
Security News
US Government Forces Anthropic to Pull Claude Fable Days After Launch
Anthropic says the directive cited national security concerns over a narrow jailbreak, but offered no specific technical details.
Academic paper revision workflow: Word ↔ Markdown round-trips, DOI validation, reviewer comments
A CLI for writing documents in Markdown while collaborating with Word users.
You write in Markdown under version control. Your collaborators use Word (or PDF). docrev converts between the two, preserving track changes, comments, equations, and cross-references.
You've been here before:
manuscript_v1.docx
manuscript_v2_john_comments.docx
manuscript_v2_jane_comments.docx
manuscript_v3_merged_final.docx
manuscript_v3_merged_final_REAL.docx
manuscript_v3_merged_final_REAL_submitted.docx
Three reviewers send back three Word files. You manually compare changes, copy-paste between documents, lose track of who said what. A week later, you can't remember which version has the figure updates.
docrev fixes this. You write in plain text. Reviewers use Word. Their feedback flows back into your files automatically. One source of truth, full version history, no more file chaos.
npm install -g docrev
Requires Node.js 18+. Pandoc is needed for building DOCX/PDF output. LaTeX is additionally needed for PDF.
Write in Markdown with citations and cross-references:
Climate change poses significant challenges [@IPCC2021]. As shown in
@fig:temperature, global temperatures have risen steadily.
{#fig:temperature}
The relationship follows $\Delta T = \lambda \cdot \Delta F$ (@eq:forcing).
Build and share:
rev build docx # → paper.docx (for collaborators)
rev build pdf # → paper.pdf (for journals)
When collaborators return the Word doc with track changes:
rev sync reviewed.docx # their comments → your markdown
┌─────────────┐ rev build docx ┌─────────────┐
│ │ ───────────────────────→│ │
│ Markdown │ │ Word │ → collaborators
│ (you) │ rev build pdf │ / PDF │ → journals
│ │ ───────────────────────→│ │
└─────────────┘ └─────────────┘
↑ │
│ rev sync │
└───────────────────────────────────────┘
their feedback → your files
You stay in Markdown. Collaborators use Word. Journals get PDF. Everyone works in their preferred format.
When reviewers send back a Word document with track changes and comments:
rev sync reviewed.docx # import feedback into markdown
Track changes appear inline - accept or reject by editing:
The sample size was {--100--}{++150++} participants.
Handle comments without opening Word:
rev comments # list all comments
rev reply methods.md -n 1 -m "Added clarification"
rev resolve methods.md -n 1 # mark as resolved
rev build docx --dual # clean + annotated versions
Reviewers who annotate PDFs instead of Word? That works too:
rev sync annotated.pdf # extract PDF comments
rev pdf-comments annotated.pdf --append methods.md
Multiple reviewers sending back separate files? Merge them:
rev merge reviewer_A.docx reviewer_B.docx # three-way merge
The merge command uses the original document (auto-saved in .rev/base.docx on build) to detect what each reviewer changed, identifies conflicts when reviewers edit the same text differently, and lets you resolve them interactively.
Your entire revision cycle stays in the terminal. final_v3_REAL_final.docx is over.
Create a new project:
rev new my-report
cd my-report
You'll be prompted to enter your section names, or press Enter to use the default structure. You can also specify sections directly:
rev new my-report -s intro,methods,results,discussion
Or set your preferred default sections once:
rev config sections "intro,methods,results,discussion"
This creates a folder with your chosen sections:
my-report/
├── intro.md
├── methods.md
├── results.md
├── discussion.md
├── references.bib
└── rev.yaml
Write your content in the markdown files. When ready to share:
rev build docx pdf
After building, your project structure looks like:
my-report/
├── intro.md
├── methods.md
├── results.md
├── discussion.md
├── references.bib
├── rev.yaml
├── paper.md ← combined sections (auto-generated)
├── my-report.docx ← output for collaborators
└── my-report.pdf ← output for journals
The output filename is derived from your project title in rev.yaml. Citations are resolved, equations rendered, and cross-references numbered.
If you have a Word document to convert:
rev import manuscript.docx
This creates a project folder and splits the document into section files. Images are extracted to figures/, equations are converted to LaTeX, and track changes/comments are preserved as markdown annotations.
Layout is controlled in rev.yaml:
title: "My Document"
output:
docx:
reference-doc: template.docx # your Word template
pdf:
documentclass: article
fontsize: 12pt
Configure your name for comment replies:
rev config user "Your Name"
For PDF output, configure columns that should not wrap:
tables:
nowrap:
- Prior # column headers to keep on one line
- "$\\widehat{R}$"
Distribution notation in nowrap columns is auto-converted to LaTeX math:
Normal(0, 0.5) → $\mathcal{N}(0, 0.5)$
Run custom scripts after output generation:
postprocess:
pdf: ./scripts/fix-tables.py # runs after PDF
docx: ./scripts/add-meta.js # runs after DOCX
all: ./scripts/notify.sh # runs after any format
Scripts receive environment variables: OUTPUT_FILE, OUTPUT_FORMAT, PROJECT_DIR, CONFIG_PATH.
Use --verbose to see script output:
rev build pdf --verbose
Journal profiles provide both validation rules and build formatting defaults. Set in rev.yaml:
journal: nature
Or pass on the command line:
rev build pdf -j nature # applies Nature's CSL style + PDF settings
When a journal is set, its formatting defaults (CSL citation style, font size, margins, line spacing) are applied automatically. Your explicit rev.yaml settings always take priority.
Six profiles include formatting: nature, science, cell, pnas, plos-one, elife. All 21 profiles support validation. Custom profiles can include formatting too — see docs/configuration.md.
rev validate --list # see all profiles ([formatting] tag = build support)
rev profiles --fetch-csl apa # download a CSL style to cache
rev profiles --list-csl # list cached CSL styles
Track changes from Word appear as CriticMarkup:
The sample size was {--100--}{++150++} participants. # deletion + insertion
Data was collected {~~monthly~>weekly~~}. # substitution
{>>Reviewer 2: Please clarify.<<} # comment
Track word count changes between versions:
rev diff # compare against last commit
# methods.md +142 words -38 words
# results.md +89 words -12 words
Add references to references.bib (BibTeX format):
@article{Smith2020,
author = {Smith, Jane},
title = {Paper Title},
journal = {Nature},
year = {2020},
doi = {10.1038/example}
}
Cite with [@Smith2020] or [@Smith2020; @Jones2021] for multiple sources.
Equations use LaTeX: inline $E = mc^2$ or display $$\sum_{i=1}^{n} x_i$$.
Cross-references: @fig:label, @tbl:label, @eq:label → "Figure 1", "Table 2", "Equation 3".
| Task | Command |
|---|---|
| Create project | rev new my-project |
| Create LaTeX project | rev new my-project --template latex |
| Import Word document | rev import manuscript.docx |
| Extract Word equations | rev equations from-word doc.docx |
| Build DOCX | rev build docx |
| Build PDF | rev build pdf |
| Build clean + annotated | rev build docx --dual |
| Sync Word feedback | rev sync reviewed.docx |
| Sync PDF comments | rev sync annotated.pdf |
| Extract PDF comments | rev pdf-comments annotated.pdf |
| Extract with highlighted text | rev pdf-comments file.pdf --with-text |
| Project status | rev status |
| Next pending comment | rev next |
| List pending comments | rev todo |
| Filter by author | rev comments file.md --author "Reviewer 2" |
| Accept all changes | rev accept file.md -a |
| Reject change | rev reject file.md -n 1 |
| Reply to comment | rev reply file.md -n 1 -m "response" |
| Reply to all pending | rev reply file.md --all -m "Addressed" |
| Resolve comment | rev resolve file.md -n 1 |
| Show contributors | rev contributors |
| Lookup ORCID | rev orcid 0000-0002-1825-0097 |
| Merge reviewer feedback | rev merge reviewer_A.docx reviewer_B.docx |
| Archive reviewer files | rev archive |
| Check DOIs | rev doi check references.bib |
| Find missing DOIs | rev doi lookup references.bib |
| Add citation from DOI | rev doi add 10.1038/example |
| Word count | rev wc |
| Pre-submission check | rev check |
| Check for updates | rev upgrade --check |
Run rev help to see all commands, or rev help <command> for details on a specific command.
Full command reference: docs/commands.md
Install the docrev skill for Claude Code:
rev install-cli-skill # install to ~/.claude/skills/docrev
rev uninstall-cli-skill # remove
Once installed, Claude understands docrev commands and can help navigate comments, draft replies, and manage your revision cycle.
Pandoc handles document conversion.
| Platform | Command |
|---|---|
| macOS | brew install pandoc |
| Windows | winget install JohnMacFarlane.Pandoc |
| Debian/Ubuntu | sudo apt install pandoc |
| Fedora | sudo dnf install pandoc |
Other platforms: pandoc.org/installing
| Platform | Command |
|---|---|
| macOS | brew install --cask mactex |
| Windows | winget install MiKTeX.MiKTeX |
| Debian/Ubuntu | sudo apt install texlive-full |
| Fedora | sudo dnf install texlive-scheme-full |
Alternatively, TinyTeX provides a minimal distribution that downloads packages on demand.
MIT
FAQs
Academic paper revision workflow: Word ↔ Markdown round-trips, DOI validation, reviewer comments
We found that docrev demonstrated a healthy version release cadence and project activity because the last version was released less than a year ago. It has 1 open source maintainer collaborating on the project.
Did you know?

Socket for GitHub automatically highlights issues in each pull request and monitors the health of all your open source dependencies. Discover the contents of your packages and block harmful activity before you install or update your dependencies.

Security News
Anthropic says the directive cited national security concerns over a narrow jailbreak, but offered no specific technical details.

Security News
A network of 152 Chrome live wallpaper extensions hid ad tracking and made extension-driven traffic look like Google search clicks.

Company News
Socket’s first CISO brings deep experience securing high-growth SaaS companies as open source supply chain threats accelerate.