@0xsequence/auth - npm Package Compare versions

Comparing version 0.10.8 to 0.10.9

CHANGELOG.md

 # @0xsequence/auth
 
+## 0.10.9
+
+### Patch Changes
+
+- add support for public addresses as signers in session.open
+- Updated dependencies [undefined]
+  - @0xsequence/abi@0.10.9
+  - @0xsequence/api@0.10.9
+  - @0xsequence/config@0.10.9
+  - @0xsequence/network@0.10.9
+  - @0xsequence/wallet@0.10.9
+
 ## 0.10.8
@@ -4,0 +16,0 @@

dist/0xsequence-auth.cjs.dev.js

@@ -264,5 +264,6 @@ 'use strict';
       return _extends({}, s, {
-        address: await s.signer.getAddress()
+        address: typeof s.signer === 'string' ? s.signer : await s.signer.getAddress()
       });
     }));
+    const fullSigners = signers.filter(s => typeof s.signer !== 'string').map(s => s.signer);
     const existingWallet = (await configFinder.findLastWalletOfInitialSigner({
@@ -290,3 +291,3 @@ signer: referenceSigner,
         context: context
-      }, ...signers.map(s => s.signer));
+      }, ...fullSigners);
       const session = new Session(config$1, context, account, metadata); // Fire JWT requests before opening session. The server-side will have to
@@ -308,3 +309,3 @@ // be smart enough to try a few times if it fails on the first block, as in
         context: context
-      }, ...signers.map(s => s.signer))); // Fire JWT requests again, but with new config
+      }, ...fullSigners)); // Fire JWT requests again, but with new config
       // MAYBE This is not neccesary, we can rely on the first request?
@@ -323,3 +324,3 @@ // TODO: lets remove this one we no longer depend on session
         context: context
-      }, ...signers.map(s => s.signer));
+      }, ...fullSigners);
       await account.publishConfig(noIndex ? false : true);
@@ -326,0 +327,0 @@ const session = new Session(config$1, context, account, metadata);

dist/0xsequence-auth.cjs.prod.js

@@ -264,5 +264,6 @@ 'use strict';
       return _extends({}, s, {
-        address: await s.signer.getAddress()
+        address: typeof s.signer === 'string' ? s.signer : await s.signer.getAddress()
       });
     }));
+    const fullSigners = signers.filter(s => typeof s.signer !== 'string').map(s => s.signer);
     const existingWallet = (await configFinder.findLastWalletOfInitialSigner({
@@ -290,3 +291,3 @@ signer: referenceSigner,
         context: context
-      }, ...signers.map(s => s.signer));
+      }, ...fullSigners);
       const session = new Session(config$1, context, account, metadata); // Fire JWT requests before opening session. The server-side will have to
@@ -308,3 +309,3 @@ // be smart enough to try a few times if it fails on the first block, as in
         context: context
-      }, ...signers.map(s => s.signer))); // Fire JWT requests again, but with new config
+      }, ...fullSigners)); // Fire JWT requests again, but with new config
       // MAYBE This is not neccesary, we can rely on the first request?
@@ -323,3 +324,3 @@ // TODO: lets remove this one we no longer depend on session
         context: context
-      }, ...signers.map(s => s.signer));
+      }, ...fullSigners);
       await account.publishConfig(noIndex ? false : true);
@@ -326,0 +327,0 @@ const session = new Session(config$1, context, account, metadata);

dist/0xsequence-auth.esm.js

@@ -260,5 +260,6 @@ import { ethers } from 'ethers';
       return _extends({}, s, {
-        address: await s.signer.getAddress()
+        address: typeof s.signer === 'string' ? s.signer : await s.signer.getAddress()
       });
     }));
+    const fullSigners = signers.filter(s => typeof s.signer !== 'string').map(s => s.signer);
     const existingWallet = (await configFinder.findLastWalletOfInitialSigner({
@@ -286,3 +287,3 @@ signer: referenceSigner,
         context: context
-      }, ...signers.map(s => s.signer));
+      }, ...fullSigners);
       const session = new Session(config, context, account, metadata); // Fire JWT requests before opening session. The server-side will have to
@@ -304,3 +305,3 @@ // be smart enough to try a few times if it fails on the first block, as in
         context: context
-      }, ...signers.map(s => s.signer))); // Fire JWT requests again, but with new config
+      }, ...fullSigners)); // Fire JWT requests again, but with new config
       // MAYBE This is not neccesary, we can rely on the first request?
@@ -319,3 +320,3 @@ // TODO: lets remove this one we no longer depend on session
         context: context
-      }, ...signers.map(s => s.signer));
+      }, ...fullSigners);
       await account.publishConfig(noIndex ? false : true);
@@ -322,0 +323,0 @@ const session = new Session(config, context, account, metadata);

