inspectpack
An inspection tool for Webpack frontend JavaScript bundles.
Inspectpack gives insight into what's in your production JS bundles and where
you can cut down on size, duplicates, etc.
Install
$ npm install inspectpack
Usage
An inspection tool for Webpack frontend JavaScript bundles.
Usage: inspectpack --action=<string> [options]
Options:
--action, -a Actions to take
[string] [required] [choices: "duplicates", "pattern", "parse", "files", "versions", "sizes"]
--bundle, -b Path to webpack-created JS bundle [string]
--root, -r Project root (for `node_modules` introspection, default cwd) [string]
--format, -f Display output format
[string] [choices: "json", "text", "tsv"] [default: "text"]
--verbose Verbose output [boolean] [default: false]
--minified, -m Calculate / display minified byte sizes [boolean] [default: true]
--gzip, -g Calculate / display minified + gzipped byte size (implies `--minified`)
[boolean] [default: true]
--pattern, -p Regular expression string(s) to match on [array] [default: []]
--path Path to input file(s) [array] [default: []]
--suspect-patterns Known 'suspicious' patterns for `--action=pattern` [boolean]
--suspect-parses Known 'suspicious' code parses for `--action=parse` [boolean]
--suspect-files Known 'suspicious' file names for `--action=files` [boolean]
--duplicates Filter `--action=versions` to libraries that cannot be deduped [boolean]
--help, -h Show help [boolean]
--version, -v Show version number [boolean]
Examples:
inspectpack --action=duplicates --bundle=bundle.js Report duplicates that cannot be deduped
inspectpack --action=pattern --bundle=bundle.js Show files with pattern matches in code
--suspect-patterns
inspectpack --action=versions --bundle=bundle.js Show version skews in a project
--root=/PATH/TO/project
inspectpack --action=parse --bundle=bundle.js Show files with parse function matches in code
--suspect-parses
inspectpack --action=files --bundle=bundle.js Show files with pattern matches in file names
--suspect-files
Inputs
The are three potential sources of input for bundle analysis:
- Stats: A metadata file of build / size information generated by Webpack
- Source Maps: The source mappings file for a bundle
- Bundle: And of course, the JS bundle itself.
Additionally, specific analysis steps also may require designated Webpack
configurations to produce a proper input.
Bundle
If an inspectpack
action requires a --bundle
, create one as follows:
Webpack configuration:
- Enable deduplication:
plugins:webpack.optimize.DedupePlugin()
- Disable minification: We need the comment headers.
- Enable output path comments:
output.pathinfo = true
.
Inputs: Create a JavaScript bundle
$ webpack
The created JS bundle path is ready to use. (Note that code split chunks should
work same as a single root bundle, but we haven't tested this yet.)
Actions
duplicates
Detect if there are libraries that should be de-duplicated with the
webpack.optimize.DedupePlugin
but are not because of version mismatches.
First create a bundle. Then run:
$ inspectpack --action=duplicates --bundle=bundle.js
Outputs: A JSON, text, or tab-separate-value report. For example:
## Summary
* Bundle:
* Path: /PATH/TO/bundle.js
* Bytes (min): 1678533
* Missed Duplicates:
* Num Unique Files: 116
* Num Extra Files: 131
* Extra Bytes (min): 253955
* Pct of Bundle Size: 15 %
- Number of unique files with missed duplicates.
- Number of total files that could be removed. This is different from the
previous number because you may have 3+ duplicates of a unique file path
that cannot be deduplicated.
- Minified byte size of the extra files. Note that we choose the "minimum
possible code size" to be the lowest of all file sizes for a given unique
file name.
Notes:
- The vast majority of the analysis time is spent minifying and gzipping
duplicate code snippets and the entire bundle. For just a list of missed
duplicates, add the
--minified=false --gzip=false
flags.
versions
Examine all of the modules in node_modules
that are used in 1+ files in the
bundle and detect version skews. Many downstream modules require the same
upstream modules at different versions and this can create inefficiencies if
those common dependencies cannot be deduplicated (detected by
--action=duplicates
). This feature figures out:
- Any skewed version dependencies for a given library. This is important because
we want to ideally make sure that only one version of a library is used.
- If that library has upstream dependencies that are themselves skewed. This
is important additional data because it tells us if this module depends on
other modules that have skews that you should resolve first.
