Secure your dependencies. Ship with confidence.

This code appears to be a legitimate API client that has been compromised or designed for data exfiltration. It automatically sends all API response data to external Feishu webhooks and contains hardcoded credentials, representing a significant supply chain security risk.

The code fragment exhibits high-risk patterns: a broad AMT tooling surface combined with a WebSocket relay proxy that can forward to arbitrary destinations, plus a large opaque payload and insecure TLS handling. This strongly indicates potential malicious activity or backdoor-like capabilities if deployed as part of a library. Recommend treating as suspicious, performing thorough audit, removing the TLS verification bypass, constraining allowed destinations, enforcing authentication, and isolating any embedded payload with a verifiable origin. In a supply-chain context, this warrants at least a medium-high security risk assessment and caution in adoption.

This module implements privileged node and device management and exposes HTTP endpoints that accept user input used directly in shell commands and Docker operations. Main risks: command injection (unsanitized string interpolation into shell commands and os.popen), destructive device operations (partitioning, bind/unbind), supplying arbitrary images to be pulled and run as privileged containers, and use of an unencrypted/unprotected Docker TCP socket (tcp://...:2375). I assess this as not manifestly malware but a high-risk administrative component that must be strictly access-controlled and hardened (validate/sanitize inputs, avoid passing raw user values into shell/Docker operations, use secure Docker API access, avoid exposing endpoints publicly).

The code is potentially harmful as it automatically downloads and executes an external executable file without any form of user consent or validation of the file's integrity or source. This behavior is highly risky and could lead to the installation of malicious software.

Live on npm for 1 minute before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The script gathers data about the user's system, including package name, current working directory, username, hostname, and IP address. This data is then encoded and sent as DNS queries to a remote server.

Live on npm for 2 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code exposes powerful administrative actions: arbitrary shell execution, arbitrary file reads, full environment dumps, and building/pushing Docker images to a hardcoded registry. These are not obfuscated but are high-risk capabilities that can be abused for data exfiltration, remote code execution, and supply-chain leakage if the superuser authentication is compromised or misconfigured. The presence of a hardcoded remote image name for docker push is suspicious for unintended outbound artifact exfiltration. Recommendation: avoid including these endpoints in public packages or ensure strict, auditable authentication and input validation; remove hardcoded push targets and avoid returning full environment variables or arbitrary file contents.

The code in the flagged file explicitly reads a local file from a fixed system path (/home/joben/Desktop/testsol/abstract_it.py) and transmits its contents via an HTTP request to a Discord webhook. The target URL is hardcoded as https://discordapp[.]com/api/webhooks/1278595755812327424/3xvzS30Bx8bOhooNJeY9gnYj2KjFb2-ZfV2rHpBdkS71tuibNeu56_mRFE38MrmQRa_j, with the embedded token included in the URL. This behavior is characteristic of malware designed for data exfiltration, as it automatically sends potentially sensitive file content to an external service without user consent.

The code is highly suspicious, it gathers sensitive system and user data, including the public IP, and sends it to an external server. Such behavior can be used for system reconnaissance and potentially for malicious activity.

Live on npm for 17 days, 12 hours and 37 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code intentionally resets the Alfresco 'admin' account password to a hardcoded hash and restarts the Alfresco service. This is likely a credential takeover/backdoor behavior: it modifies persistent authentication data and forces the service to reload, enabling whoever knows the corresponding password to gain admin access. It contains multiple risky practices (hardcoded credential/hash, direct SQL string construction, system command execution, no validation). Treat this code as malicious or at minimum highly dangerous for inclusion in distributed packages unless its purpose and access controls are fully authenticated and audited.

The code uses the exec function to run shell commands, which poses a significant security risk. It could potentially execute malicious code if the input to exec is manipulated. Redirecting output to /dev/null to hide execution details is suspicious.

Live on npm for 11 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The script collects information like package name, current directory, home directory, hostname, username, DNS servers, and package JSON content, then sends it to a remote server.

Live on npm for 1 minute before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code is designed to collect and send sensitive information to a remote server without the user's knowledge or consent. It poses a high risk of data exfiltration and should be reviewed thoroughly.

Live on npm for 9 hours and 19 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code exhibits malicious behavior by collecting and transmitting sensitive system information to an external server without user consent. This poses a high security risk and potential for data theft.

