zod

What is zod?

Zod is a TypeScript-first schema declaration and validation library. It allows developers to create complex schemas for data validation with a simple and intuitive API. Zod schemas are composable and can be used to validate data at the edge of your application, ensuring that you're working with well-structured and type-safe data.

What are zod's main functionalities?

Basic Type Validation

Validates that the input is a string.

{"const schema = zod.string(); try { schema.parse('hello world'); } catch (e) { console.error(e); }"}

Object Schema Validation

Validates that the input is an object with specific properties of certain types.

{"const userSchema = zod.object({ name: zod.string(), age: zod.number(), email: zod.string().email() }); try { userSchema.parse({ name: 'John', age: 30, email: '[e-mail]' }); } catch (e) { console.error(e); }"}

Array Validation

Validates that the input is an array of strings.

{"const stringArraySchema = zod.array(zod.string()); try { stringArraySchema.parse(['apple', 'banana']); } catch (e) { console.error(e); }"}

Complex Nested Validation

Validates nested objects with various property types.

{"const nestedSchema = zod.object({ user: zod.object({ name: zod.string(), contact: zod.object({ email: zod.string().email(), phone: zod.string() }) }) }); try { nestedSchema.parse({ user: { name: 'Jane', contact: { email: '[e-mail]', phone: '123-456-7890' } } }); } catch (e) { console.error(e); }"}

Custom Validation

Validates that a number is positive using custom validation logic.

{"const positiveNumber = zod.number().positive(); try { positiveNumber.parse(42); } catch (e) { console.error(e); }"}

Error Formatting

Formats validation errors for easier debugging and display.

{"const schema = zod.string(); try { schema.parse(42); } catch (e) { console.error(e.format()); }"}

Other packages similar to zod

joi

Joi is a powerful schema description language and data validator for JavaScript. It offers a similar API to Zod but has been around longer and is often considered more mature. Joi provides a wide range of built-in validators and is highly extensible.

yup

Yup is a JavaScript schema builder for value parsing and validation. It defines a schema with an expressive API and can be used with or without TypeScript. Yup is often used in the context of form validation, especially with libraries like Formik.

ajv

Ajv is a JSON Schema Validator. It validates data against JSON Schema (draft 06/07/2019) and is known for its performance. Unlike Zod, which is TypeScript-first, Ajv focuses on JSON Schema validation and is often used for validating data structures in RESTful APIs.

class-validator

Class-validator allows for validation of class instances based on decorators. It is tightly coupled with TypeScript and uses decorators to define validation rules, which can be more familiar to developers used to working with TypeScript classes and decorators.

README

Table of contents

• Installation
• Usage
  • Primitives
  • Parsing
  • Type inference
  • Object types
  • Array types
  • Union types
  • Tuple types
  • Intersection types
  • Recursive types
  • Function schemas
• Comparison

Installation

To install the latest version:

npm install --save zod

yarn add zod

Typescript versions

Zod 1.0.x is compatible with Typescript 3.0+.

Usage

Zod is a validation library designed for optimal developer experience.

• It takes advantage of Typescript generic inference to statically infer the types of your schemas, eliminating the need to define static types and runtime validators separately.
• It has a composable, declarative API that makes it easy to define complex types concisely.
• Schemas are immutable. All methods return a new schema instance.

Primitives

import * as z from 'zod';

const stringSchema = z.string(); // => ZodType<string>
const numberSchema = z.number(); // => ZodType<number>
const booleanSchema = z.boolean(); // => ZodType<boolean>
const undefinedSchema = z.undefined(); // => ZodType<undefined>
const nullTypeSchema = z.null(); // => ZodType<null>

Parsing

// every ZodType instance has a .parse() method
const stringSchema = z.string();
stringSchema.parse('fish'); // => "fish"
stringSchema.parse(12); // throws Error('Non-string type: number');

Type inference

You can extract the Typescript type of any schema with z.TypeOf<>.

const A = z.string();
type A = z.TypeOf<typeof A>; // string

const u: A = 12; // TypeError
const u: A = 'asdf'; // compiles

We'll include examples of inferred types throughout the rest of the documentation.

