Schema to Yup schema
Build a Yup schema from a JSON Schema, GraphQL schema (type definition) or any other similar type/class and field/properties model or schema :)
Update
Release 1.9.10
and later of schema-to-yup
fixes a bunch of issues including validation of complex nested schemas and proper handling of required
vs notRequired
including passing a mode
configuration for fine control. It also fixes certain related error message issues for certain constraints (such as required
).
The library now also includes a typings file so it should work nicely with TypeScript.
In the near future (2.0.0
release) we will include a separate constraint builder infrastructure and more flexible/configurable infastructure in general. This will decouple the JSON to schema to validation type rules from the instantiation of each type validator, making it trivial to support other validators and maintain/develop each separately.
Schemas
The builder currently supports the most commonly used JSON Schema layout and GraphQL type definition exports using graphSchemaToJson (see GraphQL schema).
It also supports some extra convenience schema properties that make it more "smooth" to define validation requirements declaratively (see below).
According to the JSON schema specs, you are free to add extra metadata to the field schema definitions beyond those supported "natively".
Quick start
Install
npm install schema-to-yup -S
or yarn add schema-to-yup
Use
const schema = {
$schema: "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
$id: "http://example.com/person.schema.json",
title: "Person",
description: "A person",
type: "object",
properties: {
name: {
description: "Name of the person",
type: "string"
},
email: {
type: "string",
format: "email"
},
fooorbar: {
type: "string",
matches: "(foo|bar)"
},
age: {
description: "Age of person",
type: "number",
exclusiveMinimum: 0,
required: true
},
characterType: {
enum: ["good", "bad"],
enum_titles: ["Good", "Bad"],
type: "string",
title: "Type of people",
propertyOrder: 3
}
},
required: ["name", "email"]
};
const config = {
errMessages: {
age: {
required: "A person must have an age"
},
email: {
required: "You must enter an email address",
format: "Not a valid email address"
}
}
};
const { buildYup } = require("schema-to-yup");
const yupSchema = buildYup(json, config);
const valid = await yupSchema.isValid({
name: "jimmy",
age: 24
});
console.log({
valid
});
This would generate the following Yup validation schema:
const schema = yup.object().shape({
name: yup.string().required(),
age: yup
.number()
.required()
.positive()
});
Note the "required": true
for the age
property (not natively supported by JSON schema).
Mode
By default, any property will be explicitly notRequired
unless set to be required, either via required: true
in the property constraint object or via the required
list of properties of the object
schema definition (of the property).
You can override the notRequired
behavior by setting it on the new mode
object of the configuration which can be used to control and fine-tune runtime behaviour.
const jsonSchema = {
title: "users",
type: "object",
properties: {
username: { type: "string" }
}
};
const yupSchema = buildYup(jsonSchema, {
mode: {
notRequired: true
},
});
const valid = yupSchema.validateSync({
foo: "dfds"
});
const yupSchema = buildYup(jsonSchema, {
mode: {
notRequired: true
},
});
const valid = yupSchema.validateSync({
foo: "dfds"
});
The new run time mode settings are demonstrated under sample-runs/mode
No validation error (prop not required unless explicitly specified):
$ npx babel-node sample-runs/modes/not-required-on.js
Validation error if not valid type:
$ npx babel-node sample-runs/modes/not-required-on.js
Shape
You can access the internal Yup shape, via shapeConfig
on the yup schema returned by the buildYup
schema builder function.
This allows you to easily mix and match to suit more advanced requirements.
const { buildYup } = require("json-schema-to-yup");
const { shapeConfig } = buildYup(json, config);
const schema = yup.object().shape({
...shapeConfig,
...customShapeConfig
})
Types
Currently the following schema types are supported:
array
boolean
date
number
object
string
Custom type handlers
You can pass any custom typehandlers in a typeHandlers
object as part of the config
object passes. See setTypeHandlers()
in entry.js
for how this works internally.
function myCustomStringHandler = (obj, config) => {
}
const yupSchema = buildYup(jsonSchema, {
typeHandlers: {
string: myCustomStringHandler
},
});
This can be used to support special cases, to circumvent a bug or unexpected/unwarranted behaviour for one or more of the built-in type handlers etc.
You can then use the built in classes as building blocks.
Release 2.0
will likely include a much improved infrastructure of suitable building blocks to easily customize behavior and extend the functionality etc.
