@balena/contrato - npm Package Compare versions

Comparing version 0.6.0 to 0.7.0-codewithcheese-update-ava-673e6e27a0b11f46b985a48be6cc73f13fd1131c

CHANGELOG.md

@@ -8,2 +8,6 @@ # Change Log
 
+## 0.7.0 - 2021-04-27
+
+* minor: Update ava from 0.22.0 to 3.15.0 [Thomas Manning]
+
 ## 0.6.0 - 2020-09-18
@@ -10,0 +14,0 @@

package.json

 {
   "name": "@balena/contrato",
-  "version": "0.6.0",
+  "version": "0.7.0-codewithcheese-update-ava-673e6e27a0b11f46b985a48be6cc73f13fd1131c",
   "description": "The official contracts implementation",
@@ -32,3 +32,3 @@ "main": "lib/index.js",
   "devDependencies": {
-    "ava": "^0.22.0",
+    "ava": "^3.15.0",
     "eslint": "^4.19.1",
@@ -35,0 +35,0 @@ "eslint-config-standard": "^10.2.1",

test/blueprint/constructor.spec.js

@@ -25,3 +25,3 @@ /*
 
-ava.test('should be a contract', (test) => {
+ava('should be a contract', (test) => {
   const blueprint = new Blueprint({
@@ -34,3 +34,3 @@ 'hw.device-type': 1
 
-ava.test('should set a proper type', (test) => {
+ava('should set a proper type', (test) => {
   const blueprint = new Blueprint({
@@ -43,3 +43,3 @@ 'hw.device-type': 1
 
-ava.test('should be a hashed contract', (test) => {
+ava('should be a hashed contract', (test) => {
   const blueprint = new Blueprint({
@@ -52,3 +52,3 @@ 'hw.device-type': 1
 
-ava.test('should parse a layout with one number selector', (test) => {
+ava('should parse a layout with one number selector', (test) => {
   const blueprint = new Blueprint({
@@ -80,3 +80,3 @@ 'hw.device-type': 1
 
-ava.test('should parse a layout with one finite and one infinite selectors', (test) => {
+ava('should parse a layout with one finite and one infinite selectors', (test) => {
   const blueprint = new Blueprint({
@@ -118,3 +118,3 @@ 'hw.device-type': 2,
 
-ava.test('should support object layout selectors', (test) => {
+ava('should support object layout selectors', (test) => {
   const filterFunction = _.identity
@@ -163,3 +163,3 @@
 
-ava.test('should allow passing a skeleton object', (test) => {
+ava('should allow passing a skeleton object', (test) => {
   const blueprint = new Blueprint({
@@ -166,0 +166,0 @@ 'hw.device-type': 1

test/blueprint/reproduce/reproduce.spec.js

@@ -41,3 +41,3 @@ /*
 
-  ava.test(testName, (test) => {
+  ava(testName, (test) => {
     const contracts = _.flatMap(testCase.universe, Contract.build)
@@ -56,3 +56,3 @@ const container = new Contract({
 
-ava.test('should consider the skeleton when computing the hashes', (test) => {
+ava('should consider the skeleton when computing the hashes', (test) => {
   const blueprint = new Blueprint({
@@ -59,0 +59,0 @@ 'hw.device-type': 1

test/blueprint/sequence/sequence.spec.js

@@ -30,3 +30,3 @@ /*
 
-  ava.test(testName, (test) => {
+  ava(testName, (test) => {
     const contracts = _.flatMap(testCase.universe1, Contract.build)
@@ -33,0 +33,0 @@ const container = new Contract({

test/cardinality/parse.spec.js

@@ -315,3 +315,3 @@ /*
 ], (testCase) => {
-  ava.test(`should parse ${JSON.stringify(testCase.input)}`, (test) => {
+  ava(`should parse ${JSON.stringify(testCase.input)}`, (test) => {
     test.deepEqual(cardinality.parse(testCase.input), testCase.expected)
@@ -371,7 +371,7 @@ })
 ], (testCase) => {
-  ava.test(`should throw "${testCase.error}" given ${JSON.stringify(testCase.input)}`, (test) => {
+  ava(`should throw "${testCase.error}" given ${JSON.stringify(testCase.input)}`, (test) => {
     test.throws(() => {
       cardinality.parse(testCase.input)
-    }, testCase.error)
+    }, { message: testCase.error })
   })
 })

test/children-tree/build.spec.js

@@ -24,3 +24,3 @@ /*
 
-ava.test('should build a tree with one children', (test) => {
+ava('should build a tree with one children', (test) => {
   const container = new Contract({
@@ -56,3 +56,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should build a tree with two contracts of different types', (test) => {
+ava('should build a tree with two contracts of different types', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -97,3 +97,3 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.blob'].nodejs['4.8.0'].object)
 
-ava.test('should build a tree with two contracts of the same type', (test) => {
+ava('should build a tree with two contracts of the same type', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -137,3 +137,3 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].fedora['25'].object)
 
-ava.test('should build a tree with two versions of the same slug', (test) => {
+ava('should build a tree with two versions of the same slug', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -178,3 +178,3 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.jessie.object)
 
-ava.test('should create a tree of two variants of the same contract', (test) => {
+ava('should create a tree of two variants of the same contract', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract({
@@ -181,0 +181,0 @@ type: 'sw.os',

test/contract/add-child.spec.js

@@ -24,3 +24,3 @@ /*
 
-ava.test('should add a contract to a contract without children', (test) => {
+ava('should add a contract to a contract without children', (test) => {
   const container = new Contract({
@@ -62,3 +62,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should add two contracts of different types', (test) => {
+ava('should add two contracts of different types', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -109,3 +109,3 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.blob'].nodejs['4.8.0'].object)
 
-ava.test('should not add a contract twice', (test) => {
+ava('should not add a contract twice', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -147,3 +147,3 @@ const container = new Contract({
 
-ava.test('should two contracts of same type but different slugs', (test) => {
+ava('should two contracts of same type but different slugs', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -193,3 +193,3 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].fedora['25'].object)
 
-ava.test('should add a new version of an existing contract', (test) => {
+ava('should add a new version of an existing contract', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -240,3 +240,3 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.jessie.object)
 
-ava.test('should add two new versions of an existing contract', (test) => {
+ava('should add two new versions of an existing contract', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -299,3 +299,3 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.jessie.object)
 
-ava.test('should return the instance', (test) => {
+ava('should return the instance', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -310,3 +310,3 @@ const container = new Contract({
 
-ava.test('should re-hash the parent contract', (test) => {
+ava('should re-hash the parent contract', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -323,3 +323,3 @@ const container = new Contract({
 
-ava.test('should not re-hash the parent contract if the rehash option is false', (test) => {
+ava('should not re-hash the parent contract if the rehash option is false', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -326,0 +326,0 @@ const container = new Contract({

test/contract/add-children.spec.js

@@ -24,3 +24,3 @@ /*
 
-ava.test('should add a set of one contract', (test) => {
+ava('should add a set of one contract', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -62,3 +62,3 @@ const container = new Contract({
 
-ava.test('should ignore duplicates from contract sets', (test) => {
+ava('should ignore duplicates from contract sets', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -100,3 +100,3 @@ const container = new Contract({
 
-ava.test('should add a set of multiple contracts to an empty universe', (test) => {
+ava('should add a set of multiple contracts to an empty universe', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -143,3 +143,3 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.jessie.object)
 
-ava.test('should return the instance', (test) => {
+ava('should return the instance', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -155,3 +155,3 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.jessie.object)
 
-ava.test('should return the instance if no contracts', (test) => {
+ava('should return the instance if no contracts', (test) => {
   const container = new Contract({
@@ -165,3 +165,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should re-hash the universe', (test) => {
+ava('should re-hash the universe', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -180,3 +180,3 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.jessie.object)
 
-ava.test('should not re-hash the universe if the rehash option is false', (test) => {
+ava('should not re-hash the universe if the rehash option is false', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -198,3 +198,3 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.jessie.object)
 
-ava.test('should add a contract of a new slug to an existing type', (test) => {
+ava('should add a contract of a new slug to an existing type', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -252,3 +252,3 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.jessie.object)
 
