@swarmy/lru-cache - npm Package Compare versions

Comparing version 2.0.4 to 2.0.5

package.json

 {
   "name": "@swarmy/lru-cache",
-  "version": "2.0.4",
+  "version": "2.0.5",
   "description": "LRU cache with event registry to handle cache changes",
@@ -31,3 +31,3 @@ "author": "Gerd Neudert",
     "generate-doc": "./node_modules/.bin/jsdoc -a all -d docs ./src/LruCache.js",
-    "prep-publish": "rm -rf docs && rm -rf coverage && npm run build && npm run test && npm run test-performance && npm run remove-absolute-pathes-from-reports && npm run generate-doc"
+    "prep-publish": "rm -rf docs && rm -rf coverage && npm run build && npm run test && npm run test-performance && npm run remove-absolute-pathes-from-reports && npm run generate-doc && echo \"!!!DO NOT FORGET TO UPDATE commit in README afterwards!!!\""
   },
@@ -34,0 +34,0 @@ "devDependencies": {

README.md

@@ -44,3 +44,3 @@ # lru-cache
     * [Detailed Usage](#caching-detail)
-    * [JSDoc](https://rawcdn.githack.com/gneu77/lru-cache/a58e345708cb07d4f24434eba9ea4760d61a264b/docs/index.html)
+    * [JSDoc](https://rawcdn.githack.com/gneu77/lru-cache/a03482ca34b4dd7decf6d6057e56c8a8cee7fb6e/docs/index.html)
 
@@ -58,8 +58,8 @@ ### Cache Events
     * [Detailed Usage](#cache-events-detail)
-    * [JSDoc](https://rawcdn.githack.com/gneu77/lru-cache/a58e345708cb07d4f24434eba9ea4760d61a264b/docs/index.html)
+    * [JSDoc](https://rawcdn.githack.com/gneu77/lru-cache/a03482ca34b4dd7decf6d6057e56c8a8cee7fb6e/docs/index.html)
 
 ## Quality
-* [Test results](https://rawcdn.githack.com/gneu77/lru-cache/a58e345708cb07d4f24434eba9ea4760d61a264b/test-report.html)
-* [Test coverage](https://rawcdn.githack.com/gneu77/lru-cache/a58e345708cb07d4f24434eba9ea4760d61a264b/coverage/index.html)
-* [Performance tests](https://rawcdn.githack.com/gneu77/lru-cache/a58e345708cb07d4f24434eba9ea4760d61a264b/performance-report.html)
+* [Test results](https://rawcdn.githack.com/gneu77/lru-cache/a03482ca34b4dd7decf6d6057e56c8a8cee7fb6e/test-report.html)
+* [Test coverage](https://rawcdn.githack.com/gneu77/lru-cache/a03482ca34b4dd7decf6d6057e56c8a8cee7fb6e/coverage/index.html)
+* [Performance tests](https://rawcdn.githack.com/gneu77/lru-cache/a03482ca34b4dd7decf6d6057e56c8a8cee7fb6e/performance-report.html)
 
@@ -88,6 +88,6 @@ ## Develop
 * Compared to a native Javascript Map, the LRU logic implies performance impact on get, set and delete. It's just the price to pay for having a LRU cache.
-    * See [Performance tests](https://rawcdn.githack.com/gneu77/lru-cache/a58e345708cb07d4f24434eba9ea4760d61a264b/performance-report.html)
+    * See [Performance tests](https://rawcdn.githack.com/gneu77/lru-cache/a03482ca34b4dd7decf6d6057e56c8a8cee7fb6e/performance-report.html)
     * However, the methods are still O(1). (Only setMaxSize has O(size-newMaxSize), if size>newMaxSize)
 * Compared to a LRU cache without cache events, the is additional performance impact on get, set and delete.
-    * Again see [Performance tests](https://rawcdn.githack.com/gneu77/lru-cache/a58e345708cb07d4f24434eba9ea4760d61a264b/performance-report.html)
+    * Again see [Performance tests](https://rawcdn.githack.com/gneu77/lru-cache/a03482ca34b4dd7decf6d6057e56c8a8cee7fb6e/performance-report.html)
     * However, if you are caching for performance, then because the fetching of values is significantly more time consuming. So whether you save 400ms or only 399ms hardly makes a difference here.
@@ -94,0 +94,0 @@ * If you are not caching for performance reasons, but to have the change events, well than again it's just the price to pay for the event handling.

New alerts

License Policy Violation

License

This package is not allowed per your license policy. Review the package's license to ensure compliance.

Found 1 instance in 1 package

Fixed alerts

License Policy Violation

License

This package is not allowed per your license policy. Review the package's license to ensure compliance.

Found 1 instance in 1 package

Improved metrics

Total package byte prevSize

118659

increased by0.06%

No dependency changes