Security News
JSR Working Group Kicks Off with Ambitious Roadmap and Plans for Open Governance
At its inaugural meeting, the JSR Working Group outlined plans for an open governance model and a roadmap to enhance JavaScript package management.
@noble/ciphers
Advanced tools
Auditable & minimal JS implementation of Salsa20, ChaCha and AES.
noble-crypto — high-security, easily auditable set of contained cryptographic libraries and tools.
npm install @noble/ciphers
We support all major platforms and runtimes. For Deno, ensure to use npm specifier. For React Native, you may need a polyfill for getRandomValues. A standalone file noble-ciphers.js is also available.
// import * from '@noble/ciphers'; // Error: use sub-imports, to ensure small app size
import { xchacha20poly1305 } from '@noble/ciphers/chacha';
// import { xchacha20poly1305 } from 'npm:@noble/ciphers@0.2.0/chacha'; // Deno
import { xchacha20poly1305 } from '@noble/ciphers/chacha';
import { utf8ToBytes } from '@noble/ciphers/utils';
import { randomBytes } from '@noble/ciphers/webcrypto/utils';
const key = randomBytes(32);
const nonce = randomBytes(24);
const chacha = xchacha20poly1305(key, nonce);
const data = utf8ToBytes('hello, noble');
const ciphertext = chacha.encrypt(data);
const data_ = chacha.decrypt(ciphertext); // utils.bytesToUtf8(data_) === data
import { gcm } from '@noble/ciphers/aes';
import { utf8ToBytes } from '@noble/ciphers/utils';
import { randomBytes } from '@noble/ciphers/webcrypto/utils';
const key = randomBytes(32);
const nonce = randomBytes(24);
const aes = gcm(key, nonce);
const data = utf8ToBytes('hello, noble');
const ciphertext = aes.encrypt(data);
const data_ = aes.decrypt(ciphertext); // utils.bytesToUtf8(data_) === data
const key = new Uint8Array([
169, 88, 160, 139, 168, 29, 147, 196,
14, 88, 237, 76, 243, 177, 109, 140,
195, 140, 80, 10, 216, 134, 215, 71,
191, 48, 20, 104, 189, 37, 38, 55
]);
const nonce = new Uint8Array([
180, 90, 27, 63, 160, 191, 150,
33, 67, 212, 86, 71, 144, 6,
200, 102, 218, 32, 23, 147, 8,
41, 147, 11
]);
// or, hex:
import { hexToBytes } from '@noble/ciphers/utils';
const key2 = hexToBytes('4b7f89bac90a1086fef73f5da2cbe93b2fae9dfbf7678ae1f3e75fd118ddf999');
const nonce2 = hexToBytes('9610467513de0bbd7c4cc2c3c64069f1802086fbd3232b13');
import { xchacha20poly1305 } from '@noble/ciphers/chacha';
import { managedNonce } from '@noble/ciphers/webcrypto/utils'
import { hexToBytes, utf8ToBytes } from '@noble/ciphers/utils';
const key = hexToBytes('fa686bfdffd3758f6377abbc23bf3d9bdc1a0dda4a6e7f8dbdd579fa1ff6d7e1');
const chacha = managedNonce(xchacha20poly1305)(key); // manages nonces for you
const data = utf8ToBytes('hello, noble');
const ciphertext = chacha.encrypt(data);
const data_ = chacha.decrypt(ciphertext);
import { chacha20poly1305 } from '@noble/ciphers/chacha';
import { utf8ToBytes } from '@noble/ciphers/utils';
import { randomBytes } from '@noble/ciphers/webcrypto/utils';
const key = randomBytes(32);
const nonce = randomBytes(12);
const buf = new Uint8Array(12 + 16);
const _data = utf8ToBytes('hello, noble');
buf.set(_data, 0); // first 12 bytes
const _12b = buf.subarray(0, 12);
const chacha = chacha20poly1305(key, nonce);
chacha.encrypt(_12b, buf);
chacha.decrypt(buf, _12b); // _12b now same as _data
import { gcm, siv } from '@noble/ciphers/aes';
import { xsalsa20poly1305 } from '@noble/ciphers/salsa';
import { chacha20poly1305, xchacha20poly1305 } from '@noble/ciphers/chacha';
// Unauthenticated encryption: make sure to use HMAC or similar
import { ctr, cbc, ecb } from '@noble/ciphers/aes';
import { salsa20, xsalsa20 } from '@noble/ciphers/salsa';
import { chacha20, xchacha20, chacha8, chacha12 } from '@noble/ciphers/chacha';
// Utilities
import { bytesToHex, hexToBytes, bytesToUtf8, utf8ToBytes } from '@noble/ciphers/utils';
import { managedNonce, randomBytes } from '@noble/ciphers/webcrypto/utils';
import { xsalsa20poly1305 } from '@noble/ciphers/salsa';
import { secretbox } from '@noble/ciphers/salsa'; // == xsalsa20poly1305
import { salsa20, xsalsa20 } from '@noble/ciphers/salsa';
Salsa20 stream cipher was released in 2005. Salsa's goal was to implement AES replacement that does not rely on S-Boxes, which are hard to implement in a constant-time manner. Salsa20 is usually faster than AES, a big deal on slow, budget mobile phones.
XSalsa20, extended-nonce variant was released in 2008. It switched nonces from 96-bit to 192-bit, and became safe to be picked at random.
Nacl / Libsodium popularized term "secretbox", a simple black-box authenticated encryption. Secretbox is just xsalsa20-poly1305. We provide the alias and corresponding seal / open methods.
import { chacha20poly1305, xchacha20poly1305 } from '@noble/ciphers/chacha';
import { chacha20, xchacha20, chacha8, chacha12 } from '@noble/ciphers/chacha';
ChaCha20 stream cipher was released in 2008. ChaCha aims to increase the diffusion per round, but had slightly less cryptanalysis. It was standardized in RFC 8439 and is now used in TLS 1.3.
XChaCha20 extended-nonce variant is also provided. Similar to XSalsa, it's safe to use with randomly-generated nonces.
import { gcm, siv, ctr, cbc, ecb } from '@noble/ciphers/aes';
import { randomBytes } from '@noble/ciphers/webcrypto/utils';
const plaintext = new Uint8Array(32).fill(16);
const key = randomBytes(32); // 24 for AES-192, 16 for AES-128
for (let cipher of [gcm, siv]) {
const stream = cipher(key, randomBytes(12));
const ciphertext_ = stream.encrypt(plaintext);
const plaintext_ = stream.decrypt(ciphertext_);
}
for (const cipher of [ctr, cbc]) {
const stream = cipher(key, randomBytes(16));
const ciphertext_ = stream.encrypt(plaintext);
const plaintext_ = stream.decrypt(ciphertext_);
}
for (const cipher of [ecb]) {
const stream = cipher(key);
const ciphertext_ = stream.encrypt(plaintext);
const plaintext_ = stream.decrypt(ciphertext_);
}
AES is a variant of Rijndael block cipher, standardized by NIST in 2001. We provide the fastest available pure JS implementation.
We support AES-128, AES-192 and AES-256: the mode is selected dynamically, based on key length (16, 24, 32).
AES-GCM-SIV nonce-misuse-resistant mode is also provided. It's recommended to use it, to prevent catastrophic consequences of nonce reuse. Our implementation of SIV has the same speed as GCM: there is no performance hit.
Check out AES internals and block modes.
import { gcm, ctr, cbc } from '@noble/ciphers/webcrypto/aes';
import { randomBytes } from '@noble/ciphers/webcrypto/utils';
const plaintext = new Uint8Array(32).fill(16);
const key = randomBytes(32);
for (const cipher of [gcm]) {
const stream = cipher(key, randomBytes(12));
const ciphertext_ = await stream.encrypt(plaintext);
const plaintext_ = await stream.decrypt(ciphertext_);
}
for (const cipher of [ctr, cbc]) {
const stream = cipher(key, randomBytes(16));
const ciphertext_ = await stream.encrypt(plaintext);
const plaintext_ = await stream.decrypt(ciphertext_);
}
We also have a separate wrapper over WebCrypto built-in.
It's the same as using crypto.subtle
, but with massively simplified API.
Unlike pure js version, it's asynchronous.
import { poly1305 } from '@noble/ciphers/_poly1305';
import { ghash, polyval } from '@noble/ciphers/_polyval';
We expose polynomial-evaluation MACs: Poly1305, AES-GCM's GHash and AES-SIV's Polyval.
Poly1305 (PDF, wiki) is a fast and parallel secret-key message-authentication code suitable for a wide variety of applications. It was standardized in RFC 8439 and is now used in TLS 1.3.