-ava.test('should add two contracts of a new slug to an existing type', (test) => {
+ava('should add two contracts of a new slug to an existing type', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -255,0 +255,0 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.jessie.object)

test/contract/are-children-satisfied.spec.js

@@ -22,3 +22,3 @@ /*
 
-ava.test('should return true given a satisfied context', (test) => {
+ava('should return true given a satisfied context', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -70,3 +70,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should return false given an unsatisfied context', (test) => {
+ava('should return false given an unsatisfied context', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -118,3 +118,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should return false given a requirement over a contract that does not exist', (test) => {
+ava('should return false given a requirement over a contract that does not exist', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -142,3 +142,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should return true given a requirement over a contract that does not ' +
+ava('should return true given a requirement over a contract that does not ' +
          'exist for which the type was not passed', (test) => {
@@ -169,3 +169,3 @@ const contract = new Contract({
 
-ava.test('should return true given one satisfied type in a satisfied context', (test) => {
+ava('should return true given one satisfied type in a satisfied context', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -219,3 +219,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should return true given one satisfied type in an unsatisfied context', (test) => {
+ava('should return true given one satisfied type in an unsatisfied context', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -269,3 +269,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should return true given one unknown type in an unsatisfied context', (test) => {
+ava('should return true given one unknown type in an unsatisfied context', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -319,3 +319,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should return false given one unsatisfied type in an unsatisfied context', (test) => {
+ava('should return false given one unsatisfied type in an unsatisfied context', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -369,3 +369,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should return false given one unsatisfied and one satisfied type in an unsatisfied context', (test) => {
+ava('should return false given one unsatisfied and one satisfied type in an unsatisfied context', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -419,3 +419,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should return true given two satisfied types in a satisfied context', (test) => {
+ava('should return true given two satisfied types in a satisfied context', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -469,3 +469,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should return true given a context with other satisfied contexts', (test) => {
+ava('should return true given a context with other satisfied contexts', (test) => {
   const container = new Contract({
@@ -525,3 +525,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should return false given a context with unsatisfied contexts', (test) => {
+ava('should return false given a context with unsatisfied contexts', (test) => {
   const container = new Contract({
@@ -528,0 +528,0 @@ type: 'foo',

test/contract/build.spec.js

@@ -22,3 +22,3 @@ /*
 
-ava.test('should build contract templates', (test) => {
+ava('should build contract templates', (test) => {
   const contracts = Contract.build({
@@ -49,3 +49,3 @@ name: 'Debian {{this.data.codename}}',
 
-ava.test('should support slug and type templates', (test) => {
+ava('should support slug and type templates', (test) => {
   const contracts = Contract.build({
@@ -76,3 +76,3 @@ name: 'Debian Wheezy',
 
-ava.test('should expand contract variants', (test) => {
+ava('should expand contract variants', (test) => {
   const contracts = Contract.build({
@@ -113,3 +113,3 @@ slug: 'debian',
 
-ava.test('should build contracts with variants and templates', (test) => {
+ava('should build contracts with variants and templates', (test) => {
   const contracts = Contract.build({
@@ -154,3 +154,3 @@ name: 'debian {{this.version}}',
 
-ava.test('should expand contract aliases', (test) => {
+ava('should expand contract aliases', (test) => {
   const contracts = Contract.build({
@@ -184,3 +184,3 @@ slug: 'debian',
 
-ava.test('should build contracts with variants and aliases', (test) => {
+ava('should build contracts with variants and aliases', (test) => {
   const contracts = Contract.build({
@@ -187,0 +187,0 @@ name: 'debian {{this.version}}',

test/contract/caching.spec.js

@@ -24,3 +24,3 @@ /*
 
-ava.test('should have an empty cache by default', (test) => {
+ava('should have an empty cache by default', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -38,3 +38,3 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.jessie.object)
 
-ava.test('should create an entry after a successful search', (test) => {
+ava('should create an entry after a successful search', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -63,3 +63,3 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].fedora['25'].object)
 
-ava.test('should be able to store multiple entries', (test) => {
+ava('should be able to store multiple entries', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -95,3 +95,3 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].fedora['25'].object)
 
-ava.test('should still store an entry if there were no results', (test) => {
+ava('should still store an entry if there were no results', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -120,3 +120,3 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].fedora['25'].object)
 
-ava.test('should honor a matcher over and over again', (test) => {
+ava('should honor a matcher over and over again', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -143,3 +143,3 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].fedora['25'].object)
 
-ava.test('should clear the cache for a certain type if a contract is added', (test) => {
+ava('should clear the cache for a certain type if a contract is added', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -178,3 +178,3 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].fedora['25'].object)
 
-ava.test('should clear the cache for a certain type if a contract is removed', (test) => {
+ava('should clear the cache for a certain type if a contract is removed', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -213,3 +213,3 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].fedora['25'].object)
 
-ava.test('should clear the cache for a certain type if the removed contract did not exist', (test) => {
+ava('should clear the cache for a certain type if the removed contract did not exist', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -216,0 +216,0 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].fedora['25'].object)

test/contract/constructor/children.spec.js

@@ -23,3 +23,3 @@ /*
 
-ava.test('should take a contract with a single child', (test) => {
+ava('should take a contract with a single child', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -77,3 +77,3 @@ type: 'misc.collection',
 
-ava.test('should take a contract with two children of the same type', (test) => {
+ava('should take a contract with two children of the same type', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -154,3 +154,3 @@ type: 'misc.collection',
 
-ava.test('should take a contract with two children of the same type and slug', (test) => {
+ava('should take a contract with two children of the same type and slug', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -243,3 +243,3 @@ type: 'misc.collection',
 
-ava.test('should take a contract with two children of different types', (test) => {
+ava('should take a contract with two children of different types', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -246,0 +246,0 @@ type: 'misc.collection',

test/contract/constructor/constructor.spec.js

@@ -24,3 +24,3 @@ /*
 
-ava.test('should create a simple contract', (test) => {
+ava('should create a simple contract', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -27,0 +27,0 @@ type: 'arch.sw',

test/contract/constructor/hash.spec.js

@@ -23,3 +23,3 @@ /*
 
-ava.test('should hash the contract by default', (test) => {
+ava('should hash the contract by default', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -29,3 +29,3 @@ test.is(typeof contract.metadata.hash, 'string')
 
-ava.test('should not hash the contract if hash is set to false', (test) => {
+ava('should not hash the contract if hash is set to false', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object, {
@@ -32,0 +32,0 @@ hash: false

test/contract/constructor/requirements.spec.js

@@ -35,3 +35,3 @@ /*
 
-ava.test('should create a simple contract with empty requirements', (test) => {
+ava('should create a simple contract with empty requirements', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -58,3 +58,3 @@ type: 'arch.sw',
 
-ava.test('should create a contract with a single top level requirement', (test) => {
+ava('should create a contract with a single top level requirement', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -103,3 +103,3 @@ type: 'arch.sw',
 
-ava.test('should ignore duplicate top level requirements matchers', (test) => {
+ava('should ignore duplicate top level requirements matchers', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -160,3 +160,3 @@ type: 'arch.sw',
 
-ava.test('should create a contract with two top level requirements', (test) => {
+ava('should create a contract with two top level requirements', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -223,3 +223,3 @@ type: 'sw.os',
 
-ava.test('should create a contract with a single or requirement', (test) => {
+ava('should create a contract with a single or requirement', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -296,3 +296,3 @@ type: 'arch.sw',
 
-ava.test('should ignore duplicate matchers from or requirements', (test) => {
+ava('should ignore duplicate matchers from or requirements', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -299,0 +299,0 @@ type: 'arch.sw',

test/contract/constructor/templates.spec.js

@@ -22,3 +22,3 @@ /*
 
-ava.test('should resolve templates for which the values exist', (test) => {
+ava('should resolve templates for which the values exist', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -41,3 +41,3 @@ type: 'arch.sw',
 
-ava.test('should not resolve templates for which the values do not exist', (test) => {
+ava('should not resolve templates for which the values do not exist', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -58,3 +58,3 @@ type: 'arch.sw',
 
-ava.test('should not hash a templated contract if the hash option is false', (test) => {
+ava('should not hash a templated contract if the hash option is false', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -61,0 +61,0 @@ type: 'arch.sw',

test/contract/create-matcher.spec.js

@@ -22,3 +22,3 @@ /*
 
-ava.test('should create contract instance', (test) => {
+ava('should create contract instance', (test) => {
   const matcher = Contract.createMatcher({
@@ -32,3 +32,3 @@ type: 'arch.sw',
 
-ava.test('should include the properties in data', (test) => {
+ava('should include the properties in data', (test) => {
   const matcher = Contract.createMatcher({
@@ -45,3 +45,3 @@ type: 'arch.sw',
 
-ava.test('should set the type appropriately', (test) => {
+ava('should set the type appropriately', (test) => {
   const matcher = Contract.createMatcher({
@@ -55,3 +55,3 @@ type: 'arch.sw',
 
