Secure your dependencies. Ship with confidence.

This code is a highly suspicious Windows in-memory loader that downloads an untrusted PE over HTTP and performs process hollowing/reflective injection: it creates a suspended process, unmaps its image, allocates RWX memory, writes the downloaded PE headers/sections into the target, patches thread context to the new entry point, and resumes execution. The absence of payload integrity/authenticity controls and the direct RWX + thread-context manipulation strongly indicate malicious loader behavior. Do not use this dependency.

The package triggers execution of an installed dependency during postinstall. While the dependency is a registry package (not an explicit remote URL), running arbitrary install-time code is high-risk. You should treat this as potentially malicious until you inspect the contents of node_modules/jolie-postinstall (or the package's published files) to confirm its behavior. Recommended actions: audit the jolie-postinstall package source, verify its integrity and publisher, and avoid installing in sensitive environments until validated.

The script collects information like package name, directory path, home directory, hostname, username, DNS servers, and package.json content, and sends it to a remote server.

Live on npm for 2 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This fragment is a usage guide and configuration examples for an agent framework. It contains no direct malicious code, no download-execute patterns, no hardcoded secrets, and no obfuscated payloads. The realistic security risks are feature-level: tools that perform destructive or external actions (deleteFile, sendEmail), persistent storage that may hold sensitive data, and database integrations that rely on environment-stored credentials. These are expected capabilities for such a framework but require runtime access controls, careful tool implementation review, and secure handling of credentials. I find no evidence of deliberate malware in the provided text.

This code is malicious or at minimum intentionally dangerous. It includes persistence measures (injecting SSH keys), sets up a proxy service (Shadowsocks) using embedded credentials, provisions offensive tooling (Metasploit container), and contains an explicit destructive task (breakOs) that will wipe critical system directories. The module provides unfettered remote command execution and file upload capabilities. Do not run this code on any system you care about; consider it hostile and remove or quarantine it.

This script is a high-risk launcher: it unconditionally fetches Python code from a hardcoded remote repo and executes it locally via a shell-invoked Python process while passing unsanitized user inputs directly into the shell command. Even if the upstream repository is currently benign, the pattern enables trivial supply-chain compromise and shell injection. Mitigations: remove runtime download-and-exec; if fetching is necessary, pin and verify cryptographic hashes or signatures, validate content, avoid os.system (use subprocess with argument lists or importlib), sanitize inputs, and add error handling and logging. Treat this module as unsafe in security-sensitive environments until hardened.

The code contains malware that exfiltrates sensitive system information to pingb[.]in using both DNS queries via ping commands and direct HTTP requests. The following data is collected without user consent: - System hostname - Username - Current working directory - Network interface addresses The exfiltrated data is base64 encoded and tagged with the identifier '158ffb54d9afbc85aacb85f63ddc'. The malware is cross-platform compatible, using different ping command parameters for Windows (-n 1) versus other operating systems (-c 1).

Live on npm for 2 hours and 13 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

A preinstall script is retrieving data from a suspicious domain (http://02036244uv5j4nh1h320rs0cd3jt7i.oastify[.]com/poc.txt). This domain and the obfuscated URL indicate a potential attempt at data exfiltration or malicious payload retrieval, making it a serious security concern.

The fragment exhibits multiple risk indicators common in malicious or poorly secured code: startup persistence via Windows Run registry keys, insecure cryptography (ECB with MD5-derived key), and deserialization risk via BinaryFormatter. While no overt payload is observed, these patterns imply moderate-to-high security risk for distribution without strict usage controls, input validation, and modern cryptographic hygiene. Recommended mitigations include removing or restricting auto-start persistence, replacing ECB/MD5 cryptography with authenticated encryption (AES-GCM with proper key management and IVs), eliminating BinaryFormatter usage in favor of safe serializers, and adding rigorous input validation and integrity checks around untrusted data flows.

This source file is an HTTP client component of the Sliver implant C2 framework. It establishes encrypted sessions, polls for commands, and sends results to a remote server. In the context of general software supply chains or public packages, this is malicious/surveillance/backdoor functionality: it enables remote control and data exchange with an operator-controlled server. The code uses some weak randomness (math/rand) for nonce/header obfuscation and reads configuration including proxy credentials from URL query parameters. No direct local destructive actions are present in this file, but the networked C2 behavior is a high-security risk. Use of this module in production or inclusion in benign projects is strongly discouraged unless for authorized security testing.

