Huge News!Announcing our $40M Series B led by Abstract Ventures.Learn More
Socket
Sign inDemoInstall
Socket

uws

Package Overview
Dependencies
Maintainers
1
Versions
15
Alerts
File Explorer

Advanced tools

Socket logo

Install Socket

Detect and block malicious and high-risk dependencies

Install

uws - npm Package Compare versions

Comparing version 10.148.1 to 10.148.2

18

package.json
{
"name": "uws",
"version": "10.148.1",
"main": "uws.js",
"description": "Tiny WebSockets",
"engines": {
"node": ">=8"
},
"keywords": [
"tiny",
"websockets"
],
"homepage": "https://github.com/uNetworking/uWebSockets",
"license": "Zlib",
"author": "Alex Hultman <alexhultman@gmail.com> (https://github.com/alexhultman)",
"repository": {
"type": "git",
"url": "https://github.com/uNetworking/uWebSockets.git"
}
"version": "10.148.2"
}

@@ -1,40 +0,1 @@

# UWS IS *NOT* AN ELECTRON MODULE
`uws` is a replacement module for `ws` which allows, but doesn't guarantee (certainly not when paired with Socket.IO), significant performance and memory-usage improvements. This module is specifically *only* compatible with Node.js and is installed *only* like so:
`npm install uws`
* uws *can* use node-gyp and *can* recompile itself at installation but does *not* require so.
* npm installation never fails, but `require('uws')` will throw if all of the below points hold true:
* There was no C++11 compiler available at installation.
* Your system is not an official **Tier 1** Node.js platform.
## Keep in mind
You can't fix a clogged up system by only fixing part of the problem. Swapping to uws can have *dramatical* effects if your entire pipeline works well. Socket.IO, SocketCluster and other such mass bloat will **not** give you desired results as those projects already, from the start, **are** the bottleneck.
[Read more about other horrible Node.js projects here](https://github.com/alexhultman/The-Node.js-performance-palette)
## Usage
`uws` tries to mimic `ws` as closely as possible without sacrificing too much performance. In most cases you simply swap `require('ws')` with `require('uws')`:
```javascript
var WebSocketServer = require('uws').Server;
var wss = new WebSocketServer({ port: 3000 });
function onMessage(message) {
console.log('received: ' + message);
}
wss.on('connection', function(ws) {
ws.on('message', onMessage);
ws.send('something');
});
```
##### Deviations from ws
There are some important incompatibilities with `ws` though, we aim to be ~90% compatible but will never implement behavior that is deemed too inefficient:
* Binary data is passed zero-copy as an `ArrayBuffer`. This means you need to copy it to keep it past the callback. It also means you need to convert it with `Buffer.from(message)` if you expect a `Node.js Buffer`.
* `webSocket._socket` is not a `net.Socket`, it is just a getter function with very basic functionalities.
* `webSocket._socket.remote...` might fail, you need to cache it at connection.
* `webSocket` acts like an `EventEmitter` with one listener per event maximum.
* `webSocket.upgradeReq` is only valid during execution of the connection handler. If you want to keep properties of the upgradeReq for the entire lifetime of the webSocket you better attach that specific property to the webSocket at connection.
# I no longer publish to NPM. Find me elsewhere.
SocketSocket SOC 2 Logo

Product

  • Package Alerts
  • Integrations
  • Docs
  • Pricing
  • FAQ
  • Roadmap
  • Changelog

Packages

npm

Stay in touch

Get open source security insights delivered straight into your inbox.


  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • Security

Made with ⚡️ by Socket Inc