Secure your dependencies. Ship with confidence.

The provided code imports multiple modules and calls a function `functame` from each one. The names of the modules and the function `functame` are unusual and may suggest obfuscation or non-standard naming conventions. Without seeing the implementation of `functame` in each module, it is difficult to determine the intent or any potential malicious behavior. However, the unconventional naming patterns and the lack of clear functionality could be a sign of obfuscated or suspicious behavior.

Live on npm for 57 days, 2 hours and 50 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This script downloads a remote file and passes sensitive information to it. The script also executes a command with nc that could allow for remote code execution. This is highly suspicious and likely malicious.

Live on npm for 6 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The primary concern with this code is the use of 'exec' to execute scripts fetched from the internet without validation. This poses a significant security risk as it can potentially execute malicious code. The use of 'os.spawnle' and 'subprocess.Popen' with user-provided inputs also adds to the security concerns. Additionally, there is a typo in 'Optarser' and incomplete handling of the temporary directory cleanup. http://python-distribute.org/distribute_setup.py was marked as Malicious by 1 engine in VT. https://www.virustotal.com/gui/url/3dce83785eafd47d40edd58b58c82593994cd409fc76351033486881fe943c36

The code snippet poses a security risk due to its use of `exec` to connect to an external IP address. This behavior is suspicious and could indicate potential malicious intent, such as data exfiltration or downloading further malicious payloads. The lack of context or justification for the external connection further elevates the risk.

This file is encrypted with PyArmor

The purpose of this code appears to be collecting specific environment variables and package information, compressing and encoding it, and sending it over HTTP to a remote domain. The intent and purpose of this behavior are unclear from the provided code fragment alone.

Live on npm for 1 hour and 35 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This script exports the HOSTNAME environment variable and sends data to a remote server using curl. The script also sends sensitive system information to the remote server. This behavior is considered highly suspicious and potentially malicious.

Live on npm for 29 days, 16 hours and 26 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This package was removed from the npm registry for security reasons.

This package was removed from the npm registry for security reasons.

The script is making a request to a remote server, which could potentially be used for malicious purposes such as downloading and executing malicious code. This behavior raises security concerns.

Live on npm for 2 days, 21 hours and 53 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code is designed for data exfiltration to a suspicious domain, constituting a significant privacy risk and potentially malicious behavior. The collection and transmission of sensitive system and user information without explicit consent or awareness significantly increase the security risk associated with this package.

Live on npm for 3 days, 5 hours and 53 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code demonstrates several security risks, particularly the direct execution of commands based on user input, which can lead to command injection vulnerabilities and unauthorized file manipulation. It also lacks proper sanitization and validation of user input. The overall structure raises significant concerns regarding the potential for malicious behavior, especially if used in an untrusted environment.

The code is heavily obfuscated and performs malicious activities such as exfiltrating environment variables and sending them to suspicious remote servers. The use of obfuscation and unusual error handling further indicates malicious intent.

Live on npm for 8 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The script is not necessarily malicious, but it does involve dubious practices like automated publishing of npm packages and programmatically updating a WordPress site. It is also insecure due to the hardcoding of credentials and the potential misuse of automated npm package publishing.

Live on npm for 7 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This file is encrypted with PyArmor

The code exhibits malicious behavior by exfiltrating sensitive user information and system data to a remote server without consent. The infinite loop structure raises concerns about resource management. The overall risk and malware scores are high due to the nature of the actions performed.

Live on npm for 1 hour and 14 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code collects sensitive system information and sends it to a hardcoded remote server without user consent. This behavior is suspicious and can be considered malicious due to potential data leakage and privacy violations.

Live on npm for 1 day and 31 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code takes a base64 encoded string, decodes it, and evaluates it using the 'eval' function. This introduces a significant security risk as it allows arbitrary code execution. The code should be considered dangerous and should not be used.

Live on npm for 20 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code appears to be collecting sensitive system information and sending it to an external server. This behavior is indicative of data theft. Additionally, the reference to buying something through Telegram is highly suspicious and suggests potential malicious intent. Overall, this code poses a significant security risk.

Live on npm for 5 hours and 22 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This code poses a serious security risk and should not be used.

Live on npm for 2 hours and 2 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code contains potentially malicious behavior with an obfuscated watchdog functionality. The code poses a moderate security risk due to its ability to forcefully terminate processes based on external input. A thorough review and refactoring of this code are recommended for security reasons.

The script collects information like package name, directory path, home directory, hostname, username, DNS servers, and package.json data, and sends it to a remote server.

Live on npm for 13 hours and 34 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code exhibits clear malicious behavior intended for data exfiltration. It collects sensitive system information and sends it to a remote server via DNS queries, which is indicative of an attempt to bypass traditional network security measures.

The code exhibits behavior consistent with a supply chain attack, aiming to exfiltrate sensitive user and system information without consent. Despite a coding error in the hostname, the intent and capability for malicious activity are evident.

The source code exhibits several serious security concerns, including collecting system information, sending it to a suspicious domain, reading and decoding potentially sensitive files, and executing potentially malicious code. These behaviors justify high malware, obfuscation, and security risk scores.

