@babel/node
Advanced tools
Babel command line
See our website @babel/node for more information.
Using npm:
npm install --save-dev @babel/node
or using yarn:
yarn add @babel/node --dev
ts-node is a TypeScript execution environment and REPL for Node.js. It allows you to run TypeScript code directly without precompiling it. Compared to @babel/node, ts-node is specifically designed for TypeScript, whereas @babel/node is for JavaScript with ES6+ syntax.
esm is a fast, production-ready ES module loader for Node.js. It allows you to use ES modules in Node.js without needing to transpile them. While @babel/node focuses on compiling and running ES6+ syntax, esm focuses on providing native support for ES modules.
Sucrase is a super-fast alternative to Babel that focuses on compiling modern JavaScript syntax. It is designed to be faster than Babel by focusing on a smaller set of transformations. While @babel/node provides a comprehensive solution for compiling and running ES6+ code, Sucrase aims for speed and simplicity.
FAQs
Babel command line
The npm package @babel/node receives a total of 910,338 weekly downloads. As such, @babel/node popularity was classified as popular.
We found that @babel/node demonstrated a healthy version release cadence and project activity because the last version was released less than a year ago. It has 4 open source maintainers collaborating on the project.
Did you know?
Socket for GitHub automatically highlights issues in each pull request and monitors the health of all your open source dependencies. Discover the contents of your packages and block harmful activity before you install or update your dependencies.
Research
/Security News
A mini Shai-Hulud campaign compromised Red Hat Cloud Services npm packages to steal developer and CI/CD secrets during installation.
Research
/Security News
The North Korean malware loader hides in a Packagist-listed package and its GitHub branch to fetch and execute remote code in a likely Contagious Interview-style lure.
Security News
The Rust project is moving toward formal rules on LLM use in contributions after months of internal debate over maintainer burden, code quality, and contributor experience.