Polynomial MACs are not perfect for every situation:
they lack Random Key Robustness: the MAC can be forged, and can't
be used in PAKE schemes. See
invisible salamanders attack.
To combat invisible salamanders, hash(key)
can be included in ciphertext,
however, this would violate ciphertext indistinguishability:
an attacker would know which key was used - so HKDF(key, i)
could be used instead.
Format-preserving encryption algorithm (FPE-FF1) specified in NIST Special Publication 800-38G. See more info.
import { managedNonce } from '@noble/ciphers/webcrypto/utils';
import { gcm, siv, ctr, cbc, ecb } from '@noble/ciphers/aes';
import { xsalsa20poly1305 } from '@noble/ciphers/salsa';
import { chacha20poly1305, xchacha20poly1305 } from '@noble/ciphers/chacha';
const wgcm = managedNonce(gcm);
const wsiv = managedNonce(siv);
const wcbc = managedNonce(cbc);
const wctr = managedNonce(ctr);
const wsalsapoly = managedNonce(xsalsa20poly1305);
const wchacha = managedNonce(chacha20poly1305);
const wxchacha = managedNonce(xchacha20poly1305);
// Now:
const encrypted = wgcm(key).encrypt(data); // no nonces
We provide API that manages nonce internally instead of exposing them to library's user.
For encrypt
, a nonceBytes
-length buffer is fetched from CSPRNG and prenended to encrypted ciphertext.
For decrypt
, first nonceBytes
of ciphertext are treated as nonce.
XChaCha20-Poly1305 is the safest bet these days. AES-GCM-SIV is the second safest. AES-GCM is the third.
Math.random
etc.01, 02...
Most ciphers need a key and a nonce (aka initialization vector / IV) to encrypt a data:
ciphertext = encrypt(plaintext, key, nonce)
Repeating (key, nonce) pair with different plaintexts would allow an attacker to decrypt it:
ciphertext_a = encrypt(plaintext_a, key, nonce)
ciphertext_b = encrypt(plaintext_b, key, nonce)
stream_diff = xor(ciphertext_a, ciphertext_b) # Break encryption
So, you can't repeat nonces. One way of doing so is using counters:
for i in 0..:
ciphertext[i] = encrypt(plaintexts[i], key, i)
Another is generating random nonce every time:
for i in 0..:
rand_nonces[i] = random()
ciphertext[i] = encrypt(plaintexts[i], key, rand_nonces[i])
Counters are OK, but it's not always possible to store current counter value: e.g. in decentralized, unsyncable systems.
Randomness is OK, but there's a catch:
ChaCha20 and AES-GCM use 96-bit / 12-byte nonces, which implies
higher chance of collision. In the example above,
random()
can collide and produce repeating nonce.
To safely use random nonces, utilize XSalsa20 or XChaCha: they increased nonce length to 192-bit, minimizing a chance of collision. AES-SIV is also fine. In situations where you can't use eXtended-nonce algorithms, key rotation is advised. hkdf would work great for this case.
A "protected message" would mean a probability of 2**-50
that a passive attacker
successfully distinguishes the ciphertext outputs of the AEAD scheme from the outputs
of a random function. See draft-irtf-cfrg-aead-limits for details.
2**36-256
2**38-64
2**32.5
2**46
, but only integrity is affected, not confidentiality2**72
2**69/B
where B is max blocks encrypted by a key. Meaning
2**59
for 1KB, 2**49
for 1MB, 2**39
for 1GB2**100
cipher = encrypt(block, key)
. Data is split into 128-bit blocks. Encrypted in 10/12/14 rounds (128/192/256bit). Every round does:
For non-deterministic (not ECB) schemes, initialization vector (IV) is mixed to block/key; and each new round either depends on previous block's key, or on some counter.
[i][j]
tweak arguments corresponding to sector i and 16-byte block (part of sector) j. Not authenticated!GCM / SIV are not ideal:
2**32
(4B) msgsThe library has not been independently audited yet.
It is tested against property-based, cross-library and Wycheproof vectors, and has fuzzing by Guido Vranken's cryptofuzz.
If you see anything unusual: investigate and report.
JIT-compiler and Garbage Collector make "constant time" extremely hard to achieve timing attack resistance in a scripting language. Which means any other JS library can't have constant-timeness. Even statically typed Rust, a language without GC, makes it harder to achieve constant-time for some cases. If your goal is absolute security, don't use any JS lib — including bindings to native ones. Use low-level libraries & languages. Nonetheless we're targetting algorithmic constant time.
npm-diff
We're deferring to built-in crypto.getRandomValues which is considered cryptographically secure (CSPRNG).
In the past, browsers had bugs that made it weak: it may happen again. Implementing a userspace CSPRNG to get resilient to the weakness is even worse: there is no reliable userspace source of quality entropy.
To summarize, noble is the fastest JS implementation of Salsa, ChaCha and AES.
You can gain additional speed-up and
avoid memory allocations by passing output
uint8array into encrypt / decrypt methods.
Benchmark results on Apple M2 with node v20:
encrypt (64B)
├─xsalsa20poly1305 x 485,672 ops/sec @ 2μs/op
├─chacha20poly1305 x 466,200 ops/sec @ 2μs/op
├─xchacha20poly1305 x 312,500 ops/sec @ 3μs/op
├─aes-256-gcm x 151,057 ops/sec @ 6μs/op
└─aes-256-gcm-siv x 124,984 ops/sec @ 8μs/op
encrypt (1KB)
├─xsalsa20poly1305 x 146,477 ops/sec @ 6μs/op
├─chacha20poly1305 x 145,518 ops/sec @ 6μs/op
├─xchacha20poly1305 x 126,119 ops/sec @ 7μs/op
├─aes-256-gcm x 43,207 ops/sec @ 23μs/op
└─aes-256-gcm-siv x 39,363 ops/sec @ 25μs/op
encrypt (8KB)
├─xsalsa20poly1305 x 23,773 ops/sec @ 42μs/op
├─chacha20poly1305 x 24,134 ops/sec @ 41μs/op
├─xchacha20poly1305 x 23,520 ops/sec @ 42μs/op
├─aes-256-gcm x 8,420 ops/sec @ 118μs/op
└─aes-256-gcm-siv x 8,126 ops/sec @ 123μs/op
encrypt (1MB)
├─xsalsa20poly1305 x 195 ops/sec @ 5ms/op
├─chacha20poly1305 x 199 ops/sec @ 5ms/op
├─xchacha20poly1305 x 198 ops/sec @ 5ms/op
├─aes-256-gcm x 76 ops/sec @ 13ms/op
└─aes-256-gcm-siv x 78 ops/sec @ 12ms/op
Unauthenticated encryption:
encrypt (64B)
├─salsa x 1,287,001 ops/sec @ 777ns/op
├─chacha x 1,555,209 ops/sec @ 643ns/op
├─xsalsa x 938,086 ops/sec @ 1μs/op
└─xchacha x 920,810 ops/sec @ 1μs/op
encrypt (1KB)
├─salsa x 353,107 ops/sec @ 2μs/op
├─chacha x 377,216 ops/sec @ 2μs/op
├─xsalsa x 331,674 ops/sec @ 3μs/op
└─xchacha x 336,247 ops/sec @ 2μs/op
encrypt (8KB)
├─salsa x 57,084 ops/sec @ 17μs/op
├─chacha x 59,520 ops/sec @ 16μs/op
├─xsalsa x 57,097 ops/sec @ 17μs/op
└─xchacha x 58,278 ops/sec @ 17μs/op
encrypt (1MB)
├─salsa x 479 ops/sec @ 2ms/op
├─chacha x 491 ops/sec @ 2ms/op
├─xsalsa x 483 ops/sec @ 2ms/op
└─xchacha x 492 ops/sec @ 2ms/op
AES
encrypt (64B)
├─ctr-256 x 689,179 ops/sec @ 1μs/op
├─cbc-256 x 639,795 ops/sec @ 1μs/op
└─ecb-256 x 668,449 ops/sec @ 1μs/op
encrypt (1KB)
├─ctr-256 x 93,668 ops/sec @ 10μs/op
├─cbc-256 x 94,428 ops/sec @ 10μs/op
└─ecb-256 x 151,699 ops/sec @ 6μs/op
encrypt (8KB)
├─ctr-256 x 13,342 ops/sec @ 74μs/op
├─cbc-256 x 13,664 ops/sec @ 73μs/op
└─ecb-256 x 22,426 ops/sec @ 44μs/op
encrypt (1MB)
├─ctr-256 x 106 ops/sec @ 9ms/op
├─cbc-256 x 109 ops/sec @ 9ms/op
└─ecb-256 x 179 ops/sec @ 5ms/op
Compare to other implementations:
xsalsa20poly1305 (encrypt, 1MB)
├─tweetnacl x 108 ops/sec @ 9ms/op
└─noble x 190 ops/sec @ 5ms/op