Custom constraint builder
Version 1.9.13
and higher supports using a custom constraint builder to add and build constraints.
class MyConstraintBuilder extends ConstraintBuilder {
constructor(typeHandler, opts = {}) {
super(typeHandler, opts);
}
build(propName, opts) {
return newBase
}
addConstraint(propName, opts) {
return this.typeHandler
}
onConstraintAdded({ name, value }) {
return this.typeHandler;
}
}
const createConstraintBuilder = (typeHandler, opts) => {
return new MyConstraintBuilder(typeHandler, opts)
}
buildYup(jsonSchema, {
createConstraintBuilder
})
Mixed (any type)
strict
default
nullable
required
notRequired
oneOf
(enum
, anyOf
)notOneOf
when
NEWisType
NEWnullable
(isNullable
) NEW
Array
ensure
compact
items
(of
)maxItems
(max
)minItems
(min
)itemsOf
(of
) NEW
Boolean
No keys
Date
maxDate
(max
)minDate
(min
)
Number
integer
moreThan
(exclusiveMinimum
)lessThan
(exclusiveMaximum
)positive
negative
min
(minimum
)max
(maximum
)truncate
round
Object
camelCase
constantCase
noUnknown
(propertyNames
)
String
minLength
(min
)maxLength
(max
)pattern
(matches
or regex
)email
(format: 'email'
)url
(format: 'url'
)lowercase
uppercase
trim
Conditional logic
Basic support for when conditions as requested and outlined in this issue is now included.
Work will continue in the when-condition branch.
Sample schema using simple when
constraint:
const biggyJson = {
title: "biggy",
type: "object",
properties: {
isBig: {
type: "boolean"
},
count: {
type: "number",
when: {
isBig: {
is: true,
then: {
min: 5
}
}
}
}
}
};
Sample valid and invalid values with respect to biggyJson
schema
const bigJson = {
valid: {
isBig: true,
count: 5
},
invalid: {
isBig: true,
count: 4
}
};
Currently basic support is included in schema-to-yup@1.9.0
on npmjs
More advanced conditionals support will likely be included the next major release: 2.0
.
You are welcome to continue the effort to support more conditional schema logic by continuing on this branch and making PRs.
Support for if
then
and else
conditional JSON schema constraints can likely be added using an approach like the when
condition (perhaps by transalating to equivalent: when
, then
and otherwise
).
if
- This keyword's value MUST be a valid JSON Schemathen
- This keyword's value MUST be a valid JSON Schemaelse
- This keyword's value MUST be a valid JSON Schema
See also json-schema-spec
Customizing conditional logic
You can now also override, extend or customize the when
condition logic by passing in your own factory method for the config object entry createWhenCondition
const myWhenConditionFactoryFn = (opts = {}) => {
const { type, key, value, when, schema, properties, config } = opts;
}
const config = {
createWhenCondition: myWhenConditionFactoryFn
}
const schema = buildYup(nameJsonSchema, config)
The best and easiest way to do this is to extend the WhenCondition
class which contains most of the necessary infrastructure you can further build on.
See the src/conditions/legacy
folder for the legacy 1.9.0
logic that works but has limited functionality.
Complex example
Here a more complete example of the variations currently possible
{
"title": "Person",
"description": "A person",
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"name": {
"description": "Name of the person",
"type": "string",
"required": true,
"matches": "[a-zA-Z- ]+",
"mix": 3,
"maxLength": 40,
},
"age": {
"description": "Age of person",
"type": "integer",
"moreThan": 0,
"max": 130,
"default": 32,
"required": false,
"nullable": true
},
"birthday": {
"type": "date",
"min": "1-1-1900",
"maxDate": "1-1-2015"
},
"married": {
"type": "boolean"
},
"boss": {
"type": "object",
"noUnknown": [
"name"
],
"properties": {
"name": {
"type": "string",
"notOneOf": ["Dr. evil", "bad ass"]
}
}
},
"colleagues": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"propertyNames": [
"name"
],
"properties": {
"name": {
"type": "string"
}
}
}
},
"programming": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"languages": {
"type": "array",
"of": {
"type": "string",
"enum": ["javascript", "java", "C#"]
},
"min": 1,
"max": 3
}
}
}
}
}
}
Complex/Nested schemas
Nested object schema properties are now finally fully supported.