With these two pieces of data, we can then look at our dependency graph for a
given application and manually harmonize module versions. The key here is to
start with modules that have no upstream skews, and accordingly the versions
action produces reports that are sorted by lowest number of upstream skews.
Let's see this in action...
First create a bundle. Then run:
$ inspectpack --action=versions --bundle=bundle.js --root=/PATH/TO/project
Outputs: A JSON, text, or tab-separate-value report. For example:
inspectpack --action=versions
=============================
## Summary
* Bundle:
* Path: /PATH/TO/bundle.js
* Num Libs: 17
## Libraries
...
* lodash
* Skewed Deps: 0
* Versions: 2
* 4.12.0:
* root -> cabal-event@3.1.0
* root -> foo-buzz-util@1.2.0
* root -> foo-footer@5.5.6 -> foo-forms@4.0.1 -> foo-validation@2.1.1
...
* 3.10.1:
* root
* root -> my-ui-config@1.3.1
* root -> foo-containers@8.1.2 -> foo-interactive@6.0.3
* root -> a11y@1.0.3 -> foo-carousel@2.0.0 -> foo-interactive@5.2.0
* root -> a11y@1.0.3 -> babar-card@6.7.3
* root -> a11y@1.0.3 -> babar-card@6.7.3 -> babar-buttons@5.7.1 -> foo-forms@2.0.1 -> foo-base@2.1.1 -> foo-layout@2.0.2 -> foo-validation@0.2.5
* root -> a11y@1.0.3 -> babar-card@6.7.3 -> babar-descriptors@2.0.0
...
...
* cabal-event
* Skewed Deps: 1
* lodash
* Versions: 2
* 3.1.0:
* root
* root -> foo-footer@5.5.6
* root -> foo-footer@5.5.6 -> foo-tutils@3.0.1
* root -> foo-header@6.11.1
* 2.1.0:
* root -> a11y@1.0.3
...
The above truncated report tells us that we have 17 module dependencies that
have at least 2+ version skews in our project. The lodash
module has 0
"Skewed Deps" upstream dependencies and there are two versions of the library
ending up in the bundle: 4.12.0
and 3.10.1
. Having no upstream skews means
we should fix these skews first in our project before moving to modules that
have 1+ upstream skews. By contrast, the cabal-event
module has 1
skewed
upstream dependency on lodash
, which illustrates that we should wait until
lodash
is resolved before moving on to harmonize versions in that module.
Notes:
- The
versions
action provides a --duplicates
flag to only list version
skews for code chunks that are missed deduplication opportunities. This is a
good prioritization step to take since different module versions may still
have the exact same code files in the resulting bundle, which can be
deduplicated and thus aren't a real concern for code size / execution speed in
optimizing your bundle. - The
--root
flag needs to point to the webpack configuration
context
value,
which defaults to process.cwd()
for both webpack and inspectpack
.
sizes
Get a simple report of each file chunk in a bundle with the type of chunk and
relevant sizes (full, min, min+gz).
First create a bundle. Then run:
$ inspectpack --action=sizes --bundle=bundle.js
Outputs: A JSON, text, or tab-separate-value report. For example:
## Summary
* Bundle:
* Path: /PATH/TO/bundle.js
* Bytes (min): 1584818
* Bytes (min+gz): 367026
## Files
0. ./app.jsx
* Type: code
* Size: 5439
* Size (min): 2314
* Size (min+gz): 1002
1. ../~/babel-polyfill/lib/index.js
* Type: code
* Size: 1423
* Size (min): 658
* Size (min+gz): 422
Notes:
- The vast majority of the analysis time is spent minifying and gzipping code
snippets and the entire bundle. To skip these sizes for a faster report, add
the
--minified=false --gzip=false
flags.
parse
Detect the occurrence of 1+ code parse function matches in code sections of the
bundle. This is another means of detecting anti-patterns, some of which we
aggregate in --suspect-parses
.
Note: This is simply a more abstract version of pattern
where you could have
a parse function that uses the same regex to match a code snippet manually. What
this feature really opens up is full Babel traversals / introspection, which are
more correct and flexible than anything regular expressions can do. In our
--suspect-parses
collection, we use babel introspection to very tightly
determine if there are multiple exports in any source code file in a bundle.
First create a bundle.