This module performs stealthy local network reconnaissance (probing TCP port 445 across the host's /24 subnet) and exfiltrates the host's IP and responsive hosts to a hardcoded external HTTP endpoint without user consent. In most contexts (especially as a dependency) this constitutes malicious or highly suspicious behavior. Recommendation: treat as high-risk — do not run or install in production; remove or sandbox; investigate provenance and any related network traffic; block outbound requests to the hardcoded domain and review systems where this ran.

Live on npm for 1 hour and 49 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code implements a downloader that receives remote metadata and automates downloads and status reporting. It exhibits several high‑risk behaviors: credentials (self.bot.id and self.bot.pw) are leaked to a hardcoded third‑party endpoint via URL query parameters; filenames from the network are used directly as filesystem templates (path traversal/overwrite risk); exec() is used to create and start thread objects from remote data (code injection risk); and TLS verification is disabled for downloads. Collectively these represent a meaningful supply‑chain/data‑exfiltration risk. Recommendation: do not run this module with real credentials or on systems with sensitive data. Replace exec usage with safe thread construction, validate/sanitize filenames, stop sending secrets in URLs (use authenticated TLS requests with secrets in headers or POST bodies), enable certificate verification, and avoid calling exit() inside threads.

This code reads the current user's crontab and posts it to a hardcoded external HTTP endpoint, constituting direct data exfiltration of potentially sensitive system configuration. The use of plain HTTP, lack of consent/configuration, and unconditional behavior make this highly suspicious and likely malicious. Do not run or include this code in trusted environments without strong justification, provenance, and remediation (remove exfiltration, require explicit opt-in, use HTTPS, and add error/consent handling).

This fragment intends to install and start KasmVNC by running many shell commands that create certs, write VNC password files, adjust group membership, and launch a VNC server. The primary security issues are unsafe shell interpolation (command injection risk), programmatic persistence of a possibly predictable password, execution with sudo based on unvalidated env vars, starting a VNC server exposed on 0.0.0.0 with disabled/basic auth, and multiple unsafe filesystem operations performed via shell. There is no clear evidence of obfuscated or direct exfiltration malware, but the behavior can provide an unauthorized remote access vector (backdoor-like) if used maliciously. Do not run this code without fixing shell usage, validating inputs, using secure randomly generated passwords, enforcing proper file permissions, and not disabling authentication.

This script is high-risk and exhibits multiple behaviors commonly used in malicious or abusive web integrations: exfiltration of environment data to an external proxy, execution of arbitrary remote JavaScript via eval()/base64 decoding, DOM/document replacement, injection and execution of fetched scripts, and anti-debugging measures. Even if intended for legitimate ad/response handling, the design gives the remote proxy full control of the user page and can be used for phishing, drive-by code execution, tracking, or loader behavior for further payloads. I recommend not using this code as-is; if legitimate functionality is required, replace the remote proxy with a trusted endpoint, remove eval()/document.write/anti-debugging, and implement strict validation and Content Security Policy controls.

The code presents significant privacy risks and potential for misuse in generating fake identities, which is indicative of malicious intent. The scraping of sensitive information from a third-party website without clear user consent is highly suspicious.

Live on pypi for 1 hour and 20 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

Malicious bash initialization script that performs destructive filesystem operations on macOS systems. When the external helper script 'isuserdarwin.sh' returns true, the script silently executes 'sudo rm -rf' to delete critical user directories including ~/Applications, ~/Movies, ~/Music, ~/Pictures, ~/Public, and ~/Sites without user confirmation. It also removes the macOS sleepimage file at /private/var/vm/sleepimage. The script modifies SSH directory permissions using 'sudo chmod -R go-rw' which can break SSH access or expose credentials. All destructive operations have their output suppressed with '>/dev/null 2>&1' to hide failures and make the actions stealthy. The script uses eval to execute the output of /usr/bin/dircolors, creating a command injection risk if the binary is compromised. It depends on external scripts (paper.sh, isuserdarwin.sh, debug.sh) whose contents are unknown and could execute arbitrary code. The destructive operations are embedded within what appears to be routine shell configuration code, likely to disguise the malicious intent.

This code poses a significant security risk due to its privacy violations. It should not be used without a clear understanding of what data is being sent and for what purpose. The lack of transparency and consent for the data collection raises significant privacy concerns and could potentially be used to steal sensitive information.