-ava.test('should be able to set the operation name', (test) => {
+ava('should be able to set the operation name', (test) => {
   const matcher = Contract.createMatcher({
@@ -58,0 +58,0 @@ type: 'arch.sw',

test/contract/find-children.spec.js

@@ -23,3 +23,3 @@ /*
 
-ava.test('should find nothing given no properties', (test) => {
+ava('should find nothing given no properties', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -36,3 +36,3 @@ const container = new Contract({
 
-ava.test('should find a specific unique contract based on its type and name', (test) => {
+ava('should find a specific unique contract based on its type and name', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -55,3 +55,3 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].fedora['25'].object)
 
-ava.test('should find a specific unique contract based on its type and slug', (test) => {
+ava('should find a specific unique contract based on its type and slug', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -76,3 +76,3 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.jessie.object)
 
-ava.test('should find a specific unique contract based on another property', (test) => {
+ava('should find a specific unique contract based on another property', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -97,3 +97,3 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.jessie.object)
 
-ava.test('should find multiple contracts based on a type', (test) => {
+ava('should find multiple contracts based on a type', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -119,3 +119,3 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.jessie.object)
 
-ava.test('should find nothing based on a non-existent type', (test) => {
+ava('should find nothing based on a non-existent type', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -137,3 +137,3 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.jessie.object)
 
-ava.test('should find nothing because of an invalid type', (test) => {
+ava('should find nothing because of an invalid type', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -156,3 +156,3 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.jessie.object)
 
-ava.test('should find a contract based on one of its aliases', (test) => {
+ava('should find a contract based on one of its aliases', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract({
@@ -185,3 +185,3 @@ type: 'hw.device-type',
 
-ava.test('should find a nested contract by its type and slug', (test) => {
+ava('should find a nested contract by its type and slug', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -208,3 +208,3 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.jessie.object)
 
-ava.test('should find a nested contract by its type and another property', (test) => {
+ava('should find a nested contract by its type and another property', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -231,3 +231,3 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.jessie.object)
 
-ava.test('should fail to find a nested contract with an incorrect slug', (test) => {
+ava('should fail to find a nested contract with an incorrect slug', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -252,3 +252,3 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.jessie.object)
 
-ava.test('should fail to find a nested contract with an incorrect type', (test) => {
+ava('should fail to find a nested contract with an incorrect type', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -273,3 +273,3 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.jessie.object)
 
-ava.test('should be able to find a two level nested children using its type', (test) => {
+ava('should be able to find a two level nested children using its type', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['hw.device-type'].artik10.object)
@@ -276,0 +276,0 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)

test/contract/get-all-slugs.spec.js

@@ -22,3 +22,3 @@ /*
 
-ava.test('should return only the slug given a contract without aliases', (test) => {
+ava('should return only the slug given a contract without aliases', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -33,3 +33,3 @@ type: 'arch.sw',
 
-ava.test('should include the aliases if present', (test) => {
+ava('should include the aliases if present', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -49,3 +49,3 @@ type: 'hw.device-type',
 
-ava.test('should return only the slug if aliases is empty', (test) => {
+ava('should return only the slug if aliases is empty', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -52,0 +52,0 @@ type: 'arch.sw',

test/contract/get-canonical-slug.spec.js

@@ -22,3 +22,3 @@ /*
 
-ava.test('should return the canonical slug', (test) => {
+ava('should return the canonical slug', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -34,3 +34,3 @@ type: 'arch.sw',
 
-ava.test('should return the slug if canonical slug does not exist', (test) => {
+ava('should return the slug if canonical slug does not exist', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -37,0 +37,0 @@ type: 'arch.sw',

test/contract/get-child-by-hash.spec.js

@@ -23,3 +23,3 @@ /*
 
-ava.test('should return an existing child given its hash', (test) => {
+ava('should return an existing child given its hash', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -40,3 +40,3 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.jessie.object)
 
-ava.test('should return nothing if the hash does not exist', (test) => {
+ava('should return nothing if the hash does not exist', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -43,0 +43,0 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.jessie.object)

test/contract/get-children-by-type.spec.js

@@ -23,3 +23,3 @@ /*
 
-ava.test('should return all contracts of the type if the type exists', (test) => {
+ava('should return all contracts of the type if the type exists', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -44,3 +44,3 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.jessie.object)
 
-ava.test('should always return the same results', (test) => {
+ava('should always return the same results', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -77,3 +77,3 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.jessie.object)
 
-ava.test('should return nothing if the type does not exist', (test) => {
+ava('should return nothing if the type does not exist', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -94,3 +94,3 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.jessie.object)
 
-ava.test('should not return the same contract multiple times if it contains aliases', (test) => {
+ava('should not return the same contract multiple times if it contains aliases', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.blob'].nodejs['4.8.0'].object)
@@ -97,0 +97,0 @@ const contract2 = new Contract({

test/contract/get-children-combinations.spec.js

@@ -23,3 +23,3 @@ /*
 
-ava.test('should throw if the type is not valid', (test) => {
+ava('should throw if the type is not valid', (test) => {
   const container = new Contract({
@@ -41,6 +41,6 @@ type: 'foo',
     })
-  }, 'Invalid cardinality: 2 to 2. The number of foo contracts in the universe is 0')
+  }, { message: 'Invalid cardinality: 2 to 2. The number of foo contracts in the universe is 0' })
 })
 
-ava.test('should return combinations of cardinality 1 for one contract', (test) => {
+ava('should return combinations of cardinality 1 for one contract', (test) => {
   const container = new Contract({
@@ -67,3 +67,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should return combinations of cardinality 1 for two contracts', (test) => {
+ava('should return combinations of cardinality 1 for two contracts', (test) => {
   const container = new Contract({
@@ -94,3 +94,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should return combinations of cardinality 1 for three contracts', (test) => {
+ava('should return combinations of cardinality 1 for three contracts', (test) => {
   const container = new Contract({
@@ -125,3 +125,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should return combinations of cardinality 2 for two contracts', (test) => {
+ava('should return combinations of cardinality 2 for two contracts', (test) => {
   const container = new Contract({
@@ -150,3 +150,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should return combinations of cardinality 2 for three contracts', (test) => {
+ava('should return combinations of cardinality 2 for three contracts', (test) => {
   const container = new Contract({
@@ -184,3 +184,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should throw if "from" is greater than "to"', (test) => {
+ava('should throw if "from" is greater than "to"', (test) => {
   const container = new Contract({
@@ -202,6 +202,6 @@ type: 'foo',
     })
-  }, 'Invalid cardinality: 2 to 1. The starting point is greater than the ending point')
+  }, { message: 'Invalid cardinality: 2 to 1. The starting point is greater than the ending point' })
 })
 
-ava.test('should generate combinations from 1 to 2 for one contract', (test) => {
+ava('should generate combinations from 1 to 2 for one contract', (test) => {
   const container = new Contract({
@@ -228,3 +228,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should return combinations from 1 to 2 for two contracts', (test) => {
+ava('should return combinations from 1 to 2 for two contracts', (test) => {
   const container = new Contract({
@@ -259,3 +259,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should return combinations from 1 to 3 for two contracts', (test) => {
+ava('should return combinations from 1 to 3 for two contracts', (test) => {
   const container = new Contract({
@@ -290,3 +290,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should return combinations from 1 to 3 for three contracts', (test) => {
+ava('should return combinations from 1 to 3 for three contracts', (test) => {
   const container = new Contract({
@@ -337,3 +337,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should not consider aliases as separate contracts', (test) => {
+ava('should not consider aliases as separate contracts', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract({
@@ -340,0 +340,0 @@ type: 'hw.device-type',

test/contract/get-children-cross-referenced-contracts.spec.js

@@ -22,3 +22,3 @@ /*
 
-ava.test('should compute the intersection of one type and two contracts with or operators', (test) => {
+ava('should compute the intersection of one type and two contracts with or operators', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -101,3 +101,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should return nothing if the from contract does not contain the referenced contracts', (test) => {
+ava('should return nothing if the from contract does not contain the referenced contracts', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -159,3 +159,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should compute the intersection of more than one type, from more than two contracts', (test) => {
+ava('should compute the intersection of more than one type, from more than two contracts', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -301,3 +301,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should return nothing if there is no intersection', (test) => {
+ava('should return nothing if there is no intersection', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -366,3 +366,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should not discard contracts of a type not defined in another contracts', (test) => {
+ava('should not discard contracts of a type not defined in another contracts', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -369,0 +369,0 @@ type: 'foo',

test/contract/get-children-types.spec.js

@@ -23,3 +23,3 @@ /*
 
-ava.test('should return an empty set if no children', (test) => {
+ava('should return an empty set if no children', (test) => {
   const container = new Contract({
@@ -33,3 +33,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should return one type given one child', (test) => {
+ava('should return one type given one child', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -46,3 +46,3 @@ const container = new Contract({
 
