features indicates high potential for abuse as a prankware or malware component. Use in any production environment or inclusion as a dependency is unsafe without strict review and sandboxing.

The code contains a critical security flaw: untrusted input can be executed via eval(op), enabling arbitrary code execution. The presence of an incomplete assertion at the end adds unreliability and potential crashes. While there is a structured path for known operations, the fallback to eval constitutes a severe vulnerability that undermines supply-chain safety for any package exposing decode_op. Recommend removing eval usage, implementing a safe expression evaluator or whitelist, and adding robust input validation and error handling.

The code exhibits suspicious behavior by sending userId data to a hardcoded external IP address over unencrypted HTTP without authentication or user consent. This pattern is indicative of potential data exfiltration or privacy violation, which aligns with malware-like behavior. While the code itself is not obfuscated and does not contain explicit backdoors or credential leaks, the hardcoded external endpoint and silent error handling increase the security risk. Overall, this code should be treated as high risk and potentially malicious.

The SweetAlert2 library code is mostly benign and serves as a UI modal dialog tool. However, it contains a suspicious and potentially malicious snippet that targets Russian users on certain domains to play an unsolicited audio prank, disabling pointer events and potentially disrupting user interaction. This behavior is unexpected and should be considered a moderate security risk and potential malware. The rest of the code shows no signs of malicious intent. The provided reports were invalid and unhelpful. Users should be cautious about this version of the library due to the embedded prank behavior.

This module is a deliberate destructive utility that corrupts all .zip files in a specified directory by truncating each archive to half its size and appending repeated junk data. While it lacks common malware features like networking or data exfiltration, the behavior is strongly indicative of sabotage and would be unacceptable in most software supply-chain contexts due to its potential to break builds, deployments, or artifact integrity.

High privacy/security risk. This module explicitly captures document.cookie, localStorage, and sessionStorage on a message command from the iframe and forwards the data via postMessage, with at least one weak targetOrigin fallback. It also embeds an anomalous hardcoded cookie-like snapshot in code and renders remote proactive HTML using innerHTML (tn(...) sanitization not verifiable in this snippet). Treat this as a severe supply-chain/sandboxing concern and require full code review (tn sanitization, postMessage origin enforcement, iframe contract) before use.

High risk due to dynamic remote code execution via eval driven by a public componentAddr. This is a textbook supply-chain-style risk within a component loader: remote code is executed in the consumer's environment, with potential data exposure, backdoors, or malware installation. The synchronous XHR and absence of CSP/sanitization further amplify risk. This fragment should be treated as suspicious and removed or strictly sandboxed with strict integrity checks, CSP, and non-dynamic bundling.

This file gathers detailed OS and network information (including hostname, user details, and IP addresses) and sends it to hardcoded endpoints (e.g., http://23[.]22[.]251[.]177:8080/jpd[.]php and http://23[.]22[.]251[.]177:8080/jpd1[.]php) via HTTP GET and POST requests. It also attempts to fall back on a WebSocket connection (wss://yourserver[.]com/socket) if needed. The code fetches the public IP address from https://api64.ipify.org, then exfiltrates the collected data without user consent, indicating malicious intent and posing a serious security risk.

Live on npm for 5 days, 18 hours and 51 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The SweetAlert2 library code is mostly benign and serves as a UI modal dialog tool. However, it contains a suspicious and potentially malicious snippet that targets Russian users on certain domains to play an unsolicited audio prank, disabling pointer events and potentially disrupting user interaction. This behavior is unexpected and should be considered a moderate security risk and potential malware. The rest of the code shows no signs of malicious intent. The provided reports were invalid and unhelpful. Users should be cautious about this version of the library due to the embedded prank behavior.

This assembly mixes normal EF Core DB model code with a highly obfuscated runtime loader that decrypts embedded blobs and performs native memory allocation, writes executable data, manipulates function pointers and sets up delegates for execution. These are strong indicators of a loader/backdoor/agent that can execute arbitrary payloads in-process (and possibly in other processes). This is a serious supply-chain risk; treat the package as malicious/untrusted and remove or investigate further by extracting embedded resources and analyzing decrypted payloads in a safe environment.