Live on npm for 2 days, 2 hours and 32 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

High risk. The preinstall hook executes local code (index.js) during npm install, and the package depends on a same-named package version — a combination frequently used in malicious supply-chain packages. You should not run npm install for this package without a full code review of index.js and the exact package version that would be installed from the registry. Treat this as potentially malicious until proven otherwise.

This fragment contains clear backdoor/control-plane behavior: a server-exposed API endpoint (/api/9remote/start) starts a local executable named "9remote" via child_process.spawn using environment variables and a derived on-disk path, suppresses child I/O, and includes explicit lifecycle termination logic. This is highly consistent with supply-chain malware/backdoor functionality rather than legitimate application behavior.

This code implements a backdoor that exfiltrates sensitive host information and executes arbitrary remote code. It collects all environment variables (process.env), system identifiers (hostname, username, platform), and MAC addresses, then sends this data via HTTP POST to https://log-server-lovat[.]vercel[.]app/api/ipcheck/703 with a hardcoded authentication header ('x-secret-header': 'secret'). The response from this server is directly executed via eval(r.data), enabling complete remote control over the infected system. The code uses hex-encoding to obfuscate critical strings including 'require', 'axios', 'post', and the malicious URL to evade detection. Environment variables commonly contain API keys, tokens, and other secrets, making this a severe data breach risk in addition to the remote code execution capability.

The SweetAlert2 library code is mostly benign and serves as a UI modal dialog tool. However, it contains a suspicious and potentially malicious snippet that targets Russian users on certain domains to play an unsolicited audio prank, disabling pointer events and potentially disrupting user interaction. This behavior is unexpected and should be considered a moderate security risk and potential malware. The rest of the code shows no signs of malicious intent. The provided reports were invalid and unhelpful. Users should be cautious about this version of the library due to the embedded prank behavior.

This module is a deliberate destructive utility that corrupts all .zip files in a specified directory by truncating each archive to half its size and appending repeated junk data. While it lacks common malware features like networking or data exfiltration, the behavior is strongly indicative of sabotage and would be unacceptable in most software supply-chain contexts due to its potential to break builds, deployments, or artifact integrity.

The code exhibits malicious behavior by collecting and sending system information to an external domain without user consent.

Live on npm for 14 days, 15 hours and 28 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This code is a highly suspicious Windows in-memory loader that downloads an untrusted PE over HTTP and performs process hollowing/reflective injection: it creates a suspended process, unmaps its image, allocates RWX memory, writes the downloaded PE headers/sections into the target, patches thread context to the new entry point, and resumes execution. The absence of payload integrity/authenticity controls and the direct RWX + thread-context manipulation strongly indicate malicious loader behavior. Do not use this dependency.

The package triggers execution of an installed dependency during postinstall. While the dependency is a registry package (not an explicit remote URL), running arbitrary install-time code is high-risk. You should treat this as potentially malicious until you inspect the contents of node_modules/jolie-postinstall (or the package's published files) to confirm its behavior. Recommended actions: audit the jolie-postinstall package source, verify its integrity and publisher, and avoid installing in sensitive environments until validated.

The script collects information like package name, directory path, home directory, hostname, username, DNS servers, and package.json content, and sends it to a remote server.

Live on npm for 2 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This fragment is a usage guide and configuration examples for an agent framework. It contains no direct malicious code, no download-execute patterns, no hardcoded secrets, and no obfuscated payloads. The realistic security risks are feature-level: tools that perform destructive or external actions (deleteFile, sendEmail), persistent storage that may hold sensitive data, and database integrations that rely on environment-stored credentials. These are expected capabilities for such a framework but require runtime access controls, careful tool implementation review, and secure handling of credentials. I find no evidence of deliberate malware in the provided text.

This code is malicious or at minimum intentionally dangerous. It includes persistence measures (injecting SSH keys), sets up a proxy service (Shadowsocks) using embedded credentials, provisions offensive tooling (Metasploit container), and contains an explicit destructive task (breakOs) that will wipe critical system directories. The module provides unfettered remote command execution and file upload capabilities. Do not run this code on any system you care about; consider it hostile and remove or quarantine it.

This script is a high-risk launcher: it unconditionally fetches Python code from a hardcoded remote repo and executes it locally via a shell-invoked Python process while passing unsanitized user inputs directly into the shell command. Even if the upstream repository is currently benign, the pattern enables trivial supply-chain compromise and shell injection. Mitigations: remove runtime download-and-exec; if fetching is necessary, pin and verify cryptographic hashes or signatures, validate content, avoid os.system (use subprocess with argument lists or importlib), sanitize inputs, and add error handling and logging. Treat this module as unsafe in security-sensitive environments until hardened.

