
Security News
Ruby's Bundler 4.0.18 Extends Cooldown to bundle lock and bundle cache
The supply chain control that delays freshly published gems now covers lockfile generation and gem vendoring in Ruby projects.
inference-aiops
Advanced tools
Governed AI-ops for GPU inference clusters (vLLM + Ray Serve/Jobs): latency/utilization RCA, replica scaling, drain, model lifecycle, and destructive-op guardrails with a built-in governance harness (audit, budget, undo, risk tiers)
Disclaimer: Community-maintained open-source project. Not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the vLLM or Ray projects or any inference-serving vendor. Product and trademark names belong to their owners. MIT licensed.
Governed AI-ops for GPU inference clusters — vLLM (OpenAI API + Prometheus
/metrics) and Ray Serve / Ray Jobs (Ray dashboard), plus the single-process
serving engines SGLang and TGI (Text Generation Inference) — with a
built-in governance harness: unified audit log, policy engine, token/runaway
budget guard, undo-token recording, and descriptive risk-tier labels on every
audit row. It parses each engine's Prometheus /metrics directly (no Prometheus
server required) and
probes the Ray dashboard independently. A bearer token is optional (many
stacks run open).
Serving engines. vLLM is the flagship (full Ray Serve control plane: scale, drain, autoscale, LoRA, hot-swap). SGLang and TGI are supported for engine-agnostic observability — health, running-model identity, request-latency metrics, queue depth, and latency RCA — read from each engine's own endpoints and metric names. Being single-process servers, they have no Ray-shaped scale/drain API: those writes return a teaching error pointing you at a real horizontal-scale layer (Ray Serve / Kubernetes / a load balancer).
The flagship value is root-cause analysis, wrapped in guarded reads and writes:
diagnose_latency_spike (flagship RCA) — when TTFT/TPOT/e2e latency
climbs, it correlates queue depth (running vs waiting), KV-cache
pressure / preemptions, and prefix-cache locality into a ranked cause
plus the specific knob to turn (add replicas, raise max-num-seqs, fix
routing, enlarge KV cache). Every flag is a number, not a black-box verdict.diagnose_low_utilization — the inverse: idle GPUs, over-provisioned
replicas, or routing that strands a cache-warm replica → what to scale down./metrics endpoint directly; no
Prometheus/Grafana deployment needed.ray start --head).It delivers inference-cluster operations — reads and writes — accurately and efficiently, and records every one of them. It does not decide whether a write is allowed to happen. That is the agent's judgement, or the permission of the environment you connect it with: restrict the network path so it can only reach the read/metrics endpoints, or run the Ray dashboard without its job-submission API, and the writes fail at the server — the place that actually owns the permission.
So there is no read-only switch, no policy file, no approval gate to configure.
The one thing the tool guarantees is that nothing is silent: every call, over
MCP and over the CLI alike, lands an audit row in
~/.inference-aiops/audit.db, and destructive writes still capture their
before-state and record an inverse where one exists.
Each tool declares a
risk_level, kept in agreement with its[READ]/[WRITE]documentation tag by a test, and carried into the audit row as a descriptive tier — so a reviewer can see at a glance that a row was a high-risk scale-to-zero. It is a label, not a gate.
Running a smaller / local model? See agent-guardrails.md — it lists the guardrails this tool enforces for you (so you don't spend prompt budget restating them) and gives a ready-made system prompt for what's left.
| Group | Tools | Count | R/W (risk) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Metrics & RCA (vLLM) | request_metrics, queue_depth, kv_cache_stats, diagnose_latency_spike, diagnose_low_utilization | 5 | read |
| Engine-agnostic (vLLM / SGLang / TGI) | engine_health, engine_inventory, engine_request_metrics, engine_queue_depth, diagnose_engine_latency | 5 | read |
| Ray Serve (read) | serve_deployment_list, deployment_status, replica_list, autoscale_config_get | 4 | read |
| Ray Serve (write) | scale_replicas_up, scale_replicas_down, scale_to_zero, autoscale_config_update, drain_replica | 5 | write (med / high) |
| Models / vLLM | model_list, model_info, model_is_sleeping, lora_load, lora_unload | 5 | read + write (med) |
