Security News
GitHub Removes Malicious Pull Requests Targeting Open Source Repositories
GitHub removed 27 malicious pull requests attempting to inject harmful code across multiple open source repositories, in another round of low-effort attacks.
taskgroup
Advanced tools
Group together synchronous and asynchronous tasks and execute them with support for concurrency, naming, and nesting.
Group together synchronous and asynchronous tasks and execute them with support for concurrency, naming, and nesting.
require('taskgroup')
npm install --save taskgroup
require('taskgroup')
ender add taskgroup
// Import
var TaskGroup = require('taskgroup').TaskGroup;
// Create our new group
var group = new TaskGroup();
// Define what should happen once the group has completed
group.once('complete', function(err, results){
// Log the error that has occured
console.log(err);
// => null
// Log the results that our group received from the executing items
console.log(JSON.stringify(results));
/* =>
[
[null, 'first', 'task'],
[null, 'second task'],
[null, [
[null, 'sub second task'],
[null, 'sub first', 'task']
]]
]
*/
});
// Add an asynchronous task that gives the result to the completion callback
group.addTask(function(complete){
setTimeout(function(){
complete(null, 'first', 'task');
},500);
});
// Add a synchronous task that returns the result
// Errors should be returned, though if an error is thrown we will catch it
group.addTask(function(){
return 'second task';
});
// Add a sub-group to our exiting group
group.addGroup(function(addGroup, addTask){
// Tell this sub-group to execute in parallel (all at once) by setting its concurrency to unlimited
// by default the concurrency for all groups is set to 1
// which means that they execute in serial fashion (one after the other, instead of all at once)
this.setConfig({concurrency:0});
// Add an asynchronous task that gives its result to the completion callback
addTask(function(complete){
setTimeout(function(){
complete(null, 'sub first', 'task');
},500);
});
// Add a synchronous task that returns its result
addTask(function(){
return 'sub second task';
});
});
// Execute our group
group.run();
new (require('taskgroup')).TaskGroup()
constructor(name?,fn?)
- create our new group, arguments can be a String for name
, an Object for config
, and a Function for next
setConfig(config)
- set the configuration for the group, returns chaingetconfig()
- return the set configurationaddTask(args...)
, addTasks(tasks, args..)
- create a new task item with the arguments and adds it to the group, returns the new task item(s)addGroup(args...)
, addGroups(groups, args..)
- create a new group item with the arguments and adds it to the group, returns the new group item(s)addItem(item)
, addItem(items)
- adds the items to the group, returns the item(s)getTotals()
- returns counts for the following {running,remaining,completed,total}
clear()
- remove the remaining items to be executedpause()
- pause the execution of the itemsstop()
- clear and pauseexit(err)
- stop and complete, err
if specified is sent to the completion event when firedcomplete()
- will fire the completion event if we are already complete, useful if you're binding your listeners after runrun()
- start/resume executing the items, returns chainname
, no default - allows us to assign a name to the group, useful for debuggingmethod(addGroup, addTask, complete?)
, no default - allows us to use an inline and self-executing style for defining groups, useful for nestingconcurrency
, defaults to 1
- how many items shall we allow to be run at the same time, set to 0
to allow unlimitedpauseOnError
, defaults to true
- if an error occurs in one of our items, should we stop executing any remaining items?
false
will continue with execution with the other items even if an item experiences an erroritems
- alias for .addTasks(items)
groups
- alias for .addGroups(groups)
tasks
- alias for .addTasks(tasks)
next
- alias for .once('complete', next)
run()
- fired just before we execute the itemscomplete(err, results)
- fired when all our items have completedtask.run(task)
- fired just before a task item executestask.complete(task, err, args...)
- fired when a task item has completedgroup.run(group)
- fired just before a group item executesgroup.complete(group, err, results)
- fired when a group item has completeditem.run(item)
- fired just before an item executes (fired for both sub-tasks and sub-groups)item.complete(item, err, args...)
- fired when an item has completed (fired for both sub-task and sub-groups)new (require('taskgroup')).Task()
constructor(args...)