See test/types/object/complex-schema.test.js
Custom models
This library now also supports non JSON schema models. See the types/defaults
mappings.
types/defaults/json-schema.js
module.exports {
getProps: obj => obj.properties,
getType: obj => obj.type,
getName: obj => obj.name || obj.title,
getConstraints: obj => obj,
isString: obj => obj.type === "string",
isArray: obj => obj.type === "array",
isInteger: obj => obj.type === "integer",
isBoolean: obj => obj.type === "boolean",
hasDateFormat: obj => ["date", "date-time"].find(t => t === obj.format),
isDate: obj => obj.type === "string" && defaults.hasDateFormat(obj.format),
isNumber: obj => obj.type === "number" || defaults.isInteger(obj.type),
isObject: obj => obj.type === "object",
isRequired: obj => obj.required
};
GraphQL schema
To support another model, such as GraphQL schema (type definitions) via graphSchemaToJson
Person:
{
Person: {
name: 'Person',
fields: {
name: {
type: 'String',
directives: {
constraints: {
minLength: 2
}
},
isNullable: false,
isList: false
}
}
directives: {},
type: 'Object',
implements: []
}
}
Create a map of methods to match your model layout:
const typeDefConf = {
getProps: obj => obj.fields,
getType: obj => obj.type,
getName: obj => obj.name,
getConstraints: obj => (obj.directives || {}).constraints || {},
isString: obj => obj.type === "String",
isArray: obj => obj.isList,
isInteger: obj => obj.type === "Int",
isBoolean: obj => obj.type === "Boolean",
isDate: obj => obj.type === "Date" || obj.directives.date,
isNumber: obj => obj.type === "Int" || obj.type === "Float",
isObject: obj => obj.type === "Object",
isRequired: obj => !obj.isNullable
};
Please note that getConstraints
can be used to control where the constraints of the field will be taken from (depending on the type of model/schema or your preference).
Pass overrides to match your model in config
as follows:
const schema = buildYup(nameJsonSchema, { ...typeDefConf, log: true });
The type definition mappings above are already built-in and available.
To switch the schema type, pass schemaType
in config as follows.
const schema = buildYup(nameJsonSchema, { schemaType: "type-def", log: true });
Feel free to make PRs to make more common schema models conveniently available!
Custom logs and error handling
You can enable logging py passing a log
option in the config
argument. If set to true, it will by default assign the internal log function to console.log
const schema = buildYup(nameJsonSchema, { log: true });
You can also pass a log function in the log
option to handle log messages and an err
option with a custom error handler function.
See Custom errors in Node for how to design custom errors
class ValidationError extends Error {}
const schema = buildYup(nameJsonSchema, {
log: (name, msg) => console.log(`[${name}] ${msg}`)
err: (msg) => {
console.error(`[${name}] ERROR: ${msg}`
throw new ValidationError(msg)
})
});
Customization
You can supply a createYupSchemaEntry
function as an entry in the config
object.
This function will then be used to build each Yup Schema entry in the Yup Schema being built.
Use the Yup Type classes such as types.YupArray
to act as building blocks or create your own custom logic as you see fit.
Customization example
const { YupSchemaEntry, buildYup, types } = require("schema-to-yup");
class CustomYupArray extends types.YupArray {
}
class CustomYupSchemaEntry extends YupSchemaEntry {
}
function createYupSchemaEntry(key, value, config) {
const builder = new CustomYupSchemaEntryBuilder(key, value, config);
builder.types.array = config => createYupArray(config);
return builder.toEntry();
}
const messages = i18n.locale(LOCALE);
const yupSchema = buildYup(json, {
createYupSchemaEntry,
messages
});
Extend Yup API to bridge other validators
You can use extendYupApi
to extend the Yup API with extra validation methods:
const validator = require("validator");
const { extendYupApi } = require("schema-to-yup/validator-bridge");
extendYupApi({ validator });
You can optionally pass in a custom validator
and a constraints map of your choice.
You can either extend the default constraints or override them with your own map.
PS: Check out src/validator-bridge
for more many options for fine control
const myValidator = new MyValidator();
const constraints = ["creditCard", "currency", { name: "hash", opts: "algo" }];
extendYupApi({ validator: myValidator, override: true, constraints });
const { buildYup } = require("schema-to-yup");
const schema = {
name: "BankAccount",
fields: {
accountNumber: {
type: "String",
format: "credit-card"
}
}
};
const yupSchema = buildYup(schema, { format: true, schemaType: "type-def" });
const valid = await yupSchema.isValid({
accountNumber: "123-4567-1828-2929"
});
Now the bridge includes tests. Seems to work ;)
Subclassing
You can sublass YupBuilder
or any of the internal classes to create your own custom infrastructure to suit your particular needs, expand with support for extra features etc.
const { YupBuilder } = require("schema-to-yup");
class MyYupBuilder extends YupBuilder {
}
const builder = new MyYupBuilder(schema, config);
const { yupSchema } = builder;
Error messages
You can pass an errMessages
object in the optional config
object argument with key mappings for your custom validation error messages.