Sleep Mode / vLLM (needs VLLM_SERVER_DEV_MODE=1) | model_sleep, model_wake | 2 | write (high / med) |
| Ray cluster / jobs / GPU | ray_cluster_resources, ray_dashboard_status, ray_job_list, gpu_utilization, ray_job_cancel, replica_restart | 6 | read + write (med / high) |
| Deploy lifecycle | model_deploy, model_undeploy, deployment_redeploy, routing_policy_update | 4 | write (med / high) |
| Cost | cost_per_token | 1 | read |
The engine-agnostic group works against any supported engine (including vLLM); use it for SGLang/TGI targets or a uniform view across a mixed fleet. The Ray Serve / cluster / deploy write groups are vLLM-only (Ray control plane) — they teach-and-refuse on a SGLang/TGI target.
23 read, 16 write. High-risk writes (scale_replicas_down,
scale_to_zero, drain_replica, lora_unload, model_sleep,
replica_restart, model_undeploy, deployment_redeploy) all support
dry_run + double-confirm; reversible writes record an undo descriptor.
Sleep Mode requires a dev-mode server. vLLM registers
/sleep,/wake_upand/is_sleepingonly when started withVLLM_SERVER_DEV_MODE=1. Against any other server these three tools report that the route is absent and why, rather than failing vaguely. Sleep Mode suspends the same model; it does not swap base models — serving a different base model means restarting vLLM with a different--model.
uv tool install inference-aiops # or: pipx install inference-aiops
inference-aiops init # wizard: engine (vllm/sglang/tgi) + host + port + scheme
inference-aiops doctor # vLLM: probes Ray + vLLM; SGLang/TGI: engine health + inventory
inference-aiops overview # deployments + total replicas + queue backpressure
inference-aiops metrics diagnose # why is inference slow? ranked RCA + the knob to turn
inference-aiops serve list # Ray Serve deployments + replica counts
Run as an MCP server (stdio) for the full 39-tool surface:
export INFERENCE_AIOPS_MASTER_PASSWORD=... # only if a bearer token is stored
inference-aiops mcp
The CLI is a convenience subset (init, overview, serve …, metrics …,
secret …, doctor, mcp); the full 39 tools are exposed via the MCP server.
Every MCP tool passes through the bundled @governed_tool harness. It does not
decide whether a write is permitted — see What this tool does, and does not,
decide above — but it records every call:
~/.inference-aiops/audit.db
(relocatable via INFERENCE_AIOPS_HOME).risk_level; it is a label, not a gate. INFERENCE_AUDIT_APPROVED_BY
/ INFERENCE_AUDIT_RATIONALE are optional annotations recorded when set,
never required.Behaviour is exercised by the test suite against mocked vLLM /metrics, vLLM
OpenAI API, and Ray dashboard responses. ~80% of the tool self-tests on a
laptop — vLLM on a single GPU or CPU-mock plus a local one-node Ray head. It
has not been run against a live production cluster; see
docs/VERIFICATION.md for the live-verification
checklist.
Unverified against real hardware / topology:
/api/nodes),The fastest live check is inference-aiops doctor; the full checklist lives in
docs/VERIFICATION.md.
This is the GPU-inference member of the AIops-tools family (governed AI-ops with audit + budget + undo + risk tiers). If a vLLM or Ray capability you need is missing, or your stack speaks a dialect these tools don't yet handle — open an issue or a PR. Contributions welcome.
FAQs
Governed AI-ops for GPU inference clusters (vLLM + Ray Serve/Jobs): latency/utilization RCA, replica scaling, drain, model lifecycle, and destructive-op guardrails with a built-in governance harness (audit, budget, undo, risk tiers)
We found that inference-aiops demonstrated a healthy version release cadence and project activity because the last version was released less than a year ago. It has 1 open source maintainer collaborating on the project.
Did you know?

Socket for GitHub automatically highlights issues in each pull request and monitors the health of all your open source dependencies. Discover the contents of your packages and block harmful activity before you install or update your dependencies.

Security News
The supply chain control that delays freshly published gems now covers lockfile generation and gem vendoring in Ruby projects.

Security News
During a UK cyber test, a Mythos 5 agent used sockpuppets, social engineering, and prompt injection to try to get a maintainer to merge malware.

Company News
Socket is now in the AWS Security Hub Extended plan. Adopt it through AWS, apply committed spend, and block malicious open source packages.