sliced - npm Package Compare versions

Comparing version 0.0.5 to 1.0.0

History.md

 
+1.0.0 / 2015-07-12
+==================
+
+ * Remove unnecessary files from npm package - #6 via joaquimserafim
+ * updated readme stats
+
 0.0.5 / 2013-02-05
@@ -3,0 +9,0 @@ ==================

package.json

 {
   "name": "sliced",
-  "version": "0.0.5",
+  "version": "1.0.0",
   "description": "A faster Node.js alternative to Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments)",
   "main": "index.js",
+  "files": [
+    "LICENSE",
+    "README.md",
+    "index.js"
+  ],
   "scripts": {
@@ -7,0 +12,0 @@ "test": "make test"

README.md

@@ -10,30 +10,30 @@ #sliced
 
-    Array.prototype.slice.call x 1,320,205 ops/sec ±2.35% (92 runs sampled)
-    [].slice.call x 1,314,605 ops/sec ±1.60% (95 runs sampled)
-    cached slice.call x 10,468,380 ops/sec ±1.45% (95 runs sampled)
-    sliced x 16,608,237 ops/sec ±1.40% (92 runs sampled)
+    Array.prototype.slice.call x 1,401,820 ops/sec ±2.16% (90 runs sampled)
+    [].slice.call x 1,313,116 ops/sec ±2.04% (96 runs sampled)
+    cached slice.call x 10,297,910 ops/sec ±1.81% (96 runs sampled)
+    sliced x 19,906,019 ops/sec ±1.23% (89 runs sampled)
     fastest is sliced
 
-    Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments, 1) x 1,383,584 ops/sec ±1.73% (97 runs sampled)
-    [].slice.call(arguments, 1) x 1,494,735 ops/sec ±1.33% (95 runs sampled)
-    cached slice.call(arguments, 1) x 10,085,270 ops/sec ±1.51% (97 runs sampled)
-    sliced(arguments, 1) x 16,620,480 ops/sec ±1.29% (95 runs sampled)
+    Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments, 1) x 1,373,238 ops/sec ±1.84% (95 runs sampled)
+    [].slice.call(arguments, 1) x 1,395,336 ops/sec ±1.36% (93 runs sampled)
+    cached slice.call(arguments, 1) x 9,926,018 ops/sec ±1.67% (92 runs sampled)
+    sliced(arguments, 1) x 20,747,990 ops/sec ±1.16% (93 runs sampled)
     fastest is sliced(arguments, 1)
 
-    Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments, -1) x 1,303,262 ops/sec ±1.62% (94 runs sampled)
-    [].slice.call(arguments, -1) x 1,325,615 ops/sec ±1.36% (97 runs sampled)
-    cached slice.call(arguments, -1) x 9,673,603 ops/sec ±1.70% (96 runs sampled)
-    sliced(arguments, -1) x 16,384,575 ops/sec ±1.06% (91 runs sampled)
+    Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments, -1) x 1,319,908 ops/sec ±2.12% (91 runs sampled)
+    [].slice.call(arguments, -1) x 1,336,170 ops/sec ±1.33% (97 runs sampled)
+    cached slice.call(arguments, -1) x 10,078,718 ops/sec ±1.21% (98 runs sampled)
+    sliced(arguments, -1) x 20,471,474 ops/sec ±1.81% (92 runs sampled)
     fastest is sliced(arguments, -1)
 
-    Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments, -2, -10) x 1,404,390 ops/sec ±1.61% (95 runs sampled)
-    [].slice.call(arguments, -2, -10) x 1,514,367 ops/sec ±1.21% (96 runs sampled)
-    cached slice.call(arguments, -2, -10) x 9,836,017 ops/sec ±1.21% (95 runs sampled)
-    sliced(arguments, -2, -10) x 18,544,882 ops/sec ±1.30% (91 runs sampled)
+    Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments, -2, -10) x 1,369,246 ops/sec ±1.68% (97 runs sampled)
+    [].slice.call(arguments, -2, -10) x 1,387,935 ops/sec ±1.70% (95 runs sampled)
+    cached slice.call(arguments, -2, -10) x 9,593,428 ops/sec ±1.23% (97 runs sampled)
+    sliced(arguments, -2, -10) x 23,178,931 ops/sec ±1.70% (92 runs sampled)
     fastest is sliced(arguments, -2, -10)
 
-    Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments, -2, -1) x 1,458,604 ops/sec ±1.41% (97 runs sampled)
-    [].slice.call(arguments, -2, -1) x 1,536,547 ops/sec ±1.63% (99 runs sampled)
-    cached slice.call(arguments, -2, -1) x 10,060,633 ops/sec ±1.37% (96 runs sampled)
-    sliced(arguments, -2, -1) x 18,608,712 ops/sec ±1.08% (93 runs sampled)
+    Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments, -2, -1) x 1,441,300 ops/sec ±1.26% (98 runs sampled)
+    [].slice.call(arguments, -2, -1) x 1,410,326 ops/sec ±1.96% (93 runs sampled)
+    cached slice.call(arguments, -2, -1) x 9,854,419 ops/sec ±1.02% (97 runs sampled)
+    sliced(arguments, -2, -1) x 22,550,801 ops/sec ±1.86% (91 runs sampled)
     fastest is sliced(arguments, -2, -1)
@@ -40,0 +40,0 @@

New alerts

License Policy Violation

License

This package is not allowed per your license policy. Review the package's license to ensure compliance.

Found 1 instance in 1 package

Major refactor

Supply chain risk

Package has recently undergone a major refactor. It may be unstable or indicate significant internal changes. Use caution when updating to versions that include significant changes.

Found 1 instance in 1 package

Trivial Package

Supply chain risk

Packages less than 10 lines of code are easily copied into your own project and may not warrant the additional supply chain risk of an external dependency.

Found 1 instance in 1 package

Fixed alerts

License Policy Violation

License

This package is not allowed per your license policy. Review the package's license to ensure compliance.

Found 1 instance in 1 package

No v1

Quality

Package is not semver >=1. This means it is not stable and does not support ^ ranges.

Found 1 instance in 1 package

Improved metrics

Number of low quality alerts

1

decreased by-50%

Worsened metrics

Total package byte prevSize

5038

decreased by-55.89%

Number of package files

5

decreased by-58.33%

Lines of code

1

decreased by-99.5%

Number of medium supply chain risk alerts

2

increased byInfinity%

No dependency changes