-ava.test('should ignore duplicate types', (test) => {
+ava('should ignore duplicate types', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -59,3 +59,3 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.jessie.object)
 
-ava.test('should return all children types', (test) => {
+ava('should return all children types', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -72,3 +72,3 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.blob'].nodejs['4.8.0'].object)
 
-ava.test('should update the types when adding a contract', (test) => {
+ava('should update the types when adding a contract', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -86,3 +86,3 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.blob'].nodejs['4.8.0'].object)
 
-ava.test('should consider nested children', (test) => {
+ava('should consider nested children', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -101,3 +101,3 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.blob'].nodejs['4.8.0'].object)
 
-ava.test('should consider two level nested children', (test) => {
+ava('should consider two level nested children', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['hw.device-type'].artik10.object)
@@ -104,0 +104,0 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)

test/contract/get-children.spec.js

@@ -23,3 +23,3 @@ /*
 
-ava.test('should get nothing if no children', (test) => {
+ava('should get nothing if no children', (test) => {
   const container = new Contract({
@@ -33,3 +33,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should get the paths of a one child container', (test) => {
+ava('should get the paths of a one child container', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -48,3 +48,3 @@ const container = new Contract({
 
-ava.test('should get the paths of two contracts with different slugs', (test) => {
+ava('should get the paths of two contracts with different slugs', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -65,3 +65,3 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].fedora['25'].object)
 
-ava.test('should get the paths of two contracts with same slugs', (test) => {
+ava('should get the paths of two contracts with same slugs', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -82,3 +82,3 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.jessie.object)
 
-ava.test('should be able to filter by one type', (test) => {
+ava('should be able to filter by one type', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -100,3 +100,3 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.blob'].nodejs['4.8.0'].object)
 
-ava.test('should be able to filter by two types', (test) => {
+ava('should be able to filter by two types', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -120,3 +120,3 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.blob'].nodejs['4.8.0'].object)
 
-ava.test('should ignore unknown types', (test) => {
+ava('should ignore unknown types', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -138,3 +138,3 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.blob'].nodejs['4.8.0'].object)
 
-ava.test('should return an empty array if no type matches', (test) => {
+ava('should return an empty array if no type matches', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -154,3 +154,3 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.blob'].nodejs['4.8.0'].object)
 
-ava.test('should not return the same contract multiple times if it contains aliases', (test) => {
+ava('should not return the same contract multiple times if it contains aliases', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.blob'].nodejs['4.8.0'].object)
@@ -177,3 +177,3 @@ const contract2 = new Contract({
 
-ava.test('should return nested children', (test) => {
+ava('should return nested children', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -196,3 +196,3 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.blob'].nodejs['4.8.0'].object)
 
-ava.test('should return two level nested children', (test) => {
+ava('should return two level nested children', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['hw.device-type'].artik10.object)
@@ -218,3 +218,3 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
 
-ava.test('should return nested children that match the desired type', (test) => {
+ava('should return nested children that match the desired type', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -221,0 +221,0 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.blob'].nodejs['4.8.0'].object)

test/contract/get-reference-string.spec.js

@@ -22,3 +22,3 @@ /*
 
-ava.test('should return the reference string of a contract without a version', (test) => {
+ava('should return the reference string of a contract without a version', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -33,3 +33,3 @@ type: 'sw.arch',
 
-ava.test('should return the reference string of a contract with a version', (test) => {
+ava('should return the reference string of a contract with a version', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -36,0 +36,0 @@ type: 'sw.os',

test/contract/get-slug.spec.js

@@ -22,3 +22,3 @@ /*
 
-ava.test('should return the slug', (test) => {
+ava('should return the slug', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -25,0 +25,0 @@ type: 'arch.sw',

test/contract/get-type.spec.js

@@ -22,3 +22,3 @@ /*
 
-ava.test('should return the type', (test) => {
+ava('should return the type', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -25,0 +25,0 @@ type: 'arch.sw',

test/contract/get-version.spec.js

@@ -22,3 +22,3 @@ /*
 
-ava.test('should return the version if there is one', (test) => {
+ava('should return the version if there is one', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -34,3 +34,3 @@ type: 'sw.os',
 
-ava.test('should return undefined if there is not one', (test) => {
+ava('should return undefined if there is not one', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -37,0 +37,0 @@ type: 'sw.os',

test/contract/has-aliases.spec.js

@@ -22,3 +22,3 @@ /*
 
-ava.test('should return false given a contract without aliases', (test) => {
+ava('should return false given a contract without aliases', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -33,3 +33,3 @@ type: 'arch.sw',
 
-ava.test('should return true given a contract with aliases', (test) => {
+ava('should return true given a contract with aliases', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -45,3 +45,3 @@ type: 'hw.device-type',
 
-ava.test('should return false given a contract with empty aliases', (test) => {
+ava('should return false given a contract with empty aliases', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -48,0 +48,0 @@ type: 'arch.sw',

test/contract/hash.spec.js

@@ -22,3 +22,3 @@ /*
 
-ava.test('should be able to re-hash a mutated contract', (test) => {
+ava('should be able to re-hash a mutated contract', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -36,3 +36,3 @@ type: 'arch.sw',
 
-ava.test('should not re-hash metadata changes', (test) => {
+ava('should not re-hash metadata changes', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -39,0 +39,0 @@ type: 'arch.sw',

test/contract/interpolate.spec.js

@@ -22,3 +22,3 @@ /*
 
-ava.test('should build missing templates', (test) => {
+ava('should build missing templates', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -49,3 +49,3 @@ name: 'Debian {{this.data.codename}}',
 
-ava.test('should not rehash the contract if the rehash option is set to false', (test) => {
+ava('should not rehash the contract if the rehash option is set to false', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -82,3 +82,3 @@ name: 'Debian {{this.data.codename}}',
 
-ava.test('should return the contract instance', (test) => {
+ava('should return the contract instance', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -97,3 +97,3 @@ name: 'Debian {{this.data.codename}}',
 
-ava.test('should not perform interpolation on children', (test) => {
+ava('should not perform interpolation on children', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -100,0 +100,0 @@ slug: 'debian',

test/contract/is-equal.spec.js

@@ -22,3 +22,3 @@ /*
 
-ava.test('should return true if the contracts are equal', (test) => {
+ava('should return true if the contracts are equal', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract({
@@ -39,3 +39,3 @@ type: 'arch.sw',
 
-ava.test('should return false if the contracts are different', (test) => {
+ava('should return false if the contracts are different', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract({
@@ -56,3 +56,3 @@ type: 'arch.sw',
 
-ava.test('should return false if the contracts are different but have not been hashed', (test) => {
+ava('should return false if the contracts are different but have not been hashed', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract({
@@ -77,3 +77,3 @@ type: 'arch.sw',
 
-ava.test('should return true if the contracts are equal but have not been hashed', (test) => {
+ava('should return true if the contracts are equal but have not been hashed', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract({
@@ -80,0 +80,0 @@ type: 'arch.sw',

test/contract/remove-child.spec.js

@@ -28,3 +28,3 @@ /*
 
-ava.test('should delete a contract from a set of contracts', (test) => {
+ava('should delete a contract from a set of contracts', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -43,3 +43,3 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.jessie.object)
 
-ava.test('should ignore contracts that are not in the set', (test) => {
+ava('should ignore contracts that are not in the set', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -58,3 +58,3 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.jessie.object)
 
-ava.test('should remove a slug object if it becomes empty after the removal', (test) => {
+ava('should remove a slug object if it becomes empty after the removal', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -72,3 +72,3 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].fedora['25'].object)
 
-ava.test('should correctly handle number versions', (test) => {
+ava('should correctly handle number versions', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -87,3 +87,3 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].fedora['24'].object)
 
-ava.test('should ignore an invalid version of an existing contract', (test) => {
+ava('should ignore an invalid version of an existing contract', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -102,3 +102,3 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.jessie.object)
 
-ava.test('should take versions into account before removing a contract from the slug object', (test) => {
+ava('should take versions into account before removing a contract from the slug object', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -117,3 +117,3 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].fedora['24'].object)
 
