Huge News!Announcing our $40M Series B led by Abstract Ventures.Learn More
Socket
Sign inDemoInstall
Socket

redux-action-tools

Package Overview
Dependencies
Maintainers
1
Versions
9
Alerts
File Explorer

Advanced tools

Socket logo

Install Socket

Detect and block malicious and high-risk dependencies

Install

redux-action-tools

redux action tools with full async support inspired by redux-action

  • 1.1.0-0
  • Source
  • npm
  • Socket score

Version published
Maintainers
1
Created
Source

redux-action-tools

Build Status Coverage Status

Light-weight action tools with async and optimistic update support.

This project is inspired by redux-actions and redux-promise-thunk

中文文档

Install

npm i redux-action-tools

Usage and APIs

createAction(actionName, payloadCreator [, metaCreator])

Same as createAction in redux-actions, we write our own for less dependency and fix some defects.

createAsyncAction(actionName, promiseCreator [, metaCreator])

This function is relly on redux-thunk.

The createAction returns an action creator for pain action object, While createAsyncAction will return an action creator for thunk.

promiseCreator(syncPayload, dispatch, getState)

This function should return a promise object.

The action creator returned by createAsyncAction receives one parameter -- the sync payload, we will dispatch a sync action same as createAction. And then, call the promiseCreator for the async behaviour, dispatch action for the result of it.

The dispatch and getState is the same as a normal thunk action, enables you to customize your async behaviour, even dispatch other actions.

Simple example below:

const asyncAction = createAsyncAction('ASYNC', function (syncPayload, dispatch, getState) {
  const user = getState().user;

  return asyncApi(syncPayload, user)
    .then((result) => {
      dispatch(otherAction(result));

      return result; // don't forget to return a result.
    })
});

//In your component

class Foo extends Component {
  //...
  doAsync() {
    // You don't need dispatch here if you're using bindActionCreators
    dispatch(asyncAction(syncPayload));
  }
}

After you dispatch the async action, following flux standard action might been triggered:

typeWhenpayloadmeta.asyncPhase
${actionName}before promiseCreator been calledsync payload'START'
${actionName}_COMPLETEDpromise resolvedvalue of promise'COMPLETED'
${actionName}_FAILEDpromise rejectedreason of promise'FAILED'

Idea here is that we should use different type, rather than just meta, to identity different actions during an async process. This will be more clear and closer to what we do inElm

Optimistic update

Since the first action will be triggered before async behaviour, its easy to support optimistic update.

meta.asyncPhase and middleware

We use meta.asyncPhase to identity different phases. You can use it with middleware to handle features like global loading spinner or common error handler:

import _ from 'lodash'
import { ASYNC_PHASES } from 'redux-action-tools'

function loadingMiddleWare({dispatch}) {
  return next => action => {
    const asyncStep = _.get(action, 'meta.asyncStep');
    const omitLoading = _.get(action, 'meta.omitLoading');

    if (!asyncStep || omitLoading) return;

    dispatch({
      type: asyncStep === ASYNC_PHASES.START ? 'ASYNC_STARTED' : 'ASYNC_ENDED',
      payload: {
        action
      }
    })

    next(action);
  }
}

And with metaCreator, you can change the meta object and skip the common process:

const requestWithoutLoadingSpinner = createAsyncAction(type, promiseCreator, (payload, defaultMeta) => {
  return { ...defaultMeta, omitLoading: true };
})

createReducer

But, writing things like XXX_COMPLETED, XXX_FAILED is awful !!

And this is why we build the createReducer!


const handler = (state, action) => newState

const reducer = createReducer()
  .when([ACTION_FOO, ACTION_BAR], handlerForBothActions) // share handler for multi actions
  .when('BAZ', handler) // optimistic update here if you need
  .done(handler) // handle 'BAZ_COMPLETED'
  .failed(errorHandler) // handle 'BAZ_FAILED'
  .build(initValue); // Don't forget 'build()' !


const reducer = createReducer()
  .when(FOO)     // no optimistic update here, just declare the parent action for .done & .failed
  .done(handler) //
  .build()

With createReducer, we can skip the switch-case statement which lots of people don't like it. And more important, we provide a common and semantic way to handle the async behaviour.

However, there are some limitations you should know when you use .done and .failed:


reducer = createReducer()
  .done(handler) // throw error here, cuz we don't know which action to handle
  .build()

reducer = createReducer()
  .when([A, B])
  .done(handler) // throw error here, same reason since we don't know which one you mean

Keywords

FAQs

Package last updated on 20 Sep 2016

Did you know?

Socket

Socket for GitHub automatically highlights issues in each pull request and monitors the health of all your open source dependencies. Discover the contents of your packages and block harmful activity before you install or update your dependencies.

Install

Related posts

SocketSocket SOC 2 Logo

Product

  • Package Alerts
  • Integrations
  • Docs
  • Pricing
  • FAQ
  • Roadmap
  • Changelog

Packages

npm

Stay in touch

Get open source security insights delivered straight into your inbox.


  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • Security

Made with ⚡️ by Socket Inc