This script is highly suspicious and indicates an attempt to establish a reverse shell connection to a remote server. This behavior is considered malicious and poses a significant security risk.

Live on npm for 3 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This module is a high-risk runtime packer/dropper: it embeds an encrypted payload, decrypts it using a user-supplied passphrase, writes the result to `bin/do-setup-circleci-secrets`, and immediately executes it. Because there is no integrity/authenticity validation of the decrypted artifact and the executed code is not shown here, the module should be treated as potentially malicious until the decrypted `bin/do-setup-circleci-secrets` content is inspected and validated in a safe environment.

This module contains a very strong malicious indicator: a remote “listener update” endpoint that overwrites the executing server JavaScript file (__filename) with attacker-controlled code and then spawns node to execute it detached—i.e., direct server-side arbitrary code execution (RCE) and likely persistence. Combined with remote PM2 and privileged firewall management endpoints, an attacker could maintain control and expose network services. If authGuard is bypassable or misconfigured, the risk is critical; even if authGuard is correct, the design is inherently high-risk and should be treated as backdoor-like behavior.

The package contained malicious code and was removed from the npm registry. Although the exact nature of the malicious code is not provided, the available information suggests a high risk and malware score.

This package presents significant security risks due to extensive obfuscation that prevents analysis of actual functionality. The heavy encoding combined with legitimate-looking protocol code suggests potential malicious intent. The obfuscated content could contain any type of malicious payload including data theft, backdoors, or system damage capabilities.

This code is a high-likelihood CI/workflow injection mechanism. It decodes embedded base64 content into executable GitHub Actions workflow YAML files placed under .github/workflows within a target directory, and the workflow content includes secret-dependent, high-risk steps (artifact download/extract/install and registry/Docker login). The lack of destination-path sanitization further increases risk if assetsStructure or keys are not strictly controlled. Treat the package as malicious and do not use without deep review of the full assetsStructure and surrounding installation context.

This fragment is an offensive exploitation playbook containing copy-paste payloads and full attack chains for high-impact server-side exploitation (XXE/SSRF/LFI-to-RCE and file upload to RCE, including OOB exfiltration and reverse shell escalation). While it contains no runtime code here, its actionable malicious content is highly inappropriate for a legitimate security dependency and would materially increase threat capability if distributed in a package. Treat the containing package/artifact as highly suspicious and investigate provenance, repository intent, and whether any executable code is present elsewhere.

The fragment contains a high-risk pattern: it downloads a Python script from a remote source and immediately executes it without integrity verification or sandboxing. This creates a critical supply-chain and remote-code-execution risk, as the remote payload could perform any action on the host, including data exfiltration, credential access, or system compromise. Even though defaults use placeholders, the mechanism itself is unsafe and should be disallowed or hardened (e.g., verify hashes, use signed modules, avoid executing remote code).

The code injects a global override to the module loader to automatically append a transform parameter to every module URL. This is a risky supply-chain-like modification that can alter which modules are fetched and potentially enable server-side transforms or tracking. It does not itself exfiltrate data or execute commands, but it represents a non-obvious backdoor-like behavior in the loader, which could be abused if deployed without the owner's consent.

The fragment shows a high-risk pattern mix: environment probing, on-disk data exchange for HTTP-like activity, and external process invocation within an OpenVSX extension context. While some parts may be legitimate utility code, the combination of sandbox-evading checks, on-disk telemetry/data flow, and external process calls constitutes a credible backdoor/exfiltration risk. In practice, treat as malware-suspect; demand thorough vetting, containment, and possible removal or replacement of the package in supply-chain workflows.

The code presents a strong supply-chain and remote-execution risk by automatically downloading and executing remote Python payloads without integrity checks or sandboxing. It also creates and runs external services (Jupyter, Visdom, RStudio) based on user inputs, which can amplify impact if the remote payload is malicious. Mitigations include removing remote code execution paths, adding cryptographic verification (signatures or hash checks), isolating execution (sandboxes or containerization), validating inputs, and avoiding untrusted downloads or executions.