-ava.test('should take versions into account before removing a contract from the type object', (test) => {
+ava('should take versions into account before removing a contract from the type object', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -131,3 +131,3 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.jessie.object)
 
-ava.test('should remove a type object if it becomes empty after the removal', (test) => {
+ava('should remove a type object if it becomes empty after the removal', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -145,3 +145,3 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.blob'].nodejs['4.8.0'].object)
 
-ava.test('should return the object instance', (test) => {
+ava('should return the object instance', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -156,3 +156,3 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.jessie.object)
 
-ava.test('should return the object instance even if the type does not exist', (test) => {
+ava('should return the object instance even if the type does not exist', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -167,3 +167,3 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.jessie.object)
 
-ava.test('should remove a contract with aliases', (test) => {
+ava('should remove a contract with aliases', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.blob'].nodejs['4.8.0'].object)
@@ -186,3 +186,3 @@ const contract2 = new Contract({
 
-ava.test('should remove a contract with aliases when there is another aliased contract of the same type', (test) => {
+ava('should remove a contract with aliases when there is another aliased contract of the same type', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract({
@@ -211,3 +211,3 @@ type: 'hw.device-type',
 
-ava.test('should remove a contract with aliases when there are two aliased contracts of the same type', (test) => {
+ava('should remove a contract with aliases when there are two aliased contracts of the same type', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract({
@@ -243,3 +243,3 @@ type: 'hw.device-type',
 
-ava.test('should re-hash the universe', (test) => {
+ava('should re-hash the universe', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -258,3 +258,3 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.jessie.object)
 
-ava.test('should not re-hash the universe if the rehash option is false', (test) => {
+ava('should not re-hash the universe if the rehash option is false', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object)
@@ -261,0 +261,0 @@ const contract2 = new Contract(CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.jessie.object)

test/contract/satisfies-child-contract.spec.js

@@ -23,3 +23,3 @@ /*
 
-ava.test('should return true given an empty contract and a contract without requirements', (test) => {
+ava('should return true given an empty contract and a contract without requirements', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -38,3 +38,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should return false given an empty contract and a contract with requirements', (test) => {
+ava('should return false given an empty contract and a contract with requirements', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -59,3 +59,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should return true given a contract without requirements', (test) => {
+ava('should return true given a contract without requirements', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -79,3 +79,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should return true given one fulfilled requirement', (test) => {
+ava('should return true given one fulfilled requirement', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -105,3 +105,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should return true given two fulfilled requirements', (test) => {
+ava('should return true given two fulfilled requirements', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -136,3 +136,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should return false given one unfulfilled requirement', (test) => {
+ava('should return false given one unfulfilled requirement', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -162,3 +162,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should return false given two requirements where one is not fulfilled', (test) => {
+ava('should return false given two requirements where one is not fulfilled', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -192,3 +192,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should return true given no requirements in a disjunction', (test) => {
+ava('should return true given no requirements in a disjunction', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -217,3 +217,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should return false given a partially unfulfilled not operator', (test) => {
+ava('should return false given a partially unfulfilled not operator', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -249,3 +249,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should return false given an unfulfilled not operator', (test) => {
+ava('should return false given an unfulfilled not operator', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -277,3 +277,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should return false given a fulfilled not operator', (test) => {
+ava('should return false given a fulfilled not operator', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -305,3 +305,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should return true given an empty not operator', (test) => {
+ava('should return true given an empty not operator', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -328,3 +328,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should return false given two unfulfilled requirements', (test) => {
+ava('should return false given two unfulfilled requirements', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -358,3 +358,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should return true given one fulfilled requirement in a disjunction', (test) => {
+ava('should return true given one fulfilled requirement in a disjunction', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -388,3 +388,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should return true given one fulfilled and one unfulfilled requirement in a disjunction', (test) => {
+ava('should return true given one fulfilled and one unfulfilled requirement in a disjunction', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -422,3 +422,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should return false given one unfulfilled requirement in a disjunction', (test) => {
+ava('should return false given one unfulfilled requirement in a disjunction', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -452,3 +452,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should return false given an empty disjunction and an unfulfilled requirement', (test) => {
+ava('should return false given an empty disjunction and an unfulfilled requirement', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -481,3 +481,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should return false given an fulfilled disjunction and an unfulfilled requirement', (test) => {
+ava('should return false given an fulfilled disjunction and an unfulfilled requirement', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -519,3 +519,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should be able to specify a single type', (test) => {
+ava('should be able to specify a single type', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -551,3 +551,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should be able to specify multiple types', (test) => {
+ava('should be able to specify multiple types', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -595,3 +595,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should return false given one unfulfilled requirement selected type', (test) => {
+ava('should return false given one unfulfilled requirement selected type', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -623,3 +623,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should return true given one unfulfilled requirement in a disjunction of a non-selected type', (test) => {
+ava('should return true given one unfulfilled requirement in a disjunction of a non-selected type', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -657,3 +657,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should return true given two fulfilled requirements from a context with a composite contract', (test) => {
+ava('should return true given two fulfilled requirements from a context with a composite contract', (test) => {
   const container = new Contract({
@@ -709,3 +709,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should return false given one unfulfilled requirement from a context with a composite contract', (test) => {
+ava('should return false given one unfulfilled requirement from a context with a composite contract', (test) => {
   const container = new Contract({
@@ -761,3 +761,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should return true given one ignored unfulfilled requirement ' +
+ava('should return true given one ignored unfulfilled requirement ' +
          'on a context with a composite contract', (test) => {
@@ -816,3 +816,3 @@ const container = new Contract({
 
-ava.test('should return true given a fulfilled context as an argument', (test) => {
+ava('should return true given a fulfilled context as an argument', (test) => {
   const container = new Contract({
@@ -852,3 +852,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should return false given a unfulfilled context as an argument', (test) => {
+ava('should return false given a unfulfilled context as an argument', (test) => {
   const container = new Contract({
@@ -855,0 +855,0 @@ type: 'foo',

test/contract/to-json.spec.js

@@ -23,3 +23,3 @@ /*
 
-ava.test('should convert a contract into a JSON object', (test) => {
+ava('should convert a contract into a JSON object', (test) => {
   const source = CONTRACTS['sw.os'].debian.wheezy.object
@@ -30,3 +30,3 @@ const contract = new Contract(source)
 
-ava.test('should handle a contract with one child', (test) => {
+ava('should handle a contract with one child', (test) => {
   const container = new Contract({
@@ -50,3 +50,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should handle a contract with two children of the same type and slug', (test) => {
+ava('should handle a contract with two children of the same type and slug', (test) => {
   const container = new Contract({
@@ -78,3 +78,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should handle a contract with two children of the same type but different slugs', (test) => {
+ava('should handle a contract with two children of the same type but different slugs', (test) => {
   const container = new Contract({
@@ -104,3 +104,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should handle a contract with two children of different types', (test) => {
+ava('should handle a contract with two children of different types', (test) => {
   const container = new Contract({
@@ -128,3 +128,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should not expand one child with aliases', (test) => {
+ava('should not expand one child with aliases', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract({
@@ -157,3 +157,3 @@ type: 'hw.device-type',
 
-ava.test('should expand aliases in two children of the same type', (test) => {
+ava('should expand aliases in two children of the same type', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract({
@@ -199,3 +199,3 @@ type: 'hw.device-type',
 
-ava.test('should correctly handle one aliased and one non aliased child of the same type', (test) => {
+ava('should correctly handle one aliased and one non aliased child of the same type', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract({
@@ -239,3 +239,3 @@ type: 'hw.device-type',
 
-ava.test('should correctly handle one none aliased and one aliased child of the same type', (test) => {
+ava('should correctly handle one none aliased and one aliased child of the same type', (test) => {
   const contract1 = new Contract({
@@ -242,0 +242,0 @@ type: 'hw.device-type',

test/hash/hash-object.spec.js

@@ -23,3 +23,3 @@ /*
 
-ava.test('should return a string', (test) => {
+ava('should return a string', (test) => {
   test.true(_.isString(hash.hashObject({
@@ -30,3 +30,3 @@ foo: 'bar'
 
-ava.test('should not care about properties order', (test) => {
+ava('should not care about properties order', (test) => {
   const hash1 = hash.hashObject({
@@ -45,3 +45,3 @@ foo: 'bar',
 
-ava.test('should not rely on object references', (test) => {
+ava('should not rely on object references', (test) => {
   const object = {
@@ -60,3 +60,3 @@ foo: 'bar'
 
