@gilt-tech/swig-bundle - npm Package Compare versions

Comparing version 2.0.0 to 2.6.0-vue.1

index.js

@@ -161,5 +161,15 @@
 
-      // NOTE: exlcuding src/ as we want to fetch from the new app/ folder
+      // NOTE: For current node apps, `src/` folder contains untranspiled sources, which will be
+      // transpiled and put into `app/`. Therefore ignoring the `src/` altogether, as we don't want
+      // to send incompatible code to old browsers
       `!${path.join(swig.target.path, '/public/js/**/src/**/*.js')}`,
 
+      // NOTE: Modern apps which want to leverage on smarter bundling mechanics, i.e. webpack based
+      // Can and should produce their artifacts in folder ignored by the swig bundling system,
+      // which could inadvertently nullify any possible dynamic loading strategy or similar.
+      // Choose one of the following: vue-app/ | artifacts/ | build/
+      `!${path.join(swig.target.path, '/public/js/**/vue-app/**/*.js')}`,
+      `!${path.join(swig.target.path, '/public/js/**/artifacts/**/*.js')}`,
+      `!${path.join(swig.target.path, '/public/js/**/build/**/*.js')}`,
+
       `!${path.join(swig.target.path, '/public/js/**/internal/**/*.js')}`,
@@ -166,0 +176,0 @@ `!${path.join(swig.target.path, '/public/js/**/vendor/**/*.js')}`,

package.json

 {
   "name": "@gilt-tech/swig-bundle",
   "description": "Bundles JavaScript assets.",
-  "version": "2.0.0",
+  "version": "2.6.0-vue.1",
   "repository": "https://github.com/gilt/swig/tree/master/packages/swig-bundle",
@@ -6,0 +6,0 @@ "keywords": [

New alerts

No v1

Quality

Package is not semver >=1. This means it is not stable and does not support ^ ranges.

Found 1 instance in 1 package

Improved metrics

Total package byte prevSize

21544

increased by3.65%

Lines of code

549

increased by1.67%

Worsened metrics

Number of low quality alerts

2

increased by100%

No dependency changes