Security News
Input Validation Vulnerabilities Dominate MITRE's 2024 CWE Top 25 List
MITRE's 2024 CWE Top 25 highlights critical software vulnerabilities like XSS, SQL Injection, and CSRF, reflecting shifts due to a refined ranking methodology.
next-page-tester
Advanced tools
The missing DOM integration testing tool for Next.js.
Given a Next.js route, this library will render the matching page in JSDOM, provided with the expected props derived from Next.js' routing system and data fetching methods.
import { getPage } from 'next-page-tester';
import { screen, fireEvent } from '@testing-library/react';
describe('Blog page', () => {
it('renders blog page', async () => {
const { render } = await getPage({
route: '/blog/1',
});
render();
expect(screen.getByText('Blog')).toBeInTheDocument();
fireEvent.click(screen.getByText('Link'));
await screen.findByText('Linked page');
});
});
The idea behind this library is to reproduce as closely as possible the way Next.js works without spinning up servers, and render the output in a local JSDOM environment.
In order to provide a valuable testing experience next-page-tester
replicates the rendering flow of an actual next.js
application:
head
element)The mounted application is interactive and can be tested with any DOM testing library (like @testing-library/react
).
next-page-tester
will take care of:
getServerSideProps
, getInitialProps
or getStaticProps
) if the case_app
and _document
componentsLink
, router.push
, router.replace
redirect
returnsnext/router
, next/head
, next/link
, next/config
and environment variablesgetPage
accepts an option object and returns 4 values:
import { getPage } from 'next-page-tester';
const { render, serverRender, serverRenderToString, page } = await getPage({
options,
});
Type: () => { nextRoot: HTMLElement<NextRoot> }
Returns: #__next
root element element.
Unless you have an advanced use-case, you should mostly use this method. Under the hood it calls serverRender()
and then mounts/hydrates the React application into JSDOM #__next
root element. This is what users would get/see when they visit a page.
Type: () => { nextRoot: HTMLElement<NextRoot> }
Returns: #__next
root element element.
Inject the output of server side rendering into the DOM but doesn't mount React. Use it to test how Next.js renders in the following scenarios:
Type: () => { html: string }
Render the output of server side rendering as HTML string. This is a pure method without side-effects.
Type: React.ReactElement<AppElement>
React element of the application.
Property | Description | type | Default |
---|---|---|---|
route (mandatory) | Next route (must start with / ) | string | - |
req | Enhance default mocked request object | req => req | - |
res | Enhance default mocked response object | res => res | - |
router | Enhance default mocked Next router object | router => router | - |
useApp | Render custom App component | boolean | true |
useDocument (experimental) | Render Document component | boolean | false |
nextRoot | Absolute path to Next.js root folder | string | auto detected |
dotenvFile | Relative path to a .env file holding environment variables | string | - |
wrapper | Map of render functions. Useful to decorate component tree with mocked providers. | { Page?: NextPage => NextPage; App?: NextApp => NextApp } | - |
sharedModules | List of modules that should preserve identity between client and server context. | string[] | [] |
If your pages/components import file types not natively handled by Node.js (like style sheets, images, .svg
, ...), you should configure your testing environment to properly process them. Eg, in case of Jest you might want configuring some moduleNameMapper
.
next-page-tester
expects to run into a JSDOM environment. If using Jest add this line to your jest
configuration:
"testEnvironment": "jsdom",
Since Next.js is not designed to run in a JSDOM environment we need to setup the default JSDOM to allow a smoother testing experience. By default, next-page-tester
will:
window.scrollTo
and IntersectionObserver
mocksHowever, you may choose to skip the auto cleanup & helpers initialisation by setting the NPT_SKIP_AUTO_SETUP
env variable to true
. You can do this with cross-env
like so:
cross-env NPT_SKIP_AUTO_SETUP=true jest
If using Jest v26 you might need to patch it in order to load modules with proper server/client environments. Maintenance efforts will target latest Jest version.