-ava.test('should return different hashes for different objects', (test) => {
+ava('should return different hashes for different objects', (test) => {
   const hash1 = hash.hashObject({
@@ -63,0 +63,0 @@ foo: 'bar'

test/matcher-cache/add.spec.js

@@ -23,3 +23,3 @@ /*
 
-ava.test('should add one value to the cache', (test) => {
+ava('should add one value to the cache', (test) => {
   const cache = new MatcherCache()
@@ -44,3 +44,3 @@
 
-ava.test('should add two values to the cache using the same type', (test) => {
+ava('should add two values to the cache using the same type', (test) => {
   const cache = new MatcherCache()
@@ -75,3 +75,3 @@
 
-ava.test('should add two values to the cache using different types', (test) => {
+ava('should add two values to the cache using different types', (test) => {
   const cache = new MatcherCache()
@@ -78,0 +78,0 @@

test/matcher-cache/constructor.spec.js

@@ -22,5 +22,5 @@ /*
 
-ava.test('should create an empty cache', (test) => {
+ava('should create an empty cache', (test) => {
   const cache = new MatcherCache()
   test.deepEqual(cache.data, {})
 })

test/matcher-cache/get-types.spec.js

@@ -23,3 +23,3 @@ /*
 
-ava.test('should return an empty set if the cache is empty', (test) => {
+ava('should return an empty set if the cache is empty', (test) => {
   const cache = new MatcherCache()
@@ -29,3 +29,3 @@ test.deepEqual(cache.getTypes(), new Set())
 
-ava.test('should return a single type if there is only one entry', (test) => {
+ava('should return a single type if there is only one entry', (test) => {
   const cache = new MatcherCache()
@@ -43,3 +43,3 @@
 
-ava.test('should not return duplicated types', (test) => {
+ava('should not return duplicated types', (test) => {
   const cache = new MatcherCache()
@@ -63,3 +63,3 @@
 
-ava.test('should return all added types', (test) => {
+ava('should return all added types', (test) => {
   const cache = new MatcherCache()
@@ -83,3 +83,3 @@
 
-ava.test('should not return reset types', (test) => {
+ava('should not return reset types', (test) => {
   const cache = new MatcherCache()
@@ -86,0 +86,0 @@

test/matcher-cache/get.spec.js

@@ -23,3 +23,3 @@ /*
 
-ava.test('should return the value if the matcher was cached', (test) => {
+ava('should return the value if the matcher was cached', (test) => {
   const cache = new MatcherCache()
@@ -41,3 +41,3 @@
 
-ava.test('should return null if the matcher was not cached', (test) => {
+ava('should return null if the matcher was not cached', (test) => {
   const cache = new MatcherCache()
@@ -44,0 +44,0 @@

test/matcher-cache/merge.spec.js

@@ -23,3 +23,3 @@ /*
 
-ava.test('should merge two empty caches', (test) => {
+ava('should merge two empty caches', (test) => {
   const cache1 = new MatcherCache()
@@ -31,3 +31,3 @@ const cache2 = new MatcherCache()
 
-ava.test('should merge a non empty cache with one type into an empty cache', (test) => {
+ava('should merge a non empty cache with one type into an empty cache', (test) => {
   const cache1 = new MatcherCache()
@@ -65,3 +65,3 @@ const cache2 = new MatcherCache()
 
-ava.test('should merge a non empty cache with two types into an empty cache', (test) => {
+ava('should merge a non empty cache with two types into an empty cache', (test) => {
   const cache1 = new MatcherCache()
@@ -101,3 +101,3 @@ const cache2 = new MatcherCache()
 
-ava.test('should merge two non empty caches with disjoint types', (test) => {
+ava('should merge two non empty caches with disjoint types', (test) => {
   const cache1 = new MatcherCache()
@@ -137,3 +137,3 @@ const cache2 = new MatcherCache()
 
-ava.test('should omit types in common', (test) => {
+ava('should omit types in common', (test) => {
   const cache1 = new MatcherCache()
@@ -173,3 +173,3 @@ const cache2 = new MatcherCache()
 
-ava.test('should return the instance', (test) => {
+ava('should return the instance', (test) => {
   const cache1 = new MatcherCache()
@@ -176,0 +176,0 @@ const cache2 = new MatcherCache()

test/matcher-cache/reset-type.spec.js

@@ -23,3 +23,3 @@ /*
 
-ava.test('should remove all specified types from the cache', (test) => {
+ava('should remove all specified types from the cache', (test) => {
   const cache = new MatcherCache()
@@ -58,3 +58,3 @@
 
-ava.test('should do nothing if the type does not exist', (test) => {
+ava('should do nothing if the type does not exist', (test) => {
   const cache = new MatcherCache()
@@ -61,0 +61,0 @@

test/object-set/add.spec.js

@@ -22,3 +22,3 @@ /*
 
-ava.test('should add an object to an empty set', (test) => {
+ava('should add an object to an empty set', (test) => {
   const set = new ObjectSet()
@@ -37,3 +37,3 @@
 
-ava.test('should add an object to a non empty set', (test) => {
+ava('should add an object to a non empty set', (test) => {
   const set = new ObjectSet([
@@ -59,3 +59,3 @@ {
 
-ava.test('should not add a duplicate object', (test) => {
+ava('should not add a duplicate object', (test) => {
   const set = new ObjectSet([
@@ -78,3 +78,3 @@ {
 
-ava.test('should allow the user to set a custom id', (test) => {
+ava('should allow the user to set a custom id', (test) => {
   const set = new ObjectSet([])
@@ -81,0 +81,0 @@

test/object-set/constructor.spec.js

@@ -22,3 +22,3 @@ /*
 
-ava.test('should create an empty set', (test) => {
+ava('should create an empty set', (test) => {
   const set = new ObjectSet()
@@ -28,3 +28,3 @@ test.deepEqual(set.getAll(), [])
 
-ava.test('should create a set with objects', (test) => {
+ava('should create a set with objects', (test) => {
   const set = new ObjectSet([
@@ -49,3 +49,3 @@ {
 
-ava.test('should ignore duplicate objects', (test) => {
+ava('should ignore duplicate objects', (test) => {
   const set = new ObjectSet([
@@ -67,3 +67,3 @@ {
 
-ava.test('should be able to set objects with custom ids', (test) => {
+ava('should be able to set objects with custom ids', (test) => {
   const set = new ObjectSet([
@@ -70,0 +70,0 @@ [

test/object-set/get-all.spec.js

@@ -22,3 +22,3 @@ /*
 
-ava.test('should return an empty array if the set is empty', (test) => {
+ava('should return an empty array if the set is empty', (test) => {
   const set = new ObjectSet()
@@ -28,3 +28,3 @@ test.deepEqual(set.getAll(), [])
 
-ava.test('should return the elements in the set', (test) => {
+ava('should return the elements in the set', (test) => {
   const set = new ObjectSet([
@@ -31,0 +31,0 @@ {

test/object-set/has-id.spec.js

@@ -22,3 +22,3 @@ /*
 
-ava.test('should return true if the id exists', (test) => {
+ava('should return true if the id exists', (test) => {
   const set = new ObjectSet()
@@ -41,3 +41,3 @@
 
-ava.test('should return false if the id does not exist', (test) => {
+ava('should return false if the id does not exist', (test) => {
   const set = new ObjectSet()
@@ -44,0 +44,0 @@

test/object-set/has-object.spec.js

@@ -22,3 +22,3 @@ /*
 
-ava.test('should return true if the object exists', (test) => {
+ava('should return true if the object exists', (test) => {
   const set = new ObjectSet([
@@ -38,3 +38,3 @@ {
 
-ava.test('should return false if the object does not exist', (test) => {
+ava('should return false if the object does not exist', (test) => {
   const set = new ObjectSet([
@@ -41,0 +41,0 @@ {

test/object-set/intersection.spec.js

@@ -22,3 +22,3 @@ /*
 
-ava.test('should calculate the intersection of two sets', (test) => {
+ava('should calculate the intersection of two sets', (test) => {
   const set1 = new ObjectSet()
@@ -52,3 +52,3 @@ const set2 = new ObjectSet()
 
-ava.test('should return the instance', (test) => {
+ava('should return the instance', (test) => {
   const set1 = new ObjectSet()
@@ -68,3 +68,3 @@ const set2 = new ObjectSet()
 
-ava.test('should calculate the intersection of two disjoint sets', (test) => {
+ava('should calculate the intersection of two disjoint sets', (test) => {
   const set1 = new ObjectSet()
@@ -90,3 +90,3 @@ const set2 = new ObjectSet()
 