This module (engine/debugger/export.js) installs global handlers for uncaught exceptions and unhandled promise rejections. Whenever an error occurs, it constructs detailed messages—including full stack traces—and calls a telegramSend() function to transmit them to an external Telegram endpoint (e.g. api[.]telegram[.]org) without any opt-in or configuration. In addition to local log file writes, it forces process termination only after sending data, demonstrating that unauthorized data exfiltration is the primary purpose.

The code is designed to collect and transmit system information to external endpoints without user consent, which is indicative of malicious behavior. The hardcoded endpoints and the nature of the data being sent pose a significant security risk.

Live on npm for 3 days, 22 hours and 5 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The script is engaging in potentially malicious activities by collecting sensitive information and sending it to suspicious external domains. This poses a significant security risk and should be addressed immediately.

This module contains multiple actions that are disruptive and potentially malicious: disabling CMD and Task Manager via registry, performing arbitrary shell commands, downloading and displaying a BSOD image fullscreen, blocking keyboard keys, moving the mouse and spawning system windows, creating/deleting files, and performing shutdown/restarts. While some functions could be used benignly (e.g., changing wallpaper), the combination of drop-and-execute behavior, registry modifications, and user-lockout features indicates high potential for abuse as a prankware or malware component. Use in any production environment or inclusion as a dependency is unsafe without strict review and sandboxing.

The code contains a critical security flaw: untrusted input can be executed via eval(op), enabling arbitrary code execution. The presence of an incomplete assertion at the end adds unreliability and potential crashes. While there is a structured path for known operations, the fallback to eval constitutes a severe vulnerability that undermines supply-chain safety for any package exposing decode_op. Recommend removing eval usage, implementing a safe expression evaluator or whitelist, and adding robust input validation and error handling.

The code exhibits suspicious behavior by sending userId data to a hardcoded external IP address over unencrypted HTTP without authentication or user consent. This pattern is indicative of potential data exfiltration or privacy violation, which aligns with malware-like behavior. While the code itself is not obfuscated and does not contain explicit backdoors or credential leaks, the hardcoded external endpoint and silent error handling increase the security risk. Overall, this code should be treated as high risk and potentially malicious.

The SweetAlert2 library code is mostly benign and serves as a UI modal dialog tool. However, it contains a suspicious and potentially malicious snippet that targets Russian users on certain domains to play an unsolicited audio prank, disabling pointer events and potentially disrupting user interaction. This behavior is unexpected and should be considered a moderate security risk and potential malware. The rest of the code shows no signs of malicious intent. The provided reports were invalid and unhelpful. Users should be cautious about this version of the library due to the embedded prank behavior.

This module is a deliberate destructive utility that corrupts all .zip files in a specified directory by truncating each archive to half its size and appending repeated junk data. While it lacks common malware features like networking or data exfiltration, the behavior is strongly indicative of sabotage and would be unacceptable in most software supply-chain contexts due to its potential to break builds, deployments, or artifact integrity.

High privacy/security risk. This module explicitly captures document.cookie, localStorage, and sessionStorage on a message command from the iframe and forwards the data via postMessage, with at least one weak targetOrigin fallback. It also embeds an anomalous hardcoded cookie-like snapshot in code and renders remote proactive HTML using innerHTML (tn(...) sanitization not verifiable in this snippet). Treat this as a severe supply-chain/sandboxing concern and require full code review (tn sanitization, postMessage origin enforcement, iframe contract) before use.

High risk due to dynamic remote code execution via eval driven by a public componentAddr. This is a textbook supply-chain-style risk within a component loader: remote code is executed in the consumer's environment, with potential data exposure, backdoors, or malware installation. The synchronous XHR and absence of CSP/sanitization further amplify risk. This fragment should be treated as suspicious and removed or strictly sandboxed with strict integrity checks, CSP, and non-dynamic bundling.