Next, decide if using provided --suspect-parses
or your own custom parse
functions with one or more file paths to --path
. A parse function should
follow these guidelines:
module.exports = function (src) {
return (src.match(/^.*first.*$/m) || [])[0];
};
In this simple example, we're just using regular expresssions, but for complex
projects / investigations you'll likely want to step up to some Babel magic.
Then run:
$ inspectpack \
--action=parse --bundle=bundle.js \
--path=/PATH/TO/parse.js
$ inspectpack \
--action=parse --bundle=bundle.js \
--suspect-parses
Suspect Parses: The --suspect-parses
flag looks for known "suspect"
code snippets that potentially contain inefficient code. See
the source code for the full breakdown of
SUSPECT_PARSES
.
-
MULTIPLE_EXPORTS
: Multiple exports via any number export objects /
statements.
module.exports = {
foo: __webpack_require__(1),
bar: __webpack_require__(2)
}
module.exports.foo = __webpack_require__(1);
module.exports.bar = __webpack_require__(2);
Outputs: A JSON, text, or tab-separate-value report. For example:
$ inspectpack \
--action=parse \
--bundle="/PATH/TO/bundle.js" \
--format=text \
--suspect-parses
inspectpack --action=parse
============================
## Summary
* Bundle:
* Path: /Users/rye/scm/fmd/simple-proj/dist/bundle.js
* Num Matches: 3
* Num Unique Files: 3
* Num All Files: 3
* Custom Parses:
* Suspect Parses:
* MULTIPLE_EXPORTS
## Matches
* ./lib/mod-a.js
* Num Matches: 1
* Num Files Matched: 1
* 1: ./lib/mod-a.js
* Matches: 1
* MULTIPLE_EXPORTS:
module.exports = {
first: __webpack_require__(/*! ./first */ 2),
second: __webpack_require__(/*! ./second */ 3)
};
* ./lib/mod-b.js
* Num Matches: 1
* Num Files Matched: 1
* 4: ./lib/mod-b.js
* Matches: 1
* MULTIPLE_EXPORTS:
module.exports.first = __webpack_require__(/*! ./first */ 2);
// ...
module.exports.second = __webpack_require__(/*! ./second */ 3);
pattern
Detect the occurrence of 1+ patterns in code sections of the bundle. This is
useful for detecting anti-patterns, some of which we aggregate in a useful
option --suspect-patterns
.
Note: There is a good deal of overlap with parse
in suspect patterns, were
we're doing the same thing with different approaches (code parsing vs regex
grepping). In general, parsing is far more powerful and correct. But, there's
always a use for quick and dirty regular expressions which we discuss further
in this section.
First create a bundle. Then run:
$ inspectpack \
--action=pattern --bundle=bundle.js \
--pattern="201[56]"
$ inspectpack \
--action=pattern --bundle=bundle.js \
--pattern "2016" "unicorn"
$ inspectpack \
--action=pattern --bundle=bundle.js \
--suspect-patterns
Notes:
- It is best to use quotes around patterns so that you don't have to escape
shell processing.
- Some regular expressions can be very expensive time-wise, so be sure to try
things out a bit and refactor your patterns if the inspection is taking too
long.
Suspect Patterns: The --suspect-patterns
flag looks for known "suspect"
patterns that potentially contain inefficient code. See
the source code for the full breakdown of
SUSPECT_PATTERNS
.
-
MULTIPLE_EXPORTS_SINGLE
: Multiple exports via one export object.
module.exports = {
foo: __webpack_require__(1),
bar: __webpack_require__(2)
}
-
MULTIPLE_EXPORTS_MUTIPLE
: Multiple exports via 2+ export statements.
