quant_research_mcp

An MCP server exposing a registry of paper-backed quantitative trading methods
plus a deterministic, no-LLM decision helper. The server supplies reproducible
math (screening, indicators, regime detection, method signals, scored entry
decisions); the calling agent supplies judgement (e.g. reading headlines into a
sentiment signal). No claude -p, no subprocess, no LLM inside the server.
⚠️ Not financial advice. This is read-only research and educational
tooling. It performs quantitative computation only and places no orders.
Nothing it outputs is investment advice or a recommendation. Market data may be
delayed or wrong, backtests are not forecasts, and trading carries substantial
risk of loss. You alone are responsible for any capital you risk. Provided
"as is" without warranty — see LICENSE.
Why this exists
Repackages a working day-trading pipeline as composable MCP tools, with two goals:
- Extensible to future papers. Each strategy is a
TradingMethod registered in
a registry. Adding a new paper = drop one module, call register(...), import it.
Nothing else changes.
- Decision-making is scientific, not generative. The old pipeline gated entries
with an LLM call. Here that is replaced by
quant_score_decision — a pure
function combining reward:risk, regime strength, volume, RSI positioning and
ATR-normalised stop quality into an auditable score. Same inputs → same output.
Tools (13)
quant_list_methods | no | List registered methods (key, paper, timeframe, regimes). |
quant_describe_method | no | Full detail + citation for one method. |
quant_screen_universe | yes | Rank tickers by gap / rel-volume / ATR%. |
quant_compute_indicators | yes | EMA9/20, RSI, ATR, VWAP, Hurst for a ticker. |
quant_detect_regime | yes | Hurst → TRENDING / MEAN_REVERTING / RANDOM_WALK. |
quant_analyze_setup | yes | Run a per-ticker method → signal + entry/stop/target (+ HTF context). |
quant_analyze_universe | yes | Run a universe method: momentum ranking, pairs spread. |
quant_backtest_method | yes | Validate a method: replay its own analyze() over history → win rate, expectancy, drawdown, IS/OOS halves. |
quant_check_events | yes | Next earnings (+days), ex-dividend — binary-event risk. |
quant_portfolio_risk | yes | Stateless heat / correlation / concentration check + candidate verdict. |
quant_market_context | yes | SPY/QQQ/IWM, VIX, 11 sectors ranked, risk-on/off breadth. |
quant_score_decision | no | Decision helper: setup (+ sentiment, earnings, heat) → score, verdict, size, timeframe-aware execution plan. Deterministic. |
quant_fetch_news | yes | Recent headlines (data only; agent forms sentiment). |
All tools are read-only and support response_format: markdown | json.
Workflows
Day trade
quant_market_context # tape read: risk-on/off, sectors
→ quant_screen_universe # find movers
→ quant_analyze_setup # hurst_regime_orb on the top name
→ quant_check_events + quant_fetch_news # binary risk + agent sentiment
→ quant_portfolio_risk # heat/correlation vs your open book
→ quant_score_decision(setup, news_sentiment, days_to_earnings,
portfolio_heat_pct)
Swing (days) — rsi2_reversion, pairs_cointegration via
quant_analyze_setup / quant_analyze_universe; earnings veto matters most
here (quant_check_events → days_to_earnings).
Position (weeks+) — donchian_trend per ticker, xs_momentum over the
universe; re-rank monthly, weekly stop review per the execution plan.
Before trusting any method: quant_backtest_method on your tickers and
period — it replays the method's own signal logic with costs, and reports
in-sample vs out-of-sample halves so you can see decay.
The agent writes any narrative; the server guarantees the numbers.
The decision helper (quant_score_decision)
Pure function. Composite score (weights in config.DECISION_WEIGHTS):
- reward_risk — realised R:R vs the target multiple.
- regime_strength —
|Hurst − 0.5| scaled (distance from random walk).
- volume_confirmation — relative volume vs the floor.
- momentum_position — RSI in a healthy band for the direction (not exhausted).
- stop_quality — stop distance normalised by daily ATR (noise-tight stops penalised).
Optional news_sentiment (the agent derives this) boosts an aligned score or
vetoes a contradicted one at confidence ≥ 0.5. Output includes the per-factor
breakdown, fixed-fractional position_size (with a haircut for noise-tight stops),
and a mechanically derived execution_plan (entry trigger, order type, stop ladder,
profit taking, time stop, abort conditions).
Bundled methods (5)
hurst_regime_orb | intraday | arXiv:2205.11122 — Hurst regime → ORB / VWAP fade |
rsi2_reversion | swing | Connors & Alvarez 2009 — RSI(2) pullback above the 200d SMA |
pairs_cointegration | swing | Gatev et al. 2006 — Engle-Granger spread z-score |
donchian_trend | position | Faith, Turtle Rules; Moskowitz et al. 2012 — 55d breakout, 20d/ATR trail |
xs_momentum | position | Jegadeesh & Titman 1993 — 12-1 cross-sectional momentum, top-N book |
Data providers
Default is yfinance (free, ~15-min delayed). The data layer sits behind a
provider interface (quant_research_mcp/providers/): implement the
DataProvider protocol for Alpaca/Polygon/IBKR, register the factory, then run
with QUANT_DATA_PROVIDER=<name>. All calls are TTL-cached in-process (daily
15 min, intraday 60 s, news 5 min, events/sector 1 h).
Adding a future paper
from . import register
from .base import TradingMethod, TradeSetup
def analyze(daily, session, context) -> TradeSetup:
...
register(TradingMethod(
key="my_paper_method",
name="My Method",
paper="Author et al., Title",
paper_url="https://arxiv.org/abs/...",
regime_applicability="TRENDING",
description="One paragraph on the mechanics.",
analyze=analyze,
))
Then add from . import my_paper to methods/__init__.py. It now appears in
quant_list_methods and is runnable via quant_analyze_setup(method_key=...).
Quick start (Makefile)
make install
make smoke
make run
make help
Install as a shell binary
make install-cli
quant-research-mcp
If the command isn't found after install, run uv tool update-shell and restart
your shell (uv's tool bin dir, usually ~/.local/bin, must be on PATH).
make install | uv sync — venv + dependencies |
make install-cli | install the quant-research-mcp binary onto your PATH |
make uninstall-cli | remove the binary |
make dev | install + ruff for linting |
make run | run the MCP server (stdio) |
make smoke | import + list tools, no network |
make test | run the pytest suite (no network) |
make inspect | launch the MCP Inspector |
make check | tests + lint + assert no LLM/subprocess calls |
make register | print the stdio client-config JSON |
make claude-add | register the local clone with Claude Code (user scope) |
make claude-remove | remove from Claude Code |
make build | build sdist + wheel into dist/ |
make docker-build | build the Docker image locally |
make mcpb | pack a Claude Desktop .mcpb bundle |
make clean | drop caches, venv and build artifacts |
Install
Every method runs the same stdio server — pick whichever fits your setup.
| uvx from GitHub (no clone) | uvx --from git+https://github.com/FlawlessByte/quant-research-mcp quant-research-mcp | uv |
| PyPI | uvx quant-research-mcp · pipx install quant-research-mcp | uv / pipx |
| Docker | docker run -i --rm ghcr.io/flawlessbyte/quant-research-mcp | Docker |
| From source | git clone … && cd quant-research-mcp && make install | git + uv |
| Claude Desktop | install the .mcpb from the latest release | Claude Desktop |
PyPI and Docker images are published on tagged releases; until the first
release, use the uvx from GitHub or from source rows.
Use with Claude Code
Fastest — runs straight from GitHub, no clone:
claude mcp add quant_research -- \
uvx --from git+https://github.com/FlawlessByte/quant-research-mcp quant-research-mcp
After a PyPI release this shortens to:
claude mcp add quant_research -- uvx quant-research-mcp
Containerised:
claude mcp add quant_research -- docker run -i --rm ghcr.io/flawlessbyte/quant-research-mcp
From a local clone (development): make claude-add registers this checkout at
user scope; make register prints a paste-ready .mcp.json block.
Verify inside Claude Code:
/mcp # should list 'quant_research' as connected
Then ask e.g. "screen the universe and analyze the top name with the hurst
method, then score the entry decision." It will call quant_screen_universe
→ quant_analyze_setup → quant_score_decision.
From source (development)
git clone https://github.com/FlawlessByte/quant-research-mcp
cd quant-research-mcp
make install
make smoke
make test
Optional: make install-cli puts a quant-research-mcp binary on your PATH
(via uv tool). If it isn't found afterwards, run uv tool update-shell and
restart your shell. Inspect tool schemas with make inspect.
Releasing (maintainers)
CI runs ruff + the 40 offline tests on every push/PR (Python 3.12 & 3.13).
Cutting a release is tag-driven:
git tag v0.1.0 && git push origin v0.1.0
That fires two workflows:
release.yml → uv build, publish to PyPI via Trusted Publishing
(OIDC, no stored token), and attach the wheel/sdist + a .mcpb bundle to the
GitHub Release.
docker.yml → build and push ghcr.io/flawlessbyte/quant-research-mcp.
One-time setup:
- PyPI: create the project and add a Trusted Publisher (owner
FlawlessByte,
repo quant-research-mcp, workflow release.yml, environment pypi).
- GHCR: after the first push, set the package visibility to public.
- MCP registry: after the first PyPI release, list it with the
mcp-publisher CLI —
mcp-publisher login github then mcp-publisher publish (uses server.json;
GitHub login proves ownership of the io.github.FlawlessByte/… namespace).
The Claude Desktop .mcpb invokes uvx under the hood, so a one-click install
still requires uv on the machine — bundling
pandas/scipy/statsmodels wheels directly would be large and platform-specific.
Limitations (what a serious trader still needs elsewhere)
- Delayed data until you wire a real-time provider key (interface is ready;
yfinance is ~15-min delayed and its news feed is thin).
- No macro calendar (FOMC/CPI/NFP) — no reliable free feed; pass your own
judgement through
news_sentiment / news_confidence.
- No options data (IV, term structure, gamma levels), no short
interest/float, no Level 2 — next frontier.
- Backtests are parameter validation, not forecasts: yfinance history has
survivorship bias, costs are estimates, intraday replay is capped at ~60 days
of 5m bars by the provider.
- No persistence by design — the server stores nothing; supply open
positions per call (
quant_portfolio_risk). A trade journal is a planned
opt-in module.