
Security News
Deno Goes the Way of the Dinosaur
Cloudflare is acquiring Deno’s team, which will provide another year of bug fixes and security updates before ending support for the runtime.
Tool-neutral workflow layer for spec-driven software development. Gives coding agents a durable project constitution, system specs, structured increments, bounded multi-agent execution, and verifiable delivery rules.
Works with Claude Code and Codex. Supports single-agent interactive work and multi-agent autonomous runs across providers.
npm install -g esperkit
esperkit install
Then initialize through the agent:
esper:init
This interviews you, creates the .esper/ directory with a constitution, spec scaffolding, and workflow config.
EsperKit supports two complementary development styles. Spec-to-Code supports both interactive (single-agent) and autonomous (multi-agent) execution.
flowchart LR
D{Starting point?}
D -->|Spec-first| E[Revise spec]
D -->|Direct request| P[Plan increment]
E --> G[Approve]
P --> G
G --> M{Execution mode?}
M -->|Interactive| H[Agent implements] --> O
M -->|Autonomous| I[Orchestrator splits tasks]
I --> J[Workers implement in parallel]
J --> K{Reviewer evaluates}
K -->|Fail| J
K -->|Pass| O
O[Review & sync] -->|More work| D
Spec-to-Code — define or revise the system spec first, then derive implementation from it.
esper:spec → open or create the spec working file, revise with the agent
esper:go → approve spec and begin execution (no second approval gate)
esper:review → verify implementation
Plan-to-Spec — start from a direct request, implement in bounded increments, then sync back into specs.
esper:atom → single bounded task (or esper:batch for a queue)
esper:go → approve plan, implement
esper:review → verify implementation
esper:sync → force spec sync if needed (usually automatic)
Both workflows use esper:go as the shared approval gate and esper:continue to resume interrupted sessions.
| Command | What it does |
|---|---|
esper:init | Interview, scaffold project, write constitution |
esper:spec | Open or create the spec working file for authoring and revision |
esper:atom | Create a single bounded increment from a direct request |
esper:batch | Create a queued series of related increments |
esper:go | Cross the active approval boundary and advance the workflow |
esper:continue | Resume interrupted work from current project state |
esper:review | Verify implementation against the approved plan and specs |
esper:sync | Force or retry post-implementation code-to-spec sync |
esper:context | Show current project state and next safe action |
Use the same esper:* command names across hosts, including Claude Code and Codex.
| Command | What it does |
|---|---|
esperkit install | Install or update host-specific skills |
esperkit init | Create deterministic project scaffolding |
esperkit config | Read or write project config |
esperkit context get | Print runtime context as JSON |
esperkit spec | Manage the spec tree (index, get, create, set-root, archive) |
esperkit increment | Manage increments (list, get, create, activate, finish, set, group) |
esperkit run | Manage autonomous runs (create, get, list, stop) |
esperkit doctor | Run project health checks |
esperkit migrate | Migrate project state to the latest schema |
Constitution — durable project-level document describing what the project is and is not, key technical decisions, testing strategy, and principles.
Specs — long-lived system description for agents and humans. Architecture, behavior, interfaces, constraints. Not temporary task notes.
Increments — bounded units of delivery. Each stores what will change, why, how to verify it, and which specs it touches. Single-job mode (one atomic increment) or queued mode (a series of increments processed sequentially).
Runs — machine-readable autonomous execution records derived from an approved scope contract and its corresponding parent increment.
Task packets — bounded work items inside a run, subordinate to the parent increment.
Working file — the Markdown file that serves as the shared review surface between you and the agent. Chat, edit directly, or leave comments inside it.
.esper/
├── esper.json # project config and workflow preferences
├── context.json # machine-readable runtime state
├── CONSTITUTION.md # project vision and constraints
├── WORKFLOW.md # agent bootstrap instructions
├── increments/
│ ├── pending/ # queued work
│ ├── active/ # current working increment (max 1)
│ ├── done/ # completed, not yet archived
│ └── archived/ # closed historical increments
└── runs/ # autonomous execution records
└── <run-id>/
├── run.json
├── tasks/
└── reviews/
<spec_root>/ # default: specs/
├── index.md # spec tree entrypoint
├── _work/ # temporary spec coordination files
└── ... # organized by domain
| Situation | Command |
|---|---|
| Architecture or behavior needs design before coding (approved spec goes directly to execution) | esper:spec |
| Small, bounded task with a known outcome | esper:atom |
| Multiple related changes that should be queued | esper:batch |
| Returning after a break or state is unclear | esper:context |
MIT
FAQs
Vibe coding workflow & toolkit for Claude Code and Codex
We found that esperkit demonstrated a healthy version release cadence and project activity because the last version was released less than a year ago. It has 1 open source maintainer collaborating on the project.

Security News
Cloudflare is acquiring Deno’s team, which will provide another year of bug fixes and security updates before ending support for the runtime.

Security News
Anthropic’s free OSS Scanner uses Mythos and other Claude models to find open source vulnerabilities and send maintainers reports with proposed fixes.

Security News
On Front Lines’ Early Adopters: CISO podcast, Andrew Becherer shares lessons from Datadog, weighs the long-term costs of AI-built tools, and explains how founders can actually gain a CISO’s trust.