Comparing version 1.0.0 to 3.7.1
{ | ||
"name": "terser", | ||
"version": "1.0.0", | ||
"description": "", | ||
"main": "index.js", | ||
"description": "JavaScript parser, mangler/compressor and beautifier toolkit for ES6+", | ||
"homepage": "https://github.com/fabiosantoscode/uglify-es", | ||
"author": "Mihai Bazon <mihai.bazon@gmail.com> (http://lisperator.net/)", | ||
"license": "BSD-2-Clause", | ||
"version": "3.7.1", | ||
"engines": { | ||
"node": ">=0.8.0" | ||
}, | ||
"maintainers": [ | ||
"Alex Lam <alexlamsl@gmail.com>", | ||
"Mihai Bazon <mihai.bazon@gmail.com> (http://lisperator.net/)" | ||
], | ||
"repository": "https://github.com/fabiosantoscode/uglify-es.git", | ||
"main": "tools/node.js", | ||
"bin": { | ||
"uglifyjs": "bin/uglifyjs" | ||
}, | ||
"files": [ | ||
"bin", | ||
"lib", | ||
"tools", | ||
"LICENSE" | ||
], | ||
"dependencies": { | ||
"commander": "~2.14.1", | ||
"source-map": "~0.6.1" | ||
}, | ||
"devDependencies": { | ||
"acorn": "~5.4.1", | ||
"escodegen": "^1.9.1", | ||
"mocha": "~3.5.1", | ||
"semver": "~5.5.0" | ||
}, | ||
"scripts": { | ||
"test": "echo \"Error: no test specified\" && exit 1" | ||
"test": "node test/run-tests.js" | ||
}, | ||
"author": "", | ||
"license": "ISC" | ||
"keywords": [ | ||
"uglify", | ||
"uglify-es", | ||
"uglify-js", | ||
"minify", | ||
"minifier", | ||
"javascript", | ||
"ecmascript", | ||
"es5", | ||
"es6", | ||
"es7", | ||
"es8", | ||
"es2015", | ||
"es2016", | ||
"es2017", | ||
"async", | ||
"await" | ||
] | ||
} |
License Policy Violation
LicenseThis package is not allowed per your license policy. Review the package's license to ensure compliance.
Found 1 instance in 1 package
Major refactor
Supply chain riskPackage has recently undergone a major refactor. It may be unstable or indicate significant internal changes. Use caution when updating to versions that include significant changes.
Found 1 instance in 1 package
New author
Supply chain riskA new npm collaborator published a version of the package for the first time. New collaborators are usually benign additions to a project, but do indicate a change to the security surface area of a package.
Found 1 instance in 1 package
Uses eval
Supply chain riskPackage uses dynamic code execution (e.g., eval()), which is a dangerous practice. This can prevent the code from running in certain environments and increases the risk that the code may contain exploits or malicious behavior.
Found 1 instance in 1 package
Dynamic require
Supply chain riskDynamic require can indicate the package is performing dangerous or unsafe dynamic code execution.
Found 1 instance in 1 package
Filesystem access
Supply chain riskAccesses the file system, and could potentially read sensitive data.
Found 1 instance in 1 package
License Policy Violation
LicenseThis package is not allowed per your license policy. Review the package's license to ensure compliance.
Found 1 instance in 1 package
Empty package
Supply chain riskPackage does not contain any code. It may be removed, is name squatting, or the result of a faulty package publish.
Found 1 instance in 1 package
No README
QualityPackage does not have a README. This may indicate a failed publish or a low quality package.
Found 1 instance in 1 package
No contributors or author data
MaintenancePackage does not specify a list of contributors or an author in package.json.
Found 1 instance in 1 package
No repository
Supply chain riskPackage does not have a linked source code repository. Without this field, a package will have no reference to the location of the source code use to generate the package.
Found 1 instance in 1 package
No tests
QualityPackage does not have any tests. This is a strong signal of a poorly maintained or low quality package.
Found 1 instance in 1 package
No website
QualityPackage does not have a website.
Found 1 instance in 1 package
804549
21
20516
1
0
0
1220
2
4
3
3
+ Addedcommander@~2.14.1
+ Addedsource-map@~0.6.1
+ Addedcommander@2.14.1(transitive)
+ Addedsource-map@0.6.1(transitive)