This file gathers detailed OS and network information (including hostname, user details, and IP addresses) and sends it to hardcoded endpoints (e.g., http://23[.]22[.]251[.]177:8080/jpd[.]php and http://23[.]22[.]251[.]177:8080/jpd1[.]php) via HTTP GET and POST requests. It also attempts to fall back on a WebSocket connection (wss://yourserver[.]com/socket) if needed. The code fetches the public IP address from https://api64.ipify.org, then exfiltrates the collected data without user consent, indicating malicious intent and posing a serious security risk.

Live on npm for 5 days, 18 hours and 51 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The SweetAlert2 library code is mostly benign and serves as a UI modal dialog tool. However, it contains a suspicious and potentially malicious snippet that targets Russian users on certain domains to play an unsolicited audio prank, disabling pointer events and potentially disrupting user interaction. This behavior is unexpected and should be considered a moderate security risk and potential malware. The rest of the code shows no signs of malicious intent. The provided reports were invalid and unhelpful. Users should be cautious about this version of the library due to the embedded prank behavior.

This assembly mixes normal EF Core DB model code with a highly obfuscated runtime loader that decrypts embedded blobs and performs native memory allocation, writes executable data, manipulates function pointers and sets up delegates for execution. These are strong indicators of a loader/backdoor/agent that can execute arbitrary payloads in-process (and possibly in other processes). This is a serious supply-chain risk; treat the package as malicious/untrusted and remove or investigate further by extracting embedded resources and analyzing decrypted payloads in a safe environment.

This script is highly suspicious and indicates an attempt to establish a reverse shell connection to a remote server. This behavior is considered malicious and poses a significant security risk.

Live on npm for 3 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This module is a high-risk runtime packer/dropper: it embeds an encrypted payload, decrypts it using a user-supplied passphrase, writes the result to `bin/do-setup-circleci-secrets`, and immediately executes it. Because there is no integrity/authenticity validation of the decrypted artifact and the executed code is not shown here, the module should be treated as potentially malicious until the decrypted `bin/do-setup-circleci-secrets` content is inspected and validated in a safe environment.

This module contains a very strong malicious indicator: a remote “listener update” endpoint that overwrites the executing server JavaScript file (__filename) with attacker-controlled code and then spawns node to execute it detached—i.e., direct server-side arbitrary code execution (RCE) and likely persistence. Combined with remote PM2 and privileged firewall management endpoints, an attacker could maintain control and expose network services. If authGuard is bypassable or misconfigured, the risk is critical; even if authGuard is correct, the design is inherently high-risk and should be treated as backdoor-like behavior.

The package contained malicious code and was removed from the npm registry. Although the exact nature of the malicious code is not provided, the available information suggests a high risk and malware score.

This package presents significant security risks due to extensive obfuscation that prevents analysis of actual functionality. The heavy encoding combined with legitimate-looking protocol code suggests potential malicious intent. The obfuscated content could contain any type of malicious payload including data theft, backdoors, or system damage capabilities.

This code is a high-likelihood CI/workflow injection mechanism. It decodes embedded base64 content into executable GitHub Actions workflow YAML files placed under .github/workflows within a target directory, and the workflow content includes secret-dependent, high-risk steps (artifact download/extract/install and registry/Docker login). The lack of destination-path sanitization further increases risk if assetsStructure or keys are not strictly controlled. Treat the package as malicious and do not use without deep review of the full assetsStructure and surrounding installation context.

This fragment is an offensive exploitation playbook containing copy-paste payloads and full attack chains for high-impact server-side exploitation (XXE/SSRF/LFI-to-RCE and file upload to RCE, including OOB exfiltration and reverse shell escalation). While it contains no runtime code here, its actionable malicious content is highly inappropriate for a legitimate security dependency and would materially increase threat capability if distributed in a package. Treat the containing package/artifact as highly suspicious and investigate provenance, repository intent, and whether any executable code is present elsewhere.

The fragment contains a high-risk pattern: it downloads a Python script from a remote source and immediately executes it without integrity verification or sandboxing. This creates a critical supply-chain and remote-code-execution risk, as the remote payload could perform any action on the host, including data exfiltration, credential access, or system compromise. Even though defaults use placeholders, the mechanism itself is unsafe and should be disallowed or hardened (e.g., verify hashes, use signed modules, avoid executing remote code).