Sonde

A local code-context engine for AI coding agents. Sonde indexes a TypeScript,
Python, or Swift repository into a symbol-level graph in SQLite and exposes
three MCP tools — find_symbols, query_graph, and get_impact_radius — so an
agent can answer who calls this, what breaks if I change it, and which
tests relate to it in one call instead of a search loop.
What the benchmark actually shows
The honest claim is not "finds what grep cannot". A competent agentic search
loop finds the same structural evidence — we measured it, on a real 19,409-line
repository, and it scored 1.000 recall on every task.
The claim is the same answers for a fraction of the cost, inside a budget:
| Recall on structural tasks | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Tool calls | 1.0 | 8.0 |
| Context tokens | 1,262 | 3,621 |
| Latency | 263 ms | 38,602 ms |
| Runs that blew the token budget | 0 of 6 | 3 of 6 |
Sonde matches the baseline's answers on every structural task while using
~3× less context, 8× fewer calls, and ~147× less wall-clock time — and it never
exceeds the caller's token budget, because the packer truncates to it by
construction. That is the trade being offered.
Where it loses. Behavioural queries with no shared vocabulary — "where is
the retry backoff decided?" — score 0.00. Local semantic retrieval was built
and measured and does not fix it (see the design doc §2.2); the capability is
therefore not claimed. If your questions are mostly of that shape, an agentic
search loop is the better tool today.
Numbers are reproducible: npm run bench:fixture && npm run bench:large.
Full results in BENCHMARK-LARGE.md and
BENCHMARK.md.
Install and run
npm install -g @cheppulabs/sonde
cd your-project
sonde init
sonde init indexes the repository and registers sonde as an MCP server in
this project's .mcp.json, asking before it writes anything (skip the prompt
with sonde init --yes). It never touches an .mcp.json it can't safely merge
into — an existing sonde entry that differs from what init would write is
left alone and reported, not overwritten.
For Python repositories, use sonde init --resolve; the default tree-sitter
tier did not pass the project's placement gate for structural queries.
Equivalent by hand, if you'd rather see every step:
sonde index .
No account or hosted service is required.
Architecture documentation
sonde doc writes an ARCHITECTURE.md describing the
repository's modules, how they depend on each other, and what each one exposes —
generated from the graph, so it reports what the code actually does rather than
what someone remembered.
sonde doc
sonde doc --stdout
sonde doc --check
sonde doc --module src/store
It is meant to be committed and regenerated, not hand-edited. Regeneration is
byte-identical when nothing changed, so it does not churn your diffs; when two
branches both regenerate it, resolve the conflict by running sonde doc again
rather than merging by hand. It refuses to overwrite an ARCHITECTURE.md it did
not generate.
Three things it deliberately does not do:
- It does not draw a dependency it cannot evidence. Module pairs that merely
share symbol names are excluded and counted separately. On this repository two
adapters share the filenames
symbols.ts, parser.ts and references.ts,
which manufactured 62 heuristic "references" between modules that never import
each other — once the second-heaviest arrow in the diagram.
- It does not pretend the diagram is complete. The diagram shows the
heaviest dependencies and states how many it omitted; the table below it goes
further, and
--module has the rest. A diagram containing every dependency is
unreadable and therefore shows nothing.
- It does not claim to be current when it is not. The header names the
commit it describes and warns when files have changed since.
What it guarantees
- Never returns stale source bytes. Whenever a response includes source,
Sonde re-reads and re-hashes the indexed byte range before returning it
(spec §8.1, Guarantee A).
- Always reports structural drift, rather than claiming completeness it
cannot verify (spec §8.1, Guarantee B).
sonde status shows the same
drift and tier distribution carried by tool response envelopes.
- Every edge is tier-labelled by how it was found —
COMPILER (resolved
exactly by a bundled type checker under --resolve: the TypeScript compiler
for TypeScript, pyright for Python), LEXICAL
(resolved through an import binding or lexical scope), HEURISTIC (member
access or another relationship requiring type inference), EXTERNAL (target
outside the indexed repository), or UNRESOLVED (genuinely unplaceable,
with a reason).
- Never fabricates an edge. An unresolved reference becomes
EXTERNAL or
UNRESOLVED — never a guessed target and never a silently dropped reference.
Accuracy
Sonde measures its zero-setup tree-sitter path against the TypeScript
compiler on a pinned fixture and publishes the result, unflattering numbers
included (spec §12). COMPILER edges use that compiler directly, so comparing
them back to the same authority would not be an independent accuracy test.
Sonde edge accuracy vs the TypeScript compiler
Generated: 2026-08-23T18:16:41.557Z
TypeScript: 5.9.3 (bundled; repository TypeScript is never loaded)
What these numbers cover. The oracle measures the tree-sitter resolution
path — the zero-setup default, and the only tier whose accuracy is in question.
COMPILER-tier edges come from the TypeScript compiler itself, so scoring them
against the same compiler would measure nothing; they are exact by construction
and excluded from these figures. Run sonde index --resolve to produce them.
The oracle is filtered to in-repo targets; node_modules and .d.ts
declarations are excluded. Type-only references, JSX intrinsics, export =,
decorators, and declaration merging are known expected divergences (spec §10).
Tier rows compare that tier alone with the complete oracle, making each tier's
independent contribution visible; ALL is the combined result.
Why precision below 1.000 is expected here
These divergences are structural, so reading a precision figure as
"how often Sonde is wrong" overstates the error rate:
- Ambiguous member calls emit every candidate. For
x.foo() with two
visible foo declarations, Sonde emits both as confidence-weighted
HEURISTIC edges. At most one matches the compiler, so the other counts
as a false positive by construction. The alternative is guessing a single
target, which invariant 1 forbids — a wrong resolved-looking edge is worse
than two honestly heuristic ones. Precision is therefore capped below
1.000 wherever the fixture contains an ambiguous call.
