
What
Brief
In the usual gig, we make do with Array.push and Array.shift to play Queue in JavaScript, but here's the kicker – native
JavaScript Array isn't exactly Queue VIP. That shift move? It's a bit of a slow dance with a time complexity
of linear time complexity
O(n). When you're working with big data, you don't want to be caught slow-shifting. So, we roll up our sleeves and
craft a Queue that's got a
speedy constant time complexity
O(1) Queue.enqueue(), a snappy O(1) Queue.dequeue(), and a lightning-fast O(1)
Queue.getAt(). Yep, it's Queue-tastic!
| Queue Typed | O(1) | O(1) | O(1) | 22.60ms | 10.60ms |
| JavaScript Native Array | O(1) | O(n) | O(1) | 931.10ms | 8.60ms |
| Other Queue | O(1) | O(1) | O(n) | 28.90ms | 17175.90ms |
more data structures
This is a standalone Queue data structure from the data-structure-typed collection. If you wish to access more data
structures or advanced features, you can transition to directly installing the
complete data-structure-typed package
How
install
npm
npm i queue-typed --save
yarn
yarn add queue-typed
snippet
TS
import {Queue} from 'queue-typed';
const queue = new Queue<number>();
for (let i = 0; i < magnitude; i++) {
queue.enqueue(i);
}
for (let i = 0; i < magnitude; i++) {
queue.dequeue();
}
for (let i = 0; i < magnitude; i++) {
console.log(queue.getAt(i));
}
JS
const {Queue} = require('queue-typed');
const queue = new Queue();
for (let i = 0; i < magnitude; i++) {
queue.enqueue(i);
}
for (let i = 0; i < magnitude; i++) {
queue.dequeue();
}
for (let i = 0; i < magnitude; i++) {
console.log(queue.getAt(i));
}
basic Queue creation and push operation
const queue = new Queue([1, 2, 3, 4, 5]);
console.log([...queue]);
console.log(queue.length);
Queue shift and peek operations
const queue = new Queue<number>([10, 20, 30, 40]);
console.log(queue.first);
const first = queue.shift();
console.log(first);
console.log([...queue]);
console.log(queue.length);
Queue for...of iteration and isEmpty check
const queue = new Queue<string>(['A', 'B', 'C', 'D']);
const elements: string[] = [];
for (const item of queue) {
elements.push(item);
}
console.log(elements);
while (queue.length > 0) {
queue.shift();
}
console.log(queue.length);
Queue as message broker for event processing
interface Message {
id: string;
type: 'email' | 'sms' | 'push';
recipient: string;
content: string;
timestamp: Date;
}
const messageQueue = new Queue<Message>([
{
id: 'msg-001',
type: 'email',
recipient: 'user@example.com',
content: 'Welcome!',
timestamp: new Date()
},
{
id: 'msg-002',
type: 'sms',
recipient: '+1234567890',
content: 'OTP: 123456',
timestamp: new Date()
},
{
id: 'msg-003',
type: 'push',
recipient: 'device-token-xyz',
content: 'New notification',
timestamp: new Date()
},
{
id: 'msg-004',
type: 'email',
recipient: 'admin@example.com',
content: 'Daily report',
timestamp: new Date()
}
]);
const processedMessages: string[] = [];
while (messageQueue.length > 0) {
const message = messageQueue.shift();
if (message) {
processedMessages.push(`${message.type}:${message.recipient}`);
}
}
console.log(processedMessages);
console.log(messageQueue.length);
API docs & Examples
API Docs
Live Examples
Examples Repository
Data Structures
Standard library data structure comparison
| Queue<E> | queue<T> | Queue<E> | - |
Benchmark
queue
| test name | time taken (ms) | executions per sec | sample deviation |
|---|
| 1,000,000 push | 39.90 | 25.07 | 0.01 |
| 1,000,000 push & shift | 81.79 | 12.23 | 0.00 |
Built-in classic algorithms
Software Engineering Design Standards
| Principle | Description |
|---|
| Practicality | Follows ES6 and ESNext standards, offering unified and considerate optional parameters, and simplifies method names. |
| Extensibility | Adheres to OOP (Object-Oriented Programming) principles, allowing inheritance for all data structures. |
| Modularization | Includes data structure modularization and independent NPM packages. |
| Efficiency | All methods provide time and space complexity, comparable to native JS performance. |
| Maintainability | Follows open-source community development standards, complete documentation, continuous integration, and adheres to TDD (Test-Driven Development) patterns. |
| Testability | Automated and customized unit testing, performance testing, and integration testing. |
| Portability | Plans for porting to Java, Python, and C++, currently achieved to 80%. |
| Reusability | Fully decoupled, minimized side effects, and adheres to OOP. |
| Security | Carefully designed security for member variables and methods. Read-write separation. Data structure software does not need to consider other security aspects. |
| Scalability | Data structure software does not involve load issues. |