-ava.test('should return an empty array if the left set is empty', (test) => {
+ava('should return an empty array if the left set is empty', (test) => {
   const set1 = new ObjectSet()
@@ -104,3 +104,3 @@ const set2 = new ObjectSet()
 
-ava.test('should return an empty array if the right set is empty', (test) => {
+ava('should return an empty array if the right set is empty', (test) => {
   const set1 = new ObjectSet()
@@ -118,3 +118,3 @@ const set2 = new ObjectSet()
 
-ava.test('should take custom ids into account', (test) => {
+ava('should take custom ids into account', (test) => {
   const set1 = new ObjectSet()
@@ -156,3 +156,3 @@ const set2 = new ObjectSet()
 
-ava.test('should trust ids rather than objects', (test) => {
+ava('should trust ids rather than objects', (test) => {
   const set1 = new ObjectSet()
@@ -159,0 +159,0 @@ const set2 = new ObjectSet()

test/object-set/size.spec.js

@@ -22,3 +22,3 @@ /*
 
-ava.test('should return zero if the set has no objects', (test) => {
+ava('should return zero if the set has no objects', (test) => {
   const set = new ObjectSet()
@@ -28,3 +28,3 @@ test.is(set.size(), 0)
 
-ava.test('should return one if the set has one object', (test) => {
+ava('should return one if the set has one object', (test) => {
   const set = new ObjectSet([
@@ -39,3 +39,3 @@ {
 
-ava.test('should return two if the set has two object', (test) => {
+ava('should return two if the set has two object', (test) => {
   const set = new ObjectSet([
@@ -53,3 +53,3 @@ {
 
-ava.test('should ignore duplicates', (test) => {
+ava('should ignore duplicates', (test) => {
   const set = new ObjectSet([
@@ -67,3 +67,3 @@ {
 
-ava.test('should change if new objects are added', (test) => {
+ava('should change if new objects are added', (test) => {
   const set = new ObjectSet()
@@ -70,0 +70,0 @@

test/partials/find-partial.spec.js

@@ -23,3 +23,3 @@ /*
 
-ava.test('should find a partial in a one level structure with one contract of a type', (test) => {
+ava('should find a partial in a one level structure with one contract of a type', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -47,3 +47,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should find a partial in a one level structure with one alias contract of a type', (test) => {
+ava('should find a partial in a one level structure with one alias contract of a type', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -72,3 +72,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should find a partial in a one level structure with two alias contracts of a type', (test) => {
+ava('should find a partial in a one level structure with two alias contracts of a type', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -103,3 +103,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should find a partial in a one level structure with two contracts of a type with one right version', (test) => {
+ava('should find a partial in a one level structure with two contracts of a type with one right version', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -134,3 +134,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should find a partial in a one level structure with two contracts of a type with one right version', (test) => {
+ava('should find a partial in a one level structure with two contracts of a type with one right alias', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -146,32 +146,2 @@ type: 'foo',
       name: 'armv7hf',
-      slug: 'armv7hf'
-    }),
-    new Contract({
-      type: 'arch.sw',
-      name: 'armel',
-      slug: 'armel'
-    })
-  ])
-
-  test.deepEqual(partials.findPartial('my-partial', contract, {
-    baseDirectory: 'path/to/partials',
-    structure: [ 'arch.sw' ]
-  }), [
-    'path/to/partials/armel+armv7hf@3/my-partial.tpl',
-    'path/to/partials/armel+armv7hf/my-partial.tpl',
-    'path/to/partials/my-partial.tpl'
-  ])
-})
-
-ava.test('should find a partial in a one level structure with two contracts of a type with one right alias', (test) => {
-  const contract = new Contract({
-    type: 'foo',
-    slug: 'bar'
-  })
-
-  contract.addChildren([
-    new Contract({
-      type: 'arch.sw',
-      version: '3',
-      name: 'armv7hf',
       slug: 'armhf',
@@ -197,3 +167,3 @@ canonicalSlug: 'armv7hf'
 
-ava.test('should find a partial in a one level structure with two contracts of a type with one left version', (test) => {
+ava('should find a partial in a one level structure with two contracts of a type with one left version', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -228,3 +198,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should find a partial in a one level structure with two contracts of a type with one left alias', (test) => {
+ava('should find a partial in a one level structure with two contracts of a type with one left alias', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -260,3 +230,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should find a partial in a one level structure with two contracts of a type with two versions', (test) => {
+ava('should find a partial in a one level structure with two contracts of a type with two versions', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -292,3 +262,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should find a partial in a one level structure with one contract of a type with a version', (test) => {
+ava('should find a partial in a one level structure with one contract of a type with a version', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -318,3 +288,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should find a partial in a two level structure with one contract of each type', (test) => {
+ava('should find a partial in a two level structure with one contract of each type', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -348,3 +318,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should find a partial in a two level structure with one contract of each type with versions', (test) => {
+ava('should find a partial in a two level structure with one contract of each type with versions', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -384,3 +354,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should find a partial in a three level structure with one contract of each type', (test) => {
+ava('should find a partial in a three level structure with one contract of each type', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -420,3 +390,3 @@ type: 'foo',
 
-ava.test('should find a partial in a three level structure with one contract with version of each type', (test) => {
+ava('should find a partial in a three level structure with one contract with version of each type', (test) => {
   const contract = new Contract({
@@ -423,0 +393,0 @@ type: 'foo',

test/template/compile-contract.spec.js

@@ -22,3 +22,3 @@ /*
 
-ava.test('should compile a contract without templates', (test) => {
+ava('should compile a contract without templates', (test) => {
   test.deepEqual(template.compileContract({
@@ -37,3 +37,3 @@ type: 'distro',
 
-ava.test('should compile a single top level template', (test) => {
+ava('should compile a single top level template', (test) => {
   test.deepEqual(template.compileContract({
@@ -52,3 +52,3 @@ type: 'distro',
 
-ava.test('should compile templates inside arrays', (test) => {
+ava('should compile templates inside arrays', (test) => {
   test.deepEqual(template.compileContract({
@@ -85,3 +85,3 @@ type: 'distro',
 
-ava.test('should compile multiple top level templates', (test) => {
+ava('should compile multiple top level templates', (test) => {
   test.deepEqual(template.compileContract({
@@ -100,3 +100,3 @@ type: 'distro',
 
-ava.test('should compile a single nested template', (test) => {
+ava('should compile a single nested template', (test) => {
   test.deepEqual(template.compileContract({
@@ -129,3 +129,3 @@ type: 'distro',
 
-ava.test('should leave missing values as interpolations', (test) => {
+ava('should leave missing values as interpolations', (test) => {
   test.deepEqual(template.compileContract({
@@ -144,3 +144,3 @@ type: 'distro',
 
-ava.test('should be able to blacklist a top level element', (test) => {
+ava('should be able to blacklist a top level element', (test) => {
   const result = template.compileContract({
@@ -169,3 +169,3 @@ type: 'distro',
 
-ava.test('should be able to blacklist a nested element', (test) => {
+ava('should be able to blacklist a nested element', (test) => {
   const result = template.compileContract({
@@ -200,3 +200,3 @@ type: 'distro',
 
-ava.test('should be able to blacklist more than one element', (test) => {
+ava('should be able to blacklist more than one element', (test) => {
   const result = template.compileContract({
@@ -231,3 +231,3 @@ type: 'distro',
 
-ava.test('should be able to blacklist elements inside arrays', (test) => {
+ava('should be able to blacklist elements inside arrays', (test) => {
   const result = template.compileContract({
@@ -256,3 +256,3 @@ slug: 'debian',
 
-ava.test('should be able to blacklist a whole subtree', (test) => {
+ava('should be able to blacklist a whole subtree', (test) => {
   const result = template.compileContract({
@@ -259,0 +259,0 @@ type: 'distro',

test/utils/are-sets-disjoint.spec.js

@@ -22,3 +22,3 @@ /*
 
-ava.test('should return true if sets are disjoint', (test) => {
+ava('should return true if sets are disjoint', (test) => {
   const set1 = new Set([ 'foo', 'bar' ])
@@ -31,3 +31,3 @@ const set2 = new Set([ 'baz', 'qux' ])
 
-ava.test('should return false if sets are not disjoint', (test) => {
+ava('should return false if sets are not disjoint', (test) => {
   const set1 = new Set([ 'foo', 'bar' ])
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ const set2 = new Set([ 'bar', 'baz' ])
 
-ava.test('should return true if both sets are empty', (test) => {
+ava('should return true if both sets are empty', (test) => {
   test.true(utils.areSetsDisjoint(new Set(), new Set()))
 })
 