Live on pypi for 21 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The provided code imports multiple modules and calls a function `functame` from each one. The names of the modules and the function `functame` are unusual and may suggest obfuscation or non-standard naming conventions. Without seeing the implementation of `functame` in each module, it is difficult to determine the intent or any potential malicious behavior. However, the unconventional naming patterns and the lack of clear functionality could be a sign of obfuscated or suspicious behavior.

Live on npm for 57 days, 2 hours and 50 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This script downloads a remote file and passes sensitive information to it. The script also executes a command with nc that could allow for remote code execution. This is highly suspicious and likely malicious.

Live on npm for 6 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The primary concern with this code is the use of 'exec' to execute scripts fetched from the internet without validation. This poses a significant security risk as it can potentially execute malicious code. The use of 'os.spawnle' and 'subprocess.Popen' with user-provided inputs also adds to the security concerns. Additionally, there is a typo in 'Optarser' and incomplete handling of the temporary directory cleanup. http://python-distribute.org/distribute_setup.py was marked as Malicious by 1 engine in VT. https://www.virustotal.com/gui/url/3dce83785eafd47d40edd58b58c82593994cd409fc76351033486881fe943c36

The code snippet poses a security risk due to its use of `exec` to connect to an external IP address. This behavior is suspicious and could indicate potential malicious intent, such as data exfiltration or downloading further malicious payloads. The lack of context or justification for the external connection further elevates the risk.

This file is encrypted with PyArmor

The purpose of this code appears to be collecting specific environment variables and package information, compressing and encoding it, and sending it over HTTP to a remote domain. The intent and purpose of this behavior are unclear from the provided code fragment alone.

Live on npm for 1 hour and 35 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This script exports the HOSTNAME environment variable and sends data to a remote server using curl. The script also sends sensitive system information to the remote server. This behavior is considered highly suspicious and potentially malicious.

Live on npm for 29 days, 16 hours and 26 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This package was removed from the npm registry for security reasons.

This package was removed from the npm registry for security reasons.

The script is making a request to a remote server, which could potentially be used for malicious purposes such as downloading and executing malicious code. This behavior raises security concerns.

Live on npm for 2 days, 21 hours and 53 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code is designed for data exfiltration to a suspicious domain, constituting a significant privacy risk and potentially malicious behavior. The collection and transmission of sensitive system and user information without explicit consent or awareness significantly increase the security risk associated with this package.

Live on npm for 3 days, 5 hours and 53 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code demonstrates several security risks, particularly the direct execution of commands based on user input, which can lead to command injection vulnerabilities and unauthorized file manipulation. It also lacks proper sanitization and validation of user input. The overall structure raises significant concerns regarding the potential for malicious behavior, especially if used in an untrusted environment.

The code is heavily obfuscated and performs malicious activities such as exfiltrating environment variables and sending them to suspicious remote servers. The use of obfuscation and unusual error handling further indicates malicious intent.

Live on npm for 8 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The script is not necessarily malicious, but it does involve dubious practices like automated publishing of npm packages and programmatically updating a WordPress site. It is also insecure due to the hardcoding of credentials and the potential misuse of automated npm package publishing.

Live on npm for 7 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This file is encrypted with PyArmor

The code exhibits malicious behavior by exfiltrating sensitive user information and system data to a remote server without consent. The infinite loop structure raises concerns about resource management. The overall risk and malware scores are high due to the nature of the actions performed.

Live on npm for 1 hour and 14 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code collects sensitive system information and sends it to a hardcoded remote server without user consent. This behavior is suspicious and can be considered malicious due to potential data leakage and privacy violations.

Live on npm for 1 day and 31 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code takes a base64 encoded string, decodes it, and evaluates it using the 'eval' function. This introduces a significant security risk as it allows arbitrary code execution. The code should be considered dangerous and should not be used.

Live on npm for 20 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code appears to be collecting sensitive system information and sending it to an external server. This behavior is indicative of data theft. Additionally, the reference to buying something through Telegram is highly suspicious and suggests potential malicious intent. Overall, this code poses a significant security risk.

Live on npm for 5 hours and 22 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This code poses a serious security risk and should not be used.

Live on npm for 2 hours and 2 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code contains potentially malicious behavior with an obfuscated watchdog functionality. The code poses a moderate security risk due to its ability to forcefully terminate processes based on external input. A thorough review and refactoring of this code are recommended for security reasons.

The script collects information like package name, directory path, home directory, hostname, username, DNS servers, and package.json data, and sends it to a remote server.

Live on npm for 13 hours and 34 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code exhibits clear malicious behavior intended for data exfiltration. It collects sensitive system information and sends it to a remote server via DNS queries, which is indicative of an attempt to bypass traditional network security measures.

The code exhibits behavior consistent with a supply chain attack, aiming to exfiltrate sensitive user and system information without consent. Despite a coding error in the hostname, the intent and capability for malicious activity are evident.

The source code exhibits several serious security concerns, including collecting system information, sending it to a suspicious domain, reading and decoding potentially sensitive files, and executing potentially malicious code. These behaviors justify high malware, obfuscation, and security risk scores.

Live on pypi for 21 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.