@financial-times/ft-date-format
Advanced tools
Comparing version 1.0.5 to 2.0.0-beta.0
@@ -30,3 +30,3 @@ // Karma configuration | ||
preprocessors: { | ||
'**/*.test.js': ['webpack'] | ||
'**/*.test.js': ['esbuild'] | ||
}, | ||
@@ -33,0 +33,0 @@ |
{ | ||
"description": "ft-date-format provides javascript utilities for formatting and updating dates in FT style.", | ||
"origamiType": "library", | ||
"origamiVersion": 1, | ||
"keywords": [], | ||
"origamiVersion": "2.0", | ||
"support": "https://github.com/Financial-Times/ft-date-format/issues", | ||
@@ -7,0 +5,0 @@ "supportStatus": "maintained", |
{ | ||
"name": "@financial-times/ft-date-format", | ||
"version": "1.0.5", | ||
"version": "2.0.0-beta.0", | ||
"description": "Utility for formatting and updating dates for Financial-Times customer-facing products", | ||
@@ -15,12 +15,10 @@ "main": "index.js", | ||
"devDependencies": { | ||
"karma": "5.2.3", | ||
"karma": "^6.3.2", | ||
"karma-chrome-launcher": "3.1.0", | ||
"karma-esbuild": "^2.1.3", | ||
"karma-mocha": "2.0.1", | ||
"karma-webpack": "3.0.5", | ||
"mocha": "8.2.1", | ||
"mocha": "8.3.2", | ||
"proclaim": "3.6.0", | ||
"sinon": "9.2.3", | ||
"webpack": "4.45.0" | ||
"sinon": "10.0.1" | ||
}, | ||
"dependencies": {}, | ||
"repository": { | ||
@@ -33,3 +31,10 @@ "type": "git", | ||
}, | ||
"homepage": "https://github.com/Financial-Times/ft-date-format#readme" | ||
"homepage": "https://github.com/Financial-Times/ft-date-format#readme", | ||
"engines": { | ||
"npm": "^7" | ||
}, | ||
"volta": { | ||
"node": "14.16.1", | ||
"npm": "7.11.1" | ||
} | ||
} |
Sorry, the diff of this file is not supported yet
Sorry, the diff of this file is not supported yet
Sorry, the diff of this file is not supported yet
Sorry, the diff of this file is not supported yet
Sorry, the diff of this file is not supported yet
Sorry, the diff of this file is not supported yet
Sorry, the diff of this file is not supported yet
Sorry, the diff of this file is not supported yet
License Policy Violation
LicenseThis package is not allowed per your license policy. Review the package's license to ensure compliance.
Found 1 instance in 1 package
No v1
QualityPackage is not semver >=1. This means it is not stable and does not support ^ ranges.
Found 1 instance in 1 package
License Policy Violation
LicenseThis package is not allowed per your license policy. Review the package's license to ensure compliance.
Found 1 instance in 1 package
7
42681
17
778
2