Objects

// all properties are required by default
const dogSchema = z.object({
  name: z.string(),
  age: z.number(),
  neutered: z.boolean(),
});

type Dog = z.TypeOf<typeof dogSchema>;
/* 
equivalent to:
type Dog = { 
  name:string; 
  age: number; 
  neutered: boolean;
}
*/

const cujo = dogSchema.parse({
  name: 'Cujo',
  age: 4,
  neutered: true,
}); // passes, returns Dog

const fido: Dog = {
  name: 'Fido',
  age: 2,
}; // TypeError: missing required property `neutered`

Arrays

const dogsList = z.array(dogSchema);

dogSchema.parse([
  { name: 'Cujo', neutered: null },
  { name: 'Fido', age: 4, neutered: true },
]); // passes

dogsList.parse([]); // passes

// Non-empty lists

const nonEmptyDogsList = z.array(dogSchema).nonempty();
nonEmptyDogsList.parse([]); // throws Error("Array cannot be empty")

Unions

Including Nullable and Optional types.

Zod includes a built-in z.union method for composing "OR" types.

const stringOrNumber = z.union([z.string(), z.number()]);

stringOrNumber.parse('foo'); // passes
stringOrNumber.parse(14); // passes

Unions are the basis for defining nullable and optional values.

/* Optional Types */

// "optional string" === the union of string and undefined
const A = z.union([z.string(), z.undefined()]);
A.parse(undefined); // => passes, returns undefined
type A = z.TypeOf<typeof A>; // string | undefined

There is also a shorthand way to make a schema "optional":

const B = z.string().optional(); // equivalent to A

const C = z.object({
  username: z.string().optional(),
});
type C = z.TypeOf<typeof C>; // { username?: string | undefined };

Similarly, you can create nullable types like so:

/* Nullable Types */
const D = z.union([z.string(), z.null()]);

const E = z.string().nullable(); // equivalent to D
type E = z.TypeOf<typeof D>; // string | null

You can create unions of any two schemas.

/* Custom Union Types */

const F = z
  .union([z.string(), z.number()])
  .optional()
  .nullable();
F.parse('tuna'); // => tuna
F.parse(42); // => 42
F.parse(undefined); // => undefined
F.parse(null); // => 42
F.parse({}); // => throws Error!

type F = z.TypeOf<typeof F>; // string | number | undefined | null;

Intersections

Intersections are useful for creating "logical AND" types.

const a = z.union([z.number(), z.string()]);
const b = z.union([z.number(), z.boolean()]);

const c = z.intersection(a, b);
type c = z.TypeOf<typeof C>; // => number

const neverType = z.intersection(z.string(), z.number());
type Never = z.TypeOf<typeof stringAndNumber>; // => never

This is particularly useful for defining "schema mixins" that you can apply to multiple schemas.

const HasId = z.object({
  id: z.string(),
});

const BaseTeacher = z.object({
  name: z.string(),
});

const Teacher = z.intersection(BaseTeacher, HasId);

type Teacher = z.TypeOf<typeof Teacher>;
// { id:string; name:string };

Object merging

In the examples above, the return value of z.intersection is an instance of ZodIntersection, a generic class that wraps the two schemas passed in as arguments.

But if you're trying to combine two object schemas, there is a shorthand:

const Teacher = BaseTeacher.merge(HasId);

The benefit of using this shorthand is that the returned value is a new object schema (ZodObject), instead of a generic ZodIntersection instance. This way, you're able to fluently chain together many .merge calls:

// chaining mixins
const Teacher = BaseTeacher.merge(HasId)
  .merge(HasName)
  .merge(HasAddress);

Tuples

These differ from arrays in that they have a fixed number of elements, and each element can have a different type.

const athleteSchema = z.tuple([
  // takes an array of schemas
  z.string(), // name
  z.number(), // jersey number
  z.object({
    pointsScored: z.number(),
  }), // statistics
]);

type Athlete = z.TypeOf<typeof athleteSchema>;
// type Athlete = [string, number, { pointsScored: number }]

Recursive types

You can define a recursive schema in Zod, but because of a limitation of Typescript, their type can't be statically inferred. If you need a recursive Zod schema you'll need to define the type definition manually, and provide it to Zod as a "type hint".

interface Category {
  name: string;
  subcategories: Category[];
}

const Category: z.ZodType<Category> = z.lazy(() => {
  return z.object({
    name: z.string(),
    subcategories: z.array(Category),
  });
});

Category.parse({
  name: 'People',
  subcategories: [
    {
      name: 'Politicians',
      subcategories: [{ name: 'Presidents', subcategories: [] }],
    },
  ],
}); // passes

Function schemas

Zod also lets you define "function schemas". This makes it easy to validate the inputs and outputs of a function without intermixing your validation code and "business logic".

You can create a function schema with z.function(args, returnType) which accepts these arguments.