Internally the validator error messages are resolved with the instance method valErrMessage
(from Mixed
class)
notOneOf() {
const {not, notOneOf} = this.value
const $oneOf = notOneOf || (not && (not.enum || not.oneOf))
$oneOf && this
.base
.notOneOf($oneOf, this.valErrMessage('notOneOf'))
return this
}
The key entries can be either a function, taking a value
argument or a static string.
Here are some of the defaults that you can override as needed.
export const errValKeys = [
"oneOf",
"enum",
"required",
"notRequired",
"minDate",
"min",
"maxDate",
"max",
"trim",
"lowercase",
"uppercase",
"email",
"url",
"minLength",
"maxLength",
"pattern",
"matches",
"regex",
"integer",
"positive",
"minimum",
"maximum"
];
export const defaults = {
errMessages: (keys = errValKeys) =>
keys.reduce((acc, key) => {
const fn = ({ key, value }) =>
`${key}: invalid for ${value.name || value.title}`;
acc[key] = fn;
return acc;
}, {})
};
Custom validation messages using select defaults
const { buildYup, types } = require("schema-to-yup");
const { defaults } = types;
const myErrMessages = require("./err-messages");
const valKeys = ["lowercase", "integer"];
const errMessages = {
...defaults.errMessages(valKeys),
myErrMessages
};
const yupSchema = buildYup(json, {
errMessages
});
Adding custom constraints
See the number
type for the current best practice to add type constraints.
For simple cases: use addConstraint
from the superclass YupMixed
required() {
return this.addConstraint("required");
}
For types with several of these, we should map through a list or map to add them all.
strict() {
return this.addValueConstraint("strict");
}
required() {
return this.addConstraint("required");
}
notRequired() {
return this.addConstraint("notRequired");
}
Can be rewritten to use conventions, iterating a map:
addMappedConstraints() {
Object.keys(this.constraintsMap).map(key => {
const list = constraintsMap[key];
const fnName = key === 'value' ? 'addValueConstraint' : 'addConstraint'
list.map(this.[fnName]);
});
}
get constraintsMap() {
return {
simple: ["required", "notRequired", "nullable"],
value: ["default", "strict"]
};
}
For more complex contraints that:
- have multiple valid constraint names
- require validation
- optional transformation
You can create a separate Constraint
subclass, to offload and handle it all separately.
Here is a sample RangeConstraint
used by number.
class RangeConstraint extends NumericConstraint {
constructor(typer) {
super(typer);
}
get $map() {
return {
moreThan: ["exclusiveMinimum", "moreThan"],
lessThan: ["exclusiveMaximum", "lessThan"],
max: ["maximum", "max"],
min: ["minimum", "min"]
};
}
}
Instead of wrapping a Constraint
you can call it directly with a map
range() {
return createNumericConstraint(this, map);
}
For the core type constraint class (such as YupNumber
) you should now be able to simplify it to:
get enabled() {
return ["range", "posNeg", "integer"];
}
convert() {
this.enabled.map(name => this.processConstraint(name));
super.convert();
return this;
}
The following constraint classes are available for use:
NumericConstraint
StringConstraint
RegExpConstraint
DateConstraint
Currently only YupNumber
has been (partly) refactored to take advantage of this new infrastructure. Please help refactor the rest!
YupNumber
also has the most unit test coverage, used to test the current infrastructure!
Similar projects
The library JSON Schema model builder is a powerful toolset to build a framework to create any kind of output model from a JSON schema.
If you enjoy this declarative/generator approach, try it out!
Testing
Uses jest for unit testing.
- Have unit tests that cover most of the constraints supported.
- Could use some refactoring using the latest infrastructure (see
NumericConstraint
) - Please help add more test coverage and help refactor to make this lib even more awesome :)
Development
Current development is taking place on refactoring branch.
On his branch:
- all the code has been converted to TypeScript
- constraint classes for String, Numeric, RegExp etc.
- Validator building has been extracted so you can add support for any Validator, such as Forg
- more...
If you would like to further improved this library or add support for more validators than Yup, please help on this branch. Cheers!
Refactoring
On the master
branch we've added a ConstraintBuilder
class which should contain all the logic to build the constraints from a set of options in the future. Currently this logic is on the YupMixed
class where it really doesn't belong.
YupMixed or any other Yup type class should delegate the building of a Yup constraint to a dedicated class.
Ideas and suggestions
Please feel free to come with ideas and suggestions on how to further improve this library.
Author
2018 Kristian Mandrup (CTO@Tecla5)
License
MIT