- Constructor calls are ours alone. Sonde emits
CALLS for
new Foo(); the oracle does not model them, so each one is a false
positive against ground truth that omits it.
- Member-level IMPLEMENTS is ours alone. Sonde derives an
IMPLEMENTS edge from
RegExpRouter.add to Router.add once the class
declares it implements the interface. tsc reports heritage clauses at the
type level only, so every member-level edge counts as a false positive
against ground truth that does not model them. The capability is the
reason impact on an interface method works at all, so the precision cost
is disclosed rather than removed.
Counts are absolute, not percentages of a large corpus. Fixture edge totals
appear below so a single edge's effect on each figure is visible.
tests/fixtures/repos/small
Fixture config SHA-256: e02e2d5003f96d1ad22519f04e10d687fe689cf9298e7fcbc588eab525dce1ad
Oracle edges: 9 · Sonde edges: 7 · one oracle edge moves recall by 11.1%
| CALLS | ALL | 0.500 | 1.000 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| CALLS | LEXICAL | 0.500 | 0.500 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| CALLS | HEURISTIC | 0.500 | 0.500 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| IMPLEMENTS | ALL | 0.500 | 1.000 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| IMPLEMENTS | LEXICAL | 0.500 | 1.000 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| IMPLEMENTS | HEURISTIC | 1.000 | 0.000 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| INHERITS | ALL | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| INHERITS | LEXICAL | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| INHERITS | HEURISTIC | 1.000 | 0.000 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| REFERENCES | ALL | 0.571 | 0.800 | 4 | 3 | 1 |
| REFERENCES | LEXICAL | 0.800 | 0.800 | 4 | 1 | 1 |
| REFERENCES | HEURISTIC | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
Overall: precision 0.571, recall 0.889
Regenerate with npm run bench:oracle.
CLI
sonde init [path] [--resolve] [--yes] # index and register project MCP config
sonde index [path] [--resolve] # full index; optional compiler pass
sonde update [path] [--resolve] # update; optional compiler pass
sonde status [path] # freshness and tier distribution
sonde search <query> [path] # find_symbols
sonde query <pattern> <symbol> [path] # query_graph
sonde impact [path] --symbol <name> # get_impact_radius by symbol
sonde impact [path] --from-git-diff # impact from working-tree diff
sonde doctor [path] # parser/database/tsc health
sonde clean [path] # remove the cached index
sonde mcp serve [path] # MCP server over stdio
impact also accepts repeatable --symbol options and
--token-budget <n>. The init, index, update, status, search, query,
impact, doctor, and clean commands accept --json.
Known limitations
- Node 22+ is required.
better-sqlite3 needs it; installing on an older
Node prints an EBADENGINE warning but still completes. If sonde then
fails to run, this is why — upgrade Node rather than ignore the warning.
- Python needs
--resolve, and its edges are not oracle-verified. Without
it, Python indexes at the tree-sitter tier only, which measured 62.81%
unresolved on a real 56-file project and 57.39% on pydantic — far past the
30% ceiling this project requires, so it is not fit for structural queries.
With --resolve, a bundled pyright drives a COMPILER tier and the same
corpora measure 27.00% and 17.42% unresolved. That gate measured
placement — whether a reference found a target — not whether the target was
correct; TypeScript's edges are scored against tsc in ORACLE.md and
Python has no equivalent oracle. On the worse corpus the margin is thin: 0.28
points once a known upward bias is reversed. See
probes/python-placement/FINDINGS.md.
- TypeScript, Python and Swift only; no other language adapter.
- Swift resolution is heuristic, not compiler-backed, and one narrowing
rule is unvalidated. References are narrowed by file visibility and
explicit local type annotations, not full type inference. On a real
376-file Swift application this reached 74.84% placed / 25.16% unresolved
— see
probes/swift-narrowing/FINDINGS.md
for the full measurement. The third narrowing rule (SwiftPM target
boundaries) has never been tested: the validating corpus was an Xcode
project, which has no Package.swift layout to supply that signal. The
curated Swift SDK symbol table is also deliberately conservative — several
ambiguous names were dropped rather than guessed, so some legitimate SDK
references may still show as UNRESOLVED rather than EXTERNAL.
- Compiler resolution for TypeScript (
--resolve) is opt-in because it is
materially slower and uses more transient memory. On the 19,409-line Hono
fixture, default indexing took 3.58 s; --resolve took 13.70 s, added
10,329 exact placements/promotions, and changed callers_of Hono.route
from zero graph results to eight compiler callers. The Program is discarded
after indexing; inline refresh stays compiler-free and explicitly
downgrades affected evidence until a full sonde update --resolve.
- Compiler resolution uses bundled TypeScript 5.9.3, not the repository's own
compiler, so version skew is possible and disclosed in
doctor and response
envelopes.
- A file with a parse error still contributes whatever tree-sitter
recovered from it — this is deliberate (see the design spec §8). Its
parse_state is partial when real declarations were recovered despite
the error, or failed only when nothing usable came out of it at all.
TESTS edges indicate structural relatedness only; they never prove coverage.
- Type-only references, JSX intrinsics,
export =/import =, decorators, and
declaration merging are known gaps in the tree-sitter extraction path.
- No rename inference. Renaming a file changes every stable key derived
from its path; anything holding an old key (a saved query, an agent's prior
turn) will silently stop resolving rather than following the rename.
- Semantic/behavioural search is not available. It was built and measured —
two embedding models, four document configurations — and none of them beat
lexical/structural retrieval on the task class it was meant to help with.
See design spec §2.2 for the numbers. It is not wired into
find_symbols.
See
docs/superpowers/specs/2026-08-16-sonde-design.md
for the full design.