Comparing version 1.2.0 to 1.3.0
@@ -12,2 +12,3 @@ /* | ||
case 'event': return require('./src/jsu_event.js'); | ||
case 'latex': return require('./src/jsu_latex.js'); | ||
} | ||
@@ -25,2 +26,3 @@ throw new Error('Failed to load script id: ' + scriptId); | ||
get Event() { return requireScript('event'); }, | ||
get Latex() { return requireScript('latex'); }, | ||
}; |
{ | ||
"name": "jsupack", | ||
"version": "1.2.0", | ||
"version": "1.3.0", | ||
"license": "MIT", | ||
@@ -5,0 +5,0 @@ "description": "JavaScript Utilities", |
@@ -13,9 +13,7 @@ # jsu | ||
disadvantages, you can use jsu as a possible fallback. For example, [jsu_event.js](src/jsu_event.js) | ||
supports generic and timer events in just a few lines of code. | ||
supports generic and timer events in just a few lines of code. Also note that | ||
type checking is need-specific, i.e. not all use cases will accept a boolean | ||
object as a boolean, or a numeric string or an infinite number as a number; so | ||
even jsu implementation might not be of any help in checking data types. | ||
Also note that type checking is need-specific, i.e. not all use cases will | ||
accept a boolean object as a boolean, or a numeric string or an infinite number | ||
as a number. So even jsu implementation might not be of any help in checking | ||
data types. | ||
Overall, jsu is not a substitute for libraries such as jQuery or others with | ||
@@ -22,0 +20,0 @@ convenient functions like [isEqual()](https://underscorejs.org/#isEqual) |
@@ -117,3 +117,3 @@ /* | ||
}); | ||
} | ||
}; | ||
@@ -120,0 +120,0 @@ API.setStringPrototypeFormat = function() { |
License Policy Violation
LicenseThis package is not allowed per your license policy. Review the package's license to ensure compliance.
Found 1 instance in 1 package
License Policy Violation
LicenseThis package is not allowed per your license policy. Review the package's license to ensure compliance.
Found 1 instance in 1 package
49472
8
961
40