Comparing version 0.0.8 to 0.1.0-next.0
{ | ||
"name": "tempura", | ||
"version": "0.0.8", | ||
"description": "ES2015+ template literal utilities under the form of tags.", | ||
"main": "lib/index.js", | ||
"version": "0.1.0-next.0", | ||
"repository": "lukeed/tempura", | ||
"description": "WIP", | ||
"unpkg": "dist/index.min.js", | ||
"module": "dist/index.mjs", | ||
"main": "dist/index.js", | ||
"types": "index.d.ts", | ||
"license": "MIT", | ||
"author": { | ||
"name": "Luke Edwards", | ||
"email": "luke.edwards05@gmail.com", | ||
"url": "https://lukeed.com" | ||
}, | ||
"engines": { | ||
"node": ">=10" | ||
}, | ||
"scripts": { | ||
"build": "babel src --out-dir lib", | ||
"test": "echo \"Error: no test specified\" && exit 1" | ||
"build": "bundt", | ||
"test": "uvu -r esm test" | ||
}, | ||
"repository": { | ||
"type": "git", | ||
"url": "git@github.com:mathieumg/tempura.git" | ||
"files": [ | ||
"*.d.ts", | ||
"dist" | ||
], | ||
"exports": { | ||
".": { | ||
"import": "./dist/index.mjs", | ||
"require": "./dist/index.js" | ||
}, | ||
"./package.json": "./package.json" | ||
}, | ||
"author": "Mathieu M-Gosselin <mathieumg@gmail.com>", | ||
"license": "MIT", | ||
"bugs": { | ||
"url": "https://github.com/mathieumg/tempura/issues" | ||
}, | ||
"homepage": "https://github.com/mathieumg/tempura", | ||
"keywords": [ | ||
], | ||
"devDependencies": { | ||
"babel": "^5.6.14" | ||
"bundt": "1.1.1", | ||
"esm": "3.2.25", | ||
"uvu": "0.5.1" | ||
} | ||
} |
License Policy Violation
LicenseThis package is not allowed per your license policy. Review the package's license to ensure compliance.
Found 1 instance in 1 package
Major refactor
Supply chain riskPackage has recently undergone a major refactor. It may be unstable or indicate significant internal changes. Use caution when updating to versions that include significant changes.
Found 1 instance in 1 package
New author
Supply chain riskA new npm collaborator published a version of the package for the first time. New collaborators are usually benign additions to a project, but do indicate a change to the security surface area of a package.
Found 1 instance in 1 package
No README
QualityPackage does not have a README. This may indicate a failed publish or a low quality package.
Found 1 instance in 1 package
No bug tracker
MaintenancePackage does not have a linked bug tracker in package.json.
Found 1 instance in 1 package
No repository
Supply chain riskPackage does not have a linked source code repository. Without this field, a package will have no reference to the location of the source code use to generate the package.
Found 1 instance in 1 package
No website
QualityPackage does not have a website.
Found 1 instance in 1 package
License Policy Violation
LicenseThis package is not allowed per your license policy. Review the package's license to ensure compliance.
Found 1 instance in 1 package
Deprecated
MaintenanceThe maintainer of the package marked it as deprecated. This could indicate that a single version should not be used, or that the package is no longer maintained and any new vulnerabilities will not be fixed.
Found 1 instance in 1 package
No tests
QualityPackage does not have any tests. This is a strong signal of a poorly maintained or low quality package.
Found 1 instance in 1 package
11405
224
0
3
6
1
1
0
1
2