module.exports.foo = __webpack_require__(1);
module.exports.bar = __webpack_require__(2);
Outputs: A JSON, text, or tab-separate-value report. For example:
$ inspectpack \
--action=pattern \
--bundle="/PATH/TO/bundle.js" \
--format=text \
--suspect-patterns
## Summary
* Bundle:
* Path: /PATH/TO/bundle.js
* Num Matches: 17
* Num Unique Files: 14
* Num All Files: 17
* Custom Patterns:
* Suspect Patterns:
* MULTIPLE_EXPORTS_SINGLE: [^\n]*(module\.|)exports\s*=\s*{(\s*.*__webpack_require__\(.*){2}
* MULTIPLE_EXPORTS_MUTIPLE: [^\n]*((module\.|)exports\..*\s*=\s*.*__webpack_require__\(.*\s*){2}
## Matches
* custom-lib/lib/index.js
* Num Matches: 1
* Num Files Matched: 1
* 1103: ../~/custom-lib/lib/index.js
* Matches: 1
* MULTIPLE_EXPORTS_SINGLE - /[^\n]*(module\.|)exports\s*=\s*{(\s*.*__webpack_require__\(.*){2}/:
module.exports = {
Foo: __webpack_require__(/*! ./components/foo */ 1104),
Bar: __webpack_require__(/*! ./components/bar */ 1135),
* lodash/string.js
* Num Matches: 1
* Num Files Matched: 1
* 1581: ../~/lodash/string.js
* Matches: 1
* MULTIPLE_EXPORTS_SINGLE - /[^\n]*(module\.|)exports\s*=\s*{(\s*.*__webpack_require__\(.*){2}/:
module.exports = {
'camelCase': __webpack_require__(/*! ./string/camelCase */ 1582),
'capitalize': __webpack_require__(/*! ./string/capitalize */ 1587),
* lodash/lang.js
* Num Matches: 1
* Num Files Matched: 1
* 1862: ../~/lodash/lang.js
* Matches: 1
* MULTIPLE_EXPORTS_SINGLE - /[^\n]*(module\.|)exports\s*=\s*{(\s*.*__webpack_require__\(.*){2}/:
module.exports = {
'clone': __webpack_require__(/*! ./lang/clone */ 1863),
'cloneDeep': __webpack_require__(/*! ./lang/cloneDeep */ 1869),
files
Detect the occurrence of 1+ files by the base name (resolved from
node_modules
). This is useful for detecting anti-patterns based on files that
should never be part of a webpack bundle. We aggregate useful file patterns
in the option --suspect-files
.
First create a bundle. Then run:
$ inspectpack \
--action=files --bundle=bundle.js \
--pattern="underscore"
$ inspectpack \
--action=files --bundle=bundle.js \
--pattern "underscore" "jquery"
$ inspectpack \
--action=files --bundle=bundle.js \
--suspect-files
Suspect Files: The --suspect-files
flag looks for known "suspect"
file patterns that potentially contain inefficient code. See
the source code for the full breakdown of
SUSPECT_FILES
.
LODASH
: Known lodash files that have multiple exports. You should instead
import "one-off" files.MOMENT_LOCALE_ROOT
: A webpack pattern that signals every possible locale
is bundled in your application. You should instead hone down and include
only the locales that you specifically need for your application.
Outputs: A JSON, text, or tab-separate-value report. For example:
inspectpack --action=files
==========================
## Summary
* Bundle:
* Path: /PATH/TO/bundle.js
* Num Matches: 4
* Num Files: 4
* Custom Patterns:
* underscore\/
* Suspect Patterns:
* LODASH: lodash/(index|lodash|lodash\.min|array|collection|date|function|lang|math|number|object|seq|string|util)\.js
* MOMENT_LOCALE_ROOT: moment\/locale \^\\\.\\\/\.\*\$
## Files
* lodash/index.js
* underscore/underscore.js
* lodash/lang.js
* moment/locale ^\.\/.*$
## Matches
* lodash/index.js
* Matches: 1
* LODASH - /lodash\/(index|lodash|lodash\.min|array|collection|date|function|lang|math|number|object|seq|string|util)\.js/: lodash/index.js
* Refs:
* 1400: ../~/foo/~/lodash/index.js
* underscore/underscore.js
* Matches: 1
* CUSTOM - /underscore\//: underscore/
* Refs:
* 2650: ../~/bar/~/underscore/underscore.js
* lodash/lang.js
* Matches: 1
* LODASH - /lodash\/(index|lodash|lodash\.min|array|collection|date|function|lang|math|number|object|seq|string|util)\.js/: lodash/lang.js
* Refs:
* 2820: ../~/baz/~/lodash/lang.js
* moment/locale ^\.\/.*$
* Matches: 1
* MOMENT_LOCALE_ROOT - /moment\/locale \^\\\.\\\/\.\*\$/: moment/locale ^\.\/.*$
* Refs:
* 2855: ../~/moment/locale ^\.\/.*$
Other Useful Tools
Other tools that inspect Webpack bundles: