Comparing version 0.0.80 to 0.0.82
{ | ||
"name": "raz", | ||
"description": "Razor-like Template Engine for NodeJS Express library based on ASP.NET MVC Razor syntax. Template your views by mixing HTML markup with JavaScript server-side code!", | ||
"version": "0.0.80", | ||
"version": "0.0.82", | ||
"author": { | ||
@@ -17,3 +17,2 @@ "name": "Sergey F.", | ||
}, | ||
"main": "test/run-test-server.js", | ||
"scripts": { | ||
@@ -20,0 +19,0 @@ "build-js": "browserify ./core/bundle-js.js > raz.js", |
# RAZ: Razor-Express view template engine for NodeJS | ||
> <pre>$ npm install <b>raz</b> --save</pre> | ||
> <sup>[--> JavaScript (browser) version](https://www.npmjs.com/package/razjs) of this library.</sup> | ||
- [**Intro**](#intro) | ||
@@ -42,5 +44,5 @@ - [A brief comparison of syntax of Node.JS template engines](#a-brief-comparison-of-syntax-of-nodejs-template-engines) | ||
When I just started to dive into the world of *Node.js* after years of working with [ASP.NET MVC](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/mvc/overview) I couldn't find any *view template engine* that was as convenient, elegant, concise, and syntactically close to native [HTML](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Learn/Getting_started_with_the_web/HTML_basics) as [ASP.NET MVC Razor syntax](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/mvc/views/razor) was. And when it comes to code it's also syntactically close to the original [C# language](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/csharp/programming-guide/). Actually, **ASP.NET MVC Razor markup is a hybrid of HTML markup and C# programming language**. This is exactly what I expected to see in the *NodeJS* world - **a hybrid of HTML and JavaScript**. | ||
When I just started to dive into the world of [Node.js](https://nodejs.org) after years of working with [ASP.NET MVC](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/mvc/overview) I couldn't find any *view template engine* that was as convenient, elegant, concise, and syntactically close to native [HTML](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Learn/Getting_started_with_the_web/HTML_basics) as [ASP.NET MVC Razor syntax](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/mvc/views/razor) was. And when it comes to code it's also syntactically close to the original [C# language](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/csharp/programming-guide/). Actually, **ASP.NET MVC Razor markup is a hybrid of HTML markup and C# programming language**. This is exactly what I expected to see in the *NodeJS* world - **a hybrid of HTML and JavaScript**. | ||
The closest to *Razor* currently supported library for *NodeJs & Express* I could find was [Vash](https://www.npmjs.com/package/vash). But in some points, it was quite different from *ASP.NET MVC Razor* syntax which I was used to and it just looked much less concise and convenient to me (the syntax for rendering layouts and partial blocks, for example). In short, it did not suit me completely and what's more important I couldn't see its current development. | ||
The closest to *Razor* currently supported library for NodeJs & [Express](https://expressjs.com/) I could find was [Vash](https://www.npmjs.com/package/vash). But in some points, it was quite different from *ASP.NET MVC Razor* syntax which I was used to and it just looked much less concise and convenient to me (the syntax for rendering layouts and partial blocks, for example). In short, it did not suit me completely and what's more important I couldn't see its current development. | ||
@@ -47,0 +49,0 @@ A brief comparison of syntax of Node.JS template engines |
Sorry, the diff of this file is not supported yet
License Policy Violation
LicenseThis package is not allowed per your license policy. Review the package's license to ensure compliance.
Found 1 instance in 1 package
License Policy Violation
LicenseThis package is not allowed per your license policy. Review the package's license to ensure compliance.
Found 1 instance in 1 package
855466
406