leaflet-geometryutil
Advanced tools
Comparing version 0.5.0 to 0.5.1
{ | ||
"name": "leaflet-geometryutil" | ||
, "version": "0.5.0" | ||
, "description": "Leaflet utility functions on geometries" | ||
, "keywords": ["Leaflet", "GIS"] | ||
, "main": "dist/leaflet.geometryutil.js" | ||
, "scripts": { | ||
"test": "make test" | ||
} | ||
, "dependencies": { | ||
"name": "leaflet-geometryutil", | ||
"version": "0.5.1", | ||
"description": "Leaflet utility functions on geometries", | ||
"keywords": [ | ||
"Leaflet", | ||
"GIS" | ||
], | ||
"repository": { | ||
"type": "git", | ||
"url": "https://github.com/makinacorpus/Leaflet.GeometryUtil.git" | ||
}, | ||
"license": "BSD-3-Clause", | ||
"main": "src/leaflet.geometryutil.js", | ||
"scripts": { | ||
"test": "node_modules/.bin/mocha-phantomjs spec/index.html", | ||
"generate-docs": "rm -rf docs; node_modules/.bin/jsdoc -c jsdoc.config -d ./docs/" | ||
}, | ||
"dependencies": { | ||
"leaflet": "^0.7.0" | ||
}, | ||
"devDependencies": { | ||
"chai": "3.5.0", | ||
"jsdoc": "3.4.0", | ||
"minami": "^1.1.1", | ||
"mocha": "3.0.2", | ||
"mocha-phantomjs": "4.1.0" | ||
} | ||
, "devDependencies": { | ||
"mocha": "1.9.0", | ||
"chai": "1.6.0", | ||
"mocha-phantomjs": "2.0.1", | ||
"jsdoc": "https://github.com/jsdoc3/jsdoc/tarball/v3.1.1" | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} |
@@ -8,2 +8,8 @@ Leaflet.GeometryUtil | ||
For Leaflet 1.0, some users encounter problems with closest method. | ||
We plan to open a new branch for testing purpose soon ! | ||
Don't hesitate to submit issues or Pull Request if you detect something wrong. | ||
Usage | ||
@@ -42,3 +48,3 @@ ----- | ||
``` | ||
make test | ||
npm test | ||
``` | ||
@@ -48,5 +54,15 @@ | ||
--------- | ||
### master ### | ||
* Nothing changed yet. | ||
### 0.5.1 ### | ||
* Fix closestLayer to be able to work with GeoJSON nested layers | ||
* Restrict closest method to Array and L.Polyline (L.Polygon extend L.Polyline) | ||
### 0.5.0 ### | ||
- Add function `layersWithin()` (#34, thanks @haoliangyu) | ||
* Add function `layersWithin()` (#34, thanks @haoliangyu) | ||
* Fix safety check on the ratio value in ``interpolateOnLine()` (#29, thanks @Marcussacapuces91) | ||
@@ -53,0 +69,0 @@ |
Sorry, the diff of this file is not supported yet
Sorry, the diff of this file is not supported yet
Sorry, the diff of this file is not supported yet
Sorry, the diff of this file is not supported yet
Sorry, the diff of this file is not supported yet
Sorry, the diff of this file is not supported yet
License Policy Violation
LicenseThis package is not allowed per your license policy. Review the package's license to ensure compliance.
Found 1 instance in 1 package
Native code
Supply chain riskContains native code (e.g., compiled binaries or shared libraries). Including native code can obscure malicious behavior.
Found 18 instances in 1 package
Major refactor
Supply chain riskPackage has recently undergone a major refactor. It may be unstable or indicate significant internal changes. Use caution when updating to versions that include significant changes.
Found 1 instance in 1 package
New author
Supply chain riskA new npm collaborator published a version of the package for the first time. New collaborators are usually benign additions to a project, but do indicate a change to the security surface area of a package.
Found 1 instance in 1 package
License Policy Violation
LicenseThis package is not allowed per your license policy. Review the package's license to ensure compliance.
Found 1 instance in 1 package
No repository
Supply chain riskPackage does not have a linked source code repository. Without this field, a package will have no reference to the location of the source code use to generate the package.
Found 1 instance in 1 package
1591252
70
1959
125
0
5
20