
Security News
Lovable’s OJ Rewrites Vite’s Dev Server in Rust as AI Lowers the Cost of Forking Open Source
Lovable’s OJ rewrites Vite’s dev server in Rust, reducing memory use and preview times as AI lowers the cost of open source reimplementation.
draftlytic-mcp
Advanced tools
MCP server for planning software specs (PRDs) offline, in your editor — validate, render, and checklist tools for Claude Code, Cursor, and any MCP client.
An MCP server that turns a rough project idea into a structured spec — right inside Claude Code, Cursor, or any MCP-compatible editor. No API key, no account, no network calls. It runs entirely on your machine and hands your editor's model a schema to write into, a checklist of what to ask about, a validator that catches gaps before you start coding, and a renderer that turns the result into a clean Markdown PRD.
This exists because "vibe coding" from a one-line prompt tends to produce a plausible-looking app that's missing half the decisions you actually needed to make — what's in scope for v1, what the data model looks like, what "done" means for a feature. draftlytic-mcp doesn't generate any of that for you; it structures the conversation so your model asks the right questions, then checks its own homework before you start building.
claude mcp add draftlytic -- npx -y draftlytic-mcp
Add to .cursor/mcp.json in your project (or the global ~/.cursor/mcp.json):
{
"mcpServers": {
"draftlytic": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "draftlytic-mcp"]
}
}
}
Most MCP hosts read a generic mcp.json with the same shape:
{
"mcpServers": {
"draftlytic": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "draftlytic-mcp"]
}
}
}
Once connected, ask your editor's model something like:
Use the plan_project prompt for "a habit tracker that reminds me by text message"
It'll walk through spec_checklist with you (platform, tech stack, audience, features, competitors, revenue, constraints, data model, notifications, external services, design & UX — a handful of concrete questions per category), draft a spec, run it through validate_spec, fix what comes back, and hand you a rendered PRD in Markdown you can drop straight into a coding-agent prompt, a SPEC.md, or a GitHub issue.
You can also call the tools directly if you already have a spec drafted (by hand, or from another source) and just want it checked and rendered.
| Tool | Input | What it does |
|---|---|---|
validate_spec | spec (JSON object) | Zod-validates the spec and returns structured issues: errors for missing/empty required sections, placeholder text (TBD, lorem ipsum, fixme, etc.), and features without a priority — plus non-blocking quality hints like "no acceptance criteria on your must-haves" or "no non_goals listed". |
render_prd | spec (JSON object) | Renders a validated spec into deterministic Markdown: title, overview, target audience, platforms, tech stack, features grouped by priority with acceptance-criteria checklists, screens & navigation, data model tables, constraints, and non-goals. Refuses to render (returns an error) if the spec has structural errors. |
spec_checklist | — | Returns the planning checklist grouped by category, each with 2-4 concrete questions to ask the user. |
open_in_draftlytic | spec (JSON object, optional) or idea (string) | Builds a link that opens your idea in the full Draftlytic app with the brief pre-filled — its guided AI question flow, richer generation, an editable spec editor, and PRD export live there. Compresses a spec (even a partial one) into a starting brief, or takes a plain-text idea. Builds the URL locally; sends nothing anywhere. |
Plus one prompt:
| Prompt | Args | What it does |
|---|---|---|
plan_project | idea (string) | Instructs the model to interview the user with spec_checklist, draft a spec, validate and fix it in a loop, then render the final PRD. |
{
name: string
overview: string
target_audience: string
platforms: string[]
tech_stack: string[]
features: Array<{
title: string
description: string
priority: "must-have" | "nice-to-have" | "future"
acceptance_criteria?: string[]
}>
screens?: Array<{ name: string; purpose: string }>
data_model?: Array<{
entity: string
fields: Array<{ name: string; type: string; notes?: string }>
}>
constraints?: string[]
non_goals?: string[]
revenue_model?: string
}
validate_spec and spec_checklist are heuristics, not a substitute for actually knowing what you're building. A spec that passes validation can still be a bad plan.TBD/lorem ipsum/fixme-style filler, not "this description is vague but technically real words."draftlytic-mcp is the offline sibling of draftlytic.com — the full editor adds AI generation, logo drafts, scan-for-gaps, and GitHub push.
FAQs
MCP server for planning software specs (PRDs) offline, in your editor — validate, render, and checklist tools for Claude Code, Cursor, and any MCP client.
The npm package draftlytic-mcp receives a total of 25 weekly downloads. As such, draftlytic-mcp popularity was classified as not popular.
We found that draftlytic-mcp demonstrated a healthy version release cadence and project activity because the last version was released less than a year ago. It has 1 open source maintainer collaborating on the project.

Security News
Lovable’s OJ rewrites Vite’s dev server in Rust, reducing memory use and preview times as AI lowers the cost of open source reimplementation.

Security News
It has been one year since Shai-Hulud made its first appearance on npm.

Research
/Security News
Operators behind PolinRider used a compromised GitHub account to plant malware in four development versions of a Packagist package with 700,000+ downloads.