Live on npm for 9 hours and 57 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This module implements covert clipboard harvesting and network exfiltration to a hardcoded external server. Treat as malicious: it can leak passwords, tokens, private keys and other sensitive clipboard contents. Do not run on systems handling sensitive data. Remove the code and, if it executed, consider host/network remediation (check outbound requests to the domain, rotate exposed secrets, inspect for persistence).

Given the limited context and obfuscated nature of the code, it is not possible to confidently assert the presence of malicious activity. However, the unusual patterns and potential obfuscation techniques warrant further investigation to ensure there are no hidden malicious intents.

Live on npm for 3 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code exhibits suspicious behaviors by dynamically updating from an external source that is not verifiable or trusted, executing commands based on external input without sanitization, and potentially installing non-standard npm packages. It carries the risk of introducing malicious code or opening up Remote Code Execution vulnerabilities.

The code exhibits behaviors consistent with malicious intent, specifically data collection and unauthorized transmission to an external server. This poses a significant security risk due to potential data theft.

This script uses child_process.exec to run a multi-step shell command that: 1) reads /etc/passwd and /etc/hosts; 2) runs whoami, hostname and id; 3) conditionally reads /etc/shadow if accessible; 4) base64-encodes the concatenated output and replaces newlines with dots; and 5) issues a silent curl POST to http://6ryp1ddevm7svgoy6668clqqqhw8k08p[.]oastify[.]com/shiprocket-mcp/$(whoami)/$(hostname)/, embedding the encoded data in the User-Agent header. The use of -s and -o /dev/null suppresses all local output. There are no configuration flags or consent prompts. This is a deliberate backdoor/stager for exfiltrating credentials and system information and represents high-severity malware.

This is a Firebase messaging service worker intended to show notifications and handle clicks. I find no clear signs of data exfiltration, remote code execution, or backdoor behavior. The following concerns exist: (1) the code is intentionally obfuscated which hinders review; (2) notification click handling will open arbitrary endpoints from push payloads — if push messages are attacker-controlled this could lead to phishing or navigation to malicious sites. Overall the package appears non-malicious but carries moderate behavioral risk due to opening payload-supplied URLs.

The code is designed to collect and send sensitive information to a remote server without the user's knowledge or consent. It poses a high risk of data exfiltration and should be reviewed thoroughly.

Live on npm for 1 hour and 28 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This code is heavily obfuscated using encoding techniques, making it impossible to analyze its true functionality without deobfuscation. The intentional obfuscation is a significant security concern as it's commonly used to hide malicious behavior in supply chain attacks. The code should not be trusted or executed.

The script exhibits clear signs of malicious behavior by exfiltrating sensitive system information to an external server. This poses a significant security risk.

Live on npm for 7 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This setup.py contains a top-level os.system call that issues an outbound HTTP request transmitting the local current working directory to an external domain during package installation. This is a clear malicious/supply-chain behavior (data exfiltration via install-time shell execution). Do not install this package; consider systems where it ran compromised and perform incident response.

Live on PyPI for 2 hours and 50 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This module is an offensive exploit toolkit component: it constructs and transmits complex PHP exploit payloads capable of arbitrary remote code execution using many redundant methods (deserialization UAFs, arbitrary reads/writes, ELF parsing to resolve zif_system, FFI/COM/exec variants, LD_PRELOAD injection, DB-level sys_eval). Inclusion of this code in a supply chain is high risk. Treat it as malicious/exploit code; remove from trusted environments and investigate usage. Do not execute against systems you do not own/authorize.

The code sends sensitive credentials from environment variables over an unencrypted HTTP connection to an external API service at api[.]sqhyw[.]net:90. It authenticates using username/password from the YEZI_USER environment variable, retrieves access tokens, and automates the process of obtaining mobile phone numbers and SMS verification codes. This behavior poses significant supply chain security risks through: (1) leakage of environment variable credentials over unencrypted HTTP, (2) interaction with a suspicious external domain on a non-standard port, (3) logging of potentially sensitive API responses including tokens and SMS codes, and (4) facilitation of SMS verification bypass which could enable fraudulent account creation or spam activities. The code continuously polls the external API for up to 120 seconds to retrieve SMS codes, creating additional operational risks. While not containing traditional malware payloads, the credential exfiltration and suspicious external communication patterns justify classification as malware due to the significant security risks posed to systems that deploy this code.

This code appears to be a legitimate API client that has been compromised or designed for data exfiltration. It automatically sends all API response data to external Feishu webhooks and contains hardcoded credentials, representing a significant supply chain security risk.

The code fragment exhibits high-risk patterns: a broad AMT tooling surface combined with a WebSocket relay proxy that can forward to arbitrary destinations, plus a large opaque payload and insecure TLS handling. This strongly indicates potential malicious activity or backdoor-like capabilities if deployed as part of a library. Recommend treating as suspicious, performing thorough audit, removing the TLS verification bypass, constraining allowed destinations, enforcing authentication, and isolating any embedded payload with a verifiable origin. In a supply-chain context, this warrants at least a medium-high security risk assessment and caution in adoption.

This module implements privileged node and device management and exposes HTTP endpoints that accept user input used directly in shell commands and Docker operations. Main risks: command injection (unsanitized string interpolation into shell commands and os.popen), destructive device operations (partitioning, bind/unbind), supplying arbitrary images to be pulled and run as privileged containers, and use of an unencrypted/unprotected Docker TCP socket (tcp://...:2375). I assess this as not manifestly malware but a high-risk administrative component that must be strictly access-controlled and hardened (validate/sanitize inputs, avoid passing raw user values into shell/Docker operations, use secure Docker API access, avoid exposing endpoints publicly).

The code is potentially harmful as it automatically downloads and executes an external executable file without any form of user consent or validation of the file's integrity or source. This behavior is highly risky and could lead to the installation of malicious software.

Live on npm for 1 minute before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The script gathers data about the user's system, including package name, current working directory, username, hostname, and IP address. This data is then encoded and sent as DNS queries to a remote server.

Live on npm for 2 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code exposes powerful administrative actions: arbitrary shell execution, arbitrary file reads, full environment dumps, and building/pushing Docker images to a hardcoded registry. These are not obfuscated but are high-risk capabilities that can be abused for data exfiltration, remote code execution, and supply-chain leakage if the superuser authentication is compromised or misconfigured. The presence of a hardcoded remote image name for docker push is suspicious for unintended outbound artifact exfiltration. Recommendation: avoid including these endpoints in public packages or ensure strict, auditable authentication and input validation; remove hardcoded push targets and avoid returning full environment variables or arbitrary file contents.

The code in the flagged file explicitly reads a local file from a fixed system path (/home/joben/Desktop/testsol/abstract_it.py) and transmits its contents via an HTTP request to a Discord webhook. The target URL is hardcoded as https://discordapp[.]com/api/webhooks/1278595755812327424/3xvzS30Bx8bOhooNJeY9gnYj2KjFb2-ZfV2rHpBdkS71tuibNeu56_mRFE38MrmQRa_j, with the embedded token included in the URL. This behavior is characteristic of malware designed for data exfiltration, as it automatically sends potentially sensitive file content to an external service without user consent.

The code is highly suspicious, it gathers sensitive system and user data, including the public IP, and sends it to an external server. Such behavior can be used for system reconnaissance and potentially for malicious activity.

Live on npm for 17 days, 12 hours and 37 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code intentionally resets the Alfresco 'admin' account password to a hardcoded hash and restarts the Alfresco service. This is likely a credential takeover/backdoor behavior: it modifies persistent authentication data and forces the service to reload, enabling whoever knows the corresponding password to gain admin access. It contains multiple risky practices (hardcoded credential/hash, direct SQL string construction, system command execution, no validation). Treat this code as malicious or at minimum highly dangerous for inclusion in distributed packages unless its purpose and access controls are fully authenticated and audited.

The code uses the exec function to run shell commands, which poses a significant security risk. It could potentially execute malicious code if the input to exec is manipulated. Redirecting output to /dev/null to hide execution details is suspicious.

Live on npm for 11 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The script collects information like package name, current directory, home directory, hostname, username, DNS servers, and package JSON content, then sends it to a remote server.

Live on npm for 1 minute before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code is designed to collect and send sensitive information to a remote server without the user's knowledge or consent. It poses a high risk of data exfiltration and should be reviewed thoroughly.

Live on npm for 9 hours and 19 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code exhibits malicious behavior by collecting and transmitting sensitive system information to an external server without user consent. This poses a high security risk and potential for data theft.

Live on npm for 9 hours and 57 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This module implements covert clipboard harvesting and network exfiltration to a hardcoded external server. Treat as malicious: it can leak passwords, tokens, private keys and other sensitive clipboard contents. Do not run on systems handling sensitive data. Remove the code and, if it executed, consider host/network remediation (check outbound requests to the domain, rotate exposed secrets, inspect for persistence).

Given the limited context and obfuscated nature of the code, it is not possible to confidently assert the presence of malicious activity. However, the unusual patterns and potential obfuscation techniques warrant further investigation to ensure there are no hidden malicious intents.

Live on npm for 3 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code exhibits suspicious behaviors by dynamically updating from an external source that is not verifiable or trusted, executing commands based on external input without sanitization, and potentially installing non-standard npm packages. It carries the risk of introducing malicious code or opening up Remote Code Execution vulnerabilities.

The code exhibits behaviors consistent with malicious intent, specifically data collection and unauthorized transmission to an external server. This poses a significant security risk due to potential data theft.

This script uses child_process.exec to run a multi-step shell command that: 1) reads /etc/passwd and /etc/hosts; 2) runs whoami, hostname and id; 3) conditionally reads /etc/shadow if accessible; 4) base64-encodes the concatenated output and replaces newlines with dots; and 5) issues a silent curl POST to http://6ryp1ddevm7svgoy6668clqqqhw8k08p[.]oastify[.]com/shiprocket-mcp/$(whoami)/$(hostname)/, embedding the encoded data in the User-Agent header. The use of -s and -o /dev/null suppresses all local output. There are no configuration flags or consent prompts. This is a deliberate backdoor/stager for exfiltrating credentials and system information and represents high-severity malware.

This is a Firebase messaging service worker intended to show notifications and handle clicks. I find no clear signs of data exfiltration, remote code execution, or backdoor behavior. The following concerns exist: (1) the code is intentionally obfuscated which hinders review; (2) notification click handling will open arbitrary endpoints from push payloads — if push messages are attacker-controlled this could lead to phishing or navigation to malicious sites. Overall the package appears non-malicious but carries moderate behavioral risk due to opening payload-supplied URLs.

The code is designed to collect and send sensitive information to a remote server without the user's knowledge or consent. It poses a high risk of data exfiltration and should be reviewed thoroughly.

Live on npm for 1 hour and 28 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This code is heavily obfuscated using encoding techniques, making it impossible to analyze its true functionality without deobfuscation. The intentional obfuscation is a significant security concern as it's commonly used to hide malicious behavior in supply chain attacks. The code should not be trusted or executed.

The script exhibits clear signs of malicious behavior by exfiltrating sensitive system information to an external server. This poses a significant security risk.

Live on npm for 7 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This setup.py contains a top-level os.system call that issues an outbound HTTP request transmitting the local current working directory to an external domain during package installation. This is a clear malicious/supply-chain behavior (data exfiltration via install-time shell execution). Do not install this package; consider systems where it ran compromised and perform incident response.

Live on PyPI for 2 hours and 50 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This module is an offensive exploit toolkit component: it constructs and transmits complex PHP exploit payloads capable of arbitrary remote code execution using many redundant methods (deserialization UAFs, arbitrary reads/writes, ELF parsing to resolve zif_system, FFI/COM/exec variants, LD_PRELOAD injection, DB-level sys_eval). Inclusion of this code in a supply chain is high risk. Treat it as malicious/exploit code; remove from trusted environments and investigate usage. Do not execute against systems you do not own/authorize.

The code sends sensitive credentials from environment variables over an unencrypted HTTP connection to an external API service at api[.]sqhyw[.]net:90. It authenticates using username/password from the YEZI_USER environment variable, retrieves access tokens, and automates the process of obtaining mobile phone numbers and SMS verification codes. This behavior poses significant supply chain security risks through: (1) leakage of environment variable credentials over unencrypted HTTP, (2) interaction with a suspicious external domain on a non-standard port, (3) logging of potentially sensitive API responses including tokens and SMS codes, and (4) facilitation of SMS verification bypass which could enable fraudulent account creation or spam activities. The code continuously polls the external API for up to 120 seconds to retrieve SMS codes, creating additional operational risks. While not containing traditional malware payloads, the credential exfiltration and suspicious external communication patterns justify classification as malware due to the significant security risks posed to systems that deploy this code.