@jstn-sdk/ma

Production-grade Codex skills and plugin package for architecture, evidence-backed OSS selection, gate-driven review, and release-minded build guidance.

[!IMPORTANT] Meta-Architect v0.1.9 is a production-grade skills line. It is not a lightweight demo branch. From v0.1.9 onward, the package is expected to ship with stable skill contracts, deterministic packaging, explicit release gates, and honest install and publish surfaces.

Overview

Meta-Architect is a workflow layer for teams that want architecture, evidence, review, and release discipline before build execution.

It adds:

• an architecture-first lane before implementation
• evidence-backed OSS selection through GitMCP-connected sources
• explicit logic, security, and DX/UX review gates
• installable skills and a reproducible package surface

[!NOTE] Meta-Architect does not replace your coding runtime. It wraps that runtime with architecture, evidence, gate enforcement, and release-sensitive workflow control.

Support

• GitHub Sponsors
• Buy Me A Coffee

npm package	@jstn-sdk/ma
Helper command	ma (secondary support surface)
Runtime	Node.js >=20, npm @10
Release line	v0.1.9
License	MIT

Screenshots

Prerequisites

• Node.js >=20
• npm >=10
• Git
• an MCP-capable coding runtime
• Codex for the recommended package-first path
• macOS, Linux, or WSL2 recommended

[!TIP] The most reliable default environment is a Unix-like shell with Git, Node.js, and an MCP-capable runtime already configured.

Recommended Default Flow

Meta-Architect is intended to be consumed as an installed package, not primarily as a git clone.

Primary product path:

# Install
npm i -g @openai/codex@latest @jstn-sdk/ma@latest

# Start Codex context if needed
ma --madmax --high

# Remove Meta-Architect only
npm uninstall -g @jstn-sdk/ma

# Remove Meta-Architect and Codex
npm uninstall -g @jstn-sdk/ma @openai/codex

What this assumes:

• Codex is installed globally
• Meta-Architect is installed globally as the skills/plugin package
• Meta-Architect installs its published skill surface into the active Codex home
• the product experience happens through the skill workflow inside Codex

[!IMPORTANT] The recommended default flow is package-first. The git clone path is for contributors and maintainers, not the main user-facing install story.

Repository Branch Strategy

Meta-Architect’s repository workflow follows a stricter release posture focused on gated promotion:

• main = release-facing protected branch
• development = normal integration branch
• feature/* = short-lived contribution branches
• contributors branch from development
• normal PRs target development
• only curated promotions move development into main

[!CAUTION] main is intended to be protected and exceptional. Maintainers should stop bypass-pushing to main except for genuine emergency or admin recovery cases.

Setup

Package setup

Install the consumer package directly:

# Install
npm i -g @openai/codex@latest @jstn-sdk/ma@latest

# Launch
ma --madmax --high

# Remove Meta-Architect only
npm uninstall -g @jstn-sdk/ma

# Remove Meta-Architect and Codex
npm uninstall -g @jstn-sdk/ma @openai/codex

This gives you:

• the installed Meta-Architect skill surface
• the canonical Meta-Architect skill entrypoints inside a Codex session
• the optional ma helper command when a guided start is useful

Contributor setup: source checkout

Use this path only if you want to work on Meta-Architect itself.

git clone https://github.com/JustineDevs/meta-architect.git
cd meta-architect
npm install
npm link

npm link makes ma and meta-architect available from the local checkout.

Quick Start

1. Start Codex context if needed

ma --madmax --high

2. Start with the real usage-workflow prompt

Use the same operator shape defined in example/usage-workflow.md.

Quick-start prompt:

$maestro

Or start directly with:

$arch I want to build: [PROJECT IDEA]

Context:
- Product type: [web app / mobile app / API / marketplace / agent system / internal tool]
- Users: [who will use it]
- Core problem: [what problem it solves]
- Main features:
  1. [feature one]
  2. [feature two]
  3. [feature three]
- Constraints:
  - Budget: [low / medium / high]
  - Team size: [solo / small / medium]
  - Timeline: [e.g. 2 weeks MVP, 3 months beta]
  - Preferred stack: [optional]
  - Avoid: [optional]
- Quality priorities:
  - [e.g. speed, low cost, security, DX, maintainability, scalability]
- Deployment target:
  - [Vercel / Docker / VPS / AWS / GCP / local-first / hybrid]

Required output:
1. Problem framing
2. Recommended architecture
3. Stack decision with justification
4. System components and responsibilities
5. Data model and storage choices
6. Auth/security considerations
7. DX/UX considerations
8. Delivery plan for v0.1.9
9. Risks and trade-offs
10. Decision log
11. Exact next trigger to run after this

3. Run the full trigger sequence inside Codex

After $arch, continue exactly like the usage workflow:

$maestro
$sage
$flow
$vet
$vibe
$build

See example/usage-workflow.md for the full prompt templates for each step.

