timeeditapi - npm Package Compare versions

Comparing version 1.0.0 to 1.0.5

lib/timeEditApi.js

@@ -20,3 +20,3 @@ 'use strict';
                     const parsedJson = JSON.parse(jsonString);
-                    resolve(dataParser.buildTodaysSchedule(parsedJson));
+                    resolve(dataParser.buildTodaysSchedule(parsedJson, roomId));
                 }).catch((er) => {
@@ -38,3 +38,3 @@ reject(er);
                     const parsedJson = JSON.parse(jsonString);
-                    resolve(dataParser.buildRoomSchedule(parsedJson));
+                    resolve(dataParser.buildRoomSchedule(parsedJson, roomId));
                 }).catch((er) => {
@@ -41,0 +41,0 @@ reject(er);

lib/timeEditDataParser.js

@@ -19,4 +19,4 @@ 'use strict';
      */
-    buildTodaysSchedule(object){
-        return this.buildRoomSchedule(object)
+    buildTodaysSchedule(object, roomId){
+        return this.buildRoomSchedule(object, roomId)
             .filter((reservation) => {
@@ -36,3 +36,3 @@ let reservationDate = this.parseDate(reservation.booking.time.startDate);
      */
-    buildRoomSchedule(object){
+    buildRoomSchedule(object, roomId){
         if(!object.hasOwnProperty('reservations')){ throw 'invalid search result'; }
@@ -49,2 +49,3 @@ return object.reservations
                         },
+                        roomId,
                         id: reservation.id,
@@ -51,0 +52,0 @@ other: reservation.columns[8],

package.json

 {
   "name": "timeeditapi",
-  "version": "1.0.0",
+  "version": "1.0.5",
   "description": "api to easy get schedule information from timeedit",
@@ -9,4 +9,12 @@ "main": "index.js",
   },
+  "repository": {
+    "type": "git",
+    "url": "git+https://github.com/TimeWarriors/TimeEdit.git"
+  },
   "author": "richard soderman",
-  "license": "ISC",
+  "license": "ISC","bugs": {
+    "url": "https://github.com/TimeWarriors/TimeEdit/issues"
+  },
+  "homepage": "https://github.com/TimeWarriors/TimeEdit.git#readme",
+
   "dependencies": {
@@ -13,0 +21,0 @@ "cheerio": "^0.19.0",

Fixed alerts

No README

Quality

Package does not have a README. This may indicate a failed publish or a low quality package.

Found 1 instance in 1 package

No bug tracker

Maintenance

Package does not have a linked bug tracker in package.json.

Found 1 instance in 1 package

No repository

Supply chain risk

Package does not have a linked source code repository. Without this field, a package will have no reference to the location of the source code use to generate the package.

Found 1 instance in 1 package

No website

Quality

Package does not have a website.

Found 1 instance in 1 package

Improved metrics

Total package byte prevSize

6512

increased by5.18%

Number of package files

6

increased by20%

Lines of code

169

increased by0.6%

Number of low maintenance alerts

1

decreased by-50%

Number of low quality alerts

1

decreased by-50%

Number of medium quality alerts

1

decreased by-50%

Number of lines in readme file

1

increased byInfinity%

Number of low supply chain risk alerts

0

decreased by-100%

No dependency changes