chacha20poly1305 (encrypt, 1MB)
├─node x 1,360 ops/sec @ 735μs/op
├─stablelib x 117 ops/sec @ 8ms/op
└─noble x 193 ops/sec @ 5ms/op
chacha (encrypt, 1MB)
├─node x 2,035 ops/sec @ 491μs/op
├─stablelib x 206 ops/sec @ 4ms/op
└─noble x 474 ops/sec @ 2ms/op
ctr-256 (encrypt, 1MB)
├─node x 3,530 ops/sec @ 283μs/op
├─stablelib x 70 ops/sec @ 14ms/op
├─aesjs x 31 ops/sec @ 32ms/op
├─noble-webcrypto x 4,589 ops/sec @ 217μs/op
└─noble x 107 ops/sec @ 9ms/op
cbc-256 (encrypt, 1MB)
├─node x 993 ops/sec @ 1ms/op
├─stablelib x 63 ops/sec @ 15ms/op
├─aesjs x 29 ops/sec @ 34ms/op
├─noble-webcrypto x 1,087 ops/sec @ 919μs/op
└─noble x 110 ops/sec @ 9ms/op
gcm-256 (encrypt, 1MB)
├─node x 3,196 ops/sec @ 312μs/op
├─stablelib x 27 ops/sec @ 36ms/op
├─noble-webcrypto x 4,059 ops/sec @ 246μs/op
└─noble x 74 ops/sec @ 13ms/op
Upgrade from micro-aes-gcm
package is simple:
// prepare
const key = Uint8Array.from([
64, 196, 127, 247, 172, 2, 34, 159, 6, 241, 30,
174, 183, 229, 41, 114, 253, 122, 119, 168, 177,
243, 155, 236, 164, 159, 98, 72, 162, 243, 224, 195,
]);
const message = 'Hello world';
// previous
import * as aes from 'micro-aes-gcm';
const ciphertext = await aes.encrypt(key, aes.utils.utf8ToBytes(message));
const plaintext = await aes.decrypt(key, ciphertext);
console.log(aes.utils.bytesToUtf8(plaintext) === message);
// became =>
import { gcm } from '@noble/ciphers/aes';
import { bytesToUtf8, utf8ToBytes } from '@noble/ciphers/utils';
import { managedNonce } from '@noble/ciphers/webcrypto/utils';
const aes = managedNonce(gcm)(key);
const ciphertext = aes.encrypt(utf8ToBytes(message));
const plaintext = aes.decrypt(key, ciphertext);
console.log(bytesToUtf8(plaintext) === message);
npm install
to install build dependencies like TypeScriptnpm run build
to compile TypeScript codenpm run test
will execute all main testsCheck out paulmillr.com/noble for useful resources, articles, documentation and demos related to the library.
The MIT License (MIT)
Copyright (c) 2023 Paul Miller (https://paulmillr.com) Copyright (c) 2016 Thomas Pornin pornin@bolet.org
See LICENSE file.
FAQs
Audited & minimal JS implementation of Salsa20, ChaCha and AES
The npm package @noble/ciphers receives a total of 256,645 weekly downloads. As such, @noble/ciphers popularity was classified as popular.
We found that @noble/ciphers demonstrated a healthy version release cadence and project activity because the last version was released less than a year ago. It has 1 open source maintainer collaborating on the project.
Did you know?
Socket for GitHub automatically highlights issues in each pull request and monitors the health of all your open source dependencies. Discover the contents of your packages and block harmful activity before you install or update your dependencies.
Security News
At its inaugural meeting, the JSR Working Group outlined plans for an open governance model and a roadmap to enhance JavaScript package management.
Security News
Research
An advanced npm supply chain attack is leveraging Ethereum smart contracts for decentralized, persistent malware control, evading traditional defenses.
Security News
Research
Attackers are impersonating Sindre Sorhus on npm with a fake 'chalk-node' package containing a malicious backdoor to compromise developers' projects.