Security News
PyPI Introduces Digital Attestations to Strengthen Python Package Security
PyPI now supports digital attestations, enhancing security and trust by allowing package maintainers to verify the authenticity of Python packages.
redux-action-tools
Advanced tools
redux action tools with full async support inspired by redux-action
Light-weight action tools with async and optimistic update support.
This project is inspired by
redux-actions
andredux-promise-thunk
npm i redux-action-tools
Same as createAction in redux-actions
, we write our own for less dependency and fix some defects.
This function is relly on redux-thunk
.
The createAction
returns an action creator for pain action object, While createAsyncAction
will return an action creator for thunk
.
This function should return a promise object.
The action creator returned by createAsyncAction
receives one parameter -- the sync payload, we will dispatch a sync action same as createAction
. And then, call the promiseCreator for the async behaviour, dispatch action for the result of it.
The dispatch
and getState
is the same as a normal thunk action, enables you to customize your async behaviour, even dispatch other actions.
Simple example below:
const asyncAction = createAsyncAction('ASYNC', function (syncPayload, dispatch, getState) {
const user = getState().user;
return asyncApi(syncPayload, user)
.then((result) => {
dispatch(otherAction(result));
return result; // don't forget to return a result.
})
});
//In your component
class Foo extends Component {
//...
doAsync() {
// You don't need dispatch here if you're using bindActionCreators
dispatch(asyncAction(syncPayload));
}
}
After you dispatch the async action, following flux standard action might been triggered:
type | When | payload | meta.asyncPhase |
---|---|---|---|
${actionName} | before promiseCreator been called | sync payload | 'START' |
${actionName}_COMPLETED | promise resolved | value of promise | 'COMPLETED' |
${actionName}_FAILED | promise rejected | reason of promise | 'FAILED' |
Idea here is that we should use different type, rather than just meta, to identity different actions during an async process. This will be more clear and closer to what we do in
Elm
Since the first action will be triggered before async behaviour, its easy to support optimistic update.
We use meta.asyncPhase
to identity different phases.
You can use it with middleware to handle features like global loading spinner or common error handler:
import _ from 'lodash'
import { ASYNC_PHASES } from 'redux-action-tools'
function loadingMiddleWare({dispatch}) {
return next => action => {
const asyncStep = _.get(action, 'meta.asyncStep');
const omitLoading = _.get(action, 'meta.omitLoading');
if (!asyncStep || omitLoading) return;
dispatch({
type: asyncStep === ASYNC_PHASES.START ? 'ASYNC_STARTED' : 'ASYNC_ENDED',
payload: {
action
}
})
next(action);
}
}
And with metaCreator, you can change the meta object and skip the common process:
const requestWithoutLoadingSpinner = createAsyncAction(type, promiseCreator, (payload, defaultMeta) => {
return { ...defaultMeta, omitLoading: true };
})
But, writing things like XXX_COMPLETED, XXX_FAILED is awful !!
And this is why we build the createReducer
!
const handler = (state, action) => newState
const reducer = createReducer()
.when([ACTION_FOO, ACTION_BAR], handlerForBothActions) // share handler for multi actions
.when('BAZ', handler) // optimistic update here if you need
.done(handler) // handle 'BAZ_COMPLETED'
.failed(errorHandler) // handle 'BAZ_FAILED'
.build(initValue); // Don't forget 'build()' !
const reducer = createReducer()
.when(FOO) // no optimistic update here, just declare the parent action for .done & .failed
.done(handler) //
.build()
With createReducer
, we can skip the switch-case statement which lots of people don't like it.
And more important, we provide a common and semantic way to handle the async behaviour.
However, there are some limitations you should know when you use .done
and .failed
:
reducer = createReducer()
.done(handler) // throw error here, cuz we don't know which action to handle
.build()
reducer = createReducer()
.when([A, B])
.done(handler) // throw error here, same reason since we don't know which one you mean
FAQs
redux action tools with full async support inspired by redux-action
We found that redux-action-tools demonstrated a not healthy version release cadence and project activity because the last version was released a year ago. It has 1 open source maintainer collaborating on the project.
Did you know?
Socket for GitHub automatically highlights issues in each pull request and monitors the health of all your open source dependencies. Discover the contents of your packages and block harmful activity before you install or update your dependencies.
Security News
PyPI now supports digital attestations, enhancing security and trust by allowing package maintainers to verify the authenticity of Python packages.
Security News
GitHub removed 27 malicious pull requests attempting to inject harmful code across multiple open source repositories, in another round of low-effort attacks.
Security News
RubyGems.org has added a new "maintainer" role that allows for publishing new versions of gems. This new permission type is aimed at improving security for gem owners and the service overall.