- create our new task, arguments can be a String for name
, an Object for config
, and a Function for next
setConfig(config)
- set the configuration for the group, returns chaingetconfig()
- return the set configurationcomplete()
- will fire the completion event if we are already complete, useful if you're binding your listeners after runrun()
- execute the taskname
, no default - allows us to assign a name to the group, useful for debuggingmethod(complete?)
, no default - must be set at some point, it is the function to execute for the task, if it is asynchronous it should use the completion callback providedargs
, no default - an array of arguments that you would like to precede the completion callback when executing fn
next
- alias for .once('complete', next)
run()
- fired just before we execute the taskcomplete(err, args...)
- fired when the task has completedThe biggest advantage and difference of TaskGroup over async.js is that TaskGroup has one uniform API to rule them all, whereas with async.js I found that I was always having to keep referring to the async manual to try and figure out which is the right call for my use case then somehow wrap my head around the async.js way of doing things (which more often than not I couldn't), whereas with TaskGroup I never have that problem as it is one consistent API for all the different use cases.
Let's take a look at what the most common async.js methods would look like in TaskGroup:
// ====================================
// Series
// Async
async.series([
function(){},
function(callback){callback();}
], next);
// TaskGroup
new TaskGroup({
tasks: [
function(){},
function(callback){callback();}
],
next: next
}).run();
// ====================================
// Parallel
// Async
async.parallel([
function(){},
function(callback){callback();}
], next);
// TaskGroup
new TaskGroup({
concurrency: 0,
tasks: [
function(){},
function(callback){callback();}
],
next: next
}).run();
// ====================================
// Map
// Async
async.map(['file1','file2','file3'], fs.stat, next);
// TaskGroup
new TaskGroup({
concurrency: 0,
tasks: ['file1', 'file2', 'file3'].map(function(file){
return function(complete){
fs.stat(file, complete);
}
}),
next: next
}).run();
Another big advantage of TaskGroup over async.js is TaskGroup's ability to add tasks to the group once execution has already started - this is a common use case when creating an application that must perform it's actions serially, so using TaskGroup you can create a serial TaskGroup for the application, run it right away, then add the actions to the group as tasks.
A final big advantage of TaskGroup over async.js is TaskGroup's ability to do nested groups, this allowed us to created the Joe Testing Framework & Runner incredibly easily, and because of this functionality Joe will always know which test (task) is associated to which suite (task group), whereas test runners like mocha have to guess (they add the task to the last group, which may not always be the case! especially with dynamically created tests!).
Discover the change history by heading on over to the History.md
file.
Discover how you can contribute by heading on over to the Contributing.md
file.
These amazing people are maintaining this project:
No sponsors yet! Will you be the first?
These amazing people have contributed code to this project:
Licensed under the incredibly permissive MIT license
Copyright © 2013+ Bevry Pty Ltd us@bevry.me (http://bevry.me)
Copyright © 2011-2012 Benjamin Lupton b@lupton.cc (http://balupton.com)
v3.3.0 2013 November 1
getConfig()
FAQs
Group together synchronous and asynchronous tasks and execute them with support for concurrency, naming, and nesting.
The npm package taskgroup receives a total of 0 weekly downloads. As such, taskgroup popularity was classified as not popular.
We found that taskgroup demonstrated a healthy version release cadence and project activity because the last version was released less than a year ago. It has 1 open source maintainer collaborating on the project.
Did you know?
Socket for GitHub automatically highlights issues in each pull request and monitors the health of all your open source dependencies. Discover the contents of your packages and block harmful activity before you install or update your dependencies.
Security News
GitHub removed 27 malicious pull requests attempting to inject harmful code across multiple open source repositories, in another round of low-effort attacks.
Security News
RubyGems.org has added a new "maintainer" role that allows for publishing new versions of gems. This new permission type is aimed at improving security for gem owners and the service overall.
Security News
Node.js will be enforcing stricter semver-major PR policies a month before major releases to enhance stability and ensure reliable release candidates.