Under examples folder we're documenting the testing cases which next-page-tester
enables.
next-page-tester
focuses on supporting only the last version of Next.js and Jest:
next-page-tester | next.js | Jest |
---|---|---|
v0.1.0 -> v0.7.0 | v9.X.X | v26.X.X |
v0.8.0 -> v0.22.0 | v10.0.0 -> v10.0.7 | |
v0.23.0 -> v0.25.X | v10.0.8 -> v11.0.X | |
v0.26.0 -> v0.27.X | v10.0.8 -> v11.0.X | v27.X.X |
v0.28.0 + | v11.1.0 + |
Since:
please note that we cannot guarantee support for future versions of Next.js out of the box. Even patch or minor versions could break. In this case you'll have to wait for a new next-page-tester
version to be released.
Contributions are very welcome and we do our best to support external contributors.
req
and res
objects are mocked with node-mocks-http@types/react-dom
and @types/webpack
when using Typescript in strict
mode due to this buguseDocument
optionuseDocument
option is partially implemented and might be unstable.
The first suggested way to mock network requests, consists of mocking at network layer with libraries like Mock service worker
and Mirage JS
.
Another viable approach might consist of mocking the global fetch
object with libraries like fetch-mock
.
In case you wanted a more traditional approach involving mocking the user land modules responsible for fetching data, you need to consider an extra step: since next-page-tester
isolates modules between "client" and "server" rendering, those mocks that are created in tests (client context) won't execute in server context (eg. data fetching methods).
To overcome that, we need to "taint" such modules to (preserve/share) their identity between "client" and "server" context by passing them through the sharedModules
option.
test('as a user I want to mock a module in client & server environment', async () => {
const stub = jest.spyOn(api, 'getData').mockReturnValue(Promise.resolve('data'))
const { render } = await getPage({
route: '/page',
nextRoot,
sharedModules: [`${process.cwd()}/src/path/to/my/module`],
});
expect(stub).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); // this was executed in your data fetching method
}
You can set cookies by appending them to document.cookie
before calling getPage
. next-page-tester
will propagate cookies to ctx.req.headers.cookie
so they will be available to data fetching methods. This also applies to subsequent fetching methods calls triggered by client side navigation.
test('authenticated page', async () => {
document.cookie = 'SessionId=super=secret';
document.cookie = 'SomeOtherCookie=SomeOtherValue';
const { render } = await getPage({
route: '/authenticated',
});
render();
});
Note: document.cookie
does not get cleaned up automatically. You'll have to clear it manually after each test to keep everything in isolation.
Next.js Link
component invokes window.scrollTo
on click which is not implemented in JSDOM environment. In order to fix the error you should set up your test environment or provide your own window.scrollTo
mock.
This warning means that your page renders differently between server and browser. This can be an expected behavior or signal a bug in your code.
This warning means that your application during rendering process performs some network requests which have not been mocked. You should find them and mock as needed.
trailingSlash
option_error
pagedebug
option to log execution infoThanks goes to these wonderful people (emoji key):
This project follows the all-contributors specification. Contributions of any kind welcome!
FAQs
Enable DOM integration testing on Next.js pages
We found that next-page-tester demonstrated a not healthy version release cadence and project activity because the last version was released a year ago. It has 2 open source maintainers collaborating on the project.
Did you know?
Socket for GitHub automatically highlights issues in each pull request and monitors the health of all your open source dependencies. Discover the contents of your packages and block harmful activity before you install or update your dependencies.
Security News
MITRE's 2024 CWE Top 25 highlights critical software vulnerabilities like XSS, SQL Injection, and CSRF, reflecting shifts due to a refined ranking methodology.
Security News
In this segment of the Risky Business podcast, Feross Aboukhadijeh and Patrick Gray discuss the challenges of tracking malware discovered in open source softare.
Research
Security News
A threat actor's playbook for exploiting the npm ecosystem was exposed on the dark web, detailing how to build a blockchain-powered botnet.