dist/declarations/src/session.d.ts

@@ -54,3 +54,3 @@ import { WalletConfig } from "@0xsequence/config";
         signers: {
-            signer: AbstractSigner;
+            signer: AbstractSigner | string;
             weight: ethers.BigNumberish;
@@ -57,0 +57,0 @@ }[];

package.json

 {
   "name": "@0xsequence/auth",
-  "version": "0.10.8",
+  "version": "0.10.9",
   "description": "auth sub-package for Sequence",
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ "repository": "https://github.com/0xsequence/sequence.js/tree/master/packages/auth",
   "dependencies": {
-    "@0xsequence/abi": "^0.10.8",
-    "@0xsequence/api": "^0.10.8",
-    "@0xsequence/config": "^0.10.8",
-    "@0xsequence/network": "^0.10.8",
-    "@0xsequence/wallet": "^0.10.8",
+    "@0xsequence/abi": "^0.10.9",
+    "@0xsequence/api": "^0.10.9",
+    "@0xsequence/config": "^0.10.9",
+    "@0xsequence/network": "^0.10.9",
+    "@0xsequence/wallet": "^0.10.9",
     "@0xsequence/ethauth": "^0.4.3",
@@ -27,0 +27,0 @@ "ethers": "^5.0.32"

src/session.ts

@@ -203,3 +203,3 @@ import { editConfig, genConfig, SequenceUtilsFinder, WalletConfig } from "@0xsequence/config"
     referenceSigner: string,
-    signers: { signer: AbstractSigner, weight: ethers.BigNumberish }[],
+    signers: { signer: AbstractSigner | string, weight: ethers.BigNumberish }[],
     thershold: ethers.BigNumberish,
@@ -229,3 +229,7 @@ metadata: SessionMeta,
   
-    const solvedSigners = Promise.all(signers.map(async (s) => ({ ...s, address: await s.signer.getAddress() })))
+    const solvedSigners = Promise.all(
+      signers.map(async s => ({ ...s, address: typeof(s.signer) === 'string' ? s.signer : await s.signer.getAddress() }))
+    )
+
+    const fullSigners = signers.filter(s => typeof(s.signer) !== 'string').map(s => s.signer)
   
@@ -257,3 +261,3 @@ const existingWallet = (await configFinder.findLastWalletOfInitialSigner({
         context: context
-      }, ...signers.map((s) => s.signer))
+      }, ...fullSigners)
   
@@ -286,3 +290,3 @@ const session = new Session(
         context: context
-      }, ...signers.map((s) => s.signer)))
+      }, ...fullSigners))
 
@@ -305,3 +309,3 @@ // Fire JWT requests again, but with new config
         context: context
-      }, ...signers.map((s) => s.signer))
+      }, ...fullSigners)
     
@@ -308,0 +312,0 @@ await account.publishConfig(noIndex ? false : true)

New alerts

License Policy Violation

License

This package is not allowed per your license policy. Review the package's license to ensure compliance.

Found 1 instance in 1 package

New author

Supply chain risk

A new npm collaborator published a version of the package for the first time. New collaborators are usually benign additions to a project, but do indicate a change to the security surface area of a package.

Found 1 instance in 1 package

Fixed alerts

License Policy Violation

License

This package is not allowed per your license policy. Review the package's license to ensure compliance.

Found 1 instance in 1 package

Improved metrics

Total package byte prevSize

55075

increased by1.21%

Lines of code

1267

increased by0.48%

Worsened metrics

Number of medium supply chain risk alerts

1

increased byInfinity%

Dependency changes

• Updated@0xsequence/abi@^0.10.9

• Updated@0xsequence/api@^0.10.9

• Updated@0xsequence/config@^0.10.9

• Updated@0xsequence/network@^0.10.9

• Updated@0xsequence/wallet@^0.10.9