-ava.test('should return true if one of the sets is empty', (test) => {
+ava('should return true if one of the sets is empty', (test) => {
   const set1 = new Set([ 'foo', 'bar' ])
@@ -47,0 +47,0 @@ const set2 = new Set()

test/utils/cartesian-product-with.spec.js

@@ -23,3 +23,3 @@ /*
 
-ava.test('should perform a cartesian product of empty sets', (test) => {
+ava('should perform a cartesian product of empty sets', (test) => {
   const product = utils.cartesianProductWith([
@@ -36,3 +36,3 @@ [],
 
-ava.test('should perform a cartesian product of a valid an and empty set', (test) => {
+ava('should perform a cartesian product of a valid an and empty set', (test) => {
   const product = utils.cartesianProductWith([
@@ -49,3 +49,3 @@ [ 'foo' ],
 
-ava.test('should perform a cartesian product of no sets', (test) => {
+ava('should perform a cartesian product of no sets', (test) => {
   const product = utils.cartesianProductWith([], (accumulator, element) => {
@@ -58,3 +58,3 @@ return _.concat(accumulator, [ element ])
 
-ava.test('should perform a cartesian product of a one element set', (test) => {
+ava('should perform a cartesian product of a one element set', (test) => {
   const product = utils.cartesianProductWith([
@@ -71,3 +71,3 @@ [ 'foo' ]
 
-ava.test('should calculate the cartesian product of two string sets', (test) => {
+ava('should calculate the cartesian product of two string sets', (test) => {
   const product = utils.cartesianProductWith([
@@ -93,3 +93,3 @@ [ 'hello', 'hi', 'hey' ],
 
-ava.test('should be able to discard combinations by returning undefined', (test) => {
+ava('should be able to discard combinations by returning undefined', (test) => {
   const product = utils.cartesianProductWith([
@@ -123,3 +123,3 @@ [ 'hello', 'hi', 'hey' ],
 
-ava.test('should be able to discard combinations on a 3 sets product', (test) => {
+ava('should be able to discard combinations on a 3 sets product', (test) => {
   const product = utils.cartesianProductWith([
@@ -126,0 +126,0 @@ [ 1, 2, 3 ],

test/utils/set-first.spec.js

@@ -22,3 +22,3 @@ /*
 
-ava.test('should return undefined given an empty set', (test) => {
+ava('should return undefined given an empty set', (test) => {
   const set = new Set()
@@ -28,3 +28,3 @@ test.deepEqual(utils.setFirst(set), undefined)
 
-ava.test('should return the element given an empty set with one element', (test) => {
+ava('should return the element given an empty set with one element', (test) => {
   const set = new Set([ 'foo' ])
@@ -34,3 +34,3 @@ test.deepEqual(utils.setFirst(set), 'foo')
 
-ava.test('should always return the only element', (test) => {
+ava('should always return the only element', (test) => {
   const set = new Set([ 'foo' ])
@@ -43,5 +43,5 @@ test.deepEqual(utils.setFirst(set), 'foo')
 
-ava.test('should return one of the elements given a set with more than one element', (test) => {
+ava('should return one of the elements given a set with more than one element', (test) => {
   const set = new Set([ 'foo', 'bar', 'baz' ])
   test.true(set.has(utils.setFirst(set)))
 })

test/utils/set-map.spec.js

@@ -22,3 +22,3 @@ /*
 
-ava.test('should return an empty array given an empty set', (test) => {
+ava('should return an empty array given an empty set', (test) => {
   const set = new Set()
@@ -30,3 +30,3 @@ test.deepEqual(utils.setMap(set, (element) => {
 
-ava.test('should run the iteratee on all elements', (test) => {
+ava('should run the iteratee on all elements', (test) => {
   const set = new Set([ 1, 2, 3 ])
@@ -33,0 +33,0 @@ test.deepEqual(utils.setMap(set, (element) => {

test/utils/set-union.spec.js

@@ -22,3 +22,3 @@ /*
 
-ava.test('should return an empty set for the union of two empty sets', (test) => {
+ava('should return an empty set for the union of two empty sets', (test) => {
   const set1 = new Set()
@@ -31,3 +31,3 @@ const set2 = new Set()
 
-ava.test('should return the union of two disjoint sets', (test) => {
+ava('should return the union of two disjoint sets', (test) => {
   const set1 = new Set([ 1, 2 ])
@@ -40,3 +40,3 @@ const set2 = new Set([ 3, 4 ])
 
-ava.test('should return the union of two joint sets', (test) => {
+ava('should return the union of two joint sets', (test) => {
   const set1 = new Set([ 1, 2 ])
@@ -49,3 +49,3 @@ const set2 = new Set([ 2, 3 ])
 
-ava.test('should return an inverted result if the arguments are flipped', (test) => {
+ava('should return an inverted result if the arguments are flipped', (test) => {
   const set1 = new Set([ 1, 2 ])
@@ -61,3 +61,3 @@ const set2 = new Set([ 3, 4 ])
 
-ava.test('should return the first set if the second one is empty', (test) => {
+ava('should return the first set if the second one is empty', (test) => {
   const set1 = new Set([ 1, 2 ])
@@ -69,3 +69,3 @@ const set2 = new Set()
 
-ava.test('should return the second set if the first one is empty', (test) => {
+ava('should return the second set if the first one is empty', (test) => {
   const set1 = new Set()
@@ -72,0 +72,0 @@ const set2 = new Set([ 1, 2 ])

test/utils/strip-extra-blank-lines.spec.js

@@ -23,3 +23,3 @@ /*
 
-ava.test('should replace two blank lines with one', (test) => {
+ava('should replace two blank lines with one', (test) => {
   const result = _.split(utils.stripExtraBlankLines(_.join([
@@ -44,3 +44,3 @@ 'Hello',
 
-ava.test('should replace three blank lines with one', (test) => {
+ava('should replace three blank lines with one', (test) => {
   const result = _.split(utils.stripExtraBlankLines(_.join([
@@ -67,3 +67,3 @@ 'Hello',
 
-ava.test('should remove a single leading blank line', (test) => {
+ava('should remove a single leading blank line', (test) => {
   const result = _.split(utils.stripExtraBlankLines(_.join([
@@ -79,3 +79,3 @@ '',
 
-ava.test('should remove two leading blank lines', (test) => {
+ava('should remove two leading blank lines', (test) => {
   const result = _.split(utils.stripExtraBlankLines(_.join([
@@ -92,3 +92,3 @@ '',
 
-ava.test('should remove a single trailing blank line', (test) => {
+ava('should remove a single trailing blank line', (test) => {
   const result = _.split(utils.stripExtraBlankLines(_.join([
@@ -104,3 +104,3 @@ 'Hello',
 
-ava.test('should remove two trailing blank lines', (test) => {
+ava('should remove two trailing blank lines', (test) => {
   const result = _.split(utils.stripExtraBlankLines(_.join([
@@ -107,0 +107,0 @@ 'Hello',

test/variants/build.spec.js

@@ -22,3 +22,3 @@ /*
 
-ava.test('should build a contract with no variants', (test) => {
+ava('should build a contract with no variants', (test) => {
   test.deepEqual(variants.build({
@@ -37,3 +37,3 @@ slug: 'debian',
 
-ava.test('should build a contract with empty variants', (test) => {
+ava('should build a contract with empty variants', (test) => {
   test.deepEqual(variants.build({
@@ -53,3 +53,3 @@ slug: 'debian',
 
-ava.test('should build a contract with two variants', (test) => {
+ava('should build a contract with two variants', (test) => {
   test.deepEqual(variants.build({
@@ -120,3 +120,3 @@ slug: 'nodejs_{{data.arch}}',
 
-ava.test('should supported nested variants', (test) => {
+ava('should supported nested variants', (test) => {
   test.deepEqual(variants.build({
@@ -218,3 +218,3 @@ slug: 'nodejs_{{data.arch}}',
 
-ava.test('should merge arrays correctly', (test) => {
+ava('should merge arrays correctly', (test) => {
   test.deepEqual(variants.build({
@@ -221,0 +221,0 @@ slug: 'foo',

New alerts

License Policy Violation

License

This package is not allowed per your license policy. Review the package's license to ensure compliance.

Found 1 instance in 1 package

Fixed alerts

License Policy Violation

License

This package is not allowed per your license policy. Review the package's license to ensure compliance.

Found 1 instance in 1 package

Improved metrics

Total package byte prevSize

4642663

increased by0.02%

Worsened metrics

Lines of code

143672

decreased by-0.02%

No dependency changes