The code contains malware that exfiltrates sensitive system information to pingb[.]in using both DNS queries via ping commands and direct HTTP requests. The following data is collected without user consent: - System hostname - Username - Current working directory - Network interface addresses The exfiltrated data is base64 encoded and tagged with the identifier '158ffb54d9afbc85aacb85f63ddc'. The malware is cross-platform compatible, using different ping command parameters for Windows (-n 1) versus other operating systems (-c 1).

Live on npm for 2 hours and 13 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

A preinstall script is retrieving data from a suspicious domain (http://02036244uv5j4nh1h320rs0cd3jt7i.oastify[.]com/poc.txt). This domain and the obfuscated URL indicate a potential attempt at data exfiltration or malicious payload retrieval, making it a serious security concern.

The fragment exhibits multiple risk indicators common in malicious or poorly secured code: startup persistence via Windows Run registry keys, insecure cryptography (ECB with MD5-derived key), and deserialization risk via BinaryFormatter. While no overt payload is observed, these patterns imply moderate-to-high security risk for distribution without strict usage controls, input validation, and modern cryptographic hygiene. Recommended mitigations include removing or restricting auto-start persistence, replacing ECB/MD5 cryptography with authenticated encryption (AES-GCM with proper key management and IVs), eliminating BinaryFormatter usage in favor of safe serializers, and adding rigorous input validation and integrity checks around untrusted data flows.

This source file is an HTTP client component of the Sliver implant C2 framework. It establishes encrypted sessions, polls for commands, and sends results to a remote server. In the context of general software supply chains or public packages, this is malicious/surveillance/backdoor functionality: it enables remote control and data exchange with an operator-controlled server. The code uses some weak randomness (math/rand) for nonce/header obfuscation and reads configuration including proxy credentials from URL query parameters. No direct local destructive actions are present in this file, but the networked C2 behavior is a high-security risk. Use of this module in production or inclusion in benign projects is strongly discouraged unless for authorized security testing.

This module performs stealthy local network reconnaissance (probing TCP port 445 across the host's /24 subnet) and exfiltrates the host's IP and responsive hosts to a hardcoded external HTTP endpoint without user consent. In most contexts (especially as a dependency) this constitutes malicious or highly suspicious behavior. Recommendation: treat as high-risk — do not run or install in production; remove or sandbox; investigate provenance and any related network traffic; block outbound requests to the hardcoded domain and review systems where this ran.

Live on npm for 1 hour and 49 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code implements a downloader that receives remote metadata and automates downloads and status reporting. It exhibits several high‑risk behaviors: credentials (self.bot.id and self.bot.pw) are leaked to a hardcoded third‑party endpoint via URL query parameters; filenames from the network are used directly as filesystem templates (path traversal/overwrite risk); exec() is used to create and start thread objects from remote data (code injection risk); and TLS verification is disabled for downloads. Collectively these represent a meaningful supply‑chain/data‑exfiltration risk. Recommendation: do not run this module with real credentials or on systems with sensitive data. Replace exec usage with safe thread construction, validate/sanitize filenames, stop sending secrets in URLs (use authenticated TLS requests with secrets in headers or POST bodies), enable certificate verification, and avoid calling exit() inside threads.

This code reads the current user's crontab and posts it to a hardcoded external HTTP endpoint, constituting direct data exfiltration of potentially sensitive system configuration. The use of plain HTTP, lack of consent/configuration, and unconditional behavior make this highly suspicious and likely malicious. Do not run or include this code in trusted environments without strong justification, provenance, and remediation (remove exfiltration, require explicit opt-in, use HTTPS, and add error/consent handling).

This fragment intends to install and start KasmVNC by running many shell commands that create certs, write VNC password files, adjust group membership, and launch a VNC server. The primary security issues are unsafe shell interpolation (command injection risk), programmatic persistence of a possibly predictable password, execution with sudo based on unvalidated env vars, starting a VNC server exposed on 0.0.0.0 with disabled/basic auth, and multiple unsafe filesystem operations performed via shell. There is no clear evidence of obfuscated or direct exfiltration malware, but the behavior can provide an unauthorized remote access vector (backdoor-like) if used maliciously. Do not run this code without fixing shell usage, validating inputs, using secure randomly generated passwords, enforcing proper file permissions, and not disabling authentication.

