Builder
Builder takes your npm
tasks and makes them composable, controllable from
a single point, and flexible.
npm
is fantastic for controlling dependencies, tasks (via scripts
) and
general project workflows. But a project-specific package.json
simply doesn't
scale when you're managing many (say 5-50) very similar repositories.
Enter Builder. Builder is "almost" npm
, but provides for off-the-shelf
"archetypes" to provide central sets of package.json
scripts
,
dependencies
and devDependencies
. The rest of this page will dive into
the details and machinations of the tool, but first here are a few of the
rough goals and motivations behind the project.
- Single Point of Control: A way to define a specific set of tasks /
configs / etc. for one "type" of project. For example, we have an
ever-expanding set of related repos for our
Victory
project which all share a nearly-identical dev / prod / build workflow.
- Flexibility: There are a number of meta tools for controlling JavaScript
workflows / development lifecycles. However, most are of the "buy the farm"
nature. This works great when everything is within the workflow but falls
apart once you want to be "just slightly" different. Builder solves this by
allowing fine grain task overriding by name, where the larger composed tasks
still stay the same and allow a specific repo's deviation from "completely off
the shelf" to be painless.
- You Can Give Up: One of the main goals of builder is to remain very
close to a basic
npm
workflow. So much so, that we include a section in this
guide on how to abandon the use of Builder in a project and revert everything
from archetypes back to vanilla npm
package.json
scripts
, dependencies
and devDependencies
.
Overview
At a high level builder
is a tool for consuming package.json
scripts
commands, providing sensible / flexible defaults, and support various scenarios
("archetypes") for your common use cases across multiple projects.
Builder is not opinionated, although archetypes are and typically dictate
file structure, standard configurations, and dev workflows. Builder supports
this in an agnostic way, providing essentially the following:
NODE_PATH
, PATH
enhancements to run, build, import from archetypes so
dependencies and configurations don't have to be installed directly in a
root project.- A task runner capable of single tasks (
run
) or multiple concurrent tasks
(concurrent
). - An intelligent merging of
package.json
scripts
tasks.
... and that's about it!
Usage
To start using builder, install and save builder
and any archetypes you
intend to use. We'll use the builder-react-component archetype as an
example.
Note: Most archetypes have an ARCHTEYPE
package and parallel
ARCHETYPE-dev
npm package. The ARCHETYPE
package contains almost
everything needed for the archtype (prod dependencies, scripts, etc.) except
for the devDependencies
which the latter ARCHETYPE-dev
package is solely
responsible for bringing in.
Global Install
For ease of use, one option is to globally install builder
and locally install
archetypes:
$ npm install -g builder
$ npm install --save builder-react-component
$ npm install --save-dev builder-react-component-dev
Like a global install of any Node.js meta / task runner tool (e.g., eslint
,
mocha
, gulp
, grunt
) doing a global install is painful because:
- You are tied to just one version of the tool for all projects.
- You must also globally install the tool in CI, on servers, etc.
... so instead, we strongly recommend a local install described in the
next section!
To help you keep up with project-specific builder requirements, a globally-
installed builder
will detect if a locally-installed version of builder
is
available and switch to that instead:
$ /GLOBAL/PATH/TO/builder
[builder:local-detect] Switched to local builder at: ./node_modules/builder/bin/builder-core.js
... now using local builder! ...
Local Install
To avoid tying yourself to a single, global version of builder
, the option
that we endorse is locally installing both builder
and archetypes:
$ npm install --save builder
$ npm install --save builder-react-component
$ npm install --save-dev builder-react-component-dev
However, to call builder
from the command line you will either need to
augment your PATH
variable with a shell configuration (Mac/Linux) like:
export PATH="./node_modules/.bin:${PATH}"
export PATH="${PATH}:./node_modules/.bin"
or call the longer ./node_modules/.bin/builder
instead of builder
from the
command line.
Configuration
After builder
is available, you can edit .builderrc
like:
---
archetypes:
- builder-react-component
to bind archetypes.
... and from here you are set for builder
-controlled meta goodness!
Builder Actions
Display general or command-specific help (which shows available specific flags).
$ builder help
$ builder help <action>
Run builder help <action>
for all available options. For a quick overview:
builder run
Run a single task from script
. Analogous to npm run <task>
$ builder run <task>
Flags:
--builderrc
: Path to builder config file (default: .builderrc
)--tries
: Number of times to attempt a task (default: 1
)
builder concurrent
Run multiple tasks from script
concurrently. Roughly analogous to
npm run <task1> | npm run <task2> | npm run <task3>
, but kills all processes on
first non-zero exit (which makes it suitable for test tasks).
$ builder concurrent <task1> <task2> <task3>
Flags:
--builderrc
: Path to builder config file (default: .builderrc
)--tries
: Number of times to attempt a task (default: 1
)--queue
: Number of concurrent processes to run (default: unlimited - 0|null
)--[no-]buffer
: Buffer output until process end (default: false
)
Note that tries
will retry individual tasks that are part of the concurrent
group, not the group itself. So, if builder concurrent --tries=3 foo bar baz
is run and bar fails twice, then only bar
would be retried. foo
and baz
would only execute once if successful.
builder envs
Run a single task from script
concurrently for item in an array of different
environment variables. Roughly analogous to:
$ FOO=VAL1 npm run <task> | FOO=VAL2 npm run <task> | FOO=VAL3 npm run <task>
... but kills all processes on first non-zero exit (which makes it suitable for
test tasks). Usage:
$ builder envs <task> <json-array>
$ builder envs <task> --envs-path=<path-to-json-file>
Examples:
$ builder envs <task> '[{ "FOO": "VAL1" }, { "FOO": "VAL2" }, { "ENV1": "VAL3" }]'
$ builder envs <task> '[{ "FOO": "VAL1", "BAR": "VAL2" }, { "FOO": "VAL3" }]'
Flags:
--builderrc
: Path to builder config file (default: .builderrc
)--tries
: Number of times to attempt a task (default: 1
)--queue
: Number of concurrent processes to run (default: unlimited - 0|null
)--[no-]buffer
: Buffer output until process end (default: false
)--envs-path
: Path to JSON env variable array file (default: null
)
Tasks
The underlying concept here is that builder
script
commands simply are
npm-friendly package.json
script
commands. Pretty much anything that you
can execute with npm run <task>
can be executed with builder run <task>
.
Builder can run 1+ tasks based out of package.json
scripts
. For a basic
scenario like:
{
"scripts": {
"foo": "echo FOO",
"bar": "echo BAR"
}
}
Builder can run these tasks individually:
$ builder run foo
$ builder run bar
Sequentially via ||
or &&
shell helpers:
$ builder run foo && builder run bar
Concurrently via the Builder built-in concurrent
command:
$ builder concurrent foo bar
With concurrent
, all tasks continue running until they all complete or
any task exits with a non-zero exit code, in which case all still alive tasks
are killed and the Builder process exits with the error code.
Archetypes
Archetypes deal with common scenarios for your projects. Like:
Archetypes typically provide:
- A
package.json
with builder
-friendly script
tasks. - Dependencies and dev dependencies to build, test, etc.
- Configuration files for all
script
tasks.
In most cases, you won't need to override anything. But, if you do, pick the
most granular scripts
command in the archetype you need to override and
define just that in your project's package.json
script
section. Copy
any configuration files that you need to tweak and re-define the command.
Task Resolution
The easiest bet is to just have one archetype per project. But, multiple are
supported. In terms of scripts
tasks, we end up with the following example:
ROOT/package.json
ROOT/node_modules/ARCHETYPE_ONE/package.json
ROOT/node_modules/ARCHETYPE_TWO/package.json
Say we have a .builderrc
like:
---
archetypes:
- ARCHETYPE_ONE
- ARCHETYPE_TWO
The resolution order for a script
task (say, foo
) present in all three
package.json
's would be the following:
- Look through
ROOT/package.json
then the configured archetypes in reverse
order: ARCHETYPE_TWO/package.json
, then ARCHETYPE_ONE/package.json
for
a matching task foo
- If found
foo
, check if it is a "passthrough" task, which means it delegates
to a later instance -- basically "foo": "builder run foo"
. If so, then look
to next instance of task found in order above.
Special Archetype Tasks
Archetypes use conventional scripts
task names, except for the following
special cases:
"npm:postinstall"
"npm:preversion"
"npm:version"
"npm:test"
These tasks are specifically actionable during the npm
lifecycle, and
consequently, the archetype mostly ignores those for installation by default,
offering them up for actual use in your project.
As an additional restriction, non-npm:FOO
-prefixed tasks with the same
name (e.g., FOO
) may call then npm:
-prefixed task, but not the other
way around. So
"npm:test": "builder run test-frontend",
"test": "builder run npm:test",
"npm:test": "builder run test",
"test": "builder run test-frontend",
Tips, Tricks, & Notes
Project Root
Builder uses some magic to enhance NODE_PATH
to look in the root of your
project (normal) and in the installed modules of builder archetypes. This
latter path enhancement sometimes throws tools / libraries for a loop. We
recommend using require.resolve("LIBRARY_OR_REQUIRE_PATH")
to get the
appropriate installed file path to a dependency.
This comes up in situations including:
- Webpack loaders
- Karma included files
The other thing that comes up in our Archetype configuration file is the
general requirement that builder is running from the project root, not
relative to an archetype. However, some libraries / tools will interpret
"./"
as relative to the configuration file which may be in an archetype.
So, for these instances and instances where you typically use __dirname
,
an archetype may need to use process.cwd()
and be constrained to only
ever running from the project root. Some scenarios where the process.cwd()
path base is necessary include:
- Webpack entry points, aliases
- Karma included files (that cannot be
require.resolve
-ed)
Other Process Execution
The execution of tasks generally must originate from Builder, because of all
of the environment enhancements it adds. So, for things that themselves exec
or spawn processes, like concurrently
, this can be a problem. Typically, you
will need to have the actual command line processes invoked by Builder.
Terminal Color
Builder uses exec
under the hood with piped stdout
and stderr
. Programs
typically interpret the piped environment as "doesn't support color" and
disable color. Consequently, you typically need to set a "force color"
option on your executables in scripts
commands if they exist.
Why Exec?
So, why exec
and not spawn
or something similar that has a lot more process
control and flexibility? The answer lies in the fact that most of what Builder
consumes is shell strings to execute, like script --foo --bar "Hi there"
.
Parsing these arguments into something easily consumable by spawn
and always
correct is quite challenging. exec
works easily with straight strings, and
since that is the target of scripts
commands, that is what we use for Builder.
I Give Up. How Do I Abandon Builder?
Builder is designed to be as close to vanilla npm as possible. So, if for
example you were using the builder-react-component
archetype with a project
package.json
like:
"scripts": {
"postinstall": "builder run npm:postinstall",
"preversion": "builder run npm:preversion",
"version": "builder run npm:version",
"test": "builder run npm:test",
},
"dependencies": {
"builder": "v2.0.0",
"builder-react-component": "v0.0.5",
},
"devDependencies": {
"builder-react-component-dev": "v0.0.5",
}
and decided to no longer use Builder, here is a rough set of steps to unpack
the archetype into your project and remove all Builder dependencies:
- Copy all
ARCHETYPE/package.json:dependencies
to your
PROJECT/package.json:dependencies
(e.g., from builder-react-component
).
You do not need to copy over ARCHETYPE/package.json:devDependencies
. - Copy all
ARCHETYPE/package.json:scripts
to your
PROJECT/package.json:scripts
that do not begin with the builder:
prefix.
Remove the npm:
prefix from any scripts
tasks and note that you may have
to manually resolve tasks of the same name within the archetype and also with
your project. - Copy all
ARCHETYPE-dev/package.json:dependencies
to your
PROJECT/package.json:devDependencies
(e.g., from builder-react-component-dev
) - Copy all configuration files used in your
ARCHETYPE
into the root project.
For example, for builder-react-component
you would need to copy the
builder-react-component/config
directory to PROJECT/config
(or a renamed
directory). - Review all of the combined
scripts
tasks and:
- resolve duplicate tasks names
- revise configuration file paths for the moved files
- replace instances of
builder run <task>
with npm run <task>
- for
builder concurrent <task1> <task2>
tasks, first install the
concurrently
package and then rewrite to:
concurrent 'npm run <task1>' 'npm run <task2>'
... and (with assuredly a few minor hiccups) that's about it! You are
Builder-free and back to a normal npm
-controlled project.
Versions v1, v2, v3
The builder
project effectively starts at v2.x.x
. Prior to that Builder was
a small DOM utility that fell into disuse, so we repurposed it for a new
wonderful destiny! But, because we follow semver, that means everything starts
at v2
and as a helpful tip / warning:
Treat v2.x
as a v0.x
release
We'll try hard to keep it tight, but at our current velocity there are likely
to be some bumps and API changes that won't adhere strictly to semver until
things settle down in v3.x
-on.