4. Secondary helper path

If you are working from a repository directly and need scaffolded local support files, use:

ma bootstrap
ma bootstrap --init-mcp
ma doctor
ma setup
ma

Recommended lazy-user path:

• run ma bootstrap first to repair packaged assets, scaffold local runtime files, and verify the environment
• add --init-mcp if you want starter GitMCP source files written into the local mcp/ folder when it is empty or invalid
• use ma doctor later when you want a check-only readiness report without changing files

Expected output for ma setup:

meta-architect setup
====================
ready: .codex/agents
ready: .codex/prompts
ready: .ma/skills
ready: .ma/evidence
ready: .ma/context
ready: .ma/specs
ready: .ma/plans
ready: mcp
ready: docs
ready: docs/qa
ready: sprint

5. Configure GitMCP sources

Add real repository-backed endpoints in mcp/servers.json.

Example:

{
  "category": "meta-list",
  "repo": "sindresorhus/awesome",
  "endpoint": "https://gitmcp.io/sindresorhus/awesome"
}

Recommended starter endpoints:

• https://gitmcp.io/sindresorhus/awesome
• https://gitmcp.io/dzharii/awesome-typescript
• https://gitmcp.io/sbilly/awesome-security

Core discovery standard:

• https://ossium.live/home
• use Ossium to discover trending OSS, curated repos, YC-backed repos, GSoC orgs, and contribution opportunities faster
• https://trendshift.io/
• use Trendshift for rising GitHub engagement and topic-driven trend discovery
• https://devhunt.org/
• use Dev Hunt for recently launched developer tools and current dev-tool discovery
• https://libraries.io/
• use Libraries.io for package and dependency metadata, with caution because its public data is scraped and not validated/curated for accuracy
• https://openhub.net/
• use Open Hub for project activity, contributor, popularity, and comparison signals
• https://www.opensourceprojects.dev/
• use Open-source Projects for curated OSS discovery and detailed project writeups
• treat all of these as discovery acceleration, then convert promising finds into exact upstream GitMCP mappings and official-doc checks for $sage

Canonical $sage order:

• Start with the upstream repo and official docs if you already know them.
• Use discovery accelerators only when you need help finding or narrowing candidates.
• Map selected candidates to exact upstream GitMCP endpoints.
• Verify against upstream repos and official docs before treating anything as approved evidence.

[!IMPORTANT] Verified release evidence must come from repository-form GitMCP endpoints such as https://gitmcp.io/{owner}/{repo}. A generic documentation endpoint such as https://gitmcp.io/docs does not count as VERIFIED evidence for build unlocking. Discovery surfaces such as Ossium, Trendshift, Dev Hunt, Libraries.io, Open Hub, and Open-source Projects are not substitutes for upstream repo or official-doc verification.

6. Secondary helper flow outside Codex

If you need scripted repo-local validation rather than the interactive runtime workflow:

ma idea "Build a real-time collaborative whiteboard for product teams"
ma run '$arch'
ma run '$sage'
ma run '$flow'
ma run '$vet'
ma run '$vibe'
ma status
ma run '$build'

Expected status before the helper-path $build:

Meta-Architect Status
=====================
Idea: CLEAR
Architecture: APPROVED
Evidence: VERIFIED
Logic: GREEN
Security: GREEN
Experience: GREEN
Build: LOCKED
Next allowed triggers:
$build

Expected helper-path build output:

Build gate is green.
Suggested branches:
- feature/ui
- feature/api
Optional worktree commands:
git worktree add ../ui feature/ui
git worktree add ../api feature/api

7. Simple command guide

Meta-Architect has two surfaces.

• terminal helper commands
• in-session skills

Terminal commands are normal shell commands you run in the terminal:

ma setup
ma init
ma idea "Build a product"
ma status
ma run '$arch'

In-session skills are prompts you use inside the Codex conversation after launch:

$maestro
$arch
$sage
$flow
$vet
$vibe
$build

Plain-language difference:

• ma ... = helper commands in the terminal
• $... = the product experience inside Codex

What ma setup and ma init do:

• both currently do the same thing
• they create the local support files and folders
• they prepare .ma/ runtime files such as context, specs, plans, evidence, and runbook files
• they do not run the skill workflow by themselves

What ma bootstrap does:

• checks whether codex is callable
• repairs installed skills and support-bundle assets when possible
• runs local scaffold setup
• can seed starter MCP files with --init-mcp when the local MCP config is empty or invalid
• reports READY, READY_WITH_WARNINGS, or BLOCKED

What ma doctor does:

• runs the same environment checks without changing files
• prints the current readiness state and exact next step

What to use when:

• use Codex and run the skills in-session
• use $maestro when you want Meta-Architect to choose the best next step for you
• use $arch -> $sage -> $flow -> $vet -> $vibe -> $build inside the Codex session
• use ma bootstrap when you want the lazy-user setup path
• use ma doctor when you want a check-only environment report
• use ma setup or ma init only when you want local scaffolding or scripted helper automation from the terminal
• use ma sdk-path when you need the exact installed support-bundle path for packaged prompts, MCP files, sprint files, scripts, plugin metadata, or templates

Core Maintainers

Role	Name	GitHub
Creator / Maintainer	JustineDevs	@JustineDevs

Core Triggers

Trigger	Purpose	Main output	Gate effect
$arch	Produce the first-pass architecture blueprint	decision entry	architecture_status = APPROVED
$sage	Ground major choices in configured GitMCP evidence	evidence records	`evidence_status = VERIFIED
$flow	Review baseline logic and state transitions	logic review entry	`logic_status = GREEN
$vet	Run baseline security and dependency review	audit and CVE records	`security_status = GREEN
$vibe	Review developer and user experience implications	DX/UX outcome record	`experience_status = GREEN
$build	Unlock bounded build planning	build-ready decision + .ma/plans/build.md	build_status = READY

Gate Model

Meta-Architect is intentionally fail-closed.

Status	Meaning
CLEAR	enough input exists to proceed
APPROVED	the architecture lane produced an acceptable first-pass blueprint
VERIFIED	live evidence was grounded through approved GitMCP sources
PARTIAL	evidence is configured but live proof is incomplete or unavailable
GREEN	the current baseline review passed
RED	the lane is blocked or failed
WAIVED	the lane was intentionally waived with a recorded reason
LOCKED	downstream work is not allowed yet
READY	the next gated step is allowed

[!CAUTION] $build must stay locked until the upstream release state in .ma/release.json satisfies the gate contract. Meta-Architect is designed to stop on blockers rather than silently continue. Rich runtime artifacts live in .ma/context/, .ma/specs/, .ma/plans/, and .ma/runbook.md.

Release and Packaging

Meta-Architect has two related but different distribution surfaces.

Surface	Purpose	Produced by
npm package	public package containing the installable Meta-Architect skills/plugin system, docs, scripts, and canonical skills	npm publish or npm pack
skills bundle	narrower tarball containing skills/ only	npm run skills:pack

Required packaging commands:

npm run skills:manifest
npm run skills:validate
npm run skills:pack
npm run skills:install -- --path ./dist/installed-skills
npm run pack:inspect

Pre-publish rules:

• skills/index.json must be current
• npm run skills:validate must pass
• dist/meta-architect-skills.tgz must exist
• npm pack --dry-run must show only intended public files
• docs must match the real skills/plugin and release behavior

Release lane discipline:

• stable versions publish to npm latest
• prerelease versions such as 0.2.0-beta.1 must publish with an explicit dist-tag such as beta
• alternate lanes such as next, beta, and canary must never overwrite latest

Maintainer version-bump flow:

• Bump the package with npm version <version> --no-git-tag-version
• Update CHANGELOG.md, RELEASE.md, and docs/qa/release-readiness-<version>.md
• Run npm run release:verify
• Run npm run release:check
• Create and push tag v<version>
• Preferred publish path: publish from .github/workflows/npm-publish.yml on a supported cloud runner so provenance can be generated
• Local shell fallback when not publishing from GitHub Actions or GitLab CI/CD:
  • Stable publish: npm publish --access public
  • Prerelease publish: npm publish --access public --tag <lane>
• Verify publish state with npm view @jstn-sdk/ma version dist-tags time --json

Provenance note:

• npm publish --provenance requires a supported cloud CI/CD provider
• a local shell publish will fail with Automatic provenance generation not supported for provider: null
• use the repository publish workflow when provenance is required

Release automation:

• npm run release:sync bumps and synchronizes the active release line only when watched release-relevant files changed
• npm run release:advance force-bumps the next patch line and rewrites the same version-bearing files
• .github/workflows/release-sync.yml runs the sync path on main pushes that touch watched release-relevant paths
• .github/workflows/release-advance.yml runs after a published GitHub release and advances the repo to the next patch line automatically

[!CAUTION] Do not claim npm, GitHub release, or any other publish channel until that channel has actually succeeded. Release documentation must match reality, not intent.

Package Surface

Included	bin/, skills/, docs/, scripts/, index.js, README.md, LICENSE
Excluded	.ma/ runtime state, context, specs, plans, logs, caches, and temp install outputs

Repository Structure

Path	Responsibility
.codex/	runtime prompts, hooks, and repo guidance
skills/	canonical public skill contracts
plugins/meta-architect/	plugin-oriented distribution surface
docs/	installation, publishing, and release documentation
missions/	reproducible scenario-driven workflows
mcp/	GitMCP endpoint and collection configuration
scripts/	validation, packing, and install helpers
sprint/	human-readable phased workflow documents

Documentation

Surface	Purpose
Getting Started	end-to-end local onboarding
Skills Reference	trigger-by-trigger contract guide
Installed Support Bundle	standard packaged asset path for skills and helper flows
Skills Publishing	source-to-package pipeline
MCP Setup	evidence endpoint policy
Plugin README	plugin distribution surface
Collaborative Whiteboard Mission	concrete scenario walkthrough
Release Spec	release and gate policy
Release Readiness	QA evidence for the v0.1.9 line

Release Hygiene

[!WARNING] Runtime .ma logs, state, tmp, and cache files must not be shipped. Public docs must match actual package behavior. Publish statements must match reality. Skill contracts must stay aligned across canonical and plugin-facing copies.

License

MIT