This script is high-risk and exhibits multiple behaviors commonly used in malicious or abusive web integrations: exfiltration of environment data to an external proxy, execution of arbitrary remote JavaScript via eval()/base64 decoding, DOM/document replacement, injection and execution of fetched scripts, and anti-debugging measures. Even if intended for legitimate ad/response handling, the design gives the remote proxy full control of the user page and can be used for phishing, drive-by code execution, tracking, or loader behavior for further payloads. I recommend not using this code as-is; if legitimate functionality is required, replace the remote proxy with a trusted endpoint, remove eval()/document.write/anti-debugging, and implement strict validation and Content Security Policy controls.

The code presents significant privacy risks and potential for misuse in generating fake identities, which is indicative of malicious intent. The scraping of sensitive information from a third-party website without clear user consent is highly suspicious.

Live on pypi for 1 hour and 20 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

Malicious bash initialization script that performs destructive filesystem operations on macOS systems. When the external helper script 'isuserdarwin.sh' returns true, the script silently executes 'sudo rm -rf' to delete critical user directories including ~/Applications, ~/Movies, ~/Music, ~/Pictures, ~/Public, and ~/Sites without user confirmation. It also removes the macOS sleepimage file at /private/var/vm/sleepimage. The script modifies SSH directory permissions using 'sudo chmod -R go-rw' which can break SSH access or expose credentials. All destructive operations have their output suppressed with '>/dev/null 2>&1' to hide failures and make the actions stealthy. The script uses eval to execute the output of /usr/bin/dircolors, creating a command injection risk if the binary is compromised. It depends on external scripts (paper.sh, isuserdarwin.sh, debug.sh) whose contents are unknown and could execute arbitrary code. The destructive operations are embedded within what appears to be routine shell configuration code, likely to disguise the malicious intent.

This code poses a significant security risk due to its privacy violations. It should not be used without a clear understanding of what data is being sent and for what purpose. The lack of transparency and consent for the data collection raises significant privacy concerns and could potentially be used to steal sensitive information.

Live on npm for 2 days, 2 hours and 32 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

High risk. The preinstall hook executes local code (index.js) during npm install, and the package depends on a same-named package version — a combination frequently used in malicious supply-chain packages. You should not run npm install for this package without a full code review of index.js and the exact package version that would be installed from the registry. Treat this as potentially malicious until proven otherwise.

This fragment contains clear backdoor/control-plane behavior: a server-exposed API endpoint (/api/9remote/start) starts a local executable named "9remote" via child_process.spawn using environment variables and a derived on-disk path, suppresses child I/O, and includes explicit lifecycle termination logic. This is highly consistent with supply-chain malware/backdoor functionality rather than legitimate application behavior.

This code implements a backdoor that exfiltrates sensitive host information and executes arbitrary remote code. It collects all environment variables (process.env), system identifiers (hostname, username, platform), and MAC addresses, then sends this data via HTTP POST to https://log-server-lovat[.]vercel[.]app/api/ipcheck/703 with a hardcoded authentication header ('x-secret-header': 'secret'). The response from this server is directly executed via eval(r.data), enabling complete remote control over the infected system. The code uses hex-encoding to obfuscate critical strings including 'require', 'axios', 'post', and the malicious URL to evade detection. Environment variables commonly contain API keys, tokens, and other secrets, making this a severe data breach risk in addition to the remote code execution capability.

The SweetAlert2 library code is mostly benign and serves as a UI modal dialog tool. However, it contains a suspicious and potentially malicious snippet that targets Russian users on certain domains to play an unsolicited audio prank, disabling pointer events and potentially disrupting user interaction. This behavior is unexpected and should be considered a moderate security risk and potential malware. The rest of the code shows no signs of malicious intent. The provided reports were invalid and unhelpful. Users should be cautious about this version of the library due to the embedded prank behavior.

This module is a deliberate destructive utility that corrupts all .zip files in a specified directory by truncating each archive to half its size and appending repeated junk data. While it lacks common malware features like networking or data exfiltration, the behavior is strongly indicative of sabotage and would be unacceptable in most software supply-chain contexts due to its potential to break builds, deployments, or artifact integrity.

The code exhibits malicious behavior by collecting and sending system information to an external domain without user consent.

Live on npm for 14 days, 15 hours and 28 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.