Socket
Socket
Sign inDemoInstall

react-immutable-proptypes

Package Overview
Dependencies
4
Maintainers
1
Versions
26
Alerts
File Explorer

Advanced tools

Install Socket

Detect and block malicious and high-risk dependencies

Install

    react-immutable-proptypes

PropType validators that work with Immutable.js.


Version published
Weekly downloads
380K
increased by3.92%
Maintainers
1
Created
Weekly downloads
 

Readme

Source

react-immutable-proptypes

npm package Code Climate Test Coverage

PropType validators that work with Immutable.js.

Version Updates

  • 0.1.8 added setOf checker. Thanks to Don Abrams!
  • 0.1.7 added convencience checkers for "primitive" immutable types (map, list, etc...)
  • 0.1.6 added iterableOf
  • 0.1.4 added mapOf
  • 0.1.3 updated package.json to support React v0.11.0+ (including 0.13.1). Thanks Andrey Okonetchnikov!

Since v 0.1.6 the library seems like it covers just about everything that is needed. If this package continues to be as stable on our projects as it has been, there will probably be a bump to v 1.0 soon.

About

I got tired of seeing React.PropTypes.instanceOf(Immutable.List) or React.PropTypes.instanceOf(Immutable.Map) as PropTypes for components that should be specifying an Immutable.List of something or an Immutable.Map shape. A little "googling" came up empty, unless you want to use Flow, which I do not. So, I wrote react-immutable-proptypes.

Usage is simple, they work with and like any React.PropType.* validator.

var ImmutablePropTypes = require('react-immutable-proptypes');
var MyReactComponent = React.createClass({
  // ...
  propTypes: {
    myRequiredImmutableList: ImmutablePropTypes.listOf(
      ImmutablePropTypes.shape({
        someNumberProp: React.PropTypes.number.isRequired
      })
    ).isRequired
  }
  // ...
});

Since version 0.1.7 there are convenience helpers for "primitive" Immutable.js objects.

propTypes: {
  oldListTypeChecker: React.PropTypes.instanceOf(Immutable.List),
  anotherWay: ImmutablePropTypes.list,
  requiredList: ImmutablePropTypes.list.isRequired,
  mapsToo: ImmutablePropTypes.map,
  evenIterable: ImmutablePropTypes.iterable
}

Installation

Installing via npmjs

npm install --save react-immutable-proptypes

API

React-Immutable-PropTypes has:

  • Primitive Types

      ImmutablePropTypes.list         // Immutable.List.isList
      ImmutablePropTypes.map          // Immutable.Map.isMap
      ImmutablePropTypes.orderedMap   // Immutable.OrderedMap.isOrderedMap
      ImmutablePropTypes.set          // Immutable.Set.isSet
      ImmutablePropTypes.orderedSet   // Immutable.OrderedSet.isOrderedSet
      ImmutablePropTypes.stack        // Immutable.Stack.isStack
      ImmutablePropTypes.seq          // Immutable.Seq.isSeq
      ImmutablePropTypes.iterable     // Immutable.Iterable.isIterable
    
  • ImmutablePropTypes.listOf is based on React.PropTypes.array and is specific to Immutable.List.

  • ImmutablePropTypes.mapOf is basically the same as listOf, but it is specific to Immutable.Map.

  • ImmutablePropTypes.setOf is basically the same as listOf, but it is specific to Immutable.Set.

  • ImmutbalePropTypes.iterableOf is the generic form of listOf/mapOf. It is useful when there is no need to validate anything other than Immutable.js compatible (ie. Immutable.Iterable). Continue to use listOf and/or mapOf when you know the type.

  • ImmutablePropTypes.shape is based on React.PropTypes.shape and will try to work with any Immutable.Iterable. In practice, I would recommend limiting this to Immutable.Map or Immutable.OrderedMap. However, it is possible to abuse shape to validate an array via Immutable.List.

      // ...
      aList: ImmutablePropTypes.shape({
        0: React.PropTypes.number.isRequired,
        1: React.PropTypes.string.isRequired,
        2: React.PropTypes.string
      })
      // ...
      <SomeComponent aList={new Immutable.List([1, '2'])} />
    

    That said, don't do this. Please, just... don't.

These two validators cover the output of Immutable.fromJS on standard JSON data sources.

RFC

Please send a message or, better yet, create an issue/pull request if you know a better solution, find bugs, or want a feature. For example, should listOf work with Immutable.Seq or Immutable.Range. I can think of reasons it should, but it is not a use case I have at the present, so I'm less than inclined to implement it. Alternatively, we could add a validator for sequences and/or ranges.

Keywords

FAQs

Last updated on 05 Jun 2015

Did you know?

Socket for GitHub automatically highlights issues in each pull request and monitors the health of all your open source dependencies. Discover the contents of your packages and block harmful activity before you install or update your dependencies.

Install

Related posts

SocketSocket SOC 2 Logo

Product

  • Package Alerts
  • Integrations
  • Docs
  • Pricing
  • FAQ
  • Roadmap

Packages

Stay in touch

Get open source security insights delivered straight into your inbox.


  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • Security

Made with ⚡️ by Socket Inc