• args: ZodTuple The first argument is a tuple (created with z.tuple([...]) and defines the schema of the arguments to your function. If the function doesn't accept arguments, you can pass an empty tuple (z.tuple([])).
• returnType: ZodType The second argument is the function's return type. This can be any Zod schema.

const args = z.tuple([
  z.object({ nameStartsWith: z.string() }),
  z.object({ skip: z.number(), limit: z.number() }),
]);

const returnType = z.array(
  z.object({
    id: string(),
    name: string(),
  })
);

const FetcherFactory = z.function(args, returnType);

z.function returns a higher-order "function factory". Every "factory" has .validate() method which accepts a function as input and returns a new function. The returned function automatically validates both its inputs and return value against the schemas provided to z.function. If either is invalid, the function throws.

This lets you confidently This way you can confidently execute business logic in a "validated function" without worrying about invalid inputs or return types, mixing your validation and business logic, or writing duplicative types for your functions.

Here's an example.

const validatedQueryUser = FetchFunction.validate((filters, pagination) => {
  // the arguments automatically have the appropriate types
  // as defined by the args tuple passed to `z.function()`
  // without needing to provide types in the function declaration

  filters.nameStartsWith; // autocompletes
  filters.ageLessThan; // TypeError

  // Typescript statically verifies that value returned by
  // this function is of type { id: string; name: string; }[]

  return 'salmon'; // TypeError
});

const users = validatedQueryUser(
  {
    nameStartsWith: 'John',
  },
  {
    skip: 0,
    limit: 20,
  }
); // => returns { id: string; name: string; }[]

This is particularly useful for defining HTTP or RPC endpoints that accept complex payloads that require validation. Moreover, you can define your endpoints once with Zod and share the code with both your client and server code to achieve end-to-end type safety.

Comparison

There are a handful of other widely-used validation libraries, but all of them have certain design limitations that make for a non-ideal developer experience.

Yup (https://github.com/jquense/yup)

Yup is a full-featured library that was implemented first in vanilla JS, with Typescript typings added later.

Yup supports static type inference, but unfortunately the inferred types aren't actually correct. Currently, the yup package treats all object properties as optional by default:

const schema = yup.object({
  asdf: yup.string(),
});
schema.validate({}); // passes

type SchemaType = yup.InferType<typeof schema>;
// returns { asdf: string }
// should be { asdf?: string }

Yup also mis-infers the type of required arrays.

const numList = yup
  .array()
  .of(yup.string())
  .required();

// interpreted as a non-empty list
numList.validateSync([]); // fails

// yet the inferred type doesn't reflect this
type NumList = yup.InferType<typeof numList>;
// returns 		string[]
// should be 	[string,...string[]]

These may sound like nitpicks. But it's not acceptable that an object that's assignable to the inferred Typescript type can fail validation by the validator it was inferred from.

io-ts (https://github.com/gcanti/io-ts)

io-ts is an excellent library by gcanti. The API of io-ts heavily inspired the design of Zod.

In our experience, io-ts prioritizes functional programming purity over developer experience in many cases. This is a valid and admirable design goal, but it makes io-ts particularly hard to integrate into an existing codebase with a more procedural or object-oriented bias.

For instance, consider how to define an object with optional properties in io-ts:

const A = t.type({
  foo: t.string,
});

const B = t.partial({
  bar: t.number,
});

const C = t.intersection([A, B]);

type C = t.TypeOf<typeof C>;
/*
returns {
	foo: string;
	bar?: number | undefined
}
*/

You must define the required and optional props in separate object validators, pass the optionals through t.partial (which marks all properties as optional), then combine them with t.intersection.

Consider the equivalent in Zod:

const C = z.object({
  foo: z.string(),
  bar: z.string().optional(),
});

type C = z.TypeOf<typeof C>;
// returns { foo: string; bar?: number | undefined }

This more declarative API makes schema definitions vastly more concise.

io-ts also requires the use of gcanti's functional programming library fp-ts to parse results and handle errors. This is another fantastic resource for developers looking to keep their codebase strictly functional. But depending on fp-ts necessarily comes with a lot of intellectual overhead; a developer has to be familiar with functional programming concepts, fp-ts's nomenclature, and the Either monad to do a simple schema validation. It's just not worth it for many people.

Joi (https://github.com/hapijs/joi)

Doesn't support static type inference. 😕

Changelog

zod@1.0.2

• Added type assertions
• Added ZodLiteral
